Cabot Corporation

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 231.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while LIN trades at $490.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check LIN's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while SHW trades at $357.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SHW's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while ECL trades at $301.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ECL's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while APD trades at $280.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas APD's P/E ratio is -191.31. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check APD's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while PPG trades at $124.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check PPG's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while DD trades at $50.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 239.98. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check DD's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while IFF trades at $81.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -55.75. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check IFF's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while SQM trades at $72.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is -39.05. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SQM's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while ALB trades at $168.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -29.24. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ALB's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while LYB trades at $55.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check LYB's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while RPM trades at $114.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check RPM's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while SOLS trades at $77.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 53.72. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SOLS's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while WLK trades at $95.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check WLK's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while EMN trades at $78.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check EMN's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while ESI trades at $35.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ESI's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while AXTA trades at $34.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check AXTA's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while ALTM trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ALTM's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while IKNX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check IKNX's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while NEU trades at $607.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check NEU's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while SSL trades at $8.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SSL's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while BCPC trades at $175.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check BCPC's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while PRM trades at $26.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check PRM's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while AVNT trades at $42.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check AVNT's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while SXT trades at $90.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SXT's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while FUL trades at $65.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check FUL's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while WDFC trades at $238.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check WDFC's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while HWKN trades at $144.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 37.09. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check HWKN's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while KWR trades at $173.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -335.33. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check KWR's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while LTHM trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check LTHM's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while ASH trades at $63.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ASH's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while OLN trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -65.82. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check OLN's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while NGVT trades at $72.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check NGVT's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while CC trades at $20.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CC's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while MTX trades at $72.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -122.08. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check MTX's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while IOSP trades at $82.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is -2030.50. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check IOSP's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while PQG trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check PQG's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while SCL trades at $66.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SCL's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while ECVT trades at $11.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -42.91. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ECVT's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while CCF trades at $127.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CCF's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while REX trades at $34.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check REX's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 979.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while GPRE trades at $13.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check GPRE's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 888.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while ODC trades at $63.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ODC's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 702.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while KRO trades at $6.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check KRO's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 688.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while KOP trades at $34.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check KOP's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 503.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while LWLG trades at $3.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -20.35. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check LWLG's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 450.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while GEVO trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check GEVO's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 362.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while ADUR trades at $11.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ADUR's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while OEC trades at $6.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check OEC's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 321.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while HDSN trades at $7.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check HDSN's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while ALTO trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ALTO's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while CMT trades at $19.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CMT's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while NTIC trades at $9.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -302.00. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check NTIC's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while FSI trades at $5.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 38.32. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check FSI's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while LOOP trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check LOOP's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while VNTR trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check VNTR's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while SNES trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SNES's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while TSE trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check TSE's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while GURE trades at $5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check GURE's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while YMAT trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check YMAT's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while CNEY trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CNEY's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while DNMR trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check DNMR's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while CRKN trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CRKN's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 172.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while HGAS trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check HGAS's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 23.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while HGASW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check HGASW's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while MOOV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CBT has daily volatility of 1.96 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check AVTR-PA's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while KRA trades at $46.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check KRA's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while FOE trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check FOE's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while ZY trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ZY's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while GCP trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check GCP's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while AMRS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check AMRS's competition here

CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $74.91, while TREC trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check TREC's competition here