Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 254.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while SAP trades at $218.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SAP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 194.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while SHOP trades at $149.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 94.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SHOP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while CRM trades at $209.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CRM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 161.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while UBER trades at $79.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check UBER's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while NOW trades at $128.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NOW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while ADP trades at $283.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while SNOW trades at $322.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 228.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SNOW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while ADBE trades at $276.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADBE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while INTU trades at $369.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTU's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while APP trades at $298.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APP's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while DDOG trades at $225.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 94.46. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DDOG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while ADSK trades at $254.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADSK's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while WDAY trades at $199.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WDAY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while TEAM trades at $171.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TEAM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while ROP trades at $415.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ROP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while MSTR trades at $122.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MSTR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while VEEV trades at $248.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check VEEV's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while STRC trades at $97.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ANSS's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while ZM trades at $104.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while STRF trades at $101.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRF's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while BSP trades at $41.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is -411800.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while FICO trades at $1,166.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FICO's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while STRD trades at $72.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRD's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while STRK trades at $72.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRK's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while U trades at $46.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas U's P/E ratio is -87.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to U's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check U's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while SSNC trades at $83.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SSNC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while PTC trades at $154.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AZPN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while GWRE trades at $191.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GWRE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while GRABW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRABW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while TYL trades at $355.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TYL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while DT trades at $49.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while GRAB trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRAB's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while FIG trades at $27.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 76.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FIG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while HUBS trades at $244.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check HUBS's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while CHYM trades at $32.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -467.14. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CHYM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while MANH trades at $213.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MANH's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while DOCU trades at $62.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DOCU's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BKI's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while AUR trades at $5.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AUR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while BSY trades at $37.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check XM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while FROG trades at $90.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 91.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FROG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CDAY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while PAYC trades at $229.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PAYC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while PCOR trades at $62.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCOR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while TTAN trades at $95.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 79.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTAN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while YMM trades at $8.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YMM's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while IDCC trades at $341.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check IDCC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while ESTC trades at $83.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ESTC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCFT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while PCTY trades at $152.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCTY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while APPF trades at $225.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.56. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APPF's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATI's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SMAR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while CWAN trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CWAN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while ZETA trades at $28.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZETA's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while GTLB trades at $42.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GTLB's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while NAVN trades at $29.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 451.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NAVN's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while DUOL trades at $146.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DUOL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while DSGX trades at $78.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DSGX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while LYFT trades at $17.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LYFT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while DLB trades at $66.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DLB's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COUP's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while OTEX trades at $24.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OTEX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while NICE trades at $100.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NICE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while AUROW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AUROW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while RNG trades at $67.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RNG's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while NIQ trades at $19.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is 53.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NIQ's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while PEGA trades at $34.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PEGA's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while KVYO trades at $18.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KVYO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check KVYO's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while CVLT trades at $131.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVLT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while BULLW trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is 67.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULLW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while OCTV trades at $18.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 55.52. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCTV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCTV's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while BILL trades at $48.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BILL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while DAVE trades at $354.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAVE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while BLSH trades at $30.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 81.46. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BLSH's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while BULL trades at $8.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULL's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while YOU trades at $44.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YOU's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while WIX trades at $84.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WIX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while CCC trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CCC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND-WT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVT's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PYCR's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while WK trades at $74.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WK's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WK's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while QTWO trades at $64.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check QTWO's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while DAVEW trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAVEW's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while MNDY trades at $94.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MNDY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while SRAD trades at $13.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 218.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SRAD's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PWSC's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while FRSH trades at $13.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FRSH's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while FSLY trades at $22.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 48.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FSLY's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while LIF trades at $44.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LIF's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while BRZE trades at $31.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is 76.68. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BRZE's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AYX's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ENV's competition here

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 87B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $315.92 on the NASDAQ, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.95, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PSFE-WT's competition here