Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See HQ's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for HQ and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ | $16.30 | +0.93% | 880.3M | -3.85 | -$4.24 | N/A |
| MSFT | $535.07 | +1.00% | 3.9T | 30.24 | $17.28 | +0.68% |
| PLTR | $209.05 | +7.69% | 456.4B | 165.65 | $1.20 | N/A |
| ORCL | $141.53 | -1.41% | 390.5B | 17.77 | $7.63 | +1.41% |
| PANW | $418.78 | +3.26% | 324.8B | 105.98 | $3.76 | N/A |
| CRWD | $275.04 | +3.62% | 267.8B | 255.97 | $1.03 | N/A |
| FTNT | $194.75 | +2.89% | 138.7B | 62.82 | $3.01 | N/A |
| NET | $360.93 | +5.24% | 121.3B | 338.40 | $1.01 | N/A |
| SNPS | $509.99 | +1.46% | 95.3B | 37.12 | $13.41 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT)
HQ vs MSFT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while MSFT trades at $535.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MSFT's competition here
Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: PLTR)
HQ vs PLTR Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 456.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while PLTR trades at $209.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 165.65. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PLTR's competition here
Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL)
HQ vs ORCL Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 390.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while ORCL trades at $141.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ORCL's competition here
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW)
HQ vs PANW Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 324.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while PANW trades at $418.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 105.98. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PANW's competition here
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRWD)
HQ vs CRWD Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 267.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CRWD trades at $275.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 255.97. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CRWD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CRWD's competition here
Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ: FTNT)
HQ vs FTNT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 138.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while FTNT trades at $194.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 62.82. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FTNT's competition here
Cloudflare, Inc. (NYSE: NET)
HQ vs NET Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while NET trades at $360.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 338.40. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NET's competition here
Synopsys, Inc. (NASDAQ: SNPS)
HQ vs SNPS Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while SNPS trades at $509.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SNPS's competition here
VMware, Inc. (NYSE: VMW)
HQ vs VMW Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check VMW's competition here
Block, Inc. (NYSE: SQ)
HQ vs SQ Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SQ's competition here
Block, Inc. (NYSE: XYZ)
HQ vs XYZ Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while XYZ trades at $77.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check XYZ's competition here
CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: CRWV)
HQ vs CRWV Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CRWV trades at $82.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -40.43. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CRWV's competition here
Twilio Inc. (NYSE: TWLO)
HQ vs TWLO Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while TWLO trades at $289.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 52.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TWLO's competition here
Okta, Inc. (NASDAQ: OKTA)
HQ vs OKTA Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while OKTA trades at $232.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 62.21. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OKTA's competition here
Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS)
HQ vs ZS Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while ZS trades at $233.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 55.07. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZS's competition here
MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ: MDB)
HQ vs MDB Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while MDB trades at $385.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 70.20. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to MDB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MDB's competition here
Net Element, Inc. (NASDAQ: NETE)
HQ vs NETE Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NETE's competition here
VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN)
HQ vs VRSN Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while VRSN trades at $303.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check VRSN's competition here
Splunk Inc. (NASDAQ: SPLK)
HQ vs SPLK Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SPLK's competition here
Corpay, Inc. (NYSE: CPAY)
HQ vs CPAY Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CPAY trades at $397.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CPAY's competition here
F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV)
HQ vs FFIV Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while FFIV trades at $479.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FFIV's competition here
Rubrik, Inc. (NYSE: RBRK)
HQ vs RBRK Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while RBRK trades at $125.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 447.85. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check RBRK's competition here
Samsara Inc. (NYSE: IOT)
HQ vs IOT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while IOT trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 66.44. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check IOT's competition here
FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: FLT)
HQ vs FLT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FLT's competition here
CyberArk Software Ltd. (NASDAQ: CYBR)
HQ vs CYBR Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CYBR's competition here
Nutanix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTNX)
HQ vs NTNX Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while NTNX trades at $74.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NTNX's competition here
Toast, Inc. (NYSE: TOST)
HQ vs TOST Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while TOST trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TOST's competition here
Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz (NASDAQ: KSPI)
