PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 712.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while V trades at $381.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas V's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to V's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to V. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check V's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 522.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while MA trades at $595.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check MA's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 225B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while AXP trades at $333.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check AXP's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 132.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while COF trades at $215.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check COF's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PN trades at $15.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check COF-PN's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PJ trades at $16.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check COF-PJ's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PI trades at $17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check COF-PI's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 128.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PL trades at $15.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check COF-PL's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PK trades at $16.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check COF-PK's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while EP-PC trades at $50.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check EP-PC's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check DFS's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while PYPL trades at $53.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check PYPL's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while IX trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check IX's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while AFRM trades at $77.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check AFRM's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SYF-PB trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SYF-PB's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SYF trades at $78.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SYF's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SYF-PA trades at $18.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SYF-PA's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SOFI trades at $18.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 40.98. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SOFI's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while GPN trades at $91.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check GPN's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while KKRS trades at $16.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check KKRS's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, OPFI-WT has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while OPFI-WT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas OPFI-WT's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OPFI-WT's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to OPFI-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check OPFI-WT's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ALLY trades at $42.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ALLY's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check AGM-PC's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while FCFS trades at $219.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check FCFS's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while OMF trades at $62.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check OMF's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SLMBP trades at $75.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SLMBP's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while CACC trades at $594.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check CACC's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ENVA trades at $232.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ENVA's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while KLAR trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -36.88. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check KLAR's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ORCC's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while JSM trades at $18.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check JSM's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SLM trades at $26.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SLM's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while NNI trades at $127.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check NNI's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while BFH trades at $105.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check BFH's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SEZL trades at $124.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SEZL's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ADS's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while UPST trades at $29.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check UPST's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while AGM trades at $221.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check AGM's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while WU trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check WU's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while LC trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check LC's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ECPG trades at $98.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ECPG's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PE trades at $20.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check AGM-PE's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PF trades at $18.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check AGM-PF's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PG trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.97. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check AGM-PG's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-A trades at $154.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check AGM-A's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while EZPW trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check EZPW's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCL trades at $25.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ATLCL's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCZ trades at $25.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ATLCZ's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCP trades at $24.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ATLCP's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while PRG trades at $39.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to PRG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check PRG's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ATLC trades at $91.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ATLC's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while JCAP trades at $21.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check JCAP's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while QFIN trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check QFIN's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while LU trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to LU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check LU's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, TRNI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while TRNI trades at $25.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas TRNI's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TRNI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to TRNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check TRNI's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check MGI's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 900.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYI trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check RWAYI's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 889.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while NAVI trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check NAVI's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 877.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while WRLD trades at $188.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check WRLD's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while FINV trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check FINV's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 756.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while GDOT trades at $13.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check GDOT's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 750.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while NEWTO trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check NEWTO's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 615.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PD trades at $21.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check AGM-PD's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, OPFI has a market cap of 603.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while OPFI trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas OPFI's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OPFI's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to OPFI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check OPFI's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SCE-PM has a market cap of 530.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SCE-PM trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SCE-PM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SCE-PM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to SCE-PM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SCE-PM's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while QD trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check QD's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 425M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while HTT trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check HTT's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 404.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while TREE trades at $28.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is similarly volatile compared to TREE. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check TREE's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check RWAYZ's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while LPRO trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check LPRO's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while OPRT trades at $7.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check OPRT's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while PMTS trades at $28.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check PMTS's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ORBS has a market cap of 312.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ORBS trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ORBS's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ORBS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to ORBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ORBS's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 298.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while RM trades at $32.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check RM's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while RWAY trades at $6.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check RWAY's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 276.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while MFIN trades at $11.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check MFIN's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, TROO has a market cap of 262.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while TROO trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas TROO's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TROO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to TROO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check TROO's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 250.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYL trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check RWAYL's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 204.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while CPSS trades at $9.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check CPSS's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while LX trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check LX's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SWKHL has a market cap of 193.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SWKHL trades at $25.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SWKHL's P/E ratio is -29.39. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SWKHL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to SWKHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SWKHL's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 161M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while FOA trades at $18.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FOA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check FOA's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check IFIN-WT's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SUNL's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while JFIN trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check JFIN's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ANTA trades at $3.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ANTA's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while YRD trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to YRD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check YRD's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while NISN trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NISN's ROE of -2.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check NISN's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check FOA-WT's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 71.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SUIG trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SUIG's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check ELVT's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while VRM trades at $9.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to VRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check VRM's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check NICK's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while XYF trades at $5.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check XYF's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check JT's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while PT trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check PT's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while DXF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check DXF's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, IACOW has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while IACOW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas IACOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IACOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is more volatile compared to IACOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check IACOW's competition here

PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRAA stands at 730M. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRAA is priced at $19.14 on the NASDAQ, while SNTG trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRAA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.04, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, PRAA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAA is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAA.Check SNTG's competition here