HubSpot, Inc.

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 191.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while SAP trades at $166.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check SAP's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 163B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while APP trades at $490.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 42.26. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check APP's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 159.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while CRM trades at $171.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check CRM's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 152.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while UBER trades at $74.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check UBER's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while SHOP trades at $97.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 95.51. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check SHOP's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while INTU trades at $390.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check INTU's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while CDNS trades at $350.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 82.06. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check CDNS's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while NOW trades at $92.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 53.88. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check NOW's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while DDOG trades at $206.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 520.10. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check DDOG's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while MSTR trades at $176.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check MSTR's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while SNOW trades at $156.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -38.17. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check SNOW's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while ADSK trades at $235.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 44.63. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check ADSK's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check ANSS's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while WDAY trades at $121.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 45.85. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check WDAY's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while GTOP trades at $46.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check GTOP's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while STRF trades at $100.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check STRF's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while STRC trades at $99.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check STRC's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while ZM trades at $99.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check ZM's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while FICO trades at $1,087.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check FICO's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while STRK trades at $75.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check STRK's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while TEAM trades at $84.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -98.61. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check TEAM's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check AZPN's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while PTC trades at $140.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check PTC's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while SSNC trades at $65.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check SSNC's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while GRAB trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 89.25. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check GRAB's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while TYL trades at $305.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 41.35. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check TYL's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while U trades at $27.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas U's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check U's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check BKI's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check DAY's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while DT trades at $36.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 68.75. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check DT's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check XM's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check CDAY's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while GWRE trades at $127.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check GWRE's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while FIG trades at $23.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check FIG's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while TTD trades at $20.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check TTD's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while YMM trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check YMM's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while BSY trades at $32.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 36.48. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check BSY's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while DOCU trades at $46.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check DOCU's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check OCFT's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check NATI's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check SMAR's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while FROG trades at $65.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -122.79. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check FROG's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while MANH trades at $129.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 36.15. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check MANH's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while PAYC trades at $137.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check PAYC's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while CWAN trades at $24.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.42. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check CWAN's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while PCOR trades at $47.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -91.27. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check PCOR's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while IDCC trades at $261.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check IDCC's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check COUP's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while DSGX trades at $67.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check DSGX's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while YOU trades at $57.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 45.75. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check YOU's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while OTEX trades at $22.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check OTEX's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while PEGA trades at $33.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check PEGA's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while PCTY trades at $106.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check PCTY's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while TTAN trades at $58.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -33.03. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check TTAN's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while APPF trades at $152.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check APPF's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while ESTC trades at $50.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -63.03. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check ESTC's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while NICE trades at $88.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check NICE's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while DUOL trades at $108.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check DUOL's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while KC trades at $15.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -33.22. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check KC's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while LYFT trades at $12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check LYFT's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while GBTG trades at $9.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.56. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check GBTG's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while COMP trades at $7.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 387.75. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check COMP's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check GRND-WT's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while NAVN trades at $18.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check NAVN's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while CVLT trades at $102.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check CVLT's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check CVT's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while ZETA trades at $16.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -165.80. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check ZETA's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check PYCR's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while BILL trades at $40.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -171.65. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check BILL's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while BULL trades at $7.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check BULL's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while GTLB trades at $23.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -66.47. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check GTLB's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check PWSC's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while SRAD trades at $12.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 48.85. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check SRAD's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while SOUN trades at $8.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check SOUN's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while MNDY trades at $69.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check MNDY's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while CLSK trades at $13.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check CLSK's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while RUM trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -25.53. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check RUM's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check AYX's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check ENV's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while ADEA trades at $30.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check ADEA's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while RNG trades at $40.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 41.87. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check RNG's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check INST's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check ZI's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while NATL trades at $44.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check NATL's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while LIF trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check LIF's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while DAVE trades at $230.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check DAVE's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while BTDR trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check BTDR's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while STUB trades at $8.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STUB's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check STUB's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while QTWO trades at $45.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check QTWO's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while FSLY trades at $17.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -25.62. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check FSLY's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while NP trades at $28.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -161.47. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check NP's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while CALX trades at $39.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 82.17. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check CALX's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while WK trades at $46.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 189.08. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check WK's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check DCT's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while PTRN trades at $16.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -20.07. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check PTRN's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while DBD trades at $71.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check DBD's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while GRND trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRND's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check GRND's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while SPNS trades at $43.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SPNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check SPNS's competition here

HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $192.38, while OS trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.07, whereas OS's P/E ratio is -85.71. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to OS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.Check OS's competition here