FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FCFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFS | $212.45 | -2.20% | 9.3B | 22.65 | $9.38 | +0.80% |
| V | $336.23 | +1.73% | 642.1B | 26.93 | $12.44 | +0.77% |
| MA | $499.02 | +2.07% | 441.1B | 27.91 | $17.89 | +0.65% |
| AXP | $340.36 | -0.61% | 232.5B | 21.25 | $16.03 | +1.00% |
| COF | $204.00 | -0.44% | 125.6B | 10.35 | $19.71 | +1.47% |
| COF-PL | $15.70 | +0.13% | 123.7B | 3.30 | $4.76 | +1.47% |
| COF-PI | $18.01 | +0.22% | 123.6B | 3.75 | $4.81 | +1.47% |
| COF-PK | $16.71 | +0.00% | 123.3B | 3.48 | $4.81 | +1.47% |
| COF-PN | $15.22 | -0.07% | 123.1B | 3.16 | $4.81 | +1.47% |
| COF-PJ | $17.29 | +0.00% | 123.1B | 3.63 | $4.76 | +1.47% |
Stock Comparison
FCFS vs V Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 642.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while V trades at $336.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas V's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check V's competition here
FCFS vs MA Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 441.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while MA trades at $499.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check MA's competition here
FCFS vs AXP Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 232.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while AXP trades at $340.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AXP's competition here
FCFS vs COF Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while COF trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF's competition here
FCFS vs COF-PL Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 123.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while COF-PL trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF-PL's competition here
FCFS vs COF-PI Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 123.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while COF-PI trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF-PI's competition here
FCFS vs COF-PK Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 123.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while COF-PK trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF-PK's competition here
FCFS vs COF-PN Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while COF-PN trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF-PN's competition here
FCFS vs COF-PJ Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while COF-PJ trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF-PJ's competition here
FCFS vs BNJ Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while BNJ trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check BNJ's competition here
FCFS vs BNH Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while BNH trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check BNH's competition here
FCFS vs DFS Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check DFS's competition here
FCFS vs IX Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while IX trades at $38.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check IX's competition here
FCFS vs PYPL Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while PYPL trades at $44.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check PYPL's competition here
FCFS vs SUNB Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while SUNB trades at $74.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SUNB's competition here
FCFS vs SYF-PA Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while SYF-PA trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SYF-PA's competition here
FCFS vs SYF Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while SYF trades at $78.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SYF's competition here
FCFS vs SYF-PB Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while SYF-PB trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SYF-PB's competition here
FCFS vs SOFI Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while SOFI trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SOFI's competition here
FCFS vs GPN Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while GPN trades at $69.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check GPN's competition here
FCFS vs ALLY Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while ALLY trades at $47.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ALLY's competition here
FCFS vs KKRS Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while KKRS trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check KKRS's competition here
FCFS vs AGM-PC Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-PC's competition here
FCFS vs OMF Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while OMF trades at $60.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check OMF's competition here
FCFS vs SLMBP Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while SLMBP trades at $74.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SLMBP's competition here
FCFS vs CACC Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while CACC trades at $628.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check CACC's competition here
FCFS vs CGABL Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while CGABL trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is 59.62. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check CGABL's competition here
FCFS vs ENVA Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while ENVA trades at $231.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ENVA's competition here
FCFS vs SEZL Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while SEZL trades at $170.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SEZL's competition here
FCFS vs OBDC Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while OBDC trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check OBDC's competition here
FCFS vs ORCC Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ORCC's competition here
FCFS vs JSM Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while JSM trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check JSM's competition here
FCFS vs NNI Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while NNI trades at $134.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NNI's competition here
FCFS vs SLM Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while SLM trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SLM's competition here
FCFS vs BFH Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while BFH trades at $106.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check BFH's competition here
FCFS vs HCXY Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HCXY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while HCXY trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas HCXY's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to HCXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check HCXY's competition here
FCFS vs UPST Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while UPST trades at $33.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 74.27. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check UPST's competition here
FCFS vs ADS Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ADS's competition here
FCFS vs WU Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while WU trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check WU's competition here
FCFS vs LC Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while LC trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check LC's competition here
FCFS vs AGM-PE Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while AGM-PE trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-PE's competition here
FCFS vs AGM Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while AGM trades at $194.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM's competition here
FCFS vs AGM-PF Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while AGM-PF trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-PF's competition here
FCFS vs AGM-PG Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while AGM-PG trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-PG's competition here
FCFS vs QFIN Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while QFIN trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check QFIN's competition here
FCFS vs EZPW Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while EZPW trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check EZPW's competition here
FCFS vs AGM-A Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while AGM-A trades at $143.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-A's competition here
FCFS vs ATLC Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while ATLC trades at $110.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ATLC's competition here
FCFS vs ATLCZ Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while ATLCZ trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ATLCZ's competition here
FCFS vs ATLCL Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while ATLCL trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ATLCL's competition here
FCFS vs ATLCP Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while ATLCP trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ATLCP's competition here
