Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | $350.79 | -2.02% | 97.8B | 82.45 | $4.30 | N/A |
| SAP | $164.22 | -1.82% | 187.4B | 21.91 | $7.34 | +2.14% |
| CRM | $168.22 | -1.80% | 157.5B | 21.26 | $7.80 | +1.01% |
| APP | $485.05 | -1.15% | 152.4B | 39.51 | $11.48 | N/A |
| UBER | $75.09 | -1.66% | 152.1B | 18.54 | $4.03 | N/A |
| SHOP | $95.88 | -3.97% | 123.8B | 93.53 | $1.02 | N/A |
| INTU | $380.59 | -1.85% | 103.4B | 24.17 | $15.38 | +1.23% |
| NOW | $91.01 | +2.26% | 89.8B | 51.84 | $1.68 | N/A |
| DDOG | $202.10 | +1.08% | 73.1B | 540.29 | $0.38 | N/A |
| MSTR | $191.87 | +4.04% | 52.9B | -4.81 | -$36.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CDNS vs SAP Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while SAP trades at $164.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SAP's competition here
CDNS vs CRM Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 157.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while CRM trades at $168.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CRM's competition here
CDNS vs APP Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 152.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while APP trades at $485.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 39.51. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APP's competition here
CDNS vs UBER Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 152.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while UBER trades at $75.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check UBER's competition here
CDNS vs SHOP Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 123.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while SHOP trades at $95.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 93.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SHOP's competition here
CDNS vs INTU Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 103.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while INTU trades at $380.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTU's competition here
CDNS vs NOW Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while NOW trades at $91.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 51.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NOW's competition here
CDNS vs DDOG Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while DDOG trades at $202.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 540.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DDOG's competition here
CDNS vs MSTR Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while MSTR trades at $191.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MSTR's competition here
CDNS vs SNOW Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while SNOW trades at $151.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -38.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SNOW's competition here
CDNS vs ADSK Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while ADSK trades at $233.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADSK's competition here
CDNS vs ANSS Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ANSS's competition here
CDNS vs WDAY Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while WDAY trades at $119.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 44.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WDAY's competition here
CDNS vs GTOP Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while GTOP trades at $47.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GTOP's competition here
CDNS vs ZM Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while ZM trades at $98.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZM's competition here
CDNS vs STRF Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while STRF trades at $100.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRF's competition here
CDNS vs STRC Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while STRC trades at $100.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRC's competition here
CDNS vs FICO Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while FICO trades at $1,090.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FICO's competition here
CDNS vs STRK Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while STRK trades at $76.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRK's competition here
CDNS vs TEAM Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while TEAM trades at $80.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -98.31. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TEAM's competition here
CDNS vs AZPN Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AZPN's competition here
CDNS vs PTC Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while PTC trades at $139.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTC's competition here
CDNS vs SSNC Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while SSNC trades at $65.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SSNC's competition here
CDNS vs GRAB Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while GRAB trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 90.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRAB's competition here
CDNS vs TYL Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while TYL trades at $299.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TYL's competition here
CDNS vs BKI Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BKI's competition here
CDNS vs U Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while U trades at $27.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas U's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check U's competition here
CDNS vs DAY Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAY's competition here
CDNS vs XM Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check XM's competition here
CDNS vs CDAY Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CDAY's competition here
CDNS vs GWRE Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while GWRE trades at $124.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 56.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GWRE's competition here
CDNS vs DT Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while DT trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 57.87. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DT's competition here
CDNS vs YMM Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while YMM trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YMM's competition here
CDNS vs TTD Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while TTD trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTD's competition here
CDNS vs FIG Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while FIG trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FIG's competition here
CDNS vs HUBS Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while HUBS trades at $183.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 94.74. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check HUBS's competition here
CDNS vs BSY Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while BSY trades at $32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSY's competition here
CDNS vs DOCU Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while DOCU trades at $45.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DOCU's competition here
CDNS vs OCFT Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCFT's competition here
CDNS vs NATI Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATI's competition here
CDNS vs SMAR Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SMAR's competition here
CDNS vs FROG Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while FROG trades at $64.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -121.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FROG's competition here
CDNS vs MANH Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while MANH trades at $129.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MANH's competition here
CDNS vs PAYC Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while PAYC trades at $135.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PAYC's competition here
CDNS vs CWAN Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while CWAN trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.19. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CWAN's competition here
CDNS vs IDCC Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while IDCC trades at $268.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check IDCC's competition here
CDNS vs PCOR Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while PCOR trades at $46.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -90.20. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCOR's competition here
CDNS vs COUP Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COUP's competition here
CDNS vs OTEX Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while OTEX trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OTEX's competition here
CDNS vs DSGX Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while DSGX trades at $67.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DSGX's competition here
CDNS vs YOU Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while YOU trades at $56.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YOU's competition here
CDNS vs PCTY Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while PCTY trades at $103.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCTY's competition here
CDNS vs PEGA Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while PEGA trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PEGA's competition here
CDNS vs APPF Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while APPF trades at $149.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APPF's competition here
CDNS vs KC Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while KC trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -35.14. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check KC's competition here
CDNS vs TTAN Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while TTAN trades at $57.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -32.46. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTAN's competition here
CDNS vs LYFT Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while LYFT trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LYFT's competition here
CDNS vs NICE Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while NICE trades at $87.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NICE's competition here
CDNS vs ESTC Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while ESTC trades at $49.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -61.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ESTC's competition here
CDNS vs COMP Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while COMP trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 405.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COMP's competition here
CDNS vs GBTG Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while GBTG trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.72. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GBTG's competition here
CDNS vs DUOL Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while DUOL trades at $109.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DUOL's competition here
CDNS vs GRND-WT Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND-WT's competition here
CDNS vs NAVN Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while NAVN trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NAVN's competition here
CDNS vs CVT Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVT's competition here
CDNS vs CVLT Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while CVLT trades at $100.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 63.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVLT's competition here
CDNS vs PYCR Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PYCR's competition here
CDNS vs ZETA Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while ZETA trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -160.40. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZETA's competition here
CDNS vs BILL Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while BILL trades at $39.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -173.72. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BILL's competition here
CDNS vs PWSC Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PWSC's competition here
CDNS vs BULL Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while BULL trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULL's competition here
CDNS vs GTLB Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while GTLB trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -64.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GTLB's competition here
CDNS vs SRAD Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while SRAD trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 47.88. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SRAD's competition here
CDNS vs RUM Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while RUM trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RUM's competition here
CDNS vs SOUN Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while SOUN trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -12.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SOUN's competition here
CDNS vs AYX Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AYX's competition here
CDNS vs ADEA Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while ADEA trades at $31.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADEA's competition here
CDNS vs ENV Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ENV's competition here
CDNS vs MNDY Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while MNDY trades at $69.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MNDY's competition here
CDNS vs INST Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INST's competition here
CDNS vs ZI Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZI's competition here
CDNS vs CLSK Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while CLSK trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CLSK's competition here
CDNS vs RNG Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while RNG trades at $39.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RNG's competition here
CDNS vs NATL Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while NATL trades at $44.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATL's competition here
CDNS vs LIF Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while LIF trades at $40.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LIF's competition here
CDNS vs DAVE Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while DAVE trades at $237.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAVE's competition here
CDNS vs FSLY Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while FSLY trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -26.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FSLY's competition here
CDNS vs QTWO Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while QTWO trades at $45.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check QTWO's competition here
CDNS vs BTDR Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while BTDR trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -9.24. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BTDR's competition here
CDNS vs NP Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while NP trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -163.94. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NP's competition here
CDNS vs PTRN Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while PTRN trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -20.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTRN's competition here
CDNS vs GRND Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while GRND trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRND's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND's competition here
CDNS vs CALX Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while CALX trades at $40.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 82.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CALX's competition here
CDNS vs DCT Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DCT's competition here
CDNS vs STUB Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while STUB trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STUB's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STUB's competition here
CDNS vs DBD Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while DBD trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DBD's competition here
CDNS vs WK Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while WK trades at $46.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 184.67. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WK's competition here
CDNS vs SPNS Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while SPNS trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SPNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SPNS's competition here
CDNS vs OS Comparison May 2026
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.8B. In comparison, OS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $350.79, while OS trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 82.45, whereas OS's P/E ratio is -85.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OS's competition here