TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 185.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while SAP trades at $159.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SAP's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while SHOP trades at $123.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 81.83. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SHOP's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while UBER trades at $72.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check UBER's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 142.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while APP trades at $424.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 36.88. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check APP's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 139.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while CRM trades at $170.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CRM's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while NOW trades at $103.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NOW's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while ADP trades at $255.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ADP's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while ADBE trades at $237.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ADBE's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while SNOW trades at $268.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 190.69. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SNOW's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while DDOG trades at $258.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 117.59. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DDOG's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while CDNS trades at $330.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CDNS's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while INTU trades at $291.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check INTU's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while ADSK trades at $218.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ADSK's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while WDAY trades at $144.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check WDAY's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while ROP trades at $363.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ROP's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ANSS's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while FICO trades at $1,257.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FICO's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while STRF trades at $96.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check STRF's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while MSTR trades at $94.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MSTR's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while STRC trades at $85.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check STRC's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while ZM trades at $91.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ZM's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while TEAM trades at $93.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TEAM's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while BSP trades at $32.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is -324000.00. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BSP's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while STRK trades at $61.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check STRK's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while STRD trades at $60.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check STRD's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while SSNC trades at $69.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SSNC's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check AZPN's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while PTC trades at $124.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PTC's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while GRAB trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GRAB's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while TYL trades at $319.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TYL's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while GRABW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GRABW's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while DT trades at $44.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DT's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while U trades at $28.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas U's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check U's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while GWRE trades at $150.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 42.99. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GWRE's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BKI's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while FIG trades at $23.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 52.01. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FIG's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while HUBS trades at $224.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check HUBS's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DAY's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check XM's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CDAY's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while FROG trades at $88.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 99.48. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FROG's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while DOCU trades at $52.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DOCU's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while MANH trades at $163.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MANH's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while YMM trades at $9.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check YMM's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while BSY trades at $32.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BSY's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check OCFT's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while PAYC trades at $147.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PAYC's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NATI's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SMAR's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while CWAN trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CWAN's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while TTAN trades at $76.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 62.81. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TTAN's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while PCOR trades at $45.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PCOR's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while PCTY trades at $126.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PCTY's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while IDCC trades at $260.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check IDCC's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while APPF trades at $179.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check APPF's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while ESTC trades at $61.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ESTC's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while DSGX trades at $74.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DSGX's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while DUOL trades at $133.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 36.27. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DUOL's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while NAVN trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 399.38. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NAVN's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while CVLT trades at $147.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CVLT's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check COUP's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while DAVE trades at $440.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DAVE's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while LYFT trades at $15.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check LYFT's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while NICE trades at $100.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NICE's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while OTEX trades at $23.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check OTEX's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while YOU trades at $56.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check YOU's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while GTLB trades at $32.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GTLB's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while ZETA trades at $21.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ZETA's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while PEGA trades at $32.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PEGA's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while KVYO trades at $17.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check KVYO's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while BILL trades at $44.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BILL's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while OCTV trades at $16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 49.85. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check OCTV's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GRND-WT's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while PTRN trades at $28.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -16.88. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PTRN's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while LIF trades at $53.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check LIF's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while SRAD trades at $14.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 59.92. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SRAD's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while DLO trades at $14.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DLO's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while BOX trades at $30.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BOX's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CVT's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PYCR's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while MNDY trades at $78.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MNDY's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while BULL trades at $7.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BULL's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PWSC's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PSFE-WT's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while RNG trades at $41.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check RNG's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while CCC trades at $6.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CCC's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check AYX's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while NATL trades at $47.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NATL's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ENV's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check INST's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while QTWO trades at $54.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check QTWO's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ZI's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while BLSH trades at $22.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 59.75. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BLSH's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while FSLY trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 71.45. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FSLY's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while STUB trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check STUB's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while WK trades at $57.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check WK's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while FRSH trades at $10.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FRSH's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while AGYS trades at $106.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 59.93. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check AGYS's competition here

WULF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 9B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $18.16, while BRZE trades at $26.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.88, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is 64.63. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BRZE's competition here