Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LU | $1.36 | +7.09% | 568.1M | -2.31 | -$0.59 | N/A |
| V | $342.80 | +1.95% | 654.8B | 27.46 | $12.44 | +0.76% |
| MA | $511.68 | +2.54% | 450.3B | 28.49 | $17.89 | +0.64% |
| AXP | $337.98 | -0.70% | 232.5B | 21.26 | $16.03 | +1.00% |
| COF-PK | $16.97 | +1.55% | 128.2B | 3.54 | $4.81 | +1.48% |
| COF-PI | $18.24 | +1.28% | 127.9B | 3.79 | $4.81 | +1.48% |
| COF-PL | $15.92 | +1.40% | 127.7B | 3.35 | $4.76 | +1.48% |
| COF-PJ | $17.52 | +1.33% | 127.6B | 3.69 | $4.76 | +1.48% |
| COF-PN | $15.45 | +1.51% | 127.4B | 3.21 | $4.81 | +1.48% |
| COF | $200.31 | -1.81% | 124.5B | 10.26 | $19.71 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
LU vs V Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 654.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while V trades at $342.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas V's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check V's competition here
LU vs MA Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 450.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while MA trades at $511.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MA's competition here
LU vs AXP Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 232.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while AXP trades at $337.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AXP's competition here
LU vs COF-PK Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while COF-PK trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PK's competition here
LU vs COF-PI Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while COF-PI trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PI's competition here
LU vs COF-PL Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while COF-PL trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PL's competition here
LU vs COF-PJ Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 127.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while COF-PJ trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PJ's competition here
LU vs COF-PN Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while COF-PN trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PN's competition here
LU vs COF Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while COF trades at $200.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF's competition here
LU vs BNJ Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while BNJ trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check BNJ's competition here
LU vs BNH Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while BNH trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check BNH's competition here
LU vs DFS Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check DFS's competition here
LU vs IX Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while IX trades at $38.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IX's competition here
LU vs PYPL Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while PYPL trades at $42.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PYPL's competition here
LU vs SUNB Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while SUNB trades at $73.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SUNB's competition here
LU vs SYF-PB Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while SYF-PB trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SYF-PB's competition here
LU vs SYF Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while SYF trades at $76.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SYF's competition here
LU vs SYF-PA Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while SYF-PA trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SYF-PA's competition here
LU vs SOFI Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while SOFI trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 41.34. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SOFI's competition here
LU vs GPN Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while GPN trades at $70.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check GPN's competition here
LU vs ALLY Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while ALLY trades at $46.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ALLY's competition here
LU vs KKRS Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while KKRS trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check KKRS's competition here
LU vs AEFC Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while AEFC trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AEFC's competition here
LU vs AGM-PC Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PC's competition here
LU vs FCFS Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while FCFS trades at $217.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FCFS's competition here
LU vs OMF Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while OMF trades at $61.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OMF's competition here
LU vs CACC Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while CACC trades at $641.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CACC's competition here
LU vs SLMBP Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while SLMBP trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SLMBP's competition here
LU vs ENVA Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while ENVA trades at $239.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ENVA's competition here
LU vs CGABL Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while CGABL trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is 59.73. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CGABL's competition here
LU vs SEZL Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while SEZL trades at $167.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 42.25. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SEZL's competition here
LU vs OBDC Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while OBDC trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OBDC's competition here
LU vs ORCC Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ORCC's competition here
LU vs SLM Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while SLM trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SLM's competition here
LU vs JSM Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while JSM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check JSM's competition here
LU vs NNI Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while NNI trades at $132.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NNI's competition here
LU vs BFH Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while BFH trades at $108.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check BFH's competition here
LU vs UPST Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while UPST trades at $34.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check UPST's competition here
LU vs HCXY Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, HCXY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while HCXY trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas HCXY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HCXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to HCXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check HCXY's competition here
LU vs ADS Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ADS's competition here
LU vs WU Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while WU trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check WU's competition here
LU vs LC Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while LC trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check LC's competition here
LU vs AGM-PE Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while AGM-PE trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PE's competition here
LU vs AGM Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while AGM trades at $200.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM's competition here
LU vs AGM-PF Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while AGM-PF trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PF's competition here
LU vs AGM-PG Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while AGM-PG trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PG's competition here
LU vs QFIN Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while QFIN trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check QFIN's competition here
LU vs EZPW Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while EZPW trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check EZPW's competition here
LU vs AGM-A Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while AGM-A trades at $147.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-A's competition here
