Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while SAP trades at $150.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SAP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while APP trades at $463.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check APP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 145.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while UBER trades at $71.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check UBER's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while SHOP trades at $107.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 106.72. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SHOP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while CRM trades at $148.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CRM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while CDNS trades at $381.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 89.88. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CDNS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while NOW trades at $92.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 56.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NOW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while SNOW trades at $232.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -65.80. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SNOW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while DDOG trades at $221.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 571.79. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DDOG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while ADBE trades at $192.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ADBE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while INTU trades at $258.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INTU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while ADSK trades at $189.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ADSK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while MSTR trades at $113.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MSTR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while ROP trades at $330.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ROP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ANSS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while WDAY trades at $114.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check WDAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while STRF trades at $92.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while STRC trades at $90.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while FICO trades at $1,076.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FICO's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while ZM trades at $83.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while TEAM trades at $80.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -100.88. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TEAM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while STRK trades at $61.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AZPN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while SSNC trades at $64.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SSNC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while GRAB trades at $3.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 89.25. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GRAB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while GRABW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GRABW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while PTC trades at $116.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PTC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while DT trades at $40.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 76.70. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while U trades at $26.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas U's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check U's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BKI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while TYL trades at $275.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TYL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check XM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CDAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while FROG trades at $79.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -156.08. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FROG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while FIG trades at $19.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FIG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while HUBS trades at $172.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 92.65. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check HUBS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while GWRE trades at $103.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 57.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GWRE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OCFT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while BSY trades at $28.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BSY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while DOCU trades at $42.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DOCU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while YMM trades at $7.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check YMM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NATI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SMAR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while MANH trades at $127.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MANH's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while IDCC trades at $294.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check IDCC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while CWAN trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -134.94. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CWAN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while PAYC trades at $122.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PAYC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while ESTC trades at $57.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ESTC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while TTAN trades at $62.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -43.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TTAN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check COUP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while COMP trades at $9.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 500.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check COMP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while PCOR trades at $38.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.41. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PCOR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while DUOL trades at $127.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DUOL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while DSGX trades at $66.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DSGX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while APPF trades at $145.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check APPF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while LYFT trades at $14.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check LYFT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while PCTY trades at $98.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PCTY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while CVLT trades at $125.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 82.30. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CVLT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while NAVN trades at $22.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -15.54. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NAVN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while YOU trades at $50.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 41.16. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check YOU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while PEGA trades at $29.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PEGA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while OTEX trades at $20.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OTEX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while NICE trades at $84.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NICE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while GBTG trades at $9.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GBTG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while ZETA trades at $18.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -189.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZETA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OCTVV's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while GTLB trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -177.07. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GTLB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while SRAD trades at $14.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 60.24. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SRAD's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while OCTV trades at $15.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OCTV's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GRND-WT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while DAVE trades at $309.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAVE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while DAVEW trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAVEW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CVT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while BTDR trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BTDR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while STUB trades at $11.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STUB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PYCR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while LIF trades at $48.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check LIF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PWSC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while BULL trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BULL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while MNDY trades at $68.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MNDY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AYX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while ADEA trades at $30.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ADEA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ENV's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INST's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while BOX trades at $24.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 38.81. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BOX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while PTRN trades at $21.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -26.37. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PTRN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while BILL trades at $31.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -141.17. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BILL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while NATL trades at $43.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NATL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while RUM trades at $7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RUM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while PPLI trades at $42.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PPLI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while SOUN trades at $6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SOUN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while RNG trades at $33.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 37.26. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RNG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while KC trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -19.73. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check KC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while BRUN trades at $36.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -87.38. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BRUN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while SOUNW trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SOUNW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while DBD trades at $83.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DBD's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $8.71, while FSLY trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.52, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -25.94. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FSLY's competition here