Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KC | $12.70 | -4.70% | 4.1B | -26.86 | -$0.51 | N/A |
| SAP | $180.96 | -7.73% | 222.3B | 26.32 | $7.25 | +1.54% |
| APP | $567.72 | -7.49% | 203.5B | 52.53 | $11.53 | N/A |
| CRM | $191.97 | -8.41% | 164.5B | 23.25 | $8.64 | +0.85% |
| SHOP | $113.34 | -8.69% | 151.8B | 114.69 | $1.02 | N/A |
| UBER | $70.65 | -4.23% | 145.9B | 17.78 | $4.03 | N/A |
| NOW | $120.19 | -11.54% | 131.6B | 75.98 | $1.68 | N/A |
| CDNS | $402.20 | -2.89% | 114.9B | 97.52 | $4.27 | N/A |
| ADBE | $256.86 | -6.26% | 105.9B | 15.27 | $17.16 | N/A |
| DDOG | $250.41 | -9.76% | 95.8B | 672.68 | $0.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KC vs SAP Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 222.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while SAP trades at $180.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SAP's competition here
KC vs APP Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while APP trades at $567.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 52.53. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check APP's competition here
KC vs CRM Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 164.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while CRM trades at $191.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CRM's competition here
KC vs SHOP Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while SHOP trades at $113.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 114.69. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SHOP's competition here
KC vs UBER Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while UBER trades at $70.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check UBER's competition here
KC vs NOW Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 131.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while NOW trades at $120.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 75.98. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NOW's competition here
KC vs CDNS Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while CDNS trades at $402.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 97.52. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CDNS's competition here
KC vs ADBE Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while ADBE trades at $256.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ADBE's competition here
KC vs DDOG Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while DDOG trades at $250.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 672.68. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DDOG's competition here
KC vs SNOW Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while SNOW trades at $245.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SNOW's competition here
KC vs INTU Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while INTU trades at $312.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check INTU's competition here
KC vs ADSK Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while ADSK trades at $231.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ADSK's competition here
KC vs MSTR Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while MSTR trades at $130.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check MSTR's competition here
KC vs WDAY Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while WDAY trades at $145.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check WDAY's competition here
KC vs ROP Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while ROP trades at $328.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ROP's competition here
KC vs ANSS Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ANSS's competition here
KC vs ZM Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while ZM trades at $106.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ZM's competition here
KC vs FICO Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while FICO trades at $1,162.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FICO's competition here
KC vs STRF Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while STRF trades at $96.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check STRF's competition here
KC vs STRC Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while STRC trades at $94.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check STRC's competition here
KC vs TEAM Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while TEAM trades at $102.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -133.05. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check TEAM's competition here
KC vs STRK Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while STRK trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check STRK's competition here
KC vs AZPN Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check AZPN's competition here
KC vs PTC Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while PTC trades at $138.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PTC's competition here
KC vs SSNC Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while SSNC trades at $67.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SSNC's competition here
KC vs GRAB Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while GRAB trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GRAB's competition here
KC vs GWRE Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while GWRE trades at $154.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 73.65. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GWRE's competition here
KC vs U Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while U trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas U's P/E ratio is -19.58. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check U's competition here
KC vs TYL Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while TYL trades at $301.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 43.20. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check TYL's competition here
KC vs DT Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while DT trades at $43.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 83.29. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DT's competition here
KC vs HUBS Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while HUBS trades at $223.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 126.32. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check HUBS's competition here
KC vs BKI Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BKI's competition here
KC vs FIG Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while FIG trades at $22.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FIG's competition here
KC vs DAY Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DAY's competition here
KC vs XM Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check XM's competition here
KC vs CDAY Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CDAY's competition here
KC vs DOCU Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while DOCU trades at $52.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 37.23. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DOCU's competition here
KC vs FROG Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while FROG trades at $83.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -166.13. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FROG's competition here
KC vs BSY Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while BSY trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 39.08. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BSY's competition here
KC vs YMM Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while YMM trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check YMM's competition here
KC vs MANH Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while MANH trades at $150.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check MANH's competition here
KC vs OCFT Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check OCFT's competition here
KC vs NATI Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NATI's competition here
KC vs PCOR Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while PCOR trades at $50.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -103.30. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PCOR's competition here
KC vs SMAR Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SMAR's competition here
KC vs PAYC Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while PAYC trades at $136.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PAYC's competition here
KC vs CWAN Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while CWAN trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.50. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CWAN's competition here
