Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See HQ's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for HQ and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ | $11.69 | -5.88% | 602.9M | -41.75 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| SAP | $179.17 | +4.77% | 208.8B | 24.02 | $7.46 | +1.64% |
| SHOP | $130.28 | +2.68% | 169.1B | 86.28 | $1.51 | N/A |
| CRM | $181.50 | +4.55% | 148.6B | 13.10 | $13.85 | +0.94% |
| UBER | $70.74 | +3.75% | 143.9B | 15.37 | $4.60 | N/A |
| APP | $418.22 | +1.33% | 140.5B | 36.34 | $11.51 | N/A |
| NOW | $110.62 | +4.79% | 114.4B | 30.12 | $3.67 | N/A |
| ADP | $264.17 | +3.60% | 105.6B | 24.60 | $10.74 | +2.51% |
| ADBE | $249.18 | +4.81% | 99B | 10.91 | $22.83 | N/A |
| CDNS | $344.72 | +1.80% | 95.1B | 45.78 | $7.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SAP SE (NYSE: SAP)
HQ vs SAP Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 208.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while SAP trades at $179.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SAP's competition here
Shopify Inc. (NASDAQ: SHOP)
HQ vs SHOP Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 169.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while SHOP trades at $130.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 86.28. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SHOP's competition here
Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE: CRM)
HQ vs CRM Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 148.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while CRM trades at $181.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CRM's competition here
Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: UBER)
HQ vs UBER Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 143.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while UBER trades at $70.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check UBER's competition here
AppLovin Corporation (NASDAQ: APP)
HQ vs APP Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while APP trades at $418.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check APP's competition here
ServiceNow, Inc. (NYSE: NOW)
HQ vs NOW Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 114.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while NOW trades at $110.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NOW's competition here
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADP)
HQ vs ADP Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while ADP trades at $264.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ADP's competition here
Adobe Inc. (NASDAQ: ADBE)
HQ vs ADBE Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while ADBE trades at $249.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ADBE's competition here
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS)
HQ vs CDNS Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 95.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while CDNS trades at $344.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 45.78. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CDNS's competition here
Snowflake Inc. (NYSE: SNOW)
HQ vs SNOW Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while SNOW trades at $270.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 191.57. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SNOW's competition here
Datadog, Inc. (NASDAQ: DDOG)
HQ vs DDOG Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while DDOG trades at $250.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 114.04. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DDOG's competition here
Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ: INTU)
HQ vs INTU Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while INTU trades at $312.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check INTU's competition here
Autodesk, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADSK)
HQ vs ADSK Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while ADSK trades at $237.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ADSK's competition here
Workday, Inc. (NASDAQ: WDAY)
HQ vs WDAY Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while WDAY trades at $159.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check WDAY's competition here
Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROP)
HQ vs ROP Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while ROP trades at $390.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ROP's competition here
ANSYS, Inc. (NASDAQ: ANSS)
HQ vs ANSS Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ANSS's competition here
Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE: VEEV)
HQ vs VEEV Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while VEEV trades at $201.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check VEEV's competition here
Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO)
HQ vs FICO Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while FICO trades at $1,336.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FICO's competition here
MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.00% Series A Perpetual Strife Preferred Stock (NASDAQ: STRF)
HQ vs STRF Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while STRF trades at $96.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STRF's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: MSTR)
HQ vs MSTR Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while MSTR trades at $96.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MSTR's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: STRC)
HQ vs STRC Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while STRC trades at $88.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STRC's competition here
Zoom Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZM)
HQ vs ZM Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while ZM trades at $91.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZM's competition here
Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM)
HQ vs TEAM Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while TEAM trades at $99.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TEAM's competition here
Bending Spoons S.p.A. (NASDAQ: BSP)
HQ vs BSP Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while BSP trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is -326900.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BSP's competition here
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SSNC)
HQ vs SSNC Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while SSNC trades at $77.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SSNC's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: STRK)
HQ vs STRK Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while STRK trades at $62.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STRK's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: STRD)
HQ vs STRD Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while STRD trades at $59.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STRD's competition here
