Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. Class A Ordinary Shares (HQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ | $23.86 | -16.02% | 1.3B | -92.57 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| SAP | $154.01 | +0.82% | 172.5B | 19.85 | $7.46 | +1.97% |
| APP | $476.27 | +2.43% | 149.8B | 38.74 | $11.51 | N/A |
| UBER | $75.11 | +1.71% | 147.1B | 15.71 | $4.60 | N/A |
| SHOP | $115.91 | +1.52% | 144.8B | 73.92 | $1.51 | N/A |
| CRM | $156.50 | +2.45% | 123B | 10.84 | $13.85 | +1.14% |
| CDNS | $372.18 | -0.06% | 101.6B | 48.90 | $7.53 | N/A |
| NOW | $96.82 | +3.22% | 92.3B | 24.38 | $3.67 | N/A |
| SNOW | $237.47 | +5.10% | 78.7B | 161.03 | $1.41 | N/A |
| DDOG | $231.91 | +4.16% | 78.6B | 100.43 | $2.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HQ vs SAP Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 172.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while SAP trades at $154.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SAP's competition here
HQ vs APP Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 149.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while APP trades at $476.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check APP's competition here
HQ vs UBER Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while UBER trades at $75.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check UBER's competition here
HQ vs SHOP Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 144.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while SHOP trades at $115.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 73.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SHOP's competition here
HQ vs CRM Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while CRM trades at $156.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CRM's competition here
HQ vs CDNS Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while CDNS trades at $372.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 48.90. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CDNS's competition here
HQ vs NOW Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while NOW trades at $96.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NOW's competition here
HQ vs SNOW Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while SNOW trades at $237.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 161.03. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SNOW's competition here
HQ vs DDOG Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while DDOG trades at $231.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 100.43. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DDOG's competition here
HQ vs ADBE Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while ADBE trades at $200.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ADBE's competition here
HQ vs INTU Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while INTU trades at $268.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check INTU's competition here
HQ vs ADSK Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while ADSK trades at $194.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ADSK's competition here
HQ vs ROP Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while ROP trades at $338.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ROP's competition here
HQ vs ANSS Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ANSS's competition here
HQ vs WDAY Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while WDAY trades at $121.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check WDAY's competition here
HQ vs FICO Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while FICO trades at $1,182.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FICO's competition here
HQ vs STRF Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while STRF trades at $84.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STRF's competition here
HQ vs MSTR Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while MSTR trades at $82.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MSTR's competition here
HQ vs ZM Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while ZM trades at $85.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZM's competition here
HQ vs STRC Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while STRC trades at $74.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STRC's competition here
HQ vs TEAM Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while TEAM trades at $77.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TEAM's competition here
HQ vs AZPN Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AZPN's competition here
HQ vs STRK Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while STRK trades at $53.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STRK's competition here
HQ vs SSNC Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while SSNC trades at $63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SSNC's competition here
HQ vs GRAB Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while GRAB trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 39.05. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GRAB's competition here
HQ vs PTC Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while PTC trades at $115.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PTC's competition here
HQ vs GRABW Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while GRABW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GRABW's competition here
HQ vs BKI Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BKI's competition here
HQ vs TYL Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while TYL trades at $293.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TYL's competition here
HQ vs DT Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while DT trades at $42.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DT's competition here
HQ vs U Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while U trades at $28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas U's P/E ratio is -24.94. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check U's competition here
HQ vs DAY Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DAY's competition here
HQ vs XM Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check XM's competition here
HQ vs CDAY Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CDAY's competition here
HQ vs FROG Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while FROG trades at $83.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 88.54. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FROG's competition here
HQ vs GWRE Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while GWRE trades at $119.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GWRE's competition here
HQ vs HUBS Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while HUBS trades at $178.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check HUBS's competition here
HQ vs OCFT Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OCFT's competition here
HQ vs BSY Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while BSY trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BSY's competition here
HQ vs FIG Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while FIG trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 36.55. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check FIG's competition here
HQ vs DOCU Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while DOCU trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DOCU's competition here
HQ vs NATI Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NATI's competition here
HQ vs SMAR Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SMAR's competition here
HQ vs YMM Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while YMM trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check YMM's competition here
HQ vs MANH Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while MANH trades at $134.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MANH's competition here
HQ vs CWAN Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while CWAN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CWAN's competition here
HQ vs IDCC Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while IDCC trades at $275.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check IDCC's competition here
HQ vs PAYC Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while PAYC trades at $128.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PAYC's competition here
