Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 210.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while SAP trades at $187.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check SAP's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 191.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while APP trades at $557.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 49.51. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check APP's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while CRM trades at $188.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check CRM's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while SHOP trades at $116.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 110.73. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check SHOP's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while UBER trades at $72.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check UBER's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while NOW trades at $120.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 70.19. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check NOW's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while CDNS trades at $410.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 95.10. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check CDNS's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while ADBE trades at $259.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check ADBE's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while DDOG trades at $244.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 641.87. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check DDOG's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while INTU trades at $303.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check INTU's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while SNOW trades at $244.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -68.34. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check SNOW's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while ADSK trades at $232.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check ADSK's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while WDAY trades at $149.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 45.76. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check WDAY's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while MSTR trades at $126.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check MSTR's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while ROP trades at $331.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check ROP's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check ANSS's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while STRF trades at $95.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check STRF's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while STRC trades at $95.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check STRC's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while FICO trades at $1,181.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check FICO's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while TEAM trades at $101.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -123.82. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check TEAM's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while STRK trades at $68.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check STRK's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check AZPN's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while SSNC trades at $69.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check SSNC's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while PTC trades at $139.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check PTC's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while GRAB trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 85.25. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check GRAB's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while GWRE trades at $156.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 70.17. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check GWRE's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while TYL trades at $307.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check TYL's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while U trades at $29.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas U's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check U's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while DT trades at $43.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 80.43. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check DT's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check BKI's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while HUBS trades at $222.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 117.02. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check HUBS's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check DAY's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while FIG trades at $22.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check FIG's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check XM's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check CDAY's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while DOCU trades at $51.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 35.41. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check DOCU's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while FROG trades at $84.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -158.23. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check FROG's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while BSY trades at $33.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 37.49. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check BSY's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while YMM trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check YMM's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while MANH trades at $150.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 42.23. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check MANH's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check OCFT's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check NATI's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check SMAR's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while PCOR trades at $50.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -99.33. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check PCOR's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while PAYC trades at $138.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check PAYC's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while CWAN trades at $24.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.44. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check CWAN's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while TTAN trades at $73.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -41.98. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check TTAN's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while ESTC trades at $65.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check ESTC's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while IDCC trades at $260.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check IDCC's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while DSGX trades at $79.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 39.63. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check DSGX's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check COUP's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while PCTY trades at $113.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check PCTY's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while APPF trades at $164.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.49. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check APPF's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while PEGA trades at $35.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check PEGA's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while ZETA trades at $23.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -232.70. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check ZETA's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while OTEX trades at $23.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check OTEX's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while YOU trades at $55.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check YOU's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while NICE trades at $94.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check NICE's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while LYFT trades at $14.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check LYFT's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while OCTV trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check OCTV's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while NAVN trades at $22.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check NAVN's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while GTLB trades at $30.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -206.20. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check GTLB's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while DUOL trades at $107.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check DUOL's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while CVLT trades at $122.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 76.49. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check CVLT's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while GBTG trades at $9.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.44. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check GBTG's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check OCTVV's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while COMP trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 380.75. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check COMP's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while BTDR trades at $19.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check BTDR's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while MNDY trades at $87.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 37.53. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check MNDY's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check GRND-WT's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check CVT's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check PYCR's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while SRAD trades at $14.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 51.77. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check SRAD's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while RNG trades at $44.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check RNG's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check PWSC's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while KC trades at $12.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -24.98. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check KC's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while LIF trades at $48.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check LIF's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while BOX trades at $26.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check BOX's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while RUM trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check RUM's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while ADEA trades at $32.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check ADEA's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check AYX's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while BILL trades at $36.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -153.02. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check BILL's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while SOUN trades at $8.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check SOUN's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check ENV's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check INST's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check ZI's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while DAVE trades at $261.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check DAVE's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while STUB trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check STUB's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while FSLY trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -30.19. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check FSLY's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while NATL trades at $44.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check NATL's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while BULL trades at $5.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check BULL's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while PTRN trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -24.54. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check PTRN's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while BRUN trades at $35.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -115.45. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check BRUN's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while QTWO trades at $45.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check QTWO's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while DBD trades at $81.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check DBD's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while WK trades at $49.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 207.55. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check WK's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while BRZE trades at $23.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -21.04. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check BRZE's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while FRSH trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check FRSH's competition here

ZM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZM stands at 31.1B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZM is priced at $105.77, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, ZM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZM is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZM.Check DCT's competition here