Qualtrics International Inc. (XM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XM | $18.15 | +0.06% | 11B | -10.43 | -$1.74 | N/A |
| SAP | $150.48 | -1.89% | 178B | 20.48 | $7.46 | +1.92% |
| APP | $444.63 | -4.79% | 156.3B | 40.41 | $11.51 | N/A |
| UBER | $72.70 | +4.34% | 150.3B | 16.05 | $4.60 | N/A |
| SHOP | $114.78 | +6.59% | 148.2B | 75.61 | $1.51 | N/A |
| CRM | $150.40 | -1.97% | 125.1B | 11.03 | $13.85 | +1.12% |
| CDNS | $367.03 | -3.17% | 102.8B | 87.05 | $4.28 | N/A |
| NOW | $90.27 | -5.91% | 96.8B | 25.55 | $3.67 | N/A |
| DDOG | $220.26 | -0.14% | 79.2B | 101.17 | $2.20 | N/A |
| SNOW | $226.58 | -1.66% | 78.3B | 160.23 | $1.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
XM vs SAP Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while SAP trades at $150.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check SAP's competition here
XM vs APP Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 156.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while APP trades at $444.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 40.41. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check APP's competition here
XM vs UBER Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 150.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while UBER trades at $72.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check UBER's competition here
XM vs SHOP Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while SHOP trades at $114.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 75.61. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check SHOP's competition here
XM vs CRM Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 125.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while CRM trades at $150.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check CRM's competition here
XM vs CDNS Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while CDNS trades at $367.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 87.05. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check CDNS's competition here
XM vs NOW Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while NOW trades at $90.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check NOW's competition here
XM vs DDOG Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 79.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while DDOG trades at $220.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 101.17. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check DDOG's competition here
XM vs SNOW Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while SNOW trades at $226.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 160.23. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check SNOW's competition here
XM vs ADBE Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while ADBE trades at $195.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check ADBE's competition here
XM vs INTU Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while INTU trades at $256.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check INTU's competition here
XM vs ADSK Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while ADSK trades at $189.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check ADSK's competition here
XM vs ROP Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while ROP trades at $335.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check ROP's competition here
XM vs ANSS Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check ANSS's competition here
XM vs WDAY Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while WDAY trades at $115.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check WDAY's competition here
XM vs MSTR Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while MSTR trades at $87.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check MSTR's competition here
XM vs FICO Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while FICO trades at $1,148.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check FICO's competition here
XM vs STRF Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while STRF trades at $85.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check STRF's competition here
XM vs ZM Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while ZM trades at $82.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check ZM's competition here
XM vs STRC Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while STRC trades at $76.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check STRC's competition here
XM vs TEAM Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while TEAM trades at $77.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check TEAM's competition here
XM vs AZPN Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check AZPN's competition here
XM vs STRK Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while STRK trades at $52.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check STRK's competition here
XM vs SSNC Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while SSNC trades at $64.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check SSNC's competition here
XM vs GRAB Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while GRAB trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check GRAB's competition here
XM vs GRABW Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while GRABW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check GRABW's competition here
XM vs PTC Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while PTC trades at $113.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check PTC's competition here
XM vs TYL Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while TYL trades at $284.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check TYL's competition here
XM vs BKI Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check BKI's competition here
XM vs U Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while U trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas U's P/E ratio is -25.36. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check U's competition here
XM vs DT Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while DT trades at $40.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check DT's competition here
XM vs DAY Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check DAY's competition here
XM vs CDAY Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check CDAY's competition here
XM vs FROG Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while FROG trades at $78.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 86.14. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check FROG's competition here
XM vs HUBS Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while HUBS trades at $172.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check HUBS's competition here
XM vs GWRE Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while GWRE trades at $112.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check GWRE's competition here
XM vs FIG Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while FIG trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check FIG's competition here
XM vs OCFT Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check OCFT's competition here
XM vs DOCU Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while DOCU trades at $43.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check DOCU's competition here
XM vs BSY Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while BSY trades at $28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check BSY's competition here
XM vs YMM Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while YMM trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check YMM's competition here
XM vs NATI Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check NATI's competition here
XM vs SMAR Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check SMAR's competition here
XM vs MANH Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while MANH trades at $128.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check MANH's competition here
XM vs CWAN Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while CWAN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check CWAN's competition here
XM vs IDCC Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while IDCC trades at $271.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check IDCC's competition here
XM vs PAYC Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while PAYC trades at $125.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check PAYC's competition here
XM vs COMP Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while COMP trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 532.25. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check COMP's competition here