HQ vs COMP Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while COMP trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 552.25. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check COMP's competition here
HQ vs COUP Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check COUP's competition here
HQ vs TTAN Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while TTAN trades at $67.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check TTAN's competition here
HQ vs PCOR Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while PCOR trades at $40.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PCOR's competition here
HQ vs DSGX Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while DSGX trades at $69.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DSGX's competition here
HQ vs DUOL Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while DUOL trades at $122.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DUOL's competition here
HQ vs ESTC Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while ESTC trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ESTC's competition here
HQ vs CVLT Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while CVLT trades at $138.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CVLT's competition here
HQ vs PCTY Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while PCTY trades at $105.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PCTY's competition here
HQ vs YOU Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while YOU trades at $54.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 42.87. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check YOU's competition here
HQ vs LYFT Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while LYFT trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check LYFT's competition here
HQ vs APPF Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while APPF trades at $153.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check APPF's competition here
HQ vs OTEX Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while OTEX trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OTEX's competition here
HQ vs NAVN Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while NAVN trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 332.15. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NAVN's competition here
HQ vs NICE Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while NICE trades at $90.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NICE's competition here
HQ vs GBTG Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while GBTG trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 134.07. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GBTG's competition here
HQ vs PEGA Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while PEGA trades at $30.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PEGA's competition here
HQ vs OCTVV Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OCTVV's competition here
HQ vs GTLB Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while GTLB trades at $28.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GTLB's competition here
HQ vs DAVEW Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while DAVEW trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DAVEW's competition here
HQ vs ZETA Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while ZETA trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZETA's competition here
HQ vs OCTV Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while OCTV trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 49.61. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check OCTV's competition here
HQ vs GRND-WT Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check GRND-WT's competition here
HQ vs DAVE Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while DAVE trades at $341.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DAVE's competition here
HQ vs SRAD Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while SRAD trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 60.21. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check SRAD's competition here
HQ vs CVT Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check CVT's competition here
HQ vs PYCR Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PYCR's competition here
HQ vs STUB Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while STUB trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check STUB's competition here
HQ vs LIF Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while LIF trades at $52.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check LIF's competition here
HQ vs BTDR Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while BTDR trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BTDR's competition here
HQ vs PWSC Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PWSC's competition here
HQ vs AYX Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AYX's competition here
HQ vs ENV Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ENV's competition here
HQ vs BULL Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while BULL trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BULL's competition here
HQ vs MNDY Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while MNDY trades at $71.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check MNDY's competition here
HQ vs INST Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check INST's competition here
HQ vs BOX Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while BOX trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BOX's competition here
HQ vs ZI Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ZI's competition here
HQ vs PTRN Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while PTRN trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PTRN's competition here
HQ vs ADEA Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while ADEA trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check ADEA's competition here
HQ vs BILL Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while BILL trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BILL's competition here
HQ vs NATL Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while NATL trades at $43.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check NATL's competition here
HQ vs PPLI Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while PPLI trades at $44.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is -45.03. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PPLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PPLI's competition here
HQ vs RNG Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while RNG trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check RNG's competition here
HQ vs DBD Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while DBD trades at $84.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check DBD's competition here
HQ vs PDFS Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PDFS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while PDFS trades at $61.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas PDFS's P/E ratio is 65.40. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PDFS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to PDFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check PDFS's competition here
HQ vs BRUN Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while BRUN trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -51.39. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BRUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check BRUN's competition here
HQ vs QTWO Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while QTWO trades at $46.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check QTWO's competition here
HQ vs AGYS Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while AGYS trades at $101.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 54.78. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check AGYS's competition here
HQ vs KC Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while KC trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check KC's competition here
HQ vs RUM Comparison June 2026
HQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HQ stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQ is priced at $23.86, while RUM trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HQ currently has a P/E ratio of -92.57, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, HQ's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HQ is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQ.Check RUM's competition here