Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | $408.00 | -2.01% | 112.5B | 95.10 | $4.29 | N/A |
| SAP | $180.67 | -5.32% | 210.5B | 24.85 | $7.27 | +1.63% |
| APP | $570.83 | -5.75% | 191.8B | 49.51 | $11.53 | N/A |
| CRM | $190.61 | -5.09% | 156.2B | 22.07 | $8.64 | +0.88% |
| SHOP | $112.94 | -3.48% | 146.6B | 110.73 | $1.02 | N/A |
| UBER | $71.69 | +0.10% | 145.9B | 17.79 | $4.03 | N/A |
| NOW | $117.90 | -7.64% | 121.6B | 70.19 | $1.68 | N/A |
| ADBE | $256.24 | -2.24% | 103.6B | 14.92 | $17.17 | N/A |
| DDOG | $250.33 | -6.99% | 89.1B | 641.87 | $0.39 | N/A |
| INTU | $311.44 | -3.32% | 85.2B | 19.01 | $16.38 | +1.49% |
Stock Comparison
CDNS vs SAP Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 210.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while SAP trades at $180.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SAP's competition here
CDNS vs APP Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 191.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while APP trades at $570.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 49.51. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APP's competition here
CDNS vs CRM Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while CRM trades at $190.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CRM's competition here
CDNS vs SHOP Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while SHOP trades at $112.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 110.73. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SHOP's competition here
CDNS vs UBER Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while UBER trades at $71.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check UBER's competition here
CDNS vs NOW Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while NOW trades at $117.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 70.19. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NOW's competition here
CDNS vs ADBE Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while ADBE trades at $256.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADBE's competition here
CDNS vs DDOG Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while DDOG trades at $250.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 641.87. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DDOG's competition here
CDNS vs INTU Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while INTU trades at $311.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTU's competition here
CDNS vs SNOW Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while SNOW trades at $241.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -68.34. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SNOW's competition here
CDNS vs ADSK Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while ADSK trades at $229.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADSK's competition here
CDNS vs WDAY Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while WDAY trades at $146.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 45.76. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WDAY's competition here
CDNS vs MSTR Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while MSTR trades at $126.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MSTR's competition here
CDNS vs ROP Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while ROP trades at $331.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ROP's competition here
CDNS vs ANSS Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ANSS's competition here
CDNS vs ZM Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while ZM trades at $106.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZM's competition here
CDNS vs STRF Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while STRF trades at $95.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRF's competition here
CDNS vs STRC Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while STRC trades at $94.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRC's competition here
CDNS vs FICO Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while FICO trades at $1,174.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FICO's competition here
CDNS vs TEAM Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while TEAM trades at $101.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -123.82. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TEAM's competition here
CDNS vs STRK Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while STRK trades at $68.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRK's competition here
CDNS vs AZPN Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AZPN's competition here
CDNS vs SSNC Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while SSNC trades at $67.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SSNC's competition here
CDNS vs PTC Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while PTC trades at $139.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTC's competition here
CDNS vs GRAB Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while GRAB trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 85.25. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRAB's competition here
CDNS vs GWRE Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while GWRE trades at $155.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 70.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GWRE's competition here
CDNS vs TYL Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while TYL trades at $303.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TYL's competition here
CDNS vs U Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while U trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas U's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check U's competition here
CDNS vs DT Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while DT trades at $43.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 80.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DT's competition here
CDNS vs BKI Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BKI's competition here
CDNS vs HUBS Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while HUBS trades at $222.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 117.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check HUBS's competition here
CDNS vs DAY Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAY's competition here
CDNS vs FIG Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while FIG trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FIG's competition here
CDNS vs XM Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check XM's competition here
CDNS vs CDAY Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CDAY's competition here
CDNS vs DOCU Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while DOCU trades at $52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 35.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DOCU's competition here
CDNS vs FROG Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while FROG trades at $83.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -158.23. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FROG's competition here
CDNS vs BSY Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while BSY trades at $32.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 37.49. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSY's competition here
CDNS vs YMM Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while YMM trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YMM's competition here
CDNS vs MANH Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while MANH trades at $151.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 42.23. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MANH's competition here
CDNS vs OCFT Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCFT's competition here
CDNS vs NATI Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATI's competition here
CDNS vs SMAR Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SMAR's competition here
CDNS vs PCOR Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while PCOR trades at $50.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -99.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCOR's competition here
CDNS vs PAYC Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while PAYC trades at $137.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PAYC's competition here
CDNS vs CWAN Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while CWAN trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CWAN's competition here