HQ vs KSPI Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while KSPI trades at $92.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check KSPI's competition here
Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM)
HQ vs AKAM Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while AKAM trades at $106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AKAM's competition here
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DOCN)
HQ vs DOCN Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while DOCN trades at $134.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 74.69. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DOCN's competition here
NortonLifeLock Inc. (NASDAQ: NLOK)
HQ vs NLOK Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NLOK's competition here
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: CHKP)
HQ vs CHKP Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CHKP trades at $137.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CHKP's competition here
GoDaddy Inc. (NYSE: GDDY)
HQ vs GDDY Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while GDDY trades at $104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GDDY's competition here
Gen Digital Inc. (NASDAQ: GEN)
HQ vs GEN Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while GEN trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GEN's competition here
SailPoint, Inc. (NASDAQ: SAIL)
HQ vs SAIL Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while SAIL trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 71.50. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SAIL's competition here
Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT)
HQ vs CFLT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CFLT's competition here
PayPay Corporation (NASDAQ: PAYP)
HQ vs PAYP Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while PAYP trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PAYP's competition here
Altair Engineering Inc. (NASDAQ: ALTR)
HQ vs ALTR Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ALTR's competition here
Anaplan, Inc. (NYSE: PLAN)
HQ vs PLAN Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PLAN's competition here
Dropbox, Inc. (NASDAQ: DBX)
HQ vs DBX Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while DBX trades at $34.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DBX's competition here
SentinelOne, Inc. (NYSE: S)
HQ vs S Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while S trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas S's P/E ratio is 115.48. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to S's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to S. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check S's competition here
Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: NTSK)
HQ vs NTSK Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while NTSK trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -21.32. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to NTSK's ROE of -4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NTSK's competition here
Informatica Inc. (NYSE: INFA)
HQ vs INFA Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to INFA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check INFA's competition here
HashiCorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: HCP)
HQ vs HCP Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check HCP's competition here
UiPath Inc. (NYSE: PATH)
HQ vs PATH Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while PATH trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PATH's competition here
Qualys, Inc. (NASDAQ: QLYS)
HQ vs QLYS Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while QLYS trades at $202.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check QLYS's competition here
Ziff Davis, Inc. (NASDAQ: JCOM)
HQ vs JCOM Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check JCOM's competition here
Amdocs Limited (NASDAQ: DOX)
HQ vs DOX Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while DOX trades at $58.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DOX's competition here
Squarespace, Inc. (NYSE: SQSP)
HQ vs SQSP Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SQSP's competition here
Gen Digital Inc. Contingent Value Rights (NASDAQ: GENVR)
HQ vs GENVR Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while GENVR trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GENVR's competition here
New Relic, Inc. (NYSE: NEWR)
HQ vs NEWR Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NEWR's competition here
WEX Inc. (NYSE: WEX)
HQ vs WEX Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while WEX trades at $172.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check WEX's competition here
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CCCS)
HQ vs CCCS Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CCCS's competition here
Varonis Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRNS)
HQ vs VRNS Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while VRNS trades at $50.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 212.52. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check VRNS's competition here
Mobility Global Inc (NYSE: MBGL)
HQ vs MBGL Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while MBGL trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is 43.07. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to MBGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MBGL's competition here
ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW)
HQ vs ACIW Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while ACIW trades at $50.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ACIW's competition here
BlackBerry Limited (NYSE: BB)
HQ vs BB Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while BB trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BB's competition here
Box, Inc. (NYSE: BOX)
HQ vs BOX Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BOX's competition here
Core Scientific, Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (NASDAQ: CORZZ)
HQ vs CORZZ Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CORZZ trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CORZZ's competition here
Remitly Global, Inc. (NASDAQ: RELY)
HQ vs RELY Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while RELY trades at $24.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check RELY's competition here
Core Scientific, Inc. (NASDAQ: CORZ)
HQ vs CORZ Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CORZ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CORZ's competition here
Nuvei Corporation (NASDAQ: NVEI)
HQ vs NVEI Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NVEI's competition here
Dlocal Limited (NASDAQ: DLO)
HQ vs DLO Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DLO's competition here
Tenable Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TENB)
HQ vs TENB Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while TENB trades at $41.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to TENB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TENB's competition here
