Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LU | $1.39 | +2.96% | 591.2M | -2.41 | -$0.59 | N/A |
| V | $358.56 | -1.80% | 687.3B | 28.82 | $12.44 | +0.73% |
| MA | $543.60 | -1.44% | 480.3B | 30.38 | $17.89 | +0.62% |
| AXP | $355.35 | -1.72% | 242.5B | 22.17 | $16.03 | +1.00% |
| COF-PL | $15.92 | +0.19% | 129.2B | 3.34 | $4.76 | +1.44% |
| COF-PI | $18.29 | +0.27% | 129B | 3.79 | $4.81 | +1.44% |
| COF-PK | $16.94 | +0.12% | 128.9B | 3.52 | $4.81 | +1.44% |
| COF-PJ | $17.57 | +0.40% | 128.8B | 3.68 | $4.76 | +1.44% |
| COF-PN | $15.50 | +0.26% | 128.7B | 3.22 | $4.81 | +1.44% |
| COF | $208.03 | -1.84% | 128.1B | 10.55 | $19.71 | +1.44% |
Stock Comparison
LU vs V Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 687.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while V trades at $358.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas V's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check V's competition here
LU vs MA Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 480.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while MA trades at $543.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MA's competition here
LU vs AXP Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 242.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while AXP trades at $355.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AXP's competition here
LU vs COF-PL Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 129.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while COF-PL trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PL's competition here
LU vs COF-PI Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while COF-PI trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PI's competition here
LU vs COF-PK Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 128.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while COF-PK trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PK's competition here
LU vs COF-PJ Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 128.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while COF-PJ trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PJ's competition here
LU vs COF-PN Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 128.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while COF-PN trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PN's competition here
LU vs COF Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while COF trades at $208.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF's competition here
LU vs BNJ Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while BNJ trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check BNJ's competition here
LU vs BNH Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while BNH trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check BNH's competition here
LU vs DFS Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check DFS's competition here
LU vs PYPL Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while PYPL trades at $56.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PYPL's competition here
LU vs IX Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while IX trades at $38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IX's competition here
LU vs SUNB Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while SUNB trades at $73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 48.29. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SUNB's competition here
LU vs SYF-PB Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while SYF-PB trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SYF-PB's competition here
LU vs SYF Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while SYF trades at $73.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SYF's competition here
LU vs SYF-PA Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while SYF-PA trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SYF-PA's competition here
LU vs SOFI Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while SOFI trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SOFI's competition here
LU vs GPN Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while GPN trades at $77.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check GPN's competition here
LU vs KKRS Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while KKRS trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check KKRS's competition here
LU vs ALLY Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while ALLY trades at $45.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ALLY's competition here
LU vs AEFC Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while AEFC trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AEFC's competition here
LU vs AGM-PC Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PC's competition here
LU vs FCFS Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while FCFS trades at $213.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FCFS's competition here
LU vs OMF Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while OMF trades at $60.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OMF's competition here
LU vs CACC Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while CACC trades at $640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CACC's competition here
LU vs SLMBP Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while SLMBP trades at $74.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SLMBP's competition here
LU vs CGABL Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while CGABL trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is 60.28. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CGABL's competition here
LU vs SEZL Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while SEZL trades at $174.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 43.24. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SEZL's competition here
LU vs ENVA Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while ENVA trades at $232.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ENVA's competition here
LU vs OBDC Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while OBDC trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OBDC's competition here
LU vs ORCC Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ORCC's competition here
LU vs JSM Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while JSM trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check JSM's competition here
LU vs NNI Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while NNI trades at $134.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NNI's competition here
LU vs SLM Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while SLM trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SLM's competition here
LU vs BFH Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while BFH trades at $99.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check BFH's competition here
LU vs HCXY Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, HCXY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while HCXY trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas HCXY's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HCXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to HCXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check HCXY's competition here
LU vs ADS Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ADS's competition here
LU vs UPST Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while UPST trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check UPST's competition here
LU vs WU Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while WU trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check WU's competition here
LU vs AGM Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while AGM trades at $205.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM's competition here
LU vs LC Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while LC trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check LC's competition here
LU vs AGM-PE Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while AGM-PE trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PE's competition here
LU vs AGM-PG Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while AGM-PG trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PG's competition here
LU vs AGM-PF Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while AGM-PF trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PF's competition here
LU vs EZPW Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while EZPW trades at $32.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check EZPW's competition here
LU vs AGM-A Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while AGM-A trades at $144.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-A's competition here
LU vs PRG Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while PRG trades at $46.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to PRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PRG's competition here
LU vs QFIN Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while QFIN trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check QFIN's competition here
LU vs ATLCZ Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while ATLCZ trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLCZ's competition here
LU vs ATLC Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while ATLC trades at $100.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLC's competition here
