Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CDNS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CDNS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | $340.02 | +2.16% | 93.8B | 45.16 | $7.53 | N/A |
| SAP | $183.62 | +1.51% | 214.1B | 24.63 | $7.46 | +1.60% |
| SHOP | $117.15 | -4.29% | 152B | 77.58 | $1.51 | N/A |
| CRM | $184.02 | +1.83% | 150.7B | 13.29 | $13.85 | +0.93% |
| UBER | $70.36 | -0.01% | 143.2B | 15.30 | $4.60 | N/A |
| APP | $395.90 | -0.89% | 135.7B | 35.09 | $11.51 | N/A |
| NOW | $111.23 | +1.05% | 115B | 30.30 | $3.67 | N/A |
| ADP | $266.46 | +0.98% | 106.5B | 24.81 | $10.74 | +2.50% |
| SNOW | $293.28 | -1.62% | 101.6B | 207.93 | $1.41 | N/A |
| ADBE | $250.41 | +1.01% | 99.5B | 10.97 | $22.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SAP SE (NYSE: SAP)
CDNS vs SAP Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 214.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while SAP trades at $183.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SAP's competition here
Shopify Inc. (NASDAQ: SHOP)
CDNS vs SHOP Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while SHOP trades at $117.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 77.58. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SHOP's competition here
Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE: CRM)
CDNS vs CRM Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 150.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while CRM trades at $184.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CRM's competition here
Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: UBER)
CDNS vs UBER Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 143.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while UBER trades at $70.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check UBER's competition here
AppLovin Corporation (NASDAQ: APP)
CDNS vs APP Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while APP trades at $395.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APP's competition here
ServiceNow, Inc. (NYSE: NOW)
CDNS vs NOW Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while NOW trades at $111.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NOW's competition here
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADP)
CDNS vs ADP Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while ADP trades at $266.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADP's competition here
Snowflake Inc. (NYSE: SNOW)
CDNS vs SNOW Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while SNOW trades at $293.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 207.93. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SNOW's competition here
Adobe Inc. (NASDAQ: ADBE)
CDNS vs ADBE Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while ADBE trades at $250.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADBE's competition here
Datadog, Inc. (NASDAQ: DDOG)
CDNS vs DDOG Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while DDOG trades at $267.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 121.80. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DDOG's competition here
Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ: INTU)
CDNS vs INTU Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while INTU trades at $316.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTU's competition here
Autodesk, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADSK)
CDNS vs ADSK Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while ADSK trades at $234.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADSK's competition here
Workday, Inc. (NASDAQ: WDAY)
CDNS vs WDAY Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while WDAY trades at $160.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WDAY's competition here
Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROP)
CDNS vs ROP Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while ROP trades at $391.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ROP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ROP's competition here
Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE: VEEV)
CDNS vs VEEV Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while VEEV trades at $203.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check VEEV's competition here
ANSYS, Inc. (NASDAQ: ANSS)
CDNS vs ANSS Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ANSS's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: MSTR)
CDNS vs MSTR Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while MSTR trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MSTR's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: STRC)
CDNS vs STRC Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while STRC trades at $89.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRC's competition here
Zoom Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZM)
CDNS vs ZM Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while ZM trades at $96.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZM's competition here
MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.00% Series A Perpetual Strife Preferred Stock (NASDAQ: STRF)
CDNS vs STRF Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while STRF trades at $94.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRF's competition here
Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM)
CDNS vs TEAM Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while TEAM trades at $101.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TEAM's competition here
Bending Spoons S.p.A. (NASDAQ: BSP)
CDNS vs BSP Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while BSP trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is -352000.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSP's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: STRD)
CDNS vs STRD Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while STRD trades at $57.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRD's competition here
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SSNC)
CDNS vs SSNC Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while SSNC trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SSNC's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: STRK)
CDNS vs STRK Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while STRK trades at $59.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRK's competition here
Aspen Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: AZPN)
CDNS vs AZPN Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AZPN's competition here
PTC Inc. (NASDAQ: PTC)
CDNS vs PTC Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while PTC trades at $137.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTC's competition here
Grab Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: GRAB)
CDNS vs GRAB Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while GRAB trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRAB's competition here
Unity Software Inc. (NYSE: U)
