Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LYFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYFT | $16.19 | +3.32% | 5.9B | 26.02 | $0.60 | N/A |
| SAP | $156.25 | -2.33% | 180.4B | 20.75 | $7.46 | +1.89% |
| SHOP | $124.31 | -0.34% | 163.1B | 83.23 | $1.51 | N/A |
| APP | $452.93 | +2.28% | 150.8B | 39.01 | $11.51 | N/A |
| UBER | $72.87 | -1.87% | 146.7B | 15.67 | $4.60 | N/A |
| CRM | $167.48 | -2.18% | 137.3B | 12.10 | $13.85 | +1.26% |
| NOW | $104.90 | -5.72% | 108.1B | 28.55 | $3.67 | N/A |
| CDNS | $371.21 | -1.78% | 103.9B | 50.04 | $7.53 | N/A |
| DDOG | $263.75 | +1.35% | 96.4B | 123.06 | $2.20 | N/A |
| SNOW | $269.62 | +0.36% | 95.7B | 195.73 | $1.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYFT vs SAP Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 180.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while SAP trades at $156.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SAP's competition here
LYFT vs SHOP Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 163.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while SHOP trades at $124.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 83.23. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SHOP's competition here
LYFT vs APP Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 150.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while APP trades at $452.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check APP's competition here
LYFT vs UBER Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 146.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while UBER trades at $72.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check UBER's competition here
LYFT vs CRM Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 137.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while CRM trades at $167.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CRM's competition here
LYFT vs NOW Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while NOW trades at $104.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NOW's competition here
LYFT vs CDNS Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while CDNS trades at $371.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 50.04. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CDNS's competition here
LYFT vs DDOG Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while DDOG trades at $263.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 123.06. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DDOG's competition here
LYFT vs SNOW Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while SNOW trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 195.73. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SNOW's competition here
LYFT vs ADBE Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while ADBE trades at $223.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ADBE's competition here
LYFT vs INTU Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while INTU trades at $279.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check INTU's competition here
LYFT vs ADSK Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while ADSK trades at $208.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ADSK's competition here
LYFT vs WDAY Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while WDAY trades at $142.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check WDAY's competition here
LYFT vs ROP Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while ROP trades at $348.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ROP's competition here
LYFT vs ANSS Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ANSS's competition here
LYFT vs MSTR Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while MSTR trades at $98.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MSTR's competition here
LYFT vs STRC Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while STRC trades at $88.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRC's competition here
LYFT vs STRF Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while STRF trades at $95.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRF's competition here
LYFT vs FICO Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while FICO trades at $1,212.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FICO's competition here
LYFT vs ZM Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while ZM trades at $92.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZM's competition here
LYFT vs TEAM Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while TEAM trades at $91.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TEAM's competition here
LYFT vs BSP Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while BSP trades at $33.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is -325000.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BSP's competition here
LYFT vs STRK Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while STRK trades at $62.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRK's competition here
LYFT vs STRD Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while STRD trades at $61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRD's competition here
LYFT vs AZPN Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AZPN's competition here
LYFT vs SSNC Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while SSNC trades at $68.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SSNC's competition here
LYFT vs GRAB Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while GRAB trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GRAB's competition here
LYFT vs PTC Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while PTC trades at $123.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PTC's competition here
LYFT vs U Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while U trades at $31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.68. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check U's competition here
LYFT vs GRABW Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while GRABW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GRABW's competition here
LYFT vs DT Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while DT trades at $45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DT's competition here
LYFT vs TYL Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while TYL trades at $304.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TYL's competition here
LYFT vs BKI Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BKI's competition here
LYFT vs GWRE Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while GWRE trades at $141.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GWRE's competition here
LYFT vs FIG Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while FIG trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 51.82. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FIG's competition here
LYFT vs DAY Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DAY's competition here
LYFT vs FROG Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while FROG trades at $90.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 102.44. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FROG's competition here
LYFT vs XM Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check XM's competition here
LYFT vs CDAY Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CDAY's competition here
LYFT vs HUBS Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while HUBS trades at $212.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check HUBS's competition here
LYFT vs WULF Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while WULF trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -13.77. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check WULF's competition here
LYFT vs DOCU Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while DOCU trades at $50.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DOCU's competition here
LYFT vs MANH Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while MANH trades at $158.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MANH's competition here
LYFT vs BSY Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while BSY trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BSY's competition here
LYFT vs YMM Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while YMM trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check YMM's competition here
