Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MANH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANH | $158.31 | +2.20% | 9.4B | 30.92 | $5.12 | N/A |
| SAP | $159.97 | +1.34% | 186.5B | 21.46 | $7.46 | +1.84% |
| SHOP | $124.74 | +1.80% | 161.9B | 82.61 | $1.51 | N/A |
| UBER | $74.26 | -0.38% | 151.2B | 16.15 | $4.60 | N/A |
| APP | $442.85 | -12.65% | 148.8B | 38.48 | $11.51 | N/A |
| CRM | $171.22 | +4.84% | 140.2B | 12.36 | $13.85 | +1.25% |
| NOW | $111.26 | +3.30% | 114.8B | 30.31 | $3.67 | N/A |
| CDNS | $377.92 | -1.63% | 104.2B | 50.19 | $7.53 | N/A |
| SNOW | $268.65 | +2.75% | 93.1B | 190.59 | $1.41 | N/A |
| DDOG | $260.24 | +1.05% | 92.6B | 118.29 | $2.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MANH vs SAP Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 186.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while SAP trades at $159.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SAP's competition here
MANH vs SHOP Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 161.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while SHOP trades at $124.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 82.61. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SHOP's competition here
MANH vs UBER Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 151.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while UBER trades at $74.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check UBER's competition here
MANH vs APP Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while APP trades at $442.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 38.48. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check APP's competition here
MANH vs CRM Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while CRM trades at $171.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CRM's competition here
MANH vs NOW Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 114.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while NOW trades at $111.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NOW's competition here
MANH vs CDNS Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 104.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while CDNS trades at $377.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 50.19. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CDNS's competition here
MANH vs SNOW Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while SNOW trades at $268.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 190.59. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SNOW's competition here
MANH vs DDOG Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while DDOG trades at $260.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 118.29. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DDOG's competition here
MANH vs ADBE Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while ADBE trades at $230.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ADBE's competition here
MANH vs INTU Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while INTU trades at $289.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check INTU's competition here
MANH vs ADSK Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while ADSK trades at $212.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ADSK's competition here
MANH vs WDAY Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while WDAY trades at $144.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check WDAY's competition here
MANH vs ROP Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while ROP trades at $360.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ROP's competition here
MANH vs ANSS Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ANSS's competition here
MANH vs FICO Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while FICO trades at $1,278.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check FICO's competition here
MANH vs STRC Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while STRC trades at $87.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check STRC's competition here
MANH vs STRF Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while STRF trades at $95.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check STRF's competition here
MANH vs MSTR Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while MSTR trades at $92.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check MSTR's competition here
MANH vs ZM Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while ZM trades at $91.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ZM's competition here
MANH vs TEAM Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while TEAM trades at $96.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check TEAM's competition here
MANH vs BSP Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while BSP trades at $31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is -317800.00. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BSP's competition here
MANH vs STRK Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while STRK trades at $60.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check STRK's competition here
MANH vs STRD Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while STRD trades at $59.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check STRD's competition here
MANH vs AZPN Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check AZPN's competition here
MANH vs SSNC Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while SSNC trades at $68.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SSNC's competition here
MANH vs GRAB Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while GRAB trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GRAB's competition here
MANH vs GRABW Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while GRABW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GRABW's competition here
MANH vs PTC Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while PTC trades at $125.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PTC's competition here
MANH vs U Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while U trades at $30.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas U's P/E ratio is -28.68. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check U's competition here
MANH vs TYL Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while TYL trades at $314.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check TYL's competition here
MANH vs DT Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while DT trades at $44.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DT's competition here
MANH vs BKI Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BKI's competition here
MANH vs GWRE Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while GWRE trades at $140.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GWRE's competition here
MANH vs FIG Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while FIG trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 51.39. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check FIG's competition here
MANH vs DAY Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DAY's competition here
MANH vs FROG Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while FROG trades at $92.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 103.39. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check FROG's competition here
MANH vs HUBS Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while HUBS trades at $217.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check HUBS's competition here
MANH vs XM Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check XM's competition here
MANH vs CDAY Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CDAY's competition here
MANH vs WULF Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while WULF trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check WULF's competition here
MANH vs DOCU Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while DOCU trades at $49.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DOCU's competition here
MANH vs BSY Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while BSY trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BSY's competition here
MANH vs YMM Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while YMM trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check YMM's competition here
MANH vs OCFT Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check OCFT's competition here
MANH vs PAYC Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while PAYC trades at $146.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PAYC's competition here