FCFS vs FINV Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while FINV trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check FINV's competition here
FCFS vs MGI Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check MGI's competition here
FCFS vs JCAP Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while JCAP trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check JCAP's competition here
FCFS vs OCSL Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while OCSL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check OCSL's competition here
FCFS vs WRLD Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 992M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while WRLD trades at $213.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check WRLD's competition here
FCFS vs RWAYI Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 888.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while RWAYI trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check RWAYI's competition here
FCFS vs BBDC Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 865.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while BBDC trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check BBDC's competition here
FCFS vs NAVI Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 815.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while NAVI trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NAVI's competition here
FCFS vs GDOT Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 756.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while GDOT trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check GDOT's competition here
FCFS vs NEWTO Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 754.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while NEWTO trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NEWTO's competition here
FCFS vs PRAA Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 722M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while PRAA trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check PRAA's competition here
FCFS vs NRDS Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 661M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while NRDS trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NRDS's competition here
FCFS vs AGM-PD Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 612.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while AGM-PD trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-PD's competition here
FCFS vs TREE Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 567.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while TREE trades at $40.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check TREE's competition here
FCFS vs LU Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 532.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while LU trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check LU's competition here
FCFS vs QD Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check QD's competition here
FCFS vs MCVT Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check MCVT's competition here
FCFS vs IACO Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 433.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while IACO trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check IACO's competition here
FCFS vs KRAQ Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 430.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while KRAQ trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check KRAQ's competition here
FCFS vs NEWTI Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 408.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while NEWTI trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NEWTI's competition here
FCFS vs NEWTG Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 408.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while NEWTG trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NEWTG's competition here
FCFS vs HTT Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 405.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while HTT trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check HTT's competition here
FCFS vs RWAYZ Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check RWAYZ's competition here
FCFS vs RM Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 377M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while RM trades at $41.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check RM's competition here
FCFS vs LPRO Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 369.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while LPRO trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is 67.69. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check LPRO's competition here
FCFS vs LX Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 328.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while LX trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check LX's competition here
FCFS vs OPRT Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 263M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while OPRT trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check OPRT's competition here
FCFS vs MFIN Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while MFIN trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check MFIN's competition here
FCFS vs PMTS Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 233.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while PMTS trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check PMTS's competition here
FCFS vs IPFXW Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IPFXW has a market cap of 229.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while IPFXW trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas IPFXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPFXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to IPFXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check IPFXW's competition here
FCFS vs IPFX Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IPFX has a market cap of 225.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while IPFX trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas IPFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to IPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check IPFX's competition here
FCFS vs CPSS Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 217M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while CPSS trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check CPSS's competition here
FCFS vs FOA Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 214.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while FOA trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check FOA's competition here
FCFS vs CURR Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 212.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while CURR trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check CURR's competition here
FCFS vs RWAYL Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while RWAYL trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check RWAYL's competition here
FCFS vs RWAY Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 191.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while RWAY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check RWAY's competition here
FCFS vs EMIS Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while EMIS trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check EMIS's competition here
FCFS vs IFIN-WT Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check IFIN-WT's competition here
FCFS vs SUNL Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SUNL's competition here
FCFS vs ANTA Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while ANTA trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ANTA's competition here
FCFS vs YRD Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while YRD trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check YRD's competition here
FCFS vs NISN Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while NISN trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NISN's competition here
FCFS vs FOA-WT Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check FOA-WT's competition here
FCFS vs ELVT Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ELVT's competition here
FCFS vs NICK Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NICK's competition here
FCFS vs XYF Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while XYF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.27. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check XYF's competition here
FCFS vs OMCC Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while OMCC trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check OMCC's competition here
FCFS vs IACOW Comparison June 2026
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IACOW has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $212.45, while IACOW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.65, whereas IACOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IACOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to IACOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check IACOW's competition here