LYFT vs OCFT Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OCFT's competition here
LYFT vs NATI Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NATI's competition here
LYFT vs SMAR Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SMAR's competition here
LYFT vs PAYC Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while PAYC trades at $144.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PAYC's competition here
LYFT vs TTAN Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while TTAN trades at $78.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 66.19. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TTAN's competition here
LYFT vs CWAN Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while CWAN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CWAN's competition here
LYFT vs COMP Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while COMP trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 583.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check COMP's competition here
LYFT vs IDCC Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while IDCC trades at $265.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check IDCC's competition here
LYFT vs PCTY Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while PCTY trades at $123.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PCTY's competition here
LYFT vs PCOR Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while PCOR trades at $43.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PCOR's competition here
LYFT vs ESTC Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while ESTC trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ESTC's competition here
LYFT vs APPF Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while APPF trades at $176.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check APPF's competition here
LYFT vs NAVN Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while NAVN trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 396.92. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NAVN's competition here
LYFT vs CVLT Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while CVLT trades at $145.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CVLT's competition here
LYFT vs DSGX Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while DSGX trades at $71.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DSGX's competition here
LYFT vs COUP Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check COUP's competition here
LYFT vs NICE Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while NICE trades at $101.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NICE's competition here
LYFT vs DUOL Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while DUOL trades at $131.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 34.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DUOL's competition here
LYFT vs ZETA Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while ZETA trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZETA's competition here
LYFT vs DAVE Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while DAVE trades at $433.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DAVE's competition here
LYFT vs GTLB Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while GTLB trades at $32.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GTLB's competition here
LYFT vs OTEX Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while OTEX trades at $22.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OTEX's competition here
LYFT vs YOU Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while YOU trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 43.16. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check YOU's competition here
LYFT vs PEGA Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while PEGA trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PEGA's competition here
LYFT vs GBTG Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while GBTG trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 134.36. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GBTG's competition here
LYFT vs OCTV Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while OCTV trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OCTV's competition here
LYFT vs SRAD Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while SRAD trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 62.63. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SRAD's competition here
LYFT vs GRND-WT Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GRND-WT's competition here
LYFT vs PTRN Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while PTRN trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -16.86. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PTRN's competition here
LYFT vs DLO Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while DLO trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DLO's competition here
LYFT vs LIF Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while LIF trades at $54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check LIF's competition here
LYFT vs CVT Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CVT's competition here
LYFT vs MNDY Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while MNDY trades at $81.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MNDY's competition here
LYFT vs BOX Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while BOX trades at $30.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BOX's competition here
LYFT vs BILL Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while BILL trades at $44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BILL's competition here
LYFT vs PYCR Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PYCR's competition here
LYFT vs BULL Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while BULL trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BULL's competition here
LYFT vs PWSC Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PWSC's competition here
LYFT vs BLSH Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while BLSH trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 66.30. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BLSH's competition here
LYFT vs STUB Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while STUB trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -14.28. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STUB's competition here
LYFT vs PSFE-WT Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
LYFT vs RNG Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while RNG trades at $40.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check RNG's competition here
LYFT vs AYX Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AYX's competition here
LYFT vs ENV Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ENV's competition here
LYFT vs INST Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check INST's competition here
LYFT vs ZI Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZI's competition here
LYFT vs NATL Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while NATL trades at $46.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NATL's competition here
LYFT vs QTWO Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while QTWO trades at $52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check QTWO's competition here
LYFT vs FSLY Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while FSLY trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 69.07. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FSLY's competition here
LYFT vs ADEA Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while ADEA trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ADEA's competition here
LYFT vs NP Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while NP trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas NP's P/E ratio is 77.41. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NP's competition here
LYFT vs WK Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while WK trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check WK's competition here
LYFT vs DBD Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while DBD trades at $85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DBD's competition here
LYFT vs BRZE Comparison July 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $16.19, while BRZE trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is 63.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BRZE's competition here