Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (APD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APD | $295.05 | +0.52% | 66.6B | 42.46 | $7.05 | +2.38% |
| LIN | $478.70 | -0.42% | 225.9B | 34.21 | $14.08 | +1.20% |
| SHW | $367.79 | +1.08% | 93B | 36.93 | $10.10 | +0.83% |
| ECL | $279.11 | -1.40% | 80.5B | 37.98 | $7.47 | +0.89% |
| DD | $77.04 | +3.34% | 32.4B | 454.88 | $0.17 | +2.04% |
| PPG | $112.33 | +0.68% | 25.8B | 20.66 | $5.53 | +2.40% |
| LYB | $56.84 | +2.47% | 18.9B | 125.04 | $0.47 | +9.14% |
| IFF | $67.29 | +1.75% | 17.4B | -44.15 | -$1.54 | +2.35% |
| RPM | $125.74 | +1.13% | 16.4B | 23.84 | $5.35 | +1.60% |
| WLK | $87.35 | +5.57% | 11.6B | -174.38 | -$0.52 | +2.32% |
Stock Comparison
APD vs LIN Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 225.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while LIN trades at $478.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check LIN's competition here
APD vs SHW Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while SHW trades at $367.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, APD and SHW have similar daily volatility (1.85).Check SHW's competition here
APD vs ECL Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while ECL trades at $279.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check ECL's competition here
APD vs DD Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while DD trades at $77.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 454.88. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check DD's competition here
APD vs PPG Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while PPG trades at $112.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check PPG's competition here
APD vs LYB Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while LYB trades at $56.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 125.04. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check LYB's competition here
APD vs IFF Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while IFF trades at $67.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -44.15. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check IFF's competition here
APD vs RPM Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while RPM trades at $125.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check RPM's competition here
APD vs WLK Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while WLK trades at $87.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -174.38. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check WLK's competition here
APD vs ALB Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while ALB trades at $81.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check ALB's competition here
APD vs AVTR Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while AVTR trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check AVTR's competition here
APD vs EMN Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while EMN trades at $68.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check EMN's competition here
APD vs NEU Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while NEU trades at $796.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check NEU's competition here
APD vs AXTA Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while AXTA trades at $31.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check AXTA's competition here
APD vs SQM Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while SQM trades at $47.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check SQM's competition here
APD vs ALTM Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check ALTM's competition here
APD vs ESI Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while ESI trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check ESI's competition here
APD vs IKNX Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check IKNX's competition here
APD vs BCPC Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while BCPC trades at $163.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check BCPC's competition here
APD vs SXT Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while SXT trades at $114.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check SXT's competition here
APD vs CBT Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while CBT trades at $81.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check CBT's competition here
APD vs SSL Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while SSL trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check SSL's competition here
APD vs HWKN Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while HWKN trades at $172.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check HWKN's competition here
APD vs AVNT Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while AVNT trades at $37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check AVNT's competition here
APD vs FUL Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while FUL trades at $61.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check FUL's competition here
APD vs WDFC Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while WDFC trades at $221.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check WDFC's competition here
APD vs LTHM Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check LTHM's competition here
APD vs PRM Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while PRM trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check PRM's competition here
APD vs OLN Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while OLN trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -210.59. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check OLN's competition here
APD vs ASH Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while ASH trades at $56.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check ASH's competition here
APD vs KWR Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while KWR trades at $145.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -344.98. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check KWR's competition here
APD vs CC Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while CC trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check CC's competition here
APD vs IOSP Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while IOSP trades at $86.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 113.14. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check IOSP's competition here
APD vs NGVT Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while NGVT trades at $57.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check NGVT's competition here
APD vs MTX Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while MTX trades at $63.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 6384.00. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check MTX's competition here
APD vs PQG Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check PQG's competition here
APD vs CCF Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check CCF's competition here
APD vs SCL Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while SCL trades at $50.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check SCL's competition here
APD vs ECVT Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while ECVT trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -76.58. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check ECVT's competition here
APD vs REX Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 987.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while REX trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check REX's competition here
APD vs ODC Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 821.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while ODC trades at $58.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check ODC's competition here
APD vs KRO Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 742.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while KRO trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check KRO's competition here
APD vs OEC Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 605.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while OEC trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check OEC's competition here
APD vs KOP Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while KOP trades at $29.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 40.28. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check KOP's competition here
APD vs GPRE Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 585.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while GPRE trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check GPRE's competition here
APD vs HDSN Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 425.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while HDSN trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check HDSN's competition here
APD vs GEVO Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 418.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while GEVO trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check GEVO's competition here
APD vs ADUR Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while ADUR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -38.93. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check ADUR's competition here
APD vs LWLG Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while LWLG trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check LWLG's competition here
APD vs CMT Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while CMT trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check CMT's competition here
APD vs FSI Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while FSI trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check FSI's competition here
APD vs TSE Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while TSE trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSE's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check TSE's competition here
APD vs ALTO Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while ALTO trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check ALTO's competition here
APD vs NTIC Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while NTIC trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check NTIC's competition here
APD vs LOOP Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while LOOP trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check LOOP's competition here
APD vs VNTR Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check VNTR's competition here
APD vs SNES Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while SNES trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check SNES's competition here
APD vs GURE Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while GURE trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check GURE's competition here
APD vs CNEY Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while CNEY trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check CNEY's competition here
APD vs DNMR Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check DNMR's competition here
APD vs CRKN Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while CRKN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check CRKN's competition here
APD vs HGAS Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 726.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while HGAS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check HGAS's competition here
APD vs HGASW Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 18K. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check HGASW's competition here
APD vs MOOV Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. APD has daily volatility of 1.85 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
APD vs KRA Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check KRA's competition here
APD vs ZY Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check ZY's competition here
APD vs FOE Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check FOE's competition here
APD vs GCP Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check GCP's competition here
APD vs TREC Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check TREC's competition here
APD vs AVTR-PA Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
APD vs AMRS Comparison August 2025
APD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APD stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APD is priced at $295.05, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APD currently has a P/E ratio of 42.46, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, APD's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, APD is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APD.Check AMRS's competition here