Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (HQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ | $13.20 | +0.92% | 680.8M | -47.14 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| SAP | $181.79 | +3.61% | 212B | 25.03 | $7.27 | +1.61% |
| APP | $613.09 | +2.20% | 206B | 53.17 | $11.53 | N/A |
| CRM | $191.10 | +8.47% | 156.5B | 22.14 | $8.63 | +0.88% |
| SHOP | $118.71 | +3.20% | 154.2B | 116.49 | $1.02 | N/A |
| UBER | $70.40 | -0.73% | 143.2B | 17.46 | $4.03 | N/A |
| NOW | $124.37 | +14.38% | 128.3B | 73.61 | $1.69 | N/A |
| ADBE | $259.21 | +7.36% | 104.8B | 15.10 | $17.17 | N/A |
| CDNS | $374.93 | +0.29% | 103.4B | 87.62 | $4.28 | N/A |
| INTU | $331.53 | +5.92% | 90.7B | 20.22 | $16.40 | +1.41% |
Stock Comparison
HQ vs SAP Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 212B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while SAP trades at $181.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SAP's competition here
HQ vs APP Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 206B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while APP trades at $613.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 53.17. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check APP's competition here
HQ vs CRM Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 156.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while CRM trades at $191.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CRM's competition here
HQ vs SHOP Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 154.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while SHOP trades at $118.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 116.49. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SHOP's competition here
HQ vs UBER Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 143.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while UBER trades at $70.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check UBER's competition here
HQ vs NOW Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while NOW trades at $124.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 73.61. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NOW's competition here
HQ vs ADBE Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 104.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while ADBE trades at $259.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ADBE's competition here
HQ vs CDNS Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 103.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while CDNS trades at $374.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 87.62. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CDNS's competition here
HQ vs INTU Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while INTU trades at $331.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check INTU's competition here
HQ vs SNOW Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while SNOW trades at $255.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -72.55. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SNOW's competition here
HQ vs DDOG Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while DDOG trades at $247.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 650.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DDOG's competition here
HQ vs ADSK Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while ADSK trades at $231.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ADSK's competition here
HQ vs MSTR Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while MSTR trades at $159.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MSTR's competition here
HQ vs WDAY Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while WDAY trades at $146.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 45.54. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check WDAY's competition here
HQ vs ANSS Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ANSS's competition here
HQ vs ROP Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while ROP trades at $325.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ROP's competition here
HQ vs ZM Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while ZM trades at $101.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZM's competition here
HQ vs STRC Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while STRC trades at $98.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STRC's competition here
HQ vs STRF Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while STRF trades at $98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STRF's competition here
HQ vs FICO Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while FICO trades at $1,250.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 39.62. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FICO's competition here
HQ vs TEAM Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while TEAM trades at $107.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -131.26. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TEAM's competition here
HQ vs STRK Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while STRK trades at $70.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STRK's competition here
HQ vs AZPN Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AZPN's competition here
HQ vs SSNC Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while SSNC trades at $67.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SSNC's competition here
HQ vs PTC Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while PTC trades at $138.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PTC's competition here
HQ vs GRAB Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while GRAB trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 88.50. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GRAB's competition here
HQ vs U Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while U trades at $30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas U's P/E ratio is -19.43. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check U's competition here
HQ vs TYL Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while TYL trades at $313.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 42.83. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TYL's competition here
HQ vs GWRE Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while GWRE trades at $152.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 69.18. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GWRE's competition here
HQ vs FIG Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while FIG trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FIG's competition here
HQ vs DT Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while DT trades at $42.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 78.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DT's competition here
HQ vs BKI Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BKI's competition here
HQ vs HUBS Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while HUBS trades at $220.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 115.47. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check HUBS's competition here
HQ vs DAY Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DAY's competition here
HQ vs XM Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check XM's competition here
HQ vs CDAY Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CDAY's competition here
HQ vs DOCU Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while DOCU trades at $52.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 35.49. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DOCU's competition here
HQ vs FROG Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while FROG trades at $79.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -149.96. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FROG's competition here
HQ vs BSY Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while BSY trades at $32.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BSY's competition here
HQ vs YMM Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while YMM trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check YMM's competition here
HQ vs MANH Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while MANH trades at $150.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MANH's competition here
HQ vs OCFT Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OCFT's competition here
HQ vs NATI Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NATI's competition here
HQ vs SMAR Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SMAR's competition here
HQ vs PAYC Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while PAYC trades at $139.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PAYC's competition here
HQ vs PCOR Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while PCOR trades at $49.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -96.98. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PCOR's competition here
