Freshworks Inc.

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 205.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while SAP trades at $175.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SAP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 167.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while CRM trades at $178.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CRM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 163.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while APP trades at $487.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check APP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 149.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while UBER trades at $73.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check UBER's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while SHOP trades at $104.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 102.76. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SHOP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while NOW trades at $101.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 59.32. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NOW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while CDNS trades at $378.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CDNS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while ADBE trades at $243.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ADBE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while INTU trades at $306.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INTU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while DDOG trades at $221.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 559.08. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DDOG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while SNOW trades at $171.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -41.80. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SNOW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while ADSK trades at $239.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 46.10. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ADSK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while MSTR trades at $160.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MSTR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ANSS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while ROP trades at $325.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ROP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while WDAY trades at $126.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 46.87. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check WDAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while GTOP trades at $47.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 38.91. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GTOP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while STRF trades at $101.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while STRC trades at $99.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while ZM trades at $107.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while FICO trades at $1,234.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 38.93. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FICO's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while STRK trades at $74.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while TEAM trades at $85.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -100.22. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TEAM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while PTC trades at $147.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PTC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AZPN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while SSNC trades at $66.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SSNC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while GRAB trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GRAB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while TYL trades at $310.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 42.69. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TYL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BKI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while DT trades at $40.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 72.47. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while GWRE trades at $138.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 61.42. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GWRE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while U trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas U's P/E ratio is -16.26. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check U's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check XM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CDAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while FIG trades at $22.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FIG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while HUBS trades at $198.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 107.18. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check HUBS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while BSY trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 38.32. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BSY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while DOCU trades at $49.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DOCU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while YMM trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check YMM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while FROG trades at $72.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -129.89. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FROG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OCFT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NATI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while MANH trades at $136.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 37.80. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MANH's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SMAR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while PAYC trades at $136.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PAYC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while CWAN trades at $24.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.28. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CWAN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while PCOR trades at $46.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -90.92. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PCOR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while IDCC trades at $265.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check IDCC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while YOU trades at $60.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 48.86. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check YOU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check COUP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while DSGX trades at $71.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DSGX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while PCTY trades at $111.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PCTY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while TTAN trades at $62.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -35.45. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TTAN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while APPF trades at $165.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 38.66. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check APPF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while PEGA trades at $34.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PEGA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while OTEX trades at $23.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OTEX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while NICE trades at $96.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NICE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while ESTC trades at $54.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -68.15. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ESTC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while COMP trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 423.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check COMP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while LYFT trades at $13.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check LYFT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while DUOL trades at $105.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DUOL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while GBTG trades at $9.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.84. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GBTG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while ZETA trades at $18.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -180.45. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZETA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GRND-WT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while CVLT trades at $107.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 67.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CVLT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while NAVN trades at $19.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NAVN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while GTLB trades at $26.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -75.35. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GTLB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CVT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PYCR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while KC trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -26.73. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check KC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while MNDY trades at $77.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MNDY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while SRAD trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SRAD's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PWSC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while RNG trades at $43.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 44.84. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RNG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while BILL trades at $35.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -158.48. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BILL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while SOUN trades at $8.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -11.89. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SOUN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AYX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while BOX trades at $25.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 43.80. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BOX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while BULL trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BULL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while RUM trades at $8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RUM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ENV's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while BTDR trades at $14.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BTDR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INST's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while STUB trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STUB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while NATL trades at $44.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NATL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while LIF trades at $40.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check LIF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while DAVE trades at $230.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAVE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while ADEA trades at $26.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ADEA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while QTWO trades at $46.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 40.94. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check QTWO's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while WK trades at $50.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 208.42. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check WK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while PTRN trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -21.74. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PTRN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while BRZE trades at $24.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -19.19. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BRZE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while NP trades at $27.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -151.17. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while FSLY trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -23.77. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FSLY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DCT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while DBD trades at $74.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DBD's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $9.02, while CALX trades at $39.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 78.35. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CALX's competition here