Aspen Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: AZPN)
HQ vs AZPN Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AZPN's competition here
PTC Inc. (NASDAQ: PTC)
HQ vs PTC Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while PTC trades at $127.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PTC's competition here
Tyler Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: TYL)
HQ vs TYL Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while TYL trades at $333.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TYL's competition here
Unity Software Inc. (NYSE: U)
HQ vs U Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while U trades at $31.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to U. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check U's competition here
Grab Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: GRAB)
HQ vs GRAB Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while GRAB trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 38.93. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GRAB's competition here
Guidewire Software, Inc. (NYSE: GWRE)
HQ vs GWRE Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while GWRE trades at $159.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 45.72. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GWRE's competition here
Grab Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: GRABW)
HQ vs GRABW Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while GRABW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GRABW's competition here
Dynatrace, Inc. (NYSE: DT)
HQ vs DT Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while DT trades at $43.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DT's competition here
HubSpot, Inc. (NYSE: HUBS)
HQ vs HUBS Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while HUBS trades at $238.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check HUBS's competition here
Figma, Inc. (NYSE: FIG)
HQ vs FIG Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while FIG trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FIG's competition here
Black Knight, Inc. (NYSE: BKI)
HQ vs BKI Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BKI's competition here
Dayforce Inc (NYSE: DAY)
HQ vs DAY Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DAY's competition here
Qualtrics International Inc. (NASDAQ: XM)
HQ vs XM Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check XM's competition here
Dayforce Inc. (NYSE: CDAY)
HQ vs CDAY Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CDAY's competition here
DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: DOCU)
HQ vs DOCU Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while DOCU trades at $55.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DOCU's competition here
Bentley Systems, Incorporated (NASDAQ: BSY)
HQ vs BSY Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while BSY trades at $35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BSY's competition here
Manhattan Associates, Inc. (NASDAQ: MANH)
HQ vs MANH Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while MANH trades at $168.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MANH's competition here
Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (NYSE: YMM)
HQ vs YMM Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while YMM trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check YMM's competition here
JFrog Ltd. (NASDAQ: FROG)
HQ vs FROG Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while FROG trades at $76.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 85.88. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FROG's competition here
Paycom Software, Inc. (NYSE: PAYC)
HQ vs PAYC Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while PAYC trades at $161.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PAYC's competition here
OneConnect Financial Technology Co., Ltd. (NYSE: OCFT)
HQ vs OCFT Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OCFT's competition here
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF)
HQ vs WULF Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while WULF trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -12.12. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check WULF's competition here
National Instruments Corporation (NASDAQ: NATI)
HQ vs NATI Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NATI's competition here
Smartsheet Inc. (NYSE: SMAR)
HQ vs SMAR Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SMAR's competition here
ServiceTitan, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTAN)
HQ vs TTAN Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while TTAN trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 64.79. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TTAN's competition here
Paylocity Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: PCTY)
HQ vs PCTY Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while PCTY trades at $138.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PCTY's competition here
Procore Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: PCOR)
HQ vs PCOR Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while PCOR trades at $48.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PCOR's competition here
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CWAN)
HQ vs CWAN Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while CWAN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CWAN's competition here
InterDigital, Inc. (NASDAQ: IDCC)
HQ vs IDCC Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while IDCC trades at $260.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check IDCC's competition here
Duolingo, Inc. (NASDAQ: DUOL)
HQ vs DUOL Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while DUOL trades at $140.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 38.14. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DUOL's competition here
The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (NASDAQ: DSGX)
HQ vs DSGX Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while DSGX trades at $75.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DSGX's competition here
Elastic N.V. (NYSE: ESTC)
HQ vs ESTC Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while ESTC trades at $62.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ESTC's competition here
AppFolio Inc. (NASDAQ: APPF)
HQ vs APPF Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while APPF trades at $178.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check APPF's competition here
Navan, Inc. (NASDAQ: NAVN)
HQ vs NAVN Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while NAVN trades at $26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 405.38. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NAVN's competition here
Coupa Software Incorporated (NASDAQ: COUP)
HQ vs COUP Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check COUP's competition here
Open Text Corporation (NASDAQ: OTEX)
HQ vs OTEX Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while OTEX trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OTEX's competition here
NICE Ltd. (NASDAQ: NICE)
HQ vs NICE Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while NICE trades at $101.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NICE's competition here
Lyft, Inc. (NASDAQ: LYFT)
HQ vs LYFT Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while LYFT trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check LYFT's competition here
Klaviyo, Inc. (NYSE: KVYO)
HQ vs KVYO Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while KVYO trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check KVYO's competition here
GitLab Inc. (NASDAQ: GTLB)
HQ vs GTLB Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while GTLB trades at $32.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GTLB's competition here
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (NYSE: ZETA)
HQ vs ZETA Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while ZETA trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZETA's competition here
Dave Inc. (NASDAQ: DAVE)
HQ vs DAVE Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while DAVE trades at $406.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DAVE's competition here
Clear Secure, Inc. (NYSE: YOU)
HQ vs YOU Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while YOU trades at $53.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 43.41. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check YOU's competition here
Commvault Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVLT)
HQ vs CVLT Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while CVLT trades at $120.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CVLT's competition here
RingCentral, Inc. (NYSE: RNG)
HQ vs RNG Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while RNG trades at $56.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check RNG's competition here
Pegasystems Inc. (NASDAQ: PEGA)
HQ vs PEGA Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while PEGA trades at $29.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PEGA's competition here
Octave Intelligence plc (NASDAQ: OCTV)
HQ vs OCTV Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while OCTV trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 52.67. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OCTV's competition here
Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BILL)
HQ vs BILL Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while BILL trades at $46.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BILL's competition here
Life360, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIF)
HQ vs LIF Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while LIF trades at $56.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check LIF's competition here
monday.com Ltd. (NASDAQ: MNDY)
HQ vs MNDY Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while MNDY trades at $87.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MNDY's competition here
Grindr Inc. WT (NYSE: GRND-WT)
HQ vs GRND-WT Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GRND-WT's competition here
Sportradar Group AG (NASDAQ: SRAD)
HQ vs SRAD Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while SRAD trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SRAD's competition here
Dlocal Limited (NASDAQ: DLO)
HQ vs DLO Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DLO's competition here
Box, Inc. (NYSE: BOX)
HQ vs BOX Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BOX's competition here
Cvent Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CVT)
HQ vs CVT Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CVT's competition here
Paycor HCM, Inc. (NASDAQ: PYCR)
HQ vs PYCR Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PYCR's competition here
Webull Corporation Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BULL)
HQ vs BULL Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while BULL trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BULL's competition here
PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: PWSC)
HQ vs PWSC Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PWSC's competition here
Q2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: QTWO)
HQ vs QTWO Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while QTWO trades at $59.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check QTWO's competition here
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CCC)
HQ vs CCC Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while CCC trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CCC's competition here
Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (NASDAQ: PTRN)
HQ vs PTRN Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while PTRN trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PTRN's competition here
Alteryx, Inc. (NYSE: AYX)
HQ vs AYX Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AYX's competition here
Envestnet, Inc. (NYSE: ENV)
HQ vs ENV Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ENV's competition here
NCR Atleos Corporation (NYSE: NATL)
HQ vs NATL Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while NATL trades at $47.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NATL's competition here
Paysafe Equity Warrants Exp 30th March 2026 (NYSE: PSFE-WT)
HQ vs PSFE-WT Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
Instructure Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: INST)
HQ vs INST Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check INST's competition here
Bullish (NYSE: BLSH)
HQ vs BLSH Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while BLSH trades at $22.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 60.44. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BLSH's competition here
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: ZI)
HQ vs ZI Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZI's competition here
Workiva Inc. (NYSE: WK)
HQ vs WK Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while WK trades at $58.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check WK's competition here
Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY)
HQ vs FSLY Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while FSLY trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 71.72. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FSLY's competition here
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (NYSE: DBD)
HQ vs DBD Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while DBD trades at $90.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DBD's competition here
Agilysys, Inc. (NASDAQ: AGYS)
HQ vs AGYS Comparison July 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 602.9M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $11.69 on the NASDAQ, while AGYS trades at $110.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -41.75, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 62.19. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AGYS's competition here