Qudian Inc.
Qudian Inc. (QD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QD | $3.20 | +0.63% | 528.4M | 12.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| V | $333.41 | +2.35% | 637.9B | 29.01 | $11.47 | +0.78% |
| MA | $509.47 | +3.09% | 446.9B | 29.24 | $17.30 | +0.65% |
| AXP | $311.29 | -0.70% | 213.1B | 19.49 | $16.02 | +1.09% |
| COF | $183.99 | -1.70% | 116.5B | 57.40 | $3.26 | +1.50% |
| BNH | $15.31 | -1.10% | 103.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.56% |
| DFS | $200.05 | -0.21% | 50.3B | 10.69 | $18.72 | +0.35% |
| IX | $37.13 | +1.31% | 41B | 14.58 | $2.53 | +2.72% |
| PYPL | $44.58 | +0.38% | 39.2B | 8.33 | $5.33 | +0.63% |
| SUNB | $74.17 | -2.75% | 31.3B | 23.24 | $3.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QD vs V Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 637.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while V trades at $333.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas V's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check V's competition here
QD vs MA Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 446.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while MA trades at $509.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check MA's competition here
QD vs AXP Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 213.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while AXP trades at $311.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check AXP's competition here
QD vs COF Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 116.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while COF trades at $183.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 57.40. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check COF's competition here
QD vs BNH Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while BNH trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check BNH's competition here
QD vs DFS Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check DFS's competition here
QD vs IX Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while IX trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check IX's competition here
QD vs PYPL Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while PYPL trades at $44.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check PYPL's competition here
QD vs SUNB Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while SUNB trades at $74.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check SUNB's competition here
QD vs SYF Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while SYF trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check SYF's competition here
QD vs SOFI Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while SOFI trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check SOFI's competition here
QD vs GPN Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while GPN trades at $69.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check GPN's competition here
QD vs KKRS Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while KKRS trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check KKRS's competition here
QD vs ALLY Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while ALLY trades at $41.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check ALLY's competition here
QD vs COF-PI Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while COF-PI trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check COF-PI's competition here
QD vs COF-PJ Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while COF-PJ trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check COF-PJ's competition here
QD vs COF-PK Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while COF-PK trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check COF-PK's competition here
QD vs COF-PL Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while COF-PL trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check COF-PL's competition here
QD vs COF-PN Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while COF-PN trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check COF-PN's competition here
QD vs FCFS Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while FCFS trades at $224.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check FCFS's competition here
QD vs AGM-PC Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check AGM-PC's competition here
QD vs SYF-PB Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while SYF-PB trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check SYF-PB's competition here
QD vs SLMBP Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while SLMBP trades at $75.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.98. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check SLMBP's competition here
QD vs SYF-PA Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while SYF-PA trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check SYF-PA's competition here
QD vs OMF Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while OMF trades at $52.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check OMF's competition here
QD vs CGABL Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while CGABL trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check CGABL's competition here
QD vs CACC Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while CACC trades at $550.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check CACC's competition here
QD vs OBDC Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while OBDC trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check OBDC's competition here
QD vs ORCC Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check ORCC's competition here
QD vs JSM Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while JSM trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check JSM's competition here
QD vs NNI Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while NNI trades at $129.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check NNI's competition here
QD vs SLM Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while SLM trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check SLM's competition here
QD vs ENVA Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while ENVA trades at $162.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check ENVA's competition here
QD vs BFH Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while BFH trades at $84.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check BFH's competition here
QD vs SEZL Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while SEZL trades at $104.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check SEZL's competition here
QD vs ADS Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check ADS's competition here
QD vs UPST Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while UPST trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 68.15. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check UPST's competition here
QD vs WU Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while WU trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check WU's competition here
QD vs EZPW Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while EZPW trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check EZPW's competition here
QD vs AGM Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while AGM trades at $173.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check AGM's competition here
QD vs LC Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while LC trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check LC's competition here
QD vs AGM-A Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while AGM-A trades at $134.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check AGM-A's competition here
QD vs QFIN Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while QFIN trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check QFIN's competition here
QD vs FINV Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while FINV trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check FINV's competition here
QD vs ATLC Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while ATLC trades at $78.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check ATLC's competition here
QD vs MGI Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check MGI's competition here
QD vs JCAP Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while JCAP trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check JCAP's competition here
QD vs OCSL Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while OCSL trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check OCSL's competition here
QD vs RWAYL Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 904.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while RWAYL trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check RWAYL's competition here
QD vs RWAYI Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 901.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while RWAYI trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check RWAYI's competition here
