Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while SAP trades at $150.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SAP's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while APP trades at $461.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check APP's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 145.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while UBER trades at $72.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check UBER's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while SHOP trades at $108.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 106.72. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SHOP's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while CRM trades at $148.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CRM's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while CDNS trades at $382.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 89.88. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CDNS's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while NOW trades at $92.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 56.57. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NOW's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while SNOW trades at $232.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -65.80. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SNOW's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while DDOG trades at $220.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 571.79. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DDOG's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while ADBE trades at $192.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ADBE's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while INTU trades at $256.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check INTU's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while ADSK trades at $189.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ADSK's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while MSTR trades at $112.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check MSTR's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while ROP trades at $330.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ROP's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ANSS's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while WDAY trades at $114.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check WDAY's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while STRF trades at $92.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check STRF's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while STRC trades at $90.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check STRC's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while FICO trades at $1,076.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check FICO's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while ZM trades at $83.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ZM's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while TEAM trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -100.88. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check TEAM's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while STRK trades at $61.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check STRK's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check AZPN's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while SSNC trades at $64.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SSNC's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while GRAB trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 89.25. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GRAB's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while GRABW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GRABW's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while PTC trades at $115.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PTC's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while DT trades at $40.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 76.70. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DT's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while U trades at $26.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas U's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check U's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BKI's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while TYL trades at $275.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check TYL's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DAY's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check XM's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CDAY's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while FROG trades at $80.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -156.08. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check FROG's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while FIG trades at $19.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check FIG's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while HUBS trades at $171.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 92.65. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check HUBS's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while GWRE trades at $102.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 57.99. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GWRE's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check OCFT's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while BSY trades at $28.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BSY's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while DOCU trades at $42.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DOCU's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while YMM trades at $8.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check YMM's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NATI's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SMAR's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while IDCC trades at $294.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check IDCC's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while CWAN trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -134.94. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CWAN's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while PAYC trades at $122.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PAYC's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while ESTC trades at $57.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ESTC's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while TTAN trades at $62.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -43.99. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check TTAN's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check COUP's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while COMP trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 500.50. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check COMP's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while PCOR trades at $38.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.41. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PCOR's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while DUOL trades at $128.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DUOL's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while DSGX trades at $67.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DSGX's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while APPF trades at $145.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check APPF's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while LYFT trades at $14.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check LYFT's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while PCTY trades at $99.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PCTY's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while CVLT trades at $125.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 82.30. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CVLT's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while NAVN trades at $22.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -15.54. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NAVN's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while YOU trades at $50.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 41.16. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check YOU's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while PEGA trades at $29.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PEGA's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while OTEX trades at $20.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check OTEX's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while NICE trades at $84.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NICE's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while GBTG trades at $9.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.50. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GBTG's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while ZETA trades at $18.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -189.00. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ZETA's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check OCTVV's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while GTLB trades at $25.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -177.07. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GTLB's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while SRAD trades at $14.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 60.24. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SRAD's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while OCTV trades at $16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check OCTV's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check GRND-WT's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while DAVE trades at $310.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DAVE's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while DAVEW trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DAVEW's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check CVT's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while BTDR trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BTDR's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while STUB trades at $11.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check STUB's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PYCR's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while LIF trades at $48.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check LIF's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PWSC's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while BