Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 240.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while SAP trades at $206.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SAP's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 202.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while CRM trades at $247.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CRM's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 167.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while SHOP trades at $128.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 81.51. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SHOP's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while UBER trades at $71.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check UBER's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while NOW trades at $132.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NOW's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while SNOW trades at $328.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 233.20. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SNOW's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while APP trades at $323.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to APP's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check APP's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while ADP trades at $268.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ADP's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while ADBE trades at $252.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ADBE's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while INTU trades at $321.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check INTU's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 79.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while CDNS trades at $289.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CDNS's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while DDOG trades at $221.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 92.56. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DDOG's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while WDAY trades at $185.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check WDAY's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while TEAM trades at $179.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 36.01. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check TEAM's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while ADSK trades at $212.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ADSK's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while MSTR trades at $130.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check MSTR's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while VEEV trades at $262.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check VEEV's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while ROP trades at $388.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ROP's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while STRC trades at $98.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STRC's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ANSS's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while STRF trades at $103.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STRF's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while ZM trades at $95.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ZM's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while BSP trades at $38.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is -387700.00. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BSP's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while STRD trades at $75.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STRD's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while STRK trades at $76.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STRK's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while FICO trades at $985.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FICO's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while U trades at $43.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas U's P/E ratio is -82.96. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to U's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to U. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check U's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while SSNC trades at $80.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SSNC's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check AZPN's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while PTC trades at $130.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PTC's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while DT trades at $51.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DT's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while TYL trades at $336.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check TYL's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while AUR trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check AUR's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while CHYM trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -471.43. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CHYM's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while DOCU trades at $65.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DOCU's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while GRAB trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GRAB's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BKI's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while MANH trades at $201.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check MANH's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while GWRE trades at $140.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 40.39. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GWRE's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while GRABW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GRABW's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while HUBS trades at $225.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check HUBS's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while FIG trades at $23.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 64.49. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FIG's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DAY's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check XM's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CDAY's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while FROG trades at $87.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 88.96. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FROG's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while PAYC trades at $218.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PAYC's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while BSY trades at $30.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BSY's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while IDCC trades at $350.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check IDCC's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while ESTC trades at $83.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ESTC's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check OCFT's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while YMM trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check YMM's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while PCOR trades at $53.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PCOR's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NATI's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while GTLB trades at $46.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 46.07. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GTLB's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SMAR's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while PCTY trades at $141.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PCTY's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while ZETA trades at $30.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ZETA's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while APPF trades at $208.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check APPF's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while CWAN trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CWAN's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MAAS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while MAAS trades at $15.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas MAAS's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAAS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to MAAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check MAAS's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while DUOL trades at $143.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DUOL's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while DSGX trades at $76.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DSGX's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while DLB trades at $64.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DLB's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check COUP's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while PEGA trades at $36.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PEGA's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while RNG trades at $68.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check RNG's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while LYFT trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check LYFT's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while NICE trades at $98.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NICE's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while OTEX trades at $23.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check OTEX's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while BULLW trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is 72.95. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BULLW's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while CVLT trades at $130.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CVLT's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while BLSH trades at $35.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 93.71. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BLSH's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while NIQ trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is 49.53. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NIQ's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while TTAN trades at $54.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 45.19. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check TTAN's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while NAVN trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 323.38. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NAVN's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while BULL trades at $9.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BULL's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while KVYO trades at $16.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KVYO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check KVYO's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while OCTV trades at $17.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 53.73. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OCTV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check OCTV's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while DAVE trades at $350.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DAVE's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while BILL trades at $47.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BILL's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while AUROW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check AUROW's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GRND-WT's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while YOU trades at $42.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check YOU's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CVT's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PYCR's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while CCC trades at $6.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CCC's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while WIX trades at $76.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check WIX's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while WK trades at $71.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WK's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check WK's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while SRAD trades at $12.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 215.17. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SRAD's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PWSC's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while QTWO trades at $60.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check QTWO's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while MNDY trades at $86.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check MNDY's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check AYX's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ENV's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PSFE-WT's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while LIF trades at $42.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check LIF's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check INST's competition here

Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $23.16 on the NASDAQ, while NATL trades at $46.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of 49.28, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NATL's competition here