Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BFH
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BFH
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BFH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFH | $73.02 | -0.75% | 3.3B | 6.66 | $10.96 | +1.21% |
| V | $300.80 | +0.77% | 580B | 28.22 | $10.66 | +0.84% |
| MA | $493.44 | +0.36% | 440.4B | 29.87 | $16.52 | +0.64% |
| AXP | $300.11 | -0.44% | 206.1B | 19.53 | $15.37 | +1.14% |
| COF | $181.92 | -1.40% | 113.1B | 54.14 | $3.36 | +1.54% |
| BNH | $14.98 | -1.58% | 100.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.61% |
| DFS | $200.05 | -0.21% | 50.3B | 10.69 | $18.72 | +0.35% |
| PYPL | $45.34 | +1.59% | 42.4B | 8.38 | $5.41 | +0.62% |
| IX | $30.03 | -1.38% | 33.3B | 11.42 | $2.63 | +2.69% |
| SUNB | $63.09 | -2.11% | 26.1B | 19.35 | $3.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BFH vs V Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 580B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while V trades at $300.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas V's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to V's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check V's competition here
BFH vs MA Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 440.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while MA trades at $493.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check MA's competition here
BFH vs AXP Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 206.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while AXP trades at $300.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check AXP's competition here
BFH vs COF Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while COF trades at $181.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 54.14. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check COF's competition here
BFH vs BNH Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 100.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while BNH trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check BNH's competition here
BFH vs DFS Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check DFS's competition here
BFH vs PYPL Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while PYPL trades at $45.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check PYPL's competition here
BFH vs IX Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while IX trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check IX's competition here
BFH vs SUNB Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while SUNB trades at $63.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check SUNB's competition here
BFH vs SYF Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while SYF trades at $68.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check SYF's competition here
BFH vs SOFI Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while SOFI trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 40.64. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check SOFI's competition here
BFH vs KKRS Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while KKRS trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check KKRS's competition here
BFH vs ALLY Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while ALLY trades at $39.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check ALLY's competition here
BFH vs COF-PI Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while COF-PI trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check COF-PI's competition here
BFH vs COF-PJ Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while COF-PJ trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check COF-PJ's competition here
BFH vs COF-PK Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while COF-PK trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check COF-PK's competition here
BFH vs COF-PL Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while COF-PL trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check COF-PL's competition here
BFH vs COF-PN Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while COF-PN trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check COF-PN's competition here
BFH vs AGM-PC Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check AGM-PC's competition here
BFH vs SYF-PB Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while SYF-PB trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check SYF-PB's competition here
BFH vs FCFS Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while FCFS trades at $199.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check FCFS's competition here
BFH vs SYF-PA Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while SYF-PA trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check SYF-PA's competition here
BFH vs SLMBP Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while SLMBP trades at $74.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check SLMBP's competition here
BFH vs OMF Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while OMF trades at $54.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check OMF's competition here
BFH vs CGABL Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while CGABL trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check CGABL's competition here
BFH vs OBDC Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while OBDC trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check OBDC's competition here
BFH vs ORCC Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check ORCC's competition here
BFH vs JSM Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while JSM trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check JSM's competition here
BFH vs NNI Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while NNI trades at $129.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check NNI's competition here
BFH vs CACC Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while CACC trades at $416.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check CACC's competition here
BFH vs SLM Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while SLM trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check SLM's competition here
BFH vs ENVA Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while ENVA trades at $136.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check ENVA's competition here
BFH vs ADS Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check ADS's competition here
BFH vs WU Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while WU trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check WU's competition here
BFH vs UPST Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while UPST trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 56.84. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check UPST's competition here
BFH vs SEZL Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while SEZL trades at $63.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check SEZL's competition here
BFH vs QFIN Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while QFIN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check QFIN's competition here
BFH vs AGM-A Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while AGM-A trades at $119.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check AGM-A's competition here
BFH vs LC Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while LC trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check LC's competition here
BFH vs AGM Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while AGM trades at $150.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check AGM's competition here
BFH vs EZPW Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while EZPW trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check EZPW's competition here
BFH vs FINV Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while FINV trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check FINV's competition here
BFH vs JCAP Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while JCAP trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check JCAP's competition here
BFH vs MGI Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check MGI's competition here
BFH vs OCSL Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while OCSL trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check OCSL's competition here
BFH vs RWAYI Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 926.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while RWAYI trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check RWAYI's competition here
BFH vs RWAYL Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 911.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while RWAYL trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check RWAYL's competition here
BFH vs BBDC Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while BBDC trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check BBDC's competition here
BFH vs ATLC Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 809.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while ATLC trades at $53.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check ATLC's competition here
BFH vs NAVI Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 789.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while NAVI trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check NAVI's competition here
BFH vs LU Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 779.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while LU trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check LU's competition here
BFH vs NRDS Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 772.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while NRDS trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check NRDS's competition here
BFH vs NEWTO Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 723.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while NEWTO trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check NEWTO's competition here
BFH vs NEWTG Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 721M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while NEWTG trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check NEWTG's competition here
BFH vs WRLD Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 704.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while WRLD trades at $139.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check WRLD's competition here
BFH vs PRAA Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 693.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while PRAA trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check PRAA's competition here
BFH vs NEWTH Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NEWTH has a market cap of 657.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while NEWTH trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas NEWTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWTH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to NEWTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check NEWTH's competition here
BFH vs GDOT Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 616.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while GDOT trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check GDOT's competition here
BFH vs AGM-PD Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 596M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while AGM-PD trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check AGM-PD's competition here
BFH vs QD Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check QD's competition here
BFH vs MCVT Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check MCVT's competition here
BFH vs KRAQ Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 426.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while KRAQ trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check KRAQ's competition here
BFH vs RWAYZ Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check RWAYZ's competition here
BFH vs HTT Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 385.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while HTT trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check HTT's competition here
BFH vs LX Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 381.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while LX trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check LX's competition here
BFH vs ATLCL Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while ATLCL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check ATLCL's competition here
BFH vs ATLCZ Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 373.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while ATLCZ trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check ATLCZ's competition here
BFH vs ATLCP Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while ATLCP trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check ATLCP's competition here
BFH vs NEWTI Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while NEWTI trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check NEWTI's competition here
BFH vs RM Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while RM trades at $33.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check RM's competition here
BFH vs RWAY Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while RWAY trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check RWAY's competition here
BFH vs AGM-PE Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while AGM-PE trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check AGM-PE's competition here
BFH vs CURR Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 219.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while CURR trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check CURR's competition here
BFH vs AHG Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 210.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while AHG trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check AHG's competition here
BFH vs OPRT Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 205.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while OPRT trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check OPRT's competition here
BFH vs AGM-PF Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 205.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while AGM-PF trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check AGM-PF's competition here
BFH vs MFIN Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while MFIN trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check MFIN's competition here
BFH vs AGM-PG Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 189.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while AGM-PG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check AGM-PG's competition here
BFH vs FOA Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while FOA trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check FOA's competition here
BFH vs PMTS Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while PMTS trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check PMTS's competition here
BFH vs CPSS Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 170.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while CPSS trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check CPSS's competition here
BFH vs ANTA Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while ANTA trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check ANTA's competition here
BFH vs EMIS Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 158.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while EMIS trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMIS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check EMIS's competition here
BFH vs IFIN-WT Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check IFIN-WT's competition here
BFH vs SUNL Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check SUNL's competition here
BFH vs LPRO Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 141.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while LPRO trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check LPRO's competition here
BFH vs YRD Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while YRD trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check YRD's competition here
BFH vs FOA-WT Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check FOA-WT's competition here
BFH vs ELVT Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check ELVT's competition here
BFH vs NICK Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check NICK's competition here
BFH vs OMCC Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while OMCC trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check OMCC's competition here
BFH vs XYF Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while XYF trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check XYF's competition here
BFH vs DXF Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while DXF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DXF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check DXF's competition here
BFH vs KRAQW Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KRAQW has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while KRAQW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas KRAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRAQW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to KRAQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check KRAQW's competition here
BFH vs JT Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check JT's competition here
BFH vs SNTG Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while SNTG trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check SNTG's competition here
BFH vs NISN Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while NISN trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check NISN's competition here
BFH vs CURO Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check CURO's competition here
BFH vs LMFA Comparison April 2026
BFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFH stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFH is priced at $73.02, while LMFA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.66, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BFH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BFH is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFH.Check LMFA's competition here