Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 222.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while SAP trades at $181.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SAP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while APP trades at $568.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 52.53. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check APP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 164.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while CRM trades at $190.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CRM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while SHOP trades at $113.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 114.69. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SHOP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 131.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while NOW trades at $118.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 75.98. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check NOW's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while CDNS trades at $405.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 97.52. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CDNS's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while ADBE trades at $255.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ADBE's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while DDOG trades at $248.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 672.68. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DDOG's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while SNOW trades at $243.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SNOW's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while INTU trades at $311.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check INTU's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while ADSK trades at $230.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ADSK's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while MSTR trades at $130.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check MSTR's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while WDAY trades at $146.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check WDAY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while ROP trades at $329.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ROP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ANSS's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while ZM trades at $106.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ZM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while FICO trades at $1,169.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check FICO's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while STRF trades at $95.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check STRF's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while STRC trades at $94.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check STRC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while TEAM trades at $100.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -133.05. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check TEAM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while STRK trades at $69.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check STRK's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check AZPN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while PTC trades at $138.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PTC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while SSNC trades at $67.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SSNC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while GRAB trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check GRAB's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while GWRE trades at $154.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 73.65. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check GWRE's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while U trades at $29.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas U's P/E ratio is -19.58. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check U's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while TYL trades at $302.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 43.20. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check TYL's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while DT trades at $43.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 83.29. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while HUBS trades at $220.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 126.32. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check HUBS's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BKI's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while FIG trades at $22.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check FIG's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DAY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check XM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CDAY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while DOCU trades at $52.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 37.23. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DOCU's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while FROG trades at $84.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -166.13. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check FROG's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while BSY trades at $32.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 39.08. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BSY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while YMM trades at $9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check YMM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while MANH trades at $150.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check MANH's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check OCFT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check NATI's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while PCOR trades at $50.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -103.30. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PCOR's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SMAR's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while PAYC trades at $137.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PAYC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while CWAN trades at $24.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.50. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CWAN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while TTAN trades at $71.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -43.40. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check TTAN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while ESTC trades at $63.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ESTC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while OCTV trades at $19.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check OCTV's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while IDCC trades at $255.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check IDCC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while DSGX trades at $73.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DSGX's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while PCTY trades at $112.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PCTY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while ZETA trades at $22.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -252.35. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ZETA's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while APPF trades at $164.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check APPF's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while PEGA trades at $35.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PEGA's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check COUP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while OTEX trades at $23.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check OTEX's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while YOU trades at $55.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 45.41. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check YOU's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while NICE trades at $94.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check NICE's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while NAVN trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check NAVN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while GTLB trades at $30.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -93.59. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check GTLB's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while LYFT trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check LYFT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while COMP trades at $7.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 431.00. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check COMP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while DUOL trades at $106.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DUOL's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while CVLT trades at $119.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 77.29. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CVLT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while GBTG trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.53. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check GBTG's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while MNDY trades at $86.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 39.96. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check MNDY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check OCTVV's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check GRND-WT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while BTDR trades at $20.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BTDR's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CVT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PYCR's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while RNG trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check RNG's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while KC trades at $12.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -26.86. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check KC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while SRAD trades at $13.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 52.62. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SRAD's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while RUM trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -20.86. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check RUM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while BILL trades at $35.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -167.26. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BILL's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while BOX trades at $26.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BOX's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while SOUN trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SOUN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while LIF trades at $46.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check LIF's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PWSC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while DAVE trades at $248.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DAVE's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check AYX's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ENV's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check INST's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while STUB trades at $9.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check STUB's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ZI's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while ADEA trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ADEA's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while BULL trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BULL's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while NATL trades at $44.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check NATL's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while FSLY trades at $21.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check FSLY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while PTRN trades at $19.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PTRN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while QTWO trades at $45.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 43.30. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check QTWO's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while BRUN trades at $38.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -111.33. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BRUN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while WK trades at $49.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 216.42. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check WK's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while BRZE trades at $23.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -22.93. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BRZE's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while DBD trades at $81.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DBD's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while FRSH trades at $9.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check FRSH's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 145.9B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $71.24, while AGYS trades at $88.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 65.42. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check AGYS's competition here