Mastercard Incorporated (MA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA | $512.08 | +2.62% | 450.3B | 28.49 | $17.89 | +0.64% |
| V | $343.28 | +2.10% | 654.8B | 27.46 | $12.44 | +0.76% |
| AXP | $338.24 | -0.62% | 232.5B | 21.26 | $16.03 | +1.00% |
| COF-PK | $17.00 | +1.74% | 128.2B | 3.54 | $4.81 | +1.48% |
| COF-PI | $18.20 | +1.05% | 127.9B | 3.79 | $4.81 | +1.48% |
| COF-PL | $15.92 | +1.37% | 127.7B | 3.35 | $4.76 | +1.48% |
| COF-PJ | $17.49 | +1.16% | 127.6B | 3.69 | $4.76 | +1.48% |
| COF-PN | $15.45 | +1.51% | 127.4B | 3.21 | $4.81 | +1.48% |
| COF | $200.91 | -1.51% | 124.5B | 10.26 | $19.71 | +1.48% |
| BNJ | $14.88 | +0.07% | 95.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.62% |
Stock Comparison
MA vs V Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 654.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while V trades at $343.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas V's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check V's competition here
MA vs AXP Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 232.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while AXP trades at $338.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AXP's competition here
MA vs COF-PK Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while COF-PK trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF-PK's competition here
MA vs COF-PI Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while COF-PI trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF-PI's competition here
MA vs COF-PL Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while COF-PL trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF-PL's competition here
MA vs COF-PJ Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 127.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while COF-PJ trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF-PJ's competition here
MA vs COF-PN Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while COF-PN trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF-PN's competition here
MA vs COF Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while COF trades at $200.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF's competition here
MA vs BNJ Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while BNJ trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check BNJ's competition here
MA vs BNH Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while BNH trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check BNH's competition here
MA vs DFS Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check DFS's competition here
MA vs IX Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while IX trades at $38.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check IX's competition here
MA vs PYPL Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while PYPL trades at $42.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check PYPL's competition here
MA vs SUNB Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while SUNB trades at $72.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SUNB's competition here
MA vs SYF-PB Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while SYF-PB trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SYF-PB's competition here
MA vs SYF Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while SYF trades at $77.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SYF's competition here
MA vs SYF-PA Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while SYF-PA trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SYF-PA's competition here
MA vs SOFI Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while SOFI trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 41.34. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SOFI's competition here
MA vs GPN Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while GPN trades at $70.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check GPN's competition here
MA vs ALLY Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while ALLY trades at $46.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ALLY's competition here
MA vs KKRS Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while KKRS trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check KKRS's competition here
MA vs AEFC Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while AEFC trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AEFC's competition here
MA vs AGM-PC Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-PC's competition here
MA vs FCFS Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while FCFS trades at $218.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check FCFS's competition here
MA vs OMF Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while OMF trades at $61.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check OMF's competition here
MA vs CACC Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while CACC trades at $640.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check CACC's competition here
MA vs SLMBP Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while SLMBP trades at $74.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SLMBP's competition here
MA vs ENVA Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while ENVA trades at $241.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ENVA's competition here
MA vs CGABL Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while CGABL trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is 59.73. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check CGABL's competition here
MA vs SEZL Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while SEZL trades at $166.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 42.25. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SEZL's competition here
MA vs OBDC Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while OBDC trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check OBDC's competition here
MA vs ORCC Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ORCC's competition here
MA vs SLM Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while SLM trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SLM's competition here
MA vs JSM Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while JSM trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check JSM's competition here
MA vs NNI Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while NNI trades at $132.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NNI's competition here
MA vs BFH Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while BFH trades at $108.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check BFH's competition here
MA vs UPST Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while UPST trades at $35.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check UPST's competition here
MA vs HCXY Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, HCXY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while HCXY trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas HCXY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to HCXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to HCXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check HCXY's competition here
MA vs ADS Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ADS's competition here
MA vs WU Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while WU trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check WU's competition here
MA vs LC Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while LC trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check LC's competition here
MA vs AGM-PE Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while AGM-PE trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-PE's competition here
MA vs AGM Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while AGM trades at $199.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM's competition here
MA vs AGM-PF Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while AGM-PF trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-PF's competition here
MA vs AGM-PG Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while AGM-PG trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-PG's competition here
MA vs QFIN Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while QFIN trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check QFIN's competition here
MA vs EZPW Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while EZPW trades at $33.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check EZPW's competition here
MA vs AGM-A Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while AGM-A trades at $147.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-A's competition here
MA vs ATLCZ Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while ATLCZ trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ATLCZ's competition here
MA vs ATLCP Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while ATLCP trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ATLCP's competition here
