Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 676.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while V trades at $362.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas V's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to V's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to V. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check V's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 487.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while MA trades at $555.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to MA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check MA's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 206.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while AXP trades at $305.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AXP's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while COF-PN trades at $15.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF-PN's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while COF-PL trades at $15.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF-PL's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while COF-PI trades at $17.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF-PI's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 127.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while COF-PJ trades at $16.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF-PJ's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while COF-PK trades at $16.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF-PK's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while COF trades at $200.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 110.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while EP-PC trades at $49.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check EP-PC's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check DFS's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while PYPL trades at $52.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check PYPL's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while IX trades at $39.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check IX's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SYF-PB trades at $25.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SYF-PB's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SYF-PA trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SYF-PA's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while AFRM trades at $71.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AFRM's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SYF trades at $72.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SYF's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SOFI trades at $17.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SOFI's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while GPN trades at $84.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check GPN's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while KKRS trades at $15.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check KKRS's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OPFI-WT has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while OPFI-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas OPFI-WT's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPFI-WT's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to OPFI-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check OPFI-WT's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ALLY trades at $39.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ALLY's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-PC's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while FCFS trades at $220.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check FCFS's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while OMF trades at $59.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check OMF's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SLMBP trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SLMBP's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while CACC trades at $562.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check CACC's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ORCC's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while KLAR trades at $13.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -35.99. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check KLAR's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while JSM trades at $17.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check JSM's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SLM trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SLM's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while NNI trades at $126.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NNI's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ENVA trades at $168.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ENVA's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while BFH trades at $102.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check BFH's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SEZL trades at $110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SEZL's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while UPST trades at $25.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check UPST's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while AGM trades at $218.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while LC trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check LC's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ECPG trades at $98.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ECPG's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while AGM-PE trades at $20.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-PE's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while AGM-PF trades at $18.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-PF's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while AGM-PG trades at $17.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-PG's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while AGM-A trades at $151.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-A's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while WU trades at $6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check WU's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while EZPW trades at $30.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check EZPW's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ATLCL trades at $25.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ATLCL's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ATLCZ trades at $25.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ATLCZ's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ATLCP trades at $24.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ATLCP's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ATLC trades at $92.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ATLC's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while PRG trades at $34.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to PRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check PRG's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while JCAP trades at $19.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check JCAP's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TRNI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while TRNI trades at $25.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas TRNI's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRNI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to TRNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check TRNI's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check MGI's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while QFIN trades at $7.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check QFIN's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while LU trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check LU's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 895.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while RWAYI trades at $24.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check RWAYI's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 891M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while NAVI trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NAVI's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 809.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while FINV trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check FINV's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 806.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while WRLD trades at $172.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check WRLD's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 784.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while PRAA trades at $20.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check PRAA's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 749.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while GDOT trades at $13.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check GDOT's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 735.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while NEWTO trades at $25.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NEWTO's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 609.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while AGM-PD trades at $20.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-PD's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OPFI has a market cap of 547.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while OPFI trades at $6.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas OPFI's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPFI's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to OPFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check OPFI's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while QD trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check QD's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SCE-PM has a market cap of 516.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SCE-PM trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SCE-PM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCE-PM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to SCE-PM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SCE-PM's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORBS has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ORBS trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ORBS's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORBS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ORBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ORBS's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 406.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while HTT trades at $2.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to HTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check HTT's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check RWAYZ's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 380.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while OPRT trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check OPRT's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while LPRO trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check LPRO's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while TREE trades at $26.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check TREE's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 286.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while RM trades at $31.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check RM's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 286.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while PMTS trades at $24.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check PMTS's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while RWAY trades at $6.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check RWAY's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 279.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while MFIN trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check MFIN's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while RWAYL trades at $25.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check RWAYL's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TROO has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while TROO trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas TROO's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TROO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to TROO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check TROO's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 209.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while CPSS trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check CPSS's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SWKHL has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SWKHL trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SWKHL's P/E ratio is -29.04. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWKHL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to SWKHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SWKHL's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check IFIN-WT's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SUNL's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while FOA trades at $15.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check FOA's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while LX trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check LX's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while SUIG trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SUIG's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while YRD trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YRD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check YRD's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while JFIN trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check JFIN's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while NISN trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NISN's ROE of -2.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NISN's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ANTA trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ANTA's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check FOA-WT's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ADBT has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ADBT trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ADBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ADBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ADBT's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ELVT's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while VRM trades at $9.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check VRM's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NICK's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while XYF trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check XYF's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check JT's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while PT trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check PT's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IACOW has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while IACOW trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas IACOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IACOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to IACOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check IACOW's competition here

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ADS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80 on the NYSE, while DXF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check DXF's competition here