Smartsheet Inc.

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 194.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SAP trades at $159.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SAP's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 164.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while APP trades at $463.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check APP's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 162.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CRM trades at $165.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CRM's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while UBER trades at $74.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check UBER's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 129.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SHOP trades at $96.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 97.88. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SHOP's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while INTU trades at $374.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check INTU's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CDNS trades at $352.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 83.27. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CDNS's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NOW trades at $86.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 52.98. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NOW's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DDOG trades at $200.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 526.16. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DDOG's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while MSTR trades at $178.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check MSTR's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SNOW trades at $151.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -38.48. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SNOW's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ADSK trades at $225.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ADSK's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ANSS's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while WDAY trades at $112.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 45.80. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check WDAY's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GTOP trades at $46.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GTOP's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ZM trades at $102.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ZM's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while STRF trades at $100.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check STRF's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while STRC trades at $100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check STRC's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while FICO trades at $1,048.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check FICO's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while STRK trades at $76.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check STRK's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while TEAM trades at $80.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -103.66. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check TEAM's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check AZPN's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PTC trades at $140.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PTC's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SSNC trades at $65.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SSNC's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GRAB trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GRAB's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while TYL trades at $298.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 42.77. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check TYL's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BKI's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DT trades at $33.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 65.35. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DT's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while U trades at $26.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas U's P/E ratio is -17.10. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check U's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DAY's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GWRE trades at $124.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 59.18. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GWRE's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check XM's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CDAY's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while TTD trades at $20.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check TTD's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BSY trades at $31.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BSY's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while FIG trades at $19.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check FIG's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while HUBS trades at $177.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 95.02. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check HUBS's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while YMM trades at $9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check YMM's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DOCU trades at $44.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DOCU's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check OCFT's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while FROG trades at $63.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -127.45. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check FROG's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while MANH trades at $126.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 37.77. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check MANH's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NATI's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PAYC trades at $134.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PAYC's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PCOR trades at $46.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -94.29. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PCOR's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CWAN trades at $24.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.22. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CWAN's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while IDCC trades at $264.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check IDCC's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check COUP's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while OTEX trades at $22.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check OTEX's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while YOU trades at $56.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 46.11. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check YOU's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DSGX trades at $65.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 35.95. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DSGX's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PCTY trades at $103.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PCTY's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PEGA trades at $32.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PEGA's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while APPF trades at $147.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check APPF's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while TTAN trades at $54.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -33.24. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check TTAN's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while LYFT trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check LYFT's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ESTC trades at $47.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -63.41. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ESTC's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while COMP trades at $8.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 418.00. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check COMP's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NICE trades at $86.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NICE's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DUOL trades at $104.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DUOL's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GBTG trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.69. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GBTG's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while KC trades at $18.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -30.02. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check KC's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CVLT trades at $98.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 64.70. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CVLT's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GRND-WT's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NAVN trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NAVN's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CVT's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BILL trades at $39.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -179.26. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BILL's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PYCR's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ZETA trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -162.60. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ZETA's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GTLB trades at $22.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -67.88. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GTLB's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PWSC's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SRAD trades at $12.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 48.69. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SRAD's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BULL trades at $7.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BULL's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while MNDY trades at $68.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check MNDY's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while RNG trades at $38.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 44.54. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check RNG's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check AYX's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ENV's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check INST's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CLSK trades at $13.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CLSK's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while RUM trades at $8.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -24.75. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check RUM's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ADEA trades at $31.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ADEA's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SOUN trades at $8.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SOUN's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ZI's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NATL trades at $44.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NATL's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DAVE trades at $240.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DAVE's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while LIF trades at $39.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check LIF's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while FSLY trades at $18.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -27.58. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check FSLY's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while QTWO trades at $45.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check QTWO's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NP trades at $26.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -167.88. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NP's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CALX trades at $41.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 85.12. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CALX's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while WK trades at $43.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 195.21. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check WK's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BTDR trades at $13.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BTDR's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DBD trades at $73.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DBD's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PTRN trades at $16.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -20.41. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PTRN's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR and DCT have similar daily volatility (0.05).Check DCT's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GRND trades at $14.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GRND's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GRND's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while STUB trades at $7.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to STUB's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check STUB's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SPNS trades at $43.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to SPNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SPNS's competition here

SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, OS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while OS trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas OS's P/E ratio is -85.71. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to OS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check OS's competition here