Fastly, Inc.
Fastly, Inc. (FSLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSLY | $17.00 | -3.85% | 2.7B | -24.64 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| SAP | $169.48 | +3.23% | 197.5B | 23.16 | $7.32 | +2.04% |
| APP | $501.00 | +3.26% | 168.3B | 43.64 | $11.48 | N/A |
| CRM | $173.51 | +3.54% | 164.9B | 22.28 | $7.79 | +0.97% |
| UBER | $75.09 | +0.54% | 152.9B | 18.64 | $4.03 | N/A |
| SHOP | $100.28 | +2.94% | 130.1B | 98.31 | $1.02 | N/A |
| INTU | $393.00 | +3.89% | 109.4B | 25.60 | $15.35 | +1.18% |
| NOW | $95.07 | +5.05% | 98B | 56.59 | $1.68 | N/A |
| CDNS | $347.24 | -1.59% | 95.8B | 80.75 | $4.30 | N/A |
| DDOG | $207.98 | +2.53% | 74B | 533.28 | $0.39 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSLY vs SAP Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 197.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while SAP trades at $169.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SAP's competition here
FSLY vs APP Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 168.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while APP trades at $501.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 43.64. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check APP's competition here
FSLY vs CRM Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 164.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while CRM trades at $173.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CRM's competition here
FSLY vs UBER Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 152.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while UBER trades at $75.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check UBER's competition here
FSLY vs SHOP Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while SHOP trades at $100.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 98.31. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SHOP's competition here
FSLY vs INTU Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while INTU trades at $393.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check INTU's competition here
FSLY vs NOW Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while NOW trades at $95.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 56.59. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NOW's competition here
FSLY vs CDNS Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while CDNS trades at $347.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 80.75. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CDNS's competition here
FSLY vs DDOG Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while DDOG trades at $207.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 533.28. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DDOG's competition here
FSLY vs SNOW Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while SNOW trades at $157.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -39.88. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SNOW's competition here
FSLY vs MSTR Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while MSTR trades at $177.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check MSTR's competition here
FSLY vs ADSK Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while ADSK trades at $236.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ADSK's competition here
FSLY vs WDAY Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while WDAY trades at $125.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 47.35. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check WDAY's competition here
FSLY vs ANSS Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ANSS's competition here
FSLY vs GTOP Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while GTOP trades at $46.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GTOP's competition here
FSLY vs STRF Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while STRF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STRF's competition here
FSLY vs ZM Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while ZM trades at $100.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ZM's competition here
FSLY vs STRC Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while STRC trades at $99.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STRC's competition here
FSLY vs FICO Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while FICO trades at $1,098.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FICO's competition here
FSLY vs TEAM Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while TEAM trades at $87.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -106.66. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check TEAM's competition here
FSLY vs STRK Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while STRK trades at $74.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STRK's competition here
FSLY vs AZPN Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check AZPN's competition here
FSLY vs PTC Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while PTC trades at $141.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PTC's competition here
FSLY vs SSNC Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while SSNC trades at $64.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SSNC's competition here
FSLY vs GRAB Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while GRAB trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 88.75. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GRAB's competition here
FSLY vs TYL Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while TYL trades at $311.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check TYL's competition here
FSLY vs BKI Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BKI's competition here
FSLY vs U Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while U trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas U's P/E ratio is -17.30. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check U's competition here
FSLY vs DT Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while DT trades at $38.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 71.02. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DT's competition here
FSLY vs DAY Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DAY's competition here
FSLY vs FIG Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while FIG trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FIG's competition here
FSLY vs GWRE Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while GWRE trades at $130.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 58.87. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GWRE's competition here
FSLY vs XM Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check XM's competition here
FSLY vs CDAY Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CDAY's competition here
FSLY vs HUBS Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while HUBS trades at $198.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 104.38. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check HUBS's competition here
FSLY vs TTD Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while TTD trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check TTD's competition here
FSLY vs BSY Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while BSY trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 36.86. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BSY's competition here
FSLY vs DOCU Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while DOCU trades at $47.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DOCU's competition here
FSLY vs YMM Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while YMM trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check YMM's competition here
FSLY vs OCFT Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check OCFT's competition here
FSLY vs FROG Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while FROG trades at $66.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -124.83. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FROG's competition here
FSLY vs NATI Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NATI's competition here
FSLY vs SMAR Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SMAR's competition here
FSLY vs MANH Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while MANH trades at $131.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 36.78. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check MANH's competition here
FSLY vs PAYC Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while PAYC trades at $136.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PAYC's competition here
FSLY vs CWAN Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while CWAN trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.25. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CWAN's competition here
FSLY vs PCOR Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while PCOR trades at $46.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -90.84. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PCOR's competition here