LU vs ATLCZ Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while ATLCZ trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLCZ's competition here
LU vs ATLCP Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while ATLCP trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLCP's competition here
LU vs ATLCL Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while ATLCL trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLCL's competition here
LU vs ATLC Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while ATLC trades at $102.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLC's competition here
LU vs FINV Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while FINV trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FINV's competition here
LU vs JCAP Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while JCAP trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check JCAP's competition here
LU vs MGI Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MGI's competition here
LU vs OCSL Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while OCSL trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OCSL's competition here
LU vs WRLD Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while WRLD trades at $224.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check WRLD's competition here
LU vs RWAYI Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 886.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while RWAYI trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAYI's competition here
LU vs BBDC Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 881.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while BBDC trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check BBDC's competition here
LU vs NAVI Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 801.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while NAVI trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NAVI's competition here
LU vs GDOT Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 755.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while GDOT trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check GDOT's competition here
LU vs NEWTO Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 754.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while NEWTO trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NEWTO's competition here
LU vs PRAA Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 715.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while PRAA trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PRAA's competition here
LU vs NRDS Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 683.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while NRDS trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NRDS's competition here
LU vs AGM-PD Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 614.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while AGM-PD trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PD's competition here
LU vs TREE Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 596.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while TREE trades at $43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check TREE's competition here
LU vs QD Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check QD's competition here
LU vs MCVT Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MCVT's competition here
LU vs IACO Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 434M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while IACO trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IACO's competition here
LU vs NEWTG Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 432.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while NEWTG trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NEWTG's competition here
LU vs NEWTI Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 423.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while NEWTI trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NEWTI's competition here
LU vs HTT Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 404.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while HTT trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check HTT's competition here
LU vs RWAYZ Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAYZ's competition here
LU vs RM Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 382.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while RM trades at $41.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RM's competition here
LU vs LPRO Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 369.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while LPRO trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is 67.69. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check LPRO's competition here
LU vs LX Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while LX trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check LX's competition here
LU vs OPRT Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while OPRT trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OPRT's competition here
LU vs FOA Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while FOA trades at $27.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FOA's competition here
LU vs MFIN Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while MFIN trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MFIN's competition here
LU vs PMTS Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while PMTS trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PMTS's competition here
LU vs IPFX Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, IPFX has a market cap of 226.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while IPFX trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas IPFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to IPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IPFX's competition here
LU vs IPFXW Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, IPFXW has a market cap of 224.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while IPFXW trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas IPFXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPFXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to IPFXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IPFXW's competition here
LU vs CPSS Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 206.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while CPSS trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CPSS's competition here
LU vs CURR Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while CURR trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CURR's competition here
LU vs RWAY Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while RWAY trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAY's competition here
LU vs RWAYL Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while RWAYL trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAYL's competition here
LU vs EMIS Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 158.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while EMIS trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EMIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check EMIS's competition here
LU vs IFIN-WT Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IFIN-WT's competition here
LU vs SUNL Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SUNL's competition here
LU vs ANTA Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while ANTA trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ANTA's competition here
LU vs YRD Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while YRD trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YRD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check YRD's competition here
LU vs NISN Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while NISN trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NISN's competition here
LU vs FOA-WT Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FOA-WT's competition here
LU vs ELVT Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ELVT's competition here
LU vs NICK Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NICK's competition here
LU vs XYF Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while XYF trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check XYF's competition here
LU vs OMCC Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while OMCC trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OMCC's competition here
LU vs KRAQ Comparison June 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 568.1M. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $1.36, while KRAQ trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check KRAQ's competition here