Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AGM-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGM-A | $134.36 | -2.02% | 1.7B | 7.74 | $17.36 | +3.54% |
| V | $329.91 | -0.82% | 632.4B | 28.76 | $11.47 | +0.79% |
| MA | $499.70 | -1.20% | 441.6B | 28.89 | $17.30 | +0.65% |
| AXP | $309.31 | -0.94% | 211.1B | 19.31 | $16.02 | +1.10% |
| COF | $182.03 | -2.75% | 113.3B | 55.84 | $3.26 | +1.64% |
| BNH | $15.39 | -0.65% | 103.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.56% |
| DFS | $200.05 | -0.21% | 50.3B | 10.69 | $18.72 | +0.35% |
| IX | $37.22 | +0.87% | 41.3B | 14.71 | $2.53 | +2.68% |
| PYPL | $43.83 | -1.25% | 38.7B | 8.22 | $5.33 | +0.64% |
| SUNB | $75.15 | -0.82% | 31.1B | 23.06 | $3.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AGM-A vs V Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 632.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while V trades at $329.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas V's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check V's competition here
AGM-A vs MA Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 441.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while MA trades at $499.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check MA's competition here
AGM-A vs AXP Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 211.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while AXP trades at $309.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AXP's competition here
AGM-A vs COF Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while COF trades at $182.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 55.84. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF's competition here
AGM-A vs BNH Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while BNH trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check BNH's competition here
AGM-A vs DFS Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check DFS's competition here
AGM-A vs IX Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while IX trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check IX's competition here
AGM-A vs PYPL Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while PYPL trades at $43.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check PYPL's competition here
AGM-A vs SUNB Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while SUNB trades at $75.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SUNB's competition here
AGM-A vs SYF Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while SYF trades at $69.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SYF's competition here
AGM-A vs SOFI Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while SOFI trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 33.84. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SOFI's competition here
AGM-A vs GPN Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while GPN trades at $67.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check GPN's competition here
AGM-A vs KKRS Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while KKRS trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check KKRS's competition here
AGM-A vs ALLY Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while ALLY trades at $40.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ALLY's competition here
AGM-A vs COF-PI Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while COF-PI trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF-PI's competition here
AGM-A vs COF-PJ Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while COF-PJ trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF-PJ's competition here
AGM-A vs COF-PK Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while COF-PK trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF-PK's competition here
AGM-A vs COF-PL Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while COF-PL trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF-PL's competition here
AGM-A vs FCFS Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while FCFS trades at $225.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check FCFS's competition here
AGM-A vs AGM-PC Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM-PC's competition here
AGM-A vs COF-PN Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while COF-PN trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF-PN's competition here
AGM-A vs SYF-PB Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while SYF-PB trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SYF-PB's competition here
AGM-A vs SLMBP Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while SLMBP trades at $75.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.96. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SLMBP's competition here
AGM-A vs SYF-PA Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while SYF-PA trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SYF-PA's competition here
AGM-A vs OMF Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while OMF trades at $52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check OMF's competition here
AGM-A vs CGABL Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while CGABL trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check CGABL's competition here
AGM-A vs CACC Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while CACC trades at $547.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check CACC's competition here
AGM-A vs OBDC Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while OBDC trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check OBDC's competition here
AGM-A vs ORCC Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ORCC's competition here
AGM-A vs JSM Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while JSM trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check JSM's competition here
AGM-A vs NNI Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while NNI trades at $128.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NNI's competition here
AGM-A vs SLM Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while SLM trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SLM's competition here
AGM-A vs ENVA Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while ENVA trades at $160.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ENVA's competition here
AGM-A vs SEZL Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while SEZL trades at $106.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SEZL's competition here
AGM-A vs BFH Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while BFH trades at $84.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check BFH's competition here
AGM-A vs ADS Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ADS's competition here
AGM-A vs UPST Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while UPST trades at $28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 68.49. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check UPST's competition here
AGM-A vs WU Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while WU trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check WU's competition here
AGM-A vs EZPW Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while EZPW trades at $31.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check EZPW's competition here
AGM-A vs AGM Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while AGM trades at $171.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM's competition here
AGM-A vs LC Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while LC trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check LC's competition here
AGM-A vs QFIN Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while QFIN trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check QFIN's competition here
AGM-A vs FINV Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while FINV trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check FINV's competition here
AGM-A vs ATLC Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while ATLC trades at $78.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ATLC's competition here
AGM-A vs JCAP Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while JCAP trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check JCAP's competition here
AGM-A vs MGI Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A and MGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGI's competition here
AGM-A vs OCSL Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while OCSL trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check OCSL's competition here
AGM-A vs RWAYL Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 900.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while RWAYL trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check RWAYL's competition here
AGM-A vs RWAYI Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 891.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while RWAYI trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check RWAYI's competition here
AGM-A vs BBDC Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 880.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while BBDC trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check BBDC's competition here
AGM-A vs NAVI Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 775.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while NAVI trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NAVI's competition here
AGM-A vs WRLD Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 772.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while WRLD trades at $156.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check WRLD's competition here
AGM-A vs LU Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 748.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while LU trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check LU's competition here
AGM-A vs NEWTG Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 737.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while NEWTG trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NEWTG's competition here
AGM-A vs NEWTO Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while NEWTO trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A and NEWTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEWTO's competition here
AGM-A vs GDOT Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 717M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while GDOT trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -9.51. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check GDOT's competition here
AGM-A vs AGM-PD Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 602.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while AGM-PD trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM-PD's competition here
AGM-A vs NRDS Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 589.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while NRDS trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NRDS's competition here
AGM-A vs PRAA Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 561.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while PRAA trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check PRAA's competition here
AGM-A vs QD Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check QD's competition here
AGM-A vs MCVT Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check MCVT's competition here
AGM-A vs TREE Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 495.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while TREE trades at $35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check TREE's competition here
AGM-A vs IACO Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 431.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while IACO trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A and IACO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IACO's competition here
AGM-A vs KRAQ Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 427.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while KRAQ trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check KRAQ's competition here
AGM-A vs RWAYZ Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A and RWAYZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RWAYZ's competition here
AGM-A vs ATLCZ Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 385.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while ATLCZ trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ATLCZ's competition here
AGM-A vs ATLCL Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while ATLCL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ATLCL's competition here
AGM-A vs ATLCP Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 364.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while ATLCP trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ATLCP's competition here
AGM-A vs HTT Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 356.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while HTT trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check HTT's competition here
AGM-A vs LX Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while LX trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check LX's competition here
AGM-A vs NEWTI Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while NEWTI trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NEWTI's competition here
AGM-A vs RM Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while RM trades at $33.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check RM's competition here
AGM-A vs OPRT Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 240.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while OPRT trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check OPRT's competition here
AGM-A vs RWAY Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while RWAY trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is -78.62. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check RWAY's competition here
AGM-A vs AGM-PE Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while AGM-PE trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM-PE's competition here
AGM-A vs CPSS Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 223.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while CPSS trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check CPSS's competition here
AGM-A vs MFIN Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 222.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while MFIN trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check MFIN's competition here
AGM-A vs CURR Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 219.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while CURR trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check CURR's competition here
AGM-A vs LPRO Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 212.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while LPRO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check LPRO's competition here
AGM-A vs AGM-PF Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 206.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while AGM-PF trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM-PF's competition here
AGM-A vs ANTA Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 204.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while ANTA trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ANTA's competition here
AGM-A vs AGM-PG Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while AGM-PG trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM-PG's competition here
AGM-A vs PMTS Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while PMTS trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check PMTS's competition here
AGM-A vs YRD Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while YRD trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check YRD's competition here
AGM-A vs FOA Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 163.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while FOA trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check FOA's competition here
AGM-A vs AHG Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while AHG trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AHG's competition here
AGM-A vs EMIS Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while EMIS trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A and EMIS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMIS's competition here
AGM-A vs IFIN-WT Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check IFIN-WT's competition here
AGM-A vs SUNL Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SUNL's competition here
AGM-A vs FOA-WT Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check FOA-WT's competition here
AGM-A vs ELVT Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ELVT's competition here
AGM-A vs NICK Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NICK's competition here
AGM-A vs XYF Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while XYF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 0.91. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check XYF's competition here
AGM-A vs OMCC Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while OMCC trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check OMCC's competition here
AGM-A vs DXF Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while DXF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check DXF's competition here
AGM-A vs KRAQW Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KRAQW has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while KRAQW trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas KRAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KRAQW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A and KRAQW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRAQW's competition here
AGM-A vs JT Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check JT's competition here
AGM-A vs PT Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while PT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check PT's competition here
AGM-A vs SNTG Comparison May 2026
AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $134.36, while SNTG trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SNTG's competition here