FSLY vs IDCC Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while IDCC trades at $260.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check IDCC's competition here
FSLY vs COUP Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check COUP's competition here
FSLY vs YOU Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while YOU trades at $58.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 47.12. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check YOU's competition here
FSLY vs DSGX Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while DSGX trades at $67.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DSGX's competition here
FSLY vs PCTY Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while PCTY trades at $107.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PCTY's competition here
FSLY vs PEGA Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while PEGA trades at $33.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PEGA's competition here
FSLY vs TTAN Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while TTAN trades at $58.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -33.83. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check TTAN's competition here
FSLY vs OTEX Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while OTEX trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check OTEX's competition here
FSLY vs APPF Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while APPF trades at $151.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check APPF's competition here
FSLY vs NICE Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while NICE trades at $89.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NICE's competition here
FSLY vs ESTC Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while ESTC trades at $50.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -64.03. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ESTC's competition here
FSLY vs DUOL Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while DUOL trades at $112.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DUOL's competition here
FSLY vs LYFT Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while LYFT trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check LYFT's competition here
FSLY vs GBTG Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while GBTG trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.41. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GBTG's competition here
FSLY vs COMP Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while COMP trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 394.00. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check COMP's competition here
FSLY vs KC Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while KC trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -30.06. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check KC's competition here
FSLY vs GRND-WT Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GRND-WT's competition here
FSLY vs NAVN Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while NAVN trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NAVN's competition here
FSLY vs ZETA Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while ZETA trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -171.85. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ZETA's competition here
FSLY vs CVLT Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while CVLT trades at $103.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 65.76. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CVLT's competition here
FSLY vs CVT Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CVT's competition here
FSLY vs PYCR Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PYCR's competition here
FSLY vs GTLB Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while GTLB trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -69.59. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GTLB's competition here
FSLY vs BILL Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while BILL trades at $40.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -174.22. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BILL's competition here
FSLY vs PWSC Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PWSC's competition here
FSLY vs BULL Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while BULL trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BULL's competition here
FSLY vs MNDY Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while MNDY trades at $71.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check MNDY's competition here
FSLY vs SRAD Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while SRAD trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 48.04. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SRAD's competition here
FSLY vs SOUN Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while SOUN trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -12.01. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SOUN's competition here
FSLY vs RNG Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while RNG trades at $41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 43.66. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check RNG's competition here
FSLY vs AYX Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check AYX's competition here
FSLY vs ENV Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ENV's competition here
FSLY vs INST Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check INST's competition here
FSLY vs ZI Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ZI's competition here
FSLY vs CLSK Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while CLSK trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CLSK's competition here
FSLY vs ADEA Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while ADEA trades at $29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ADEA's competition here
FSLY vs NATL Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while NATL trades at $44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NATL's competition here
FSLY vs DAVE Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while DAVE trades at $235.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DAVE's competition here
FSLY vs RUM Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while RUM trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -22.52. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check RUM's competition here
FSLY vs LIF Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while LIF trades at $38.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check LIF's competition here
FSLY vs STUB Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while STUB trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STUB's competition here
FSLY vs QTWO Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while QTWO trades at $45.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check QTWO's competition here
FSLY vs BTDR Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while BTDR trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -9.34. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BTDR's competition here
FSLY vs WK Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while WK trades at $47.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 197.42. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check WK's competition here
FSLY vs NP Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while NP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -155.50. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NP's competition here
FSLY vs PTRN Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while PTRN trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -20.38. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PTRN's competition here
FSLY vs CALX Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while CALX trades at $39.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 81.29. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CALX's competition here
FSLY vs DCT Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DCT's competition here
FSLY vs FRSH Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while FRSH trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FRSH's competition here
FSLY vs SPNS Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while SPNS trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SPNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SPNS's competition here
FSLY vs DBD Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while DBD trades at $69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DBD's competition here
FSLY vs OS Comparison May 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $17.00, while OS trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas OS's P/E ratio is -85.71. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to OS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check OS's competition here