CDNS vs U Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while U trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check U's competition here
Grab Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: GRABW)
CDNS vs GRABW Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while GRABW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRABW's competition here
Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ: AUROW)
CDNS vs AUROW Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while AUROW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AUROW's competition here
Tyler Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: TYL)
CDNS vs TYL Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while TYL trades at $309.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TYL's competition here
Dynatrace, Inc. (NYSE: DT)
CDNS vs DT Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while DT trades at $44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DT's competition here
Guidewire Software, Inc. (NYSE: GWRE)
CDNS vs GWRE Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while GWRE trades at $151.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 43.56. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GWRE's competition here
HubSpot, Inc. (NYSE: HUBS)
CDNS vs HUBS Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while HUBS trades at $237.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check HUBS's competition here
Black Knight, Inc. (NYSE: BKI)
CDNS vs BKI Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BKI's competition here
Figma, Inc. (NYSE: FIG)
CDNS vs FIG Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while FIG trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 52.88. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FIG's competition here
Manhattan Associates, Inc. (NASDAQ: MANH)
CDNS vs MANH Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while MANH trades at $191.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MANH's competition here
Dayforce Inc (NYSE: DAY)
CDNS vs DAY Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAY's competition here
Gen Digital Inc. Contingent Value Rights (NASDAQ: GENVR)
CDNS vs GENVR Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while GENVR trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GENVR's competition here
Qualtrics International Inc. (NASDAQ: XM)
CDNS vs XM Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check XM's competition here
Dayforce Inc. (NYSE: CDAY)
CDNS vs CDAY Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CDAY's competition here
DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: DOCU)
CDNS vs DOCU Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while DOCU trades at $54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DOCU's competition here
Bentley Systems, Incorporated (NASDAQ: BSY)
CDNS vs BSY Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while BSY trades at $35.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSY's competition here
Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (NYSE: YMM)
CDNS vs YMM Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while YMM trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YMM's competition here
JFrog Ltd. (NASDAQ: FROG)
CDNS vs FROG Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while FROG trades at $79.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 89.65. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FROG's competition here
Paycom Software, Inc. (NYSE: PAYC)
CDNS vs PAYC Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while PAYC trades at $163.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PAYC's competition here
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF)
CDNS vs WULF Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while WULF trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -12.52. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WULF's competition here
OneConnect Financial Technology Co., Ltd. (NYSE: OCFT)
CDNS vs OCFT Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCFT's competition here
Procore Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: PCOR)
CDNS vs PCOR Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while PCOR trades at $54.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCOR's competition here
National Instruments Corporation (NASDAQ: NATI)
CDNS vs NATI Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATI's competition here
ServiceTitan, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTAN)
CDNS vs TTAN Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while TTAN trades at $83.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 68.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTAN's competition here
Smartsheet Inc. (NYSE: SMAR)
CDNS vs SMAR Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SMAR's competition here
InterDigital, Inc. (NASDAQ: IDCC)
CDNS vs IDCC Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while IDCC trades at $304.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check IDCC's competition here
Paylocity Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: PCTY)
CDNS vs PCTY Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while PCTY trades at $137.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCTY's competition here
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CWAN)
CDNS vs CWAN Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while CWAN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CWAN's competition here
Elastic N.V. (NYSE: ESTC)
CDNS vs ESTC Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while ESTC trades at $65.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ESTC's competition here
The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (NASDAQ: DSGX)
CDNS vs DSGX Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while DSGX trades at $75.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DSGX's competition here
Navan, Inc. (NASDAQ: NAVN)
CDNS vs NAVN Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while NAVN trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 409.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NAVN's competition here
AppFolio Inc. (NASDAQ: APPF)
CDNS vs APPF Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while APPF trades at $180.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APPF's competition here
Duolingo, Inc. (NASDAQ: DUOL)
CDNS vs DUOL Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while DUOL trades at $134.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 36.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DUOL's competition here
Open Text Corporation (NASDAQ: OTEX)
CDNS vs OTEX Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while OTEX trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OTEX's competition here
Coupa Software Incorporated (NASDAQ: COUP)
CDNS vs COUP Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COUP's competition here
Lyft, Inc. (NASDAQ: LYFT)