Paymentus Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: PAY)
HQ vs PAY Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while PAY trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PAY's competition here
Core Scientific, Inc. (NASDAQ: CORZW)
HQ vs CORZW Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CORZW trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CORZW's competition here
EngageSmart, Inc. (NYSE: ESMT)
HQ vs ESMT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ESMT's competition here
Shift4 Payments, Inc. (NYSE: FOUR)
HQ vs FOUR Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while FOUR trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FOUR's competition here
SolarWinds Corporation (NYSE: SWI)
HQ vs SWI Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SWI's competition here
AvePoint, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVPT)
HQ vs AVPT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while AVPT trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 40.03. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AVPT's competition here
EVO Payments, Inc. (NASDAQ: EVOP)
HQ vs EVOP Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check EVOP's competition here
Appian Corporation (NASDAQ: APPN)
HQ vs APPN Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while APPN trades at $40.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to APPN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check APPN's competition here
NetScout Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTCT)
HQ vs NTCT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while NTCT trades at $40.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NTCT's competition here
Teradata Corporation (NYSE: TDC)
HQ vs TDC Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while TDC trades at $30.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TDC's competition here
Cellebrite DI Ltd. (NASDAQ: CLBT)
HQ vs CLBT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CLBT trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 48.80. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CLBT's competition here
StoneCo Ltd. (NASDAQ: STNE)
HQ vs STNE Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while STNE trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STNE's competition here
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT)
HQ vs EEFT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while EEFT trades at $64.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check EEFT's competition here
Payoneer Global Inc. (NASDAQ: PAYO)
HQ vs PAYO Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while PAYO trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PAYO's competition here
CSG Systems International, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSGS)
HQ vs CSGS Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while CSGS trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CSGS's competition here
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: RAMP)
HQ vs RAMP Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while RAMP trades at $37.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check RAMP's competition here
GigaCloud Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: GCT)
HQ vs GCT Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while GCT trades at $57.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GCT's competition here
AvidXchange Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVDX)
HQ vs AVDX Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AVDX's competition here
Getnet Adquirência e Serviços para Meios de Pagamento S.A. (NASDAQ: GETVV)
HQ vs GETVV Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GETVV's competition here
A10 Networks, Inc. (NYSE: ATEN)
HQ vs ATEN Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while ATEN trades at $29.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ATEN's competition here
ForgeRock, Inc. (NYSE: FORG)
HQ vs FORG Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FORG's competition here
GreenSky, Inc. (NASDAQ: GSKY)
HQ vs GSKY Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GSKY's competition here
Getnet Adquirência e Serviços para Meios de Pagamento S.A. (NASDAQ: GET)
HQ vs GET Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GET's competition here
Marqeta, Inc. (NASDAQ: MQ)
HQ vs MQ Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while MQ trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 179.42. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MQ's competition here
Bandwidth Inc. (NASDAQ: BAND)
HQ vs BAND Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while BAND trades at $53.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to BAND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BAND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BAND's competition here
Nayax Ltd. (NASDAQ: NYAX)
HQ vs NYAX Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while NYAX trades at $45.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 215.31. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NYAX's competition here
Sterling Check Corp. (NASDAQ: STER)
HQ vs STER Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STER's competition here
NextNav Inc. (NASDAQ: NN)
HQ vs NN Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while NN trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to NN's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NN's competition here
Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS)
HQ vs PRGS Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while PRGS trades at $39.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PRGS's competition here
PicS N.V. (NASDAQ: PICS)
HQ vs PICS Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while PICS trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PICS's competition here
Zuora, Inc. (NYSE: ZUO)
HQ vs ZUO Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZUO's competition here
Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: PGY)
HQ vs PGY Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while PGY trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PGY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PGY's competition here
Sumo Logic, Inc. (NASDAQ: SUMO)
HQ vs SUMO Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SUMO's competition here
Global Blue Group Holding AG (NYSE: GB)
HQ vs GB Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GB's competition here
Couchbase, Inc. (NASDAQ: BASE)
HQ vs BASE Comparison October 2026
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HQ) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 880.3M. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $16.30 on the NASDAQ, while BASE trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -2.97%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BASE's competition here