LU vs ATLCP Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while ATLCP trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLCP's competition here
LU vs ATLCL Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while ATLCL trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLCL's competition here
LU vs JCAP Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while JCAP trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check JCAP's competition here
LU vs FINV Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while FINV trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FINV's competition here
LU vs MGI Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MGI's competition here
LU vs RWAYI Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 906.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while RWAYI trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAYI's competition here
LU vs WRLD Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 891.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while WRLD trades at $192.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check WRLD's competition here
LU vs NAVI Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 813M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while NAVI trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NAVI's competition here
LU vs OPFI Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, OPFI has a market cap of 800.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while OPFI trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas OPFI's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OPFI's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OPFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OPFI's competition here
LU vs GDOT Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 758.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while GDOT trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check GDOT's competition here
LU vs NEWTO Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 745.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while NEWTO trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NEWTO's competition here
LU vs PRAA Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 691.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while PRAA trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PRAA's competition here
LU vs NRDS Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 674.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while NRDS trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NRDS's competition here
LU vs TREE Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 645.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while TREE trades at $46.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check TREE's competition here
LU vs AGM-PD Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 622.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while AGM-PD trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PD's competition here
LU vs QD Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check QD's competition here
LU vs NEWTG Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 437.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while NEWTG trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NEWTG's competition here
LU vs NEWTI Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 436.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while NEWTI trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NEWTI's competition here
LU vs IACO Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 434.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while IACO trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IACO's competition here
LU vs HTT Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 427.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while HTT trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check HTT's competition here
LU vs RWAYZ Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAYZ's competition here
LU vs RM Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 384.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while RM trades at $41.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RM's competition here
LU vs LPRO Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while LPRO trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check LPRO's competition here
LU vs OPFI-WT Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, OPFI-WT has a market cap of 279.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while OPFI-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas OPFI-WT's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OPFI-WT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to OPFI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OPFI-WT's competition here
LU vs TROO Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, TROO has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while TROO trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas TROO's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TROO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to TROO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check TROO's competition here
LU vs OPRT Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 275.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while OPRT trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OPRT's competition here
LU vs CURR Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while CURR trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CURR's competition here
LU vs LX Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 259.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while LX trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check LX's competition here
LU vs MFIN Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 230M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while MFIN trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MFIN's competition here
LU vs IPFXW Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, IPFXW has a market cap of 224.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while IPFXW trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas IPFXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPFXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to IPFXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IPFXW's competition here
LU vs IPFX Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, IPFX has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while IPFX trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas IPFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to IPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IPFX's competition here
LU vs FOA Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while FOA trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FOA's competition here
LU vs PMTS Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while PMTS trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PMTS's competition here
LU vs RWAY Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 203.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while RWAY trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAY's competition here
LU vs CPSS Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 197.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while CPSS trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CPSS's competition here
LU vs RWAYL Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 190.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while RWAYL trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAYL's competition here
LU vs IFIN-WT Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IFIN-WT's competition here
LU vs SUNL Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SUNL's competition here
LU vs JFIN Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while JFIN trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check JFIN's competition here
LU vs YRD Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while YRD trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YRD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check YRD's competition here
LU vs ANTA Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 102.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while ANTA trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ANTA's competition here
LU vs NISN Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while NISN trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NISN's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NISN's competition here
LU vs FOA-WT Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FOA-WT's competition here
LU vs ELVT Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ELVT's competition here
LU vs NICK Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NICK's competition here
LU vs XYF Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while XYF trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check XYF's competition here
LU vs KRAQW Comparison July 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 591.2M. In comparison, KRAQW has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.39, while KRAQW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.41, whereas KRAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KRAQW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to KRAQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check KRAQW's competition here