Amyris, Inc.
Amyris, Inc. AMRS Peers
See (AMRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMRS | $0.05 | N/A | N/A | -0.04 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| LIN | $457.77 | +0.78% | 215.48B | 33.27 | $13.76 | +1.24% |
| SHW | $362.32 | +1.98% | 91.07B | 34.34 | $10.55 | +0.83% |
| ECL | $259.14 | +1.26% | 73.47B | 35.26 | $7.35 | +0.95% |
| APD | $278.87 | +1.62% | 62.06B | 40.18 | $6.94 | +2.55% |
| DD | $69.31 | +1.66% | 29.01B | 2310.33 | $0.03 | +2.24% |
| PPG | $114.08 | +0.90% | 25.90B | 20.19 | $5.65 | +2.39% |
| IFF | $77.71 | +2.08% | 19.88B | -23.84 | -$3.26 | +2.06% |
| LYB | $59.75 | +2.28% | 19.20B | 20.67 | $2.89 | +8.98% |
| RPM | $116.01 | +1.42% | 14.90B | 22.84 | $5.08 | +1.72% |
Stock Comparison
AMRS vs LIN Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 215.48B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while LIN trades at $457.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs SHW Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 91.07B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SHW trades at $362.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs ECL Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 73.47B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ECL trades at $259.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs APD Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while APD trades at $278.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs DD Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 29.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while DD trades at $69.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2310.33. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs PPG Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.90B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while PPG trades at $114.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs IFF Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.88B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while IFF trades at $77.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs LYB Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while LYB trades at $59.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs RPM Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.90B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while RPM trades at $116.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs WLK Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while WLK trades at $82.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs SQM Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 9.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SQM trades at $34.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is -24.52. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SQM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs EMN Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9.53B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while EMN trades at $82.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs AVTR Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while AVTR trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs AXTA Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while AXTA trades at $32.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs ALB Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 7.08B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ALB trades at $60.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs ALTM Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs NEU Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while NEU trades at $651.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs IKNX Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs BCPC Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while BCPC trades at $168.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs ESI Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ESI trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs CBT Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CBT trades at $76.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs SXT Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SXT trades at $94.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs AVNT Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while AVNT trades at $37.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs WDFC Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while WDFC trades at $245.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 39.24. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs FUL Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while FUL trades at $57.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs LTHM Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs HWKN Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while HWKN trades at $122.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs OLN Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while OLN trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs SSL Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SSL trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs ASH Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ASH trades at $52.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -28.07. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs IOSP Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while IOSP trades at $88.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 62.67. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs PQG Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs KWR Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while KWR trades at $106.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs MTX Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while MTX trades at $59.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -76.27. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs PRM Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while PRM trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs CC Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CC trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 62.08. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs NGVT Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while NGVT trades at $42.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs SCL Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SCL trades at $56.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs CCF Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs ECVT Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 888.14M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ECVT trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -75.65. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs KRO Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 815.61M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while KRO trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs REX Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 709.50M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while REX trades at $42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs ODC Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 654.76M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ODC trades at $48.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs OEC Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 638.66M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while OEC trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs KOP Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 625.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while KOP trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs GPRE Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 342.04M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while GPRE trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs HDSN Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 340.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while HDSN trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs GEVO Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 292.27M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while GEVO trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs ADUR Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 188.92M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ADUR trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ADUR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs LWLG Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 171.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while LWLG trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs CMT Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 140.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CMT trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs TSE Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 99.11M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while TSE trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs ALTO Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 70.29M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ALTO trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs NTIC Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 69.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while NTIC trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs FSI Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 55.65M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while FSI trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs LOOP Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 48.57M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while LOOP trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs VNTR Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.36M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs GURE Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 8.41M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while GURE trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs SNES Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SNES trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs CRKN Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 2.73M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CRKN trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs HGAS Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 1.13M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while HGAS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs DNMR Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs CNEY Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 796353.00. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CNEY trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs HGASW Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 9680.00. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.
AMRS vs MOOV Comparison
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at N/A. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1111.00. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AMRS has daily volatility of 25.02 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.