Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | $371.50 | -1.41% | 102.5B | 49.34 | $7.53 | N/A |
| SAP | $155.91 | +0.71% | 181.7B | 20.90 | $7.46 | +1.88% |
| SHOP | $123.55 | -1.69% | 160.3B | 81.82 | $1.51 | N/A |
| APP | $452.73 | +0.84% | 152.1B | 39.33 | $11.51 | N/A |
| UBER | $72.67 | +0.82% | 147.9B | 15.80 | $4.60 | N/A |
| CRM | $167.00 | -0.33% | 136.8B | 12.06 | $13.85 | +1.27% |
| NOW | $104.73 | -0.11% | 108B | 28.53 | $3.67 | N/A |
| SNOW | $271.87 | -1.47% | 94.2B | 192.84 | $1.41 | N/A |
| DDOG | $264.46 | -2.32% | 94.1B | 120.21 | $2.20 | N/A |
| ADBE | $224.56 | +1.71% | 89.3B | 9.84 | $22.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CDNS vs SAP Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 181.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while SAP trades at $155.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SAP's competition here
CDNS vs SHOP Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while SHOP trades at $123.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 81.82. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SHOP's competition here
CDNS vs APP Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 152.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while APP trades at $452.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APP's competition here
CDNS vs UBER Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while UBER trades at $72.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check UBER's competition here
CDNS vs CRM Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while CRM trades at $167.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CRM's competition here
CDNS vs NOW Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while NOW trades at $104.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NOW's competition here
CDNS vs SNOW Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while SNOW trades at $271.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 192.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SNOW's competition here
CDNS vs DDOG Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while DDOG trades at $264.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DDOG's competition here
CDNS vs ADBE Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while ADBE trades at $224.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADBE's competition here
CDNS vs INTU Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while INTU trades at $279.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTU's competition here
CDNS vs ADSK Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while ADSK trades at $208.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADSK's competition here
CDNS vs WDAY Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while WDAY trades at $141.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WDAY's competition here
CDNS vs ROP Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while ROP trades at $348.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ROP's competition here
CDNS vs ANSS Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ANSS's competition here
CDNS vs MSTR Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while MSTR trades at $97.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MSTR's competition here
CDNS vs STRC Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while STRC trades at $87.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRC's competition here
CDNS vs STRF Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while STRF trades at $95.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRF's competition here
CDNS vs FICO Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while FICO trades at $1,205.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 33.36. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FICO's competition here
CDNS vs ZM Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while ZM trades at $92.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZM's competition here
CDNS vs TEAM Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while TEAM trades at $91.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TEAM's competition here
CDNS vs BSP Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while BSP trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is -333500.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSP's competition here
CDNS vs STRK Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while STRK trades at $61.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRK's competition here
CDNS vs STRD Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while STRD trades at $60.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRD's competition here
CDNS vs AZPN Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AZPN's competition here
CDNS vs SSNC Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while SSNC trades at $68.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SSNC's competition here
CDNS vs GRAB Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while GRAB trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 43.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRAB's competition here
CDNS vs PTC Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while PTC trades at $123.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTC's competition here
CDNS vs U Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while U trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.22. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check U's competition here
CDNS vs DT Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while DT trades at $45.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DT's competition here
CDNS vs TYL Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while TYL trades at $303.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TYL's competition here
CDNS vs GRABW Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while GRABW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRABW's competition here
CDNS vs BKI Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BKI's competition here
CDNS vs GWRE Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while GWRE trades at $140.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GWRE's competition here
CDNS vs FIG Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while FIG trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 51.10. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FIG's competition here
CDNS vs DAY Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAY's competition here
CDNS vs FROG Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while FROG trades at $91.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 102.56. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FROG's competition here
CDNS vs HUBS Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while HUBS trades at $215.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check HUBS's competition here
CDNS vs XM Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check XM's competition here
CDNS vs CDAY Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CDAY's competition here
CDNS vs DOCU Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while DOCU trades at $51.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DOCU's competition here
CDNS vs YMM Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while YMM trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YMM's competition here
CDNS vs WULF Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while WULF trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WULF's competition here
CDNS vs MANH Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while MANH trades at $156.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MANH's competition here
CDNS vs BSY Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while BSY trades at $31.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSY's competition here
CDNS vs OCFT Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCFT's competition here
CDNS vs NATI Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATI's competition here
CDNS vs SMAR Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SMAR's competition here
