RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RNG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNG | $49.10 | +13.37% | 4.3B | 52.18 | $0.94 | +0.16% |
| SAP | $196.11 | +7.88% | 228.5B | 27.04 | $7.25 | +1.52% |
| APP | $613.70 | +0.10% | 206.2B | 53.23 | $11.53 | N/A |
| CRM | $209.60 | +9.68% | 171.7B | 24.26 | $8.64 | +0.82% |
| SHOP | $124.12 | +4.56% | 161.1B | 121.69 | $1.02 | N/A |
| UBER | $73.77 | +4.79% | 150.2B | 18.32 | $4.03 | N/A |
| NOW | $135.86 | +9.24% | 140.1B | 80.89 | $1.68 | N/A |
| CDNS | $414.16 | +10.46% | 114.2B | 96.99 | $4.27 | N/A |
| ADBE | $274.03 | +5.72% | 110.8B | 15.97 | $17.16 | N/A |
| DDOG | $277.49 | +12.19% | 98.8B | 693.73 | $0.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RNG vs SAP Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 228.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while SAP trades at $196.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check SAP's competition here
RNG vs APP Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 206.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while APP trades at $613.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 53.23. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check APP's competition here
RNG vs CRM Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 171.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while CRM trades at $209.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check CRM's competition here
RNG vs SHOP Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 161.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while SHOP trades at $124.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 121.69. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check SHOP's competition here
RNG vs UBER Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 150.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while UBER trades at $73.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check UBER's competition here
RNG vs NOW Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while NOW trades at $135.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 80.89. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check NOW's competition here
RNG vs CDNS Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while CDNS trades at $414.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 96.99. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check CDNS's competition here
RNG vs ADBE Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while ADBE trades at $274.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check ADBE's competition here
RNG vs DDOG Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while DDOG trades at $277.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 693.73. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check DDOG's competition here
RNG vs SNOW Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while SNOW trades at $280.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -79.31. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check SNOW's competition here
RNG vs INTU Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while INTU trades at $353.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check INTU's competition here
RNG vs ADSK Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while ADSK trades at $248.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check ADSK's competition here
RNG vs MSTR Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while MSTR trades at $149.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check MSTR's competition here
RNG vs WDAY Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while WDAY trades at $157.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 48.83. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check WDAY's competition here
RNG vs ROP Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while ROP trades at $344.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check ROP's competition here
RNG vs ANSS Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check ANSS's competition here
RNG vs ZM Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while ZM trades at $111.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check ZM's competition here
RNG vs TEAM Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while TEAM trades at $115.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -141.40. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check TEAM's competition here
RNG vs FICO Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while FICO trades at $1,284.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check FICO's competition here
RNG vs STRF Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while STRF trades at $98.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check STRF's competition here
RNG vs STRC Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while STRC trades at $98.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check STRC's competition here
RNG vs STRK Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while STRK trades at $71.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check STRK's competition here
RNG vs PTC Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while PTC trades at $145.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check PTC's competition here
RNG vs AZPN Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check AZPN's competition here
RNG vs SSNC Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while SSNC trades at $69.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check SSNC's competition here
RNG vs GWRE Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while GWRE trades at $171.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 77.55. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check GWRE's competition here
RNG vs GRAB Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while GRAB trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 90.25. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check GRAB's competition here
RNG vs U Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while U trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas U's P/E ratio is -20.49. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check U's competition here
RNG vs TYL Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while TYL trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 45.61. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check TYL's competition here
RNG vs HUBS Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while HUBS trades at $262.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 137.87. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check HUBS's competition here
RNG vs FIG Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while FIG trades at $27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check FIG's competition here
RNG vs DT Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while DT trades at $44.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 82.32. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check DT's competition here
RNG vs BKI Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check BKI's competition here
RNG vs DAY Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check DAY's competition here
RNG vs DOCU Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while DOCU trades at $57.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check DOCU's competition here
RNG vs XM Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check XM's competition here
RNG vs CDAY Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check CDAY's competition here
RNG vs FROG Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while FROG trades at $88.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -166.62. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check FROG's competition here
RNG vs BSY Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while BSY trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 40.51. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check BSY's competition here
RNG vs MANH Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while MANH trades at $161.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 45.13. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check MANH's competition here
RNG vs YMM Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while YMM trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check YMM's competition here
RNG vs OCFT Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check OCFT's competition here
RNG vs PCOR Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while PCOR trades at $55.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -108.24. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check PCOR's competition here
RNG vs PAYC Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while PAYC trades at $148.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check PAYC's competition here
RNG vs NATI Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check NATI's competition here
RNG vs SMAR Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check SMAR's competition here
RNG vs TTAN Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while TTAN trades at $77.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -44.90. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check TTAN's competition here
RNG vs CWAN Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while CWAN trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.50. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check CWAN's competition here
RNG vs ESTC Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while ESTC trades at $68.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check ESTC's competition here
RNG vs DSGX Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while DSGX trades at $79.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 42.70. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check DSGX's competition here
RNG vs IDCC Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while IDCC trades at $258.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check IDCC's competition here
RNG vs PCTY Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while PCTY trades at $122.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check PCTY's competition here
RNG vs APPF Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while APPF trades at $179.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check APPF's competition here
RNG vs PEGA Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while PEGA trades at $37.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check PEGA's competition here
RNG vs ZETA Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while ZETA trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -252.05. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check ZETA's competition here
RNG vs OTEX Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while OTEX trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check OTEX's competition here
RNG vs COUP Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check COUP's competition here
RNG vs NICE Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while NICE trades at $99.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check NICE's competition here
RNG vs YOU Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while YOU trades at $57.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check YOU's competition here
RNG vs GTLB Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while GTLB trades at $33.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -99.38. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check GTLB's competition here
RNG vs LYFT Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while LYFT trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check LYFT's competition here
RNG vs OCTV Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while OCTV trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check OCTV's competition here
RNG vs DUOL Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while DUOL trades at $117.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check DUOL's competition here
RNG vs NAVN Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while NAVN trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check NAVN's competition here
RNG vs COMP Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while COMP trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 422.75. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check COMP's competition here
RNG vs CVLT Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while CVLT trades at $122.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 77.46. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check CVLT's competition here
RNG vs MNDY Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while MNDY trades at $95.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check MNDY's competition here
RNG vs GBTG Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while GBTG trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.41. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check GBTG's competition here
RNG vs OCTVV Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check OCTVV's competition here
RNG vs GRND-WT Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check GRND-WT's competition here
RNG vs BTDR Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while BTDR trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -11.29. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check BTDR's competition here
RNG vs CVT Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check CVT's competition here
RNG vs RUM Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while RUM trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -22.26. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check RUM's competition here
RNG vs PYCR Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check PYCR's competition here
RNG vs SRAD Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while SRAD trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 52.96. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check SRAD's competition here
RNG vs SOUN Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while SOUN trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check SOUN's competition here
RNG vs BOX Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while BOX trades at $28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 44.99. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check BOX's competition here
RNG vs KC Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while KC trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -26.14. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check KC's competition here
RNG vs BILL Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while BILL trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -171.83. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check BILL's competition here
RNG vs LIF Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while LIF trades at $48.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check LIF's competition here
RNG vs PWSC Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check PWSC's competition here
RNG vs DAVE Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while DAVE trades at $282.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check DAVE's competition here
RNG vs STUB Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while STUB trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check STUB's competition here
RNG vs AYX Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check AYX's competition here
RNG vs BULL Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while BULL trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check BULL's competition here
RNG vs ENV Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check ENV's competition here
RNG vs INST Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check INST's competition here
RNG vs ZI Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check ZI's competition here
RNG vs QTWO Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while QTWO trades at $52.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 46.51. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check QTWO's competition here
RNG vs NATL Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while NATL trades at $44.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check NATL's competition here
RNG vs BRZE Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while BRZE trades at $28.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -25.24. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check BRZE's competition here
RNG vs BRUN Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while BRUN trades at $39.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -118.79. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check BRUN's competition here
RNG vs ADEA Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while ADEA trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check ADEA's competition here
RNG vs PTRN Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while PTRN trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -24.19. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check PTRN's competition here
RNG vs FSLY Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while FSLY trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -27.65. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check FSLY's competition here
RNG vs WK Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while WK trades at $52.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 220.06. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check WK's competition here
RNG vs FRSH Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while FRSH trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check FRSH's competition here
RNG vs DBD Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while DBD trades at $82.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check DBD's competition here
RNG vs AGYS Comparison June 2026
RNG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNG stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNG is priced at $49.10, while AGYS trades at $93.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNG currently has a P/E ratio of 52.18, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 68.28. In terms of profitability, RNG's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNG is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNG.Check AGYS's competition here