Global Payments Inc. (GPN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 668.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while V trades at $348.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas V's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check V's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 465.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while MA trades at $526.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check MA's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 239.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while AXP trades at $350.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check AXP's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while COF trades at $201.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check COF's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while COF-PI trades at $18.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check COF-PI's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while COF-PN trades at $15.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check COF-PN's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while COF-PJ trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check COF-PJ's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while COF-PL trades at $15.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check COF-PL's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 122.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while COF-PK trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check COF-PK's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while BNJ trades at $15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check BNJ's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while BNH trades at $15.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check BNH's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check DFS's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while IX trades at $40.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check IX's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while PYPL trades at $46.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check PYPL's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while SUNB trades at $74.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 49.22. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check SUNB's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while SYF trades at $72.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check SYF's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while SYF-PA trades at $18.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check SYF-PA's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while SOFI trades at $18.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 42.68. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check SOFI's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while SYF-PB trades at $25.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check SYF-PB's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while KKRS trades at $16.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check KKRS's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while ALLY trades at $45.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check ALLY's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while AEFC trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check AEFC's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check AGM-PC's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while FCFS trades at $218.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check FCFS's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while OMF trades at $59.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check OMF's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while SLMBP trades at $74.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check SLMBP's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while CACC trades at $625.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check CACC's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while SEZL trades at $179.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check SEZL's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while ENVA trades at $238.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check ENVA's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while CGABL trades at $16.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is 60.36. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check CGABL's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while OBDC trades at $10.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check OBDC's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check ORCC's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while JSM trades at $17.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check JSM's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while NNI trades at $133.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check NNI's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while SLM trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check SLM's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while BFH trades at $96.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check BFH's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while UPST trades at $32.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check UPST's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, HCXY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while HCXY trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas HCXY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HCXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to HCXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check HCXY's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check ADS's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while WU trades at $7.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check WU's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while LC trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check LC's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while AGM trades at $202.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check AGM's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while AGM-PE trades at $20.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check AGM-PE's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while AGM-PF trades at $18.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check AGM-PF's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while AGM-PG trades at $17.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.97. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check AGM-PG's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while EZPW trades at $34.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check EZPW's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while AGM-A trades at $146.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check AGM-A's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while PRG trades at $44.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to PRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check PRG's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while QFIN trades at $13.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check QFIN's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while ATLC trades at $99.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check ATLC's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while ATLCP trades at $24.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check ATLCP's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while ATLCL trades at $25.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check ATLCL's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while ATLCZ trades at $25.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check ATLCZ's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while JCAP trades at $18.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check JCAP's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while FINV trades at $4.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check FINV's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check MGI's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while OCSL trades at $12.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check OCSL's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 927M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while WRLD trades at $199.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check WRLD's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 910.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while RWAYI trades at $25.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check RWAYI's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 897.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while BBDC trades at $8.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check BBDC's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 774.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while NAVI trades at $8.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check NAVI's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 763.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while NEWTO trades at $26.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check NEWTO's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while GDOT trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check GDOT's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 705.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while PRAA trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check PRAA's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 689.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while NRDS trades at $9.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check NRDS's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 632.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while TREE trades at $45.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check TREE's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 622.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while AGM-PD trades at $21.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check AGM-PD's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 570.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while LU trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check LU's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, OPFI-WT has a market cap of 543.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while OPFI-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas OPFI-WT's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OPFI-WT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to OPFI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check OPFI-WT's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while QD trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check QD's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while HTT trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check HTT's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 434.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while IACO trades at $9.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check IACO's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 416.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while NEWTG trades at $25.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check NEWTG's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while NEWTI trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check NEWTI's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 400.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while RM trades at $43.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check RM's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check RWAYZ's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 370.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while LPRO trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is 67.91. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check LPRO's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 295.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while LX trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check LX's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 275.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while OPRT trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check OPRT's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 235.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while CURR trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check CURR's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 231.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while MFIN trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check MFIN's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while FOA trades at $25.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check FOA's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, IPFX has a market cap of 225.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while IPFX trades at $10.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas IPFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to IPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check IPFX's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 224.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while PMTS trades at $19.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check PMTS's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, IPFXW has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while IPFXW trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas IPFXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IPFXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to IPFXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check IPFXW's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 200.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while CPSS trades at $9.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check CPSS's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while RWAYL trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check RWAYL's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 192.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while RWAY trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check RWAY's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while EMIS trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EMIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check EMIS's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check IFIN-WT's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check SUNL's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while YRD trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to YRD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check YRD's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while ANTA trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check ANTA's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while NISN trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NISN's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check NISN's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check FOA-WT's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check ELVT's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check NICK's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while XYF trades at $4.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check XYF's competition here

GPN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPN stands at 18B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPN is priced at $76.04, while OMCC trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.08, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, GPN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPN is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPN.Check OMCC's competition here