Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, GOOGM has a market cap of 284B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while GOOGM trades at $48.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas GOOGM's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOOGM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GOOGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GOOGM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, GOOGN has a market cap of 282.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while GOOGN trades at $48.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas GOOGN's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOOGN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GOOGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GOOGN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 243B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while SAP trades at $208.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SAP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 196.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while SHOP trades at $151.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 95.82. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SHOP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 192.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while CRM trades at $234.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CRM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while NOW trades at $134.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NOW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 138.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while UBER trades at $68.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check UBER's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while SNOW trades at $341.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 241.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SNOW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while ADP trades at $257.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while DDOG trades at $277.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 115.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DDOG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while ADBE trades at $237.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADBE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while APP trades at $268.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APP's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while INTU trades at $281.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTU's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while NBIS trades at $242.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -122.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NBIS's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while MSTR trades at $160.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MSTR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while TEAM trades at $187.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TEAM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while WDAY trades at $186.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WDAY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while ADSK trades at $212.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADSK's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while VEEV trades at $273.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is similarly volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check VEEV's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while ROP trades at $354.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ROP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while STRC trades at $99.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ANSS's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while STRF trades at $103.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRF's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while ZM trades at $92.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while STRD trades at $73.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRD's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while STRK trades at $76.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRK's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while BSP trades at $32.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is 74.49. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while U trades at $43.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas U's P/E ratio is -82.26. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to U's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check U's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while SSNC trades at $78.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SSNC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while DT trades at $59.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AZPN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while PTC trades at $144.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while FICO trades at $661.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FICO's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while TYL trades at $322.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TYL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while DOCU trades at $69.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DOCU's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while GRABW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRABW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while GWRE trades at $152.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GWRE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while GRAB trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRAB's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while MANH trades at $204.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 39.87. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MANH's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BKI's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while FROG trades at $95.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 97.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FROG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while AUR trades at $5.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -11.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AUR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check XM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while HUBS trades at $214.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check HUBS's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CDAY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while FIG trades at $21.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 59.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to FIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FIG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while CHYM trades at $27.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -389.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CHYM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while PAYC trades at $220.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PAYC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while ESTC trades at $93.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ESTC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while BSY trades at $32.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while IDCC trades at $335.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check IDCC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCFT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while YMM trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YMM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while GTLB trades at $49.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 48.97. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GTLB's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while ZETA trades at $32.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 38.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZETA's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATI's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SMAR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while PCTY trades at $144.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCTY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while PCOR trades at $50.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCOR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while CWAN trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CWAN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while APPF trades at $202.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APPF's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while DSGX trades at $80.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DSGX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while RNG trades at $78.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RNG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while DUOL trades at $144.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DUOL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while NICE trades at $113.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NICE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while TTAN trades at $67.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 55.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTAN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while CVLT trades at $150.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVLT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COUP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, MAAS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while MAAS trades at $13.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas MAAS's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAAS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MAAS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MAAS's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while LYFT trades at $15.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LYFT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while DLB trades at $58.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DLB's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while PEGA trades at $33.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PEGA's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while OTEX trades at $22.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OTEX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while BLSH trades at $34.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 91.05. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BLSH's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while NAVN trades at $21.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 329.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NAVN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while OCTV trades at $19.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCTV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCTV's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while NIQ trades at $16.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is 46.19. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NIQ's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while KVYO trades at $15.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KVYO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check KVYO's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while DAVE trades at $346.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAVE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND-WT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while BILL trades at $43.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BILL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while YOU trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YOU's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PYCR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while FSLY trades at $25.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 54.91. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FSLY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while BULL trades at $7.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while WK trades at $71.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WK's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WK's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while CCC trades at $6.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CCC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while WIX trades at $72.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WIX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PWSC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while BULLW trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is 49.91. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULLW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while FRSH trades at $12.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FRSH's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AYX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while QTWO trades at $56.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check QTWO's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ENV's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while LIF trades at $43.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LIF's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while SRAD trades at $11.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 196.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SRAD's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 96.8B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $351.35 on the NASDAQ, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 46.66, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PSFE-WT's competition here