CDNS vs PAYC Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while PAYC trades at $144.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PAYC's competition here
CDNS vs COMP Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while COMP trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 632.60. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COMP's competition here
CDNS vs TTAN Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while TTAN trades at $78.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTAN's competition here
CDNS vs CWAN Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while CWAN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CWAN's competition here
CDNS vs IDCC Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while IDCC trades at $270.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check IDCC's competition here
CDNS vs PCTY Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while PCTY trades at $123.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCTY's competition here
CDNS vs PCOR Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while PCOR trades at $43.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCOR's competition here
CDNS vs ESTC Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while ESTC trades at $62.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ESTC's competition here
CDNS vs APPF Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while APPF trades at $175.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APPF's competition here
CDNS vs LYFT Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while LYFT trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LYFT's competition here
CDNS vs COUP Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COUP's competition here
CDNS vs DUOL Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while DUOL trades at $131.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DUOL's competition here
CDNS vs DSGX Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while DSGX trades at $71.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DSGX's competition here
CDNS vs CVLT Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while CVLT trades at $146.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVLT's competition here
CDNS vs NAVN Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while NAVN trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 389.08. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NAVN's competition here
CDNS vs NICE Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while NICE trades at $101.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NICE's competition here
CDNS vs DAVE Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while DAVE trades at $438.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAVE's competition here
CDNS vs ZETA Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while ZETA trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZETA's competition here
CDNS vs GTLB Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while GTLB trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GTLB's competition here
CDNS vs OTEX Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while OTEX trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OTEX's competition here
CDNS vs YOU Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while YOU trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YOU's competition here
CDNS vs PEGA Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while PEGA trades at $31.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PEGA's competition here
CDNS vs GBTG Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while GBTG trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 134.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GBTG's competition here
CDNS vs OCTV Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while OCTV trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 51.55. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCTV's competition here
CDNS vs PTRN Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while PTRN trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -17.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTRN's competition here
CDNS vs LIF Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while LIF trades at $55.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LIF's competition here
CDNS vs SRAD Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while SRAD trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 62.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SRAD's competition here
CDNS vs BILL Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while BILL trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BILL's competition here
CDNS vs GRND-WT Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND-WT's competition here
CDNS vs DLO Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while DLO trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DLO's competition here
CDNS vs BOX Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while BOX trades at $30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BOX's competition here
CDNS vs CVT Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVT's competition here
CDNS vs MNDY Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while MNDY trades at $80.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MNDY's competition here
CDNS vs PYCR Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PYCR's competition here
CDNS vs BULL Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while BULL trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULL's competition here
CDNS vs BLSH Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while BLSH trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 66.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BLSH's competition here
CDNS vs PWSC Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PWSC's competition here
CDNS vs PSFE-WT Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
CDNS vs RNG Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while RNG trades at $40.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RNG's competition here
CDNS vs AYX Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AYX's competition here
CDNS vs ENV Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ENV's competition here
CDNS vs INST Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INST's competition here
CDNS vs ZI Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZI's competition here
CDNS vs NATL Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while NATL trades at $46.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATL's competition here
CDNS vs STUB Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while STUB trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -12.65. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STUB's competition here
CDNS vs QTWO Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while QTWO trades at $52.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check QTWO's competition here
CDNS vs FSLY Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while FSLY trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 68.97. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FSLY's competition here
CDNS vs ADEA Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while ADEA trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADEA's competition here
CDNS vs WK Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while WK trades at $54.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WK's competition here
CDNS vs AGYS Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while AGYS trades at $106.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 59.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AGYS's competition here
CDNS vs BRZE Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while BRZE trades at $26.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is 63.93. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BRZE's competition here
CDNS vs BTDR Comparison July 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $371.50, while BTDR trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.34, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BTDR's competition here