Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 273.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while SAP trades at $234.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SAP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 189.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while SHOP trades at $147.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 93.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SHOP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 179.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while CRM trades at $217.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CRM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 142.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while UBER trades at $69.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check UBER's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 123.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while APP trades at $409.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 122.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while ADP trades at $309.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while NOW trades at $102.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NOW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while SNOW trades at $291.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 206.35. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SNOW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 94.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while ADBE trades at $243.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADBE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while INTU trades at $341.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTU's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while DDOG trades at $184.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 77.05. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DDOG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while ADSK trades at $264.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADSK's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while VEEV trades at $301.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 36.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check VEEV's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while ROP trades at $479.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ROP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while WDAY trades at $196.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WDAY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while MSTR trades at $111.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MSTR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while TEAM trades at $149.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TEAM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TEAM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while STRC trades at $99.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ANSS's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while STRF trades at $100.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRF's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while ZM trades at $99.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while NBIS trades at $115.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -58.23. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NBIS's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while BSP trades at $41.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is 95.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while U trades at $52.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas U's P/E ratio is -99.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to U's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check U's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while PTC trades at $196.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while STRK trades at $66.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRK's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while SSNC trades at $79.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SSNC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while TYL trades at $424.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 36.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TYL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AZPN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while FICO trades at $720.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FICO's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while DOCU trades at $80.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DOCU's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while MANH trades at $257.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 50.22. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MANH's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while FROG trades at $113.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 115.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FROG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while GWRE trades at $158.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 45.35. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GWRE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while BSY trades at $44.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while GRAB trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRAB's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while DT trades at $44.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while CHYM trades at $33.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -479.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHYM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CHYM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BKI's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while PCOR trades at $77.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 52.46. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCOR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while GRABW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRABW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while PAYC trades at $248.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PAYC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check XM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CDAY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while HUBS trades at $217.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check HUBS's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while FIG trades at $19.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 54.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FIG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to FIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FIG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while PCTY trades at $178.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCTY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while ESTC trades at $88.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ESTC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while ZETA trades at $36.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 43.12. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZETA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZETA's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while YMM trades at $8.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YMM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCFT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while DSGX trades at $94.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DSGX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while TTAN trades at $82.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 68.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTAN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATI's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while APPF trades at $224.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APPF's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while GTLB trades at $47.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 46.79. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GTLB's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SMAR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while IDCC trades at $288.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check IDCC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while CWAN trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CWAN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while AUR trades at $4.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AUR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while AUROW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AUROW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while DUOL trades at $165.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DUOL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while LYFT trades at $16.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LYFT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while NAVN trades at $25.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 391.08. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NAVN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while KVYO trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KVYO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check KVYO's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while CVLT trades at $152.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 34.80. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVLT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COUP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while OTEX trades at $24.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OTEX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while DLB trades at $63.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DLB's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while OCTV trades at $21.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCTV's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while NIQ trades at $19.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NIQ's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while YOU trades at $57.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YOU's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while RNG trades at $75.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNG's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RNG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while NICE trades at $96.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NICE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while PEGA trades at $32.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PEGA's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while BRZE trades at $46.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is 113.76. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BRZE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while BILL trades at $54.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BILL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while QTWO trades at $73.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 32.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check QTWO's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while CCC trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CCC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND-WT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PYCR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PWSC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while SRAD trades at $12.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 213.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SRAD's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while LIF trades at $43.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LIF's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while NATL trades at $48.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while INTA trades at $46.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is 36.35. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTA's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AYX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ENV's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while WK trades at $68.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WK's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WK's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PSFE-WT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INST's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while AGYS trades at $121.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 68.51. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AGYS's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZI's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while BLSH trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 59.86. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BLSH's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while VIA trades at $43.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is -84.37. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check VIA's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while FRSH trades at $12.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FRSH's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 88.6B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $323.01 on the NASDAQ, while MNDY trades at $78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.90, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MNDY's competition here