HQ vs CWAN Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while CWAN trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.14. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CWAN's competition here
HQ vs TTAN Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while TTAN trades at $72.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -41.83. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TTAN's competition here
HQ vs ESTC Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while ESTC trades at $64.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ESTC's competition here
HQ vs IDCC Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while IDCC trades at $252.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check IDCC's competition here
HQ vs DSGX Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while DSGX trades at $73.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DSGX's competition here
HQ vs PCTY Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while PCTY trades at $114.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PCTY's competition here
HQ vs COUP Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check COUP's competition here
HQ vs PEGA Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while PEGA trades at $35.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PEGA's competition here
HQ vs OTEX Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while OTEX trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OTEX's competition here
HQ vs APPF Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while APPF trades at $161.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check APPF's competition here
HQ vs ZETA Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while ZETA trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -229.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZETA's competition here
HQ vs YOU Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while YOU trades at $55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check YOU's competition here
HQ vs NICE Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while NICE trades at $92.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NICE's competition here
HQ vs LYFT Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while LYFT trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check LYFT's competition here
HQ vs GTLB Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while GTLB trades at $31.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -91.32. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GTLB's competition here
HQ vs DUOL Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while DUOL trades at $111.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DUOL's competition here
HQ vs NAVN Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while NAVN trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NAVN's competition here
HQ vs COMP Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while COMP trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 411.75. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check COMP's competition here
HQ vs CVLT Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while CVLT trades at $118.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 75.16. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CVLT's competition here
HQ vs GBTG Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while GBTG trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.41. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GBTG's competition here
HQ vs OCTVV Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OCTVV's competition here
HQ vs GRND-WT Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GRND-WT's competition here
HQ vs MNDY Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while MNDY trades at $83.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 36.54. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MNDY's competition here
HQ vs CVT Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CVT's competition here
HQ vs PYCR Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PYCR's competition here
HQ vs BTDR Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while BTDR trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -10.65. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BTDR's competition here
HQ vs RUM Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while RUM trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -21.37. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check RUM's competition here
HQ vs SRAD Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while SRAD trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 50.81. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SRAD's competition here
HQ vs SOUN Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while SOUN trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -12.86. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SOUN's competition here
HQ vs RNG Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while RNG trades at $43.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 46.06. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check RNG's competition here
HQ vs PWSC Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PWSC's competition here
HQ vs DAVE Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while DAVE trades at $282.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DAVE's competition here
HQ vs BOX Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while BOX trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 42.14. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BOX's competition here
HQ vs BILL Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while BILL trades at $37.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -160.91. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BILL's competition here
HQ vs KC Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while KC trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -24.08. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check KC's competition here
HQ vs AYX Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AYX's competition here
HQ vs ENV Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ENV's competition here
HQ vs STUB Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while STUB trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STUB's competition here
HQ vs INST Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check INST's competition here
HQ vs LIF Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while LIF trades at $42.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check LIF's competition here
HQ vs ZI Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZI's competition here
HQ vs BULL Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while BULL trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BULL's competition here
HQ vs NATL Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while NATL trades at $44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NATL's competition here
HQ vs QTWO Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while QTWO trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 41.88. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check QTWO's competition here
HQ vs ADEA Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while ADEA trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ADEA's competition here
HQ vs PTRN Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while PTRN trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PTRN's competition here
HQ vs BRZE Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while BRZE trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -22.88. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BRZE's competition here
HQ vs DBD Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while DBD trades at $81.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DBD's competition here
HQ vs WK Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while WK trades at $49.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 207.50. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check WK's competition here
HQ vs FSLY Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while FSLY trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FSLY's competition here
HQ vs BRUN Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while BRUN trades at $34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -101.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BRUN's competition here
HQ vs FRSH Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while FRSH trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FRSH's competition here
HQ vs NP Comparison May 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 680.8M. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $13.20, while NP trades at $28.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -47.14, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -156.03. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.71%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NP's competition here