KC vs TTAN Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while TTAN trades at $72.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -43.40. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check TTAN's competition here
KC vs ESTC Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while ESTC trades at $64.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ESTC's competition here
KC vs OCTV Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while OCTV trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check OCTV's competition here
KC vs IDCC Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while IDCC trades at $252.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check IDCC's competition here
KC vs DSGX Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while DSGX trades at $74.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DSGX's competition here
KC vs PCTY Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while PCTY trades at $112.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PCTY's competition here
KC vs ZETA Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while ZETA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -252.35. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ZETA's competition here
KC vs APPF Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while APPF trades at $163.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check APPF's competition here
KC vs PEGA Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while PEGA trades at $34.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PEGA's competition here
KC vs COUP Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check COUP's competition here
KC vs OTEX Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while OTEX trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check OTEX's competition here
KC vs YOU Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while YOU trades at $55.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 45.41. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check YOU's competition here
KC vs NICE Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while NICE trades at $93.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NICE's competition here
KC vs NAVN Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while NAVN trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NAVN's competition here
KC vs GTLB Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while GTLB trades at $30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -93.59. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GTLB's competition here
KC vs LYFT Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while LYFT trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check LYFT's competition here
KC vs COMP Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while COMP trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 431.00. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check COMP's competition here
KC vs DUOL Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while DUOL trades at $104.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DUOL's competition here
KC vs CVLT Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while CVLT trades at $119.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 77.29. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CVLT's competition here
KC vs GBTG Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while GBTG trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.53. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GBTG's competition here
KC vs MNDY Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while MNDY trades at $86.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 39.96. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check MNDY's competition here
KC vs OCTVV Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check OCTVV's competition here
KC vs GRND-WT Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GRND-WT's competition here
KC vs BTDR Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while BTDR trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BTDR's competition here
KC vs CVT Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CVT's competition here
KC vs PYCR Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PYCR's competition here
KC vs RNG Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while RNG trades at $44.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check RNG's competition here
KC vs SRAD Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while SRAD trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 52.62. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SRAD's competition here
KC vs RUM Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while RUM trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -20.86. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check RUM's competition here
KC vs BILL Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while BILL trades at $35.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -167.26. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BILL's competition here
KC vs BOX Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while BOX trades at $26.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BOX's competition here
KC vs SOUN Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while SOUN trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SOUN's competition here
KC vs LIF Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while LIF trades at $45.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check LIF's competition here
KC vs PWSC Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PWSC's competition here
KC vs DAVE Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while DAVE trades at $245.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DAVE's competition here
KC vs AYX Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check AYX's competition here
KC vs ENV Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ENV's competition here
KC vs INST Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check INST's competition here
KC vs STUB Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while STUB trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check STUB's competition here
KC vs ZI Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ZI's competition here
KC vs ADEA Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while ADEA trades at $29.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ADEA's competition here
KC vs BULL Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while BULL trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BULL's competition here
KC vs NATL Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while NATL trades at $44.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NATL's competition here
KC vs FSLY Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while FSLY trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FSLY's competition here
KC vs PTRN Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while PTRN trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PTRN's competition here
KC vs QTWO Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while QTWO trades at $45.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 43.30. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check QTWO's competition here
KC vs BRUN Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while BRUN trades at $37.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -111.33. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BRUN's competition here
KC vs WK Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while WK trades at $49.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 216.42. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check WK's competition here
KC vs BRZE Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while BRZE trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -22.93. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BRZE's competition here
KC vs DBD Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while DBD trades at $80.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DBD's competition here
KC vs FRSH Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while FRSH trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FRSH's competition here
KC vs AGYS Comparison June 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $12.70, while AGYS trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -26.86, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 65.42. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check AGYS's competition here