MANH vs NATI Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NATI's competition here
MANH vs SMAR Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SMAR's competition here
MANH vs TTAN Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while TTAN trades at $80.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 66.40. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check TTAN's competition here
MANH vs CWAN Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while CWAN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CWAN's competition here
MANH vs COMP Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while COMP trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 575.00. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check COMP's competition here
MANH vs IDCC Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while IDCC trades at $261.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check IDCC's competition here
MANH vs PCTY Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while PCTY trades at $124.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PCTY's competition here
MANH vs PCOR Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while PCOR trades at $44.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PCOR's competition here
MANH vs ESTC Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while ESTC trades at $62.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ESTC's competition here
MANH vs APPF Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while APPF trades at $179.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check APPF's competition here
MANH vs NAVN Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while NAVN trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 402.00. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NAVN's competition here
MANH vs DSGX Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while DSGX trades at $72.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DSGX's competition here
MANH vs DUOL Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while DUOL trades at $132.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DUOL's competition here
MANH vs CVLT Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while CVLT trades at $148.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 34.02. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CVLT's competition here
MANH vs COUP Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check COUP's competition here
MANH vs NICE Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while NICE trades at $103.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NICE's competition here
MANH vs LYFT Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while LYFT trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check LYFT's competition here
MANH vs OTEX Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while OTEX trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check OTEX's competition here
MANH vs GTLB Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while GTLB trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GTLB's competition here
MANH vs ZETA Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while ZETA trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ZETA's competition here
MANH vs YOU Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while YOU trades at $53.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 42.80. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check YOU's competition here
MANH vs PEGA Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while PEGA trades at $31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PEGA's competition here
MANH vs DAVE Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while DAVE trades at $389.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DAVE's competition here
MANH vs GBTG Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while GBTG trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 134.36. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GBTG's competition here
MANH vs SRAD Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while SRAD trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 64.96. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SRAD's competition here
MANH vs OCTV Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while OCTV trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 51.36. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check OCTV's competition here
MANH vs MNDY Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while MNDY trades at $86.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check MNDY's competition here
MANH vs PTRN Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while PTRN trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -17.08. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PTRN's competition here
MANH vs GRND-WT Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GRND-WT's competition here
MANH vs DLO Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while DLO trades at $14.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DLO's competition here
MANH vs BILL Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while BILL trades at $42.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BILL's competition here
MANH vs LIF Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while LIF trades at $52.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check LIF's competition here
MANH vs CVT Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CVT's competition here
MANH vs PYCR Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PYCR's competition here
MANH vs BOX Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while BOX trades at $29.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BOX's competition here
MANH vs BULL Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while BULL trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BULL's competition here
MANH vs PWSC Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PWSC's competition here
MANH vs PSFE-WT Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
MANH vs RNG Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while RNG trades at $42.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check RNG's competition here
MANH vs STUB Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while STUB trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check STUB's competition here
MANH vs AYX Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check AYX's competition here
MANH vs ENV Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ENV's competition here
MANH vs BLSH Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while BLSH trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 60.97. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BLSH's competition here
MANH vs INST Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check INST's competition here
MANH vs ZI Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ZI's competition here
MANH vs NATL Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while NATL trades at $45.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NATL's competition here
MANH vs QTWO Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while QTWO trades at $52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check QTWO's competition here
MANH vs FSLY Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while FSLY trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 69.07. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check FSLY's competition here
MANH vs AGYS Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while AGYS trades at $109.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 61.66. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check AGYS's competition here
MANH vs WK Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while WK trades at $54.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check WK's competition here
MANH vs ADEA Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while ADEA trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ADEA's competition here
MANH vs NP Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while NP trades at $32.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NP's P/E ratio is 78.39. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NP's competition here
MANH vs BRZE Comparison July 2026
MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $158.31, while BRZE trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is 64.88. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BRZE's competition here