Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KC | $10.91 | +4.20% | 3.2B | -37.62 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| VRSK | $185.39 | -0.87% | 24.3B | 25.61 | $7.24 | +1.02% |
| CART | $48.39 | +0.23% | 11.4B | 23.96 | $2.02 | N/A |
| NTSK | $12.32 | -0.81% | 5B | -13.39 | -$0.92 | N/A |
| TCGL | $172.84 | +0.00% | 3.5B | -5761.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| KEEL | $4.65 | -3.93% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TRVG | $5.32 | -0.37% | 375.3M | 53.20 | $0.10 | N/A |
| TRUE | $2.54 | +14.93% | 225.9M | -12.10 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| AIB | $2.07 | +13.11% | 157.3M | -207.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| AHG | $1.52 | +2.01% | 144M | -7.12 | -$0.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KC vs VRSK Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while VRSK trades at $185.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VRSK's ROE of -21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check VRSK's competition here
KC vs CART Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while CART trades at $48.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CART's competition here
KC vs NTSK Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while NTSK trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -13.39. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NTSK's ROE of +31.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check NTSK's competition here
KC vs TCGL Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while TCGL trades at $172.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check TCGL's competition here
KC vs KEEL Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while KEEL trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check KEEL's competition here
KC vs TRVG Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 375.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while TRVG trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is 53.20. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TRVG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check TRVG's competition here
KC vs TRUE Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while TRUE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check TRUE's competition here
KC vs AIB Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AIB has a market cap of 157.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while AIB trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas AIB's P/E ratio is -207.00. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AIB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to AIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check AIB's competition here
KC vs AHG Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 144M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while AHG trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check AHG's competition here
KC vs FIRY Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FIRY has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while FIRY trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas FIRY's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FIRY's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to FIRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FIRY's competition here
KC vs ROC Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ROC has a market cap of 96.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while ROC trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas ROC's P/E ratio is -18.48. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ROC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ROC's competition here
KC vs RSSS Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RSSS has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while RSSS trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas RSSS's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RSSS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to RSSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check RSSS's competition here
KC vs IZEA Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while IZEA trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -119.33. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check IZEA's competition here
KC vs ZSQR Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZSQR has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while ZSQR trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas ZSQR's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZSQR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ZSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ZSQR's competition here
KC vs ZTG Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while ZTG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ZTG's competition here
KC vs ZGM Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while ZGM trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ZGM's competition here
KC vs GIFT Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while GIFT trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check GIFT's competition here
KC vs SST Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while SST trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SST's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check SST's competition here
KC vs HOLO Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while HOLO trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check HOLO's competition here
KC vs AGAE Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while AGAE trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check AGAE's competition here
KC vs TGHL Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TGHL has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while TGHL trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas TGHL's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TGHL's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to TGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check TGHL's competition here
KC vs CHAI Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CHAI has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while CHAI trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas CHAI's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CHAI's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to CHAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CHAI's competition here
KC vs QCLS Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while QCLS trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check QCLS's competition here
KC vs CALD Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CALD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while CALD trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas CALD's P/E ratio is -115.41. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CALD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CALD's competition here
KC vs CSC Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while CSC trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CSC's competition here
KC vs CRA Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while CRA trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KC has daily volatility of 2.45 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here
KC vs CRTN Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while CRTN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas CRTN's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRTN's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to CRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check CRTN's competition here
KC vs XTLY Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XTLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while XTLY trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas XTLY's P/E ratio is -28.32. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to XTLY's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to XTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check XTLY's competition here
KC vs MBGL Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while MBGL trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MBGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check MBGL's competition here
KC vs ACTA Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ACTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while ACTA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas ACTA's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ACTA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is less volatile compared to ACTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check ACTA's competition here
KC vs DWCH Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while DWCH trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas DWCH's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DWCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DWCH's competition here
KC vs HDP Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while HDP trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas HDP's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HDP's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to HDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check HDP's competition here
KC vs DWRE Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while DWRE trades at $74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is -61.74. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DWRE's competition here
KC vs DST Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while DST trades at $83.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas DST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to DST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check DST's competition here
KC vs FUEL Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FUEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while FUEL trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas FUEL's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FUEL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to FUEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check FUEL's competition here
KC vs IMPV Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IMPV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while IMPV trades at $55.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas IMPV's P/E ratio is -68.74. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IMPV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to IMPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check IMPV's competition here
KC vs RMGN Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RMGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while RMGN trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas RMGN's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RMGN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KC is more volatile compared to RMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KC.Check RMGN's competition here
KC vs PRGY Comparison July 2026
KC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KC is priced at $10.91, while PRGY trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KC currently has a P/E ratio of -37.62, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KC has daily volatility of 2.45 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here