Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 214.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while SAP trades at $183.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SAP's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while SHOP trades at $117.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 77.58. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SHOP's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 150.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while CRM trades at $184.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CRM's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 143.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while UBER trades at $70.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check UBER's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while APP trades at $395.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check APP's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while NOW trades at $111.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NOW's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while ADP trades at $266.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ADP's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while SNOW trades at $293.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 207.93. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SNOW's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while ADBE trades at $250.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ADBE's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while DDOG trades at $267.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 121.80. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DDOG's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while CDNS trades at $340.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 45.16. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CDNS's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while INTU trades at $316.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check INTU's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while ADSK trades at $234.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ADSK's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while WDAY trades at $160.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check WDAY's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while ROP trades at $391.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ROP's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while VEEV trades at $203.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check VEEV's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ANSS's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while MSTR trades at $93.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check MSTR's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while STRC trades at $89.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check STRC's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while ZM trades at $96.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ZM's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while STRF trades at $94.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check STRF's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while TEAM trades at $101.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check TEAM's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while BSP trades at $35.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is -352000.00. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BSP's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while STRD trades at $57.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to STRD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check STRD's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while SSNC trades at $77.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SSNC's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while STRK trades at $59.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check STRK's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check AZPN's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while PTC trades at $137.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PTC's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while GRAB trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GRAB's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while U trades at $31.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.64. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to U. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check U's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while GRABW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GRABW's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while AUROW trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check AUROW's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while TYL trades at $309.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check TYL's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while DT trades at $44.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DT's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while GWRE trades at $151.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 43.56. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GWRE's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while HUBS trades at $237.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check HUBS's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BKI's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while FIG trades at $24.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 52.88. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FIG's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while MANH trades at $191.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check MANH's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DAY's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while GENVR trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GENVR's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check XM's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CDAY's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while DOCU trades at $54.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DOCU's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while BSY trades at $35.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BSY's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while YMM trades at $9.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check YMM's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while FROG trades at $79.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 89.65. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FROG's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while PAYC trades at $163.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PAYC's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while WULF trades at $17.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -12.52. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check WULF's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check OCFT's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while PCOR trades at $54.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PCOR's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NATI's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while TTAN trades at $83.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 68.64. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check TTAN's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SMAR's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while IDCC trades at $304.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check IDCC's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while PCTY trades at $137.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PCTY's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while CWAN trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CWAN's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while ESTC trades at $65.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ESTC's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while DSGX trades at $75.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DSGX's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while NAVN trades at $26.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 409.54. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NAVN's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while APPF trades at $180.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check APPF's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while DUOL trades at $134.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 36.53. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DUOL's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while OTEX trades at $25.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check OTEX's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check COUP's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while LYFT trades at $15.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check LYFT's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while GTLB trades at $34.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GTLB's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while NICE trades at $98.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NICE's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while YOU trades at $55.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 44.52. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check YOU's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while ZETA trades at $21.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ZETA's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while KVYO trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check KVYO's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while PEGA trades at $30.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PEGA's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while DAVE trades at $372.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DAVE's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while OCTV trades at $18.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 55.27. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check OCTV's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while CVLT trades at $117.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CVLT's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while RNG trades at $55.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check RNG's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while BILL trades at $45.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BILL's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while MNDY trades at $87.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check MNDY's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GRND-WT's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while LIF trades at $54.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check LIF's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while SRAD trades at $14.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SRAD's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CVT's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PYCR's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PWSC's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while QTWO trades at $60.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check QTWO's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while BULL trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BULL's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while CCC trades at $6.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CCC's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while PTRN trades at $23.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PTRN's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while FSLY trades at $22.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 78.14. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FSLY's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check AYX's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ENV's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while NATL trades at $47.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NATL's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check PSFE-WT's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check INST's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ZI's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while WK trades at $59.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check WK's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while BLSH trades at $21.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 58.04. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check BLSH's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while FRSH trades at $11.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FRSH's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while GRND trades at $17.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GRND's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GRND's competition here

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: KC) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $11.15 on the NASDAQ, while WIX trades at $55.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KC currently has a P/E ratio of -38.45, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check WIX's competition here