MA vs ATLCL Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while ATLCL trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ATLCL's competition here
MA vs ATLC Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while ATLC trades at $102.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ATLC's competition here
MA vs FINV Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while FINV trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check FINV's competition here
MA vs JCAP Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while JCAP trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check JCAP's competition here
MA vs MGI Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check MGI's competition here
MA vs OCSL Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while OCSL trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check OCSL's competition here
MA vs WRLD Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while WRLD trades at $225.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check WRLD's competition here
MA vs RWAYI Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 886.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while RWAYI trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check RWAYI's competition here
MA vs BBDC Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 881.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while BBDC trades at $8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check BBDC's competition here
MA vs NAVI Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 801.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while NAVI trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NAVI's competition here
MA vs GDOT Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 755.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while GDOT trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check GDOT's competition here
MA vs NEWTO Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 754.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while NEWTO trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NEWTO's competition here
MA vs PRAA Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 715.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while PRAA trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check PRAA's competition here
MA vs NRDS Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 683.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while NRDS trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NRDS's competition here
MA vs AGM-PD Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 614.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while AGM-PD trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-PD's competition here
MA vs TREE Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 596.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while TREE trades at $44.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check TREE's competition here
MA vs LU Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 568.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while LU trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check LU's competition here
MA vs QD Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check QD's competition here
MA vs MCVT Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check MCVT's competition here
MA vs IACO Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 434M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while IACO trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check IACO's competition here
MA vs NEWTG Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 432.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while NEWTG trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NEWTG's competition here
MA vs NEWTI Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 423.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while NEWTI trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NEWTI's competition here
MA vs HTT Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 404.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while HTT trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check HTT's competition here
MA vs RWAYZ Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check RWAYZ's competition here
MA vs RM Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 382.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while RM trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check RM's competition here
MA vs LPRO Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 369.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while LPRO trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is 67.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check LPRO's competition here
MA vs LX Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while LX trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check LX's competition here
MA vs OPRT Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while OPRT trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check OPRT's competition here
MA vs FOA Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while FOA trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check FOA's competition here
MA vs MFIN Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while MFIN trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check MFIN's competition here
MA vs PMTS Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while PMTS trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check PMTS's competition here
MA vs IPFX Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, IPFX has a market cap of 226.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while IPFX trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas IPFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to IPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check IPFX's competition here
MA vs IPFXW Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, IPFXW has a market cap of 224.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while IPFXW trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas IPFXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to IPFXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to IPFXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check IPFXW's competition here
MA vs CPSS Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 206.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while CPSS trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check CPSS's competition here
MA vs CURR Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while CURR trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check CURR's competition here
MA vs RWAY Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while RWAY trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check RWAY's competition here
MA vs RWAYL Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while RWAYL trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check RWAYL's competition here
MA vs EMIS Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 158.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while EMIS trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to EMIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check EMIS's competition here
MA vs IFIN-WT Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check IFIN-WT's competition here
MA vs SUNL Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SUNL's competition here
MA vs ANTA Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while ANTA trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ANTA's competition here
MA vs YRD Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while YRD trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to YRD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check YRD's competition here
MA vs NISN Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while NISN trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NISN's competition here
MA vs FOA-WT Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check FOA-WT's competition here
MA vs ELVT Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ELVT's competition here
MA vs NICK Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NICK's competition here
MA vs XYF Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while XYF trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check XYF's competition here
MA vs OMCC Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while OMCC trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check OMCC's competition here
MA vs KRAQ Comparison June 2026
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 450.3B. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $512.08, while KRAQ trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.49, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check KRAQ's competition here