XM vs TTAN Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while TTAN trades at $62.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 53.67. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check TTAN's competition here
XM vs DUOL Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while DUOL trades at $121.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 35.81. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check DUOL's competition here
XM vs COUP Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check COUP's competition here
XM vs ESTC Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while ESTC trades at $53.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check ESTC's competition here
XM vs PCOR Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while PCOR trades at $39.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check PCOR's competition here
XM vs DSGX Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while DSGX trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check DSGX's competition here
XM vs PCTY Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while PCTY trades at $101.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check PCTY's competition here
XM vs LYFT Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while LYFT trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check LYFT's competition here
XM vs CVLT Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while CVLT trades at $133.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 82.76. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check CVLT's competition here
XM vs APPF Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while APPF trades at $145.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check APPF's competition here
XM vs YOU Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while YOU trades at $52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check YOU's competition here
XM vs NAVN Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while NAVN trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 335.08. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check NAVN's competition here
XM vs OTEX Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while OTEX trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check OTEX's competition here
XM vs NICE Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while NICE trades at $86.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check NICE's competition here
XM vs PEGA Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while PEGA trades at $29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check PEGA's competition here
XM vs GBTG Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while GBTG trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 134.07. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check GBTG's competition here
XM vs DAVEW Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while DAVEW trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check DAVEW's competition here
XM vs GTLB Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while GTLB trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check GTLB's competition here
XM vs ZETA Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while ZETA trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check ZETA's competition here
XM vs OCTVV Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check OCTVV's competition here
XM vs GRND-WT Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check GRND-WT's competition here
XM vs SRAD Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while SRAD trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 61.58. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check SRAD's competition here
XM vs DAVE Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while DAVE trades at $329.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check DAVE's competition here
XM vs OCTV Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while OCTV trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check OCTV's competition here
XM vs CVT Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check CVT's competition here
XM vs BTDR Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while BTDR trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check BTDR's competition here
XM vs PYCR Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check PYCR's competition here
XM vs LIF Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while LIF trades at $49.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check LIF's competition here
XM vs STUB Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while STUB trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check STUB's competition here
XM vs PWSC Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check PWSC's competition here
XM vs MNDY Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while MNDY trades at $67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check MNDY's competition here
XM vs BULL Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while BULL trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check BULL's competition here
XM vs BOX Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while BOX trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check BOX's competition here
XM vs AYX Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check AYX's competition here
XM vs ENV Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check ENV's competition here
XM vs INST Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check INST's competition here
XM vs ZI Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check ZI's competition here
XM vs PTRN Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while PTRN trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check PTRN's competition here
XM vs BILL Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while BILL trades at $33.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check BILL's competition here
XM vs ADEA Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while ADEA trades at $30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check ADEA's competition here
XM vs NATL Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while NATL trades at $43.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check NATL's competition here
XM vs PPLI Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while PPLI trades at $42.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is -45.30. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PPLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check PPLI's competition here
XM vs RNG Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while RNG trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check RNG's competition here
XM vs DBD Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while DBD trades at $84.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check DBD's competition here
XM vs QTWO Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while QTWO trades at $45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check QTWO's competition here
XM vs BRUN Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while BRUN trades at $34.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -51.02. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BRUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check BRUN's competition here
XM vs NP Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while NP trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas NP's P/E ratio is 70.66. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check NP's competition here
XM vs SOUN Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while SOUN trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -316.75. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check SOUN's competition here
XM vs KC Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while KC trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check KC's competition here
XM vs RUM Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while RUM trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check RUM's competition here
XM vs WK Comparison June 2026
XM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XM stands at 11B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XM is priced at $18.15, while WK trades at $46.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XM currently has a P/E ratio of -10.43, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 199.29. In terms of profitability, XM's ROE is -0.52%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XM is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XM.Check WK's competition here