PayPal Holdings, Inc.

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 596.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while V trades at $309.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas V's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to V's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check V's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 449.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while MA trades at $504.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check MA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 215.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while AXP trades at $314.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AXP's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while COF trades at $191.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 59.07. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while BNH trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check BNH's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check DFS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while IX trades at $30.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check IX's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while SUNB trades at $76.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SUNB's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while SYF trades at $76.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SYF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while SOFI trades at $18.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 47.28. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SOFI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while KKRS trades at $16.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check KKRS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while ALLY trades at $44.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ALLY's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while COF-PI trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.75. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF-PI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while COF-PJ trades at $18.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF-PJ's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while COF-PK trades at $17.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF-PK's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while COF-PL trades at $16.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF-PL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while COF-PN trades at $16.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF-PN's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-PC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while FCFS trades at $219.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check FCFS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while SYF-PB trades at $26.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SYF-PB's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while SYF-PA trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SYF-PA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while OMF trades at $59.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check OMF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while SLMBP trades at $73.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SLMBP's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while CGABL trades at $17.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check CGABL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while CACC trades at $514.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check CACC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while OBDC trades at $11.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check OBDC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ORCC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while JSM trades at $18.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check JSM's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while NNI trades at $141.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NNI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while SLM trades at $23.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SLM's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while ENVA trades at $166.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ENVA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while BFH trades at $86.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check BFH's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while UPST trades at $33.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 74.42. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check UPST's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ADS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while WU trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check WU's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while SEZL trades at $78.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SEZL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while LC trades at $17.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check LC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while AGM trades at $173.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while EZPW trades at $31.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check EZPW's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while AGM-A trades at $135.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-A's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while QFIN trades at $13.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check QFIN's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while FINV trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check FINV's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while ATLC trades at $78.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ATLC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while JCAP trades at $20.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check JCAP's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while OCSL trades at $12.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check OCSL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check MGI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 924.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while RWAYI trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check RWAYI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 921.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while BBDC trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check BBDC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 918.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while RWAYL trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check RWAYL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 851.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while NAVI trades at $8.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NAVI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 825.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while PRAA trades at $21.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check PRAA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 808.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while NRDS trades at $10.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NRDS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 806.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while LU trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check LU's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 762.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while WRLD trades at $151.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check WRLD's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 732.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while NEWTO trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NEWTO's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 731.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while NEWTG trades at $25.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NEWTG's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 677.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while GDOT trades at $12.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check GDOT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, NEWTH has a market cap of 654.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while NEWTH trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas NEWTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NEWTH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to NEWTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NEWTH's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 606.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while AGM-PD trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-PD's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while QD trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check QD's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while MCVT trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check MCVT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 432.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while IACO trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check IACO's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 427.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while KRAQ trades at $9.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check KRAQ's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 395.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while HTT trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL and HTT have similar daily volatility (2.06).Check HTT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check RWAYZ's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while ATLCL trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ATLCL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 376.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while ATLCZ trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ATLCZ's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 368M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while RM trades at $39.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check RM's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 362.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while LX trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check LX's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 350.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while ATLCP trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ATLCP's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 324.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while NEWTI trades at $25.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NEWTI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 256.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while OPRT trades at $5.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check OPRT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 246.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while CURR trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check CURR's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while RWAY trades at $6.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check RWAY's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 231.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while ANTA trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ANTA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 230.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while AGM-PE trades at $21.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-PE's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 221.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while MFIN trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check MFIN's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 217.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while FOA trades at $21.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check FOA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 209.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while LPRO trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -44.25. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check LPRO's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 209.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while AGM-PF trades at $19.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-PF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while PMTS trades at $18.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check PMTS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 193.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while AGM-PG trades at $17.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-PG's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 192.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while AHG trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AHG's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 184.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while CPSS trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check CPSS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 181.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while YRD trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check YRD's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while EMIS trades at $10.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EMIS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check EMIS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check IFIN-WT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SUNL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check FOA-WT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ELVT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NICK's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while XYF trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 0.97. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check XYF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while OMCC trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -9.66. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check OMCC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check JT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, KRAQW has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while KRAQW trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas KRAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KRAQW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to KRAQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check KRAQW's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while PT trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check PT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while DXF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DXF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check DXF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while SNTG trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SNTG's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 46.5B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $50.48, while NISN trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NISN's competition here