CDNS vs TTAN Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while TTAN trades at $72.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -41.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTAN's competition here
CDNS vs ESTC Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while ESTC trades at $64.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ESTC's competition here
CDNS vs IDCC Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while IDCC trades at $256.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check IDCC's competition here
CDNS vs DSGX Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while DSGX trades at $74.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 39.63. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DSGX's competition here
CDNS vs COUP Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COUP's competition here
CDNS vs PCTY Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while PCTY trades at $112.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCTY's competition here
CDNS vs APPF Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while APPF trades at $166.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.49. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APPF's competition here
CDNS vs PEGA Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while PEGA trades at $35.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PEGA's competition here
CDNS vs ZETA Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while ZETA trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -232.70. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZETA's competition here
CDNS vs OTEX Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while OTEX trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OTEX's competition here
CDNS vs YOU Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while YOU trades at $56.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YOU's competition here
CDNS vs NICE Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while NICE trades at $94.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NICE's competition here
CDNS vs LYFT Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while LYFT trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LYFT's competition here
CDNS vs OCTV Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while OCTV trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCTV's competition here
CDNS vs NAVN Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while NAVN trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NAVN's competition here
CDNS vs GTLB Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while GTLB trades at $30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -206.20. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GTLB's competition here
CDNS vs DUOL Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while DUOL trades at $107.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DUOL's competition here
CDNS vs CVLT Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while CVLT trades at $120.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 76.49. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVLT's competition here
CDNS vs GBTG Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while GBTG trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GBTG's competition here
CDNS vs OCTVV Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCTVV's competition here
CDNS vs COMP Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while COMP trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 380.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COMP's competition here
CDNS vs BTDR Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while BTDR trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BTDR's competition here
CDNS vs MNDY Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while MNDY trades at $85.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 37.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MNDY's competition here
CDNS vs GRND-WT Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND-WT's competition here
CDNS vs CVT Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVT's competition here
CDNS vs PYCR Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PYCR's competition here
CDNS vs SRAD Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while SRAD trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 51.77. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SRAD's competition here
CDNS vs RNG Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while RNG trades at $43.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RNG's competition here
CDNS vs PWSC Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PWSC's competition here
CDNS vs KC Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while KC trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -24.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check KC's competition here
CDNS vs LIF Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while LIF trades at $46.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LIF's competition here
CDNS vs BOX Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while BOX trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BOX's competition here
CDNS vs RUM Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while RUM trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RUM's competition here
CDNS vs ADEA Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while ADEA trades at $32.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADEA's competition here
CDNS vs AYX Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AYX's competition here
CDNS vs BILL Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while BILL trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -153.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BILL's competition here
CDNS vs SOUN Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while SOUN trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SOUN's competition here
CDNS vs ENV Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ENV's competition here
CDNS vs INST Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INST's competition here
CDNS vs ZI Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZI's competition here
CDNS vs DAVE Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while DAVE trades at $249.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAVE's competition here
CDNS vs STUB Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while STUB trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STUB's competition here
CDNS vs FSLY Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while FSLY trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -30.19. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FSLY's competition here
CDNS vs NATL Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while NATL trades at $44.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATL's competition here
CDNS vs BULL Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while BULL trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULL's competition here
CDNS vs PTRN Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while PTRN trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -24.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTRN's competition here
CDNS vs BRUN Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while BRUN trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -115.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BRUN's competition here
CDNS vs QTWO Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while QTWO trades at $45.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check QTWO's competition here
CDNS vs DBD Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while DBD trades at $81.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DBD's competition here
CDNS vs WK Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while WK trades at $49.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 207.55. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WK's competition here
CDNS vs BRZE Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while BRZE trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -21.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BRZE's competition here
CDNS vs FRSH Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while FRSH trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FRSH's competition here
CDNS vs DCT Comparison June 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 112.5B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $408.00, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.10, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DCT's competition here