QD vs BBDC Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 889M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while BBDC trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check BBDC's competition here
QD vs NAVI Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 784.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while NAVI trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check NAVI's competition here
QD vs WRLD Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 770.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while WRLD trades at $154.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check WRLD's competition here
QD vs LU Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 763.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while LU trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check LU's competition here
QD vs NEWTG Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 735.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while NEWTG trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check NEWTG's competition here
QD vs NEWTO Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while NEWTO trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check NEWTO's competition here
QD vs GDOT Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 716.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while GDOT trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check GDOT's competition here
QD vs AGM-PD Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 606.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while AGM-PD trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check AGM-PD's competition here
QD vs NRDS Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 586.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while NRDS trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check NRDS's competition here
QD vs PRAA Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 566.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while PRAA trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check PRAA's competition here
QD vs TREE Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 505.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while TREE trades at $35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check TREE's competition here
QD vs MCVT Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check MCVT's competition here
QD vs IACO Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 431.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while IACO trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check IACO's competition here
QD vs KRAQ Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 428.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while KRAQ trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check KRAQ's competition here
QD vs RWAYZ Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check RWAYZ's competition here
QD vs ATLCZ Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 385.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while ATLCZ trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check ATLCZ's competition here
QD vs ATLCL Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while ATLCL trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check ATLCL's competition here
QD vs ATLCP Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 364M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while ATLCP trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check ATLCP's competition here
QD vs HTT Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 351.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while HTT trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check HTT's competition here
QD vs LX Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 333.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while LX trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check LX's competition here
QD vs NEWTI Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while NEWTI trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check NEWTI's competition here
QD vs RM Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 323.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while RM trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check RM's competition here
QD vs OPRT Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 238.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while OPRT trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check OPRT's competition here
QD vs MFIN Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 229.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while MFIN trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check MFIN's competition here
QD vs RWAY Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 228.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while RWAY trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check RWAY's competition here
QD vs AGM-PE Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 224.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while AGM-PE trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check AGM-PE's competition here
QD vs CPSS Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 222.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while CPSS trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check CPSS's competition here
QD vs LPRO Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 209.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while LPRO trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -35.40. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check LPRO's competition here
QD vs CURR Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while CURR trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check CURR's competition here
QD vs AGM-PF Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 205.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while AGM-PF trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check AGM-PF's competition here
QD vs ANTA Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 205.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while ANTA trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check ANTA's competition here
QD vs AGM-PG Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while AGM-PG trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check AGM-PG's competition here
QD vs PMTS Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while PMTS trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check PMTS's competition here
QD vs FOA Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while FOA trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check FOA's competition here
QD vs YRD Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 172.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while YRD trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check YRD's competition here
QD vs AHG Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 163.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while AHG trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check AHG's competition here
QD vs EMIS Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while EMIS trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check EMIS's competition here
QD vs IFIN-WT Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check IFIN-WT's competition here
QD vs SUNL Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check SUNL's competition here
QD vs FOA-WT Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check FOA-WT's competition here
QD vs ELVT Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check ELVT's competition here
QD vs NICK Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check NICK's competition here
QD vs XYF Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while XYF trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check XYF's competition here
QD vs OMCC Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while OMCC trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check OMCC's competition here
QD vs DXF Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while DXF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check DXF's competition here
QD vs KRAQW Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, KRAQW has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while KRAQW trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas KRAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRAQW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QD is more volatile compared to KRAQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check KRAQW's competition here
QD vs JT Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check JT's competition here
QD vs PT Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while PT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check PT's competition here
QD vs SNTG Comparison May 2026
QD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QD stands at 528.4M. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QD is priced at $3.20, while SNTG trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, QD's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QD is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QD.Check SNTG's competition here