CDNS vs LYFT Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while LYFT trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LYFT's competition here
GitLab Inc. (NASDAQ: GTLB)
CDNS vs GTLB Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while GTLB trades at $34.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GTLB's competition here
NICE Ltd. (NASDAQ: NICE)
CDNS vs NICE Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while NICE trades at $98.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NICE's competition here
Clear Secure, Inc. (NYSE: YOU)
CDNS vs YOU Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while YOU trades at $55.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 44.52. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YOU's competition here
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (NYSE: ZETA)
CDNS vs ZETA Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while ZETA trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZETA's competition here
Klaviyo, Inc. (NYSE: KVYO)
CDNS vs KVYO Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while KVYO trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check KVYO's competition here
Pegasystems Inc. (NASDAQ: PEGA)
CDNS vs PEGA Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while PEGA trades at $30.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PEGA's competition here
Dave Inc. (NASDAQ: DAVE)
CDNS vs DAVE Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while DAVE trades at $372.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAVE's competition here
Octave Intelligence plc (NASDAQ: OCTV)
CDNS vs OCTV Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while OCTV trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 55.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCTV's competition here
Commvault Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVLT)
CDNS vs CVLT Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while CVLT trades at $117.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVLT's competition here
RingCentral, Inc. (NYSE: RNG)
CDNS vs RNG Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while RNG trades at $55.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RNG's competition here
Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BILL)
CDNS vs BILL Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while BILL trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BILL's competition here
monday.com Ltd. (NASDAQ: MNDY)
CDNS vs MNDY Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while MNDY trades at $87.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MNDY's competition here
Grindr Inc. WT (NYSE: GRND-WT)
CDNS vs GRND-WT Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND-WT's competition here
Life360, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIF)
CDNS vs LIF Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while LIF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LIF's competition here
Sportradar Group AG (NASDAQ: SRAD)
CDNS vs SRAD Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while SRAD trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SRAD's competition here
Cvent Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CVT)
CDNS vs CVT Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVT's competition here
Paycor HCM, Inc. (NASDAQ: PYCR)
CDNS vs PYCR Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PYCR's competition here
PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: PWSC)
CDNS vs PWSC Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PWSC's competition here
Q2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: QTWO)
CDNS vs QTWO Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while QTWO trades at $60.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check QTWO's competition here
Webull Corporation Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BULL)
CDNS vs BULL Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while BULL trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULL's competition here
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CCC)
CDNS vs CCC Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while CCC trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CCC's competition here
Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (NASDAQ: PTRN)
CDNS vs PTRN Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while PTRN trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTRN's competition here
Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY)
CDNS vs FSLY Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while FSLY trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 78.14. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FSLY's competition here
Alteryx, Inc. (NYSE: AYX)
CDNS vs AYX Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AYX's competition here
Envestnet, Inc. (NYSE: ENV)
CDNS vs ENV Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ENV's competition here
NCR Atleos Corporation (NYSE: NATL)
CDNS vs NATL Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while NATL trades at $47.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATL's competition here
Paysafe Equity Warrants Exp 30th March 2026 (NYSE: PSFE-WT)
CDNS vs PSFE-WT Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
Instructure Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: INST)
CDNS vs INST Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INST's competition here
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: ZI)
CDNS vs ZI Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZI's competition here
Workiva Inc. (NYSE: WK)
CDNS vs WK Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while WK trades at $59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WK's competition here
Bullish (NYSE: BLSH)
CDNS vs BLSH Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while BLSH trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 58.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BLSH's competition here
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC)
CDNS vs KC Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while KC trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -38.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check KC's competition here
Freshworks Inc. (NASDAQ: FRSH)
CDNS vs FRSH Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while FRSH trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FRSH's competition here
Grindr Inc. (NYSE: GRND)
CDNS vs GRND Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while GRND trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRND's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND's competition here
Wix.com Ltd. (NASDAQ: WIX)
CDNS vs WIX Comparison August 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 93.8B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $340.02 on the NASDAQ, while WIX trades at $55.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.16, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WIX's competition here