Fastly, Inc. (FSLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSLY | $20.43 | -1.64% | 3.3B | -30.19 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| SAP | $190.65 | -0.09% | 210.5B | 24.85 | $7.27 | +1.63% |
| APP | $576.76 | -4.77% | 191.8B | 49.51 | $11.53 | N/A |
| CRM | $192.41 | -4.20% | 156.2B | 22.07 | $8.64 | +0.88% |
| SHOP | $116.77 | -0.21% | 146.6B | 110.73 | $1.02 | N/A |
| UBER | $73.02 | +1.95% | 145.9B | 17.79 | $4.03 | N/A |
| NOW | $121.91 | -4.50% | 121.6B | 70.19 | $1.68 | N/A |
| CDNS | $407.41 | -2.16% | 112.5B | 95.10 | $4.29 | N/A |
| ADBE | $262.87 | +0.29% | 103.6B | 14.92 | $17.17 | N/A |
| DDOG | $246.06 | -8.57% | 89.1B | 641.87 | $0.39 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSLY vs SAP Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 210.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while SAP trades at $190.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SAP's competition here
FSLY vs APP Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 191.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while APP trades at $576.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 49.51. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check APP's competition here
FSLY vs CRM Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while CRM trades at $192.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CRM's competition here
FSLY vs SHOP Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while SHOP trades at $116.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 110.73. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SHOP's competition here
FSLY vs UBER Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while UBER trades at $73.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check UBER's competition here
FSLY vs NOW Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while NOW trades at $121.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 70.19. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NOW's competition here
FSLY vs CDNS Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while CDNS trades at $407.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 95.10. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CDNS's competition here
FSLY vs ADBE Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while ADBE trades at $262.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ADBE's competition here
FSLY vs DDOG Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while DDOG trades at $246.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 641.87. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DDOG's competition here
FSLY vs INTU Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while INTU trades at $310.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check INTU's competition here
FSLY vs SNOW Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while SNOW trades at $248.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -68.34. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SNOW's competition here
FSLY vs ADSK Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while ADSK trades at $236.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ADSK's competition here
FSLY vs WDAY Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while WDAY trades at $150.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 45.76. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check WDAY's competition here
FSLY vs MSTR Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while MSTR trades at $129.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check MSTR's competition here
FSLY vs ROP Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while ROP trades at $337.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ROP's competition here
FSLY vs ANSS Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ANSS's competition here
FSLY vs ZM Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while ZM trades at $105.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ZM's competition here
FSLY vs STRF Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while STRF trades at $96.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STRF's competition here
FSLY vs STRC Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while STRC trades at $96.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STRC's competition here
FSLY vs FICO Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while FICO trades at $1,194.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FICO's competition here
FSLY vs TEAM Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while TEAM trades at $104.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -123.82. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check TEAM's competition here
FSLY vs STRK Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while STRK trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STRK's competition here
FSLY vs AZPN Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check AZPN's competition here
FSLY vs SSNC Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while SSNC trades at $69.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SSNC's competition here
FSLY vs PTC Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while PTC trades at $143.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PTC's competition here
FSLY vs GRAB Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while GRAB trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 85.25. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GRAB's competition here
FSLY vs GWRE Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while GWRE trades at $162.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 70.17. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GWRE's competition here
FSLY vs TYL Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while TYL trades at $311.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check TYL's competition here
FSLY vs U Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while U trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas U's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check U's competition here
FSLY vs DT Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while DT trades at $43.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 80.43. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DT's competition here
FSLY vs BKI Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BKI's competition here
FSLY vs HUBS Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while HUBS trades at $230.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 117.02. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check HUBS's competition here
FSLY vs DAY Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DAY's competition here
FSLY vs FIG Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while FIG trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FIG's competition here
FSLY vs XM Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check XM's competition here
FSLY vs CDAY Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CDAY's competition here
FSLY vs DOCU Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while DOCU trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 35.41. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DOCU's competition here
FSLY vs FROG Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while FROG trades at $84.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -158.23. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FROG's competition here
FSLY vs BSY Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while BSY trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 37.49. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BSY's competition here
FSLY vs YMM Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while YMM trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check YMM's competition here
FSLY vs MANH Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while MANH trades at $153.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 42.23. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check MANH's competition here
FSLY vs OCFT Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check OCFT's competition here
FSLY vs NATI Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NATI's competition here
FSLY vs SMAR Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SMAR's competition here
FSLY vs PCOR Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while PCOR trades at $51.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -99.33. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PCOR's competition here
FSLY vs PAYC Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while PAYC trades at $141.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PAYC's competition here
FSLY vs CWAN Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while CWAN trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.44. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CWAN's competition here
FSLY vs TTAN Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while TTAN trades at $75.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -41.98. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check TTAN's competition here
FSLY vs ESTC Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while ESTC trades at $65.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ESTC's competition here
FSLY vs IDCC Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while IDCC trades at $259.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check IDCC's competition here
FSLY vs DSGX Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while DSGX trades at $80.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 39.63. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DSGX's competition here
FSLY vs COUP Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check COUP's competition here
FSLY vs PCTY Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while PCTY trades at $115.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PCTY's competition here
FSLY vs APPF Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while APPF trades at $169.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.49. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check APPF's competition here
FSLY vs PEGA Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while PEGA trades at $35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PEGA's competition here
FSLY vs ZETA Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while ZETA trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -232.70. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ZETA's competition here
FSLY vs OTEX Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while OTEX trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check OTEX's competition here
FSLY vs YOU Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while YOU trades at $56.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check YOU's competition here
FSLY vs NICE Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while NICE trades at $96.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NICE's competition here
FSLY vs LYFT Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while LYFT trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check LYFT's competition here
FSLY vs OCTV Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while OCTV trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check OCTV's competition here
FSLY vs NAVN Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while NAVN trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NAVN's competition here
FSLY vs GTLB Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while GTLB trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -206.20. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GTLB's competition here
FSLY vs DUOL Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while DUOL trades at $110.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DUOL's competition here
FSLY vs CVLT Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while CVLT trades at $122.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 76.49. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CVLT's competition here
FSLY vs GBTG Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while GBTG trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.44. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GBTG's competition here
FSLY vs OCTVV Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check OCTVV's competition here
FSLY vs COMP Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while COMP trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 380.75. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check COMP's competition here
FSLY vs BTDR Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while BTDR trades at $19.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BTDR's competition here
FSLY vs MNDY Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while MNDY trades at $89.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 37.53. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check MNDY's competition here
FSLY vs GRND-WT Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check GRND-WT's competition here
FSLY vs CVT Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check CVT's competition here
FSLY vs PYCR Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PYCR's competition here
FSLY vs SRAD Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while SRAD trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 51.77. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SRAD's competition here
FSLY vs RNG Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while RNG trades at $44.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check RNG's competition here
FSLY vs PWSC Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PWSC's competition here
FSLY vs KC Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while KC trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -24.98. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check KC's competition here
FSLY vs LIF Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while LIF trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check LIF's competition here
FSLY vs BOX Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while BOX trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BOX's competition here
FSLY vs RUM Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while RUM trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check RUM's competition here
FSLY vs ADEA Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while ADEA trades at $31.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ADEA's competition here
FSLY vs AYX Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check AYX's competition here
FSLY vs BILL Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while BILL trades at $36.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -153.02. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BILL's competition here
FSLY vs SOUN Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while SOUN trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check SOUN's competition here
FSLY vs ENV Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ENV's competition here
FSLY vs INST Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check INST's competition here
FSLY vs ZI Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check ZI's competition here
FSLY vs DAVE Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while DAVE trades at $255.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DAVE's competition here
FSLY vs STUB Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while STUB trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check STUB's competition here
FSLY vs NATL Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while NATL trades at $44.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check NATL's competition here
FSLY vs BULL Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while BULL trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BULL's competition here
FSLY vs PTRN Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while PTRN trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -24.54. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check PTRN's competition here
FSLY vs BRUN Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while BRUN trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -115.45. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BRUN's competition here
FSLY vs QTWO Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while QTWO trades at $46.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check QTWO's competition here
FSLY vs DBD Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while DBD trades at $81.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DBD's competition here
FSLY vs WK Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while WK trades at $50.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 207.55. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check WK's competition here
FSLY vs BRZE Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while BRZE trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -21.04. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check BRZE's competition here
FSLY vs FRSH Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while FRSH trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check FRSH's competition here
FSLY vs DCT Comparison June 2026
FSLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSLY stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSLY is priced at $20.43, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSLY currently has a P/E ratio of -30.19, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, FSLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSLY is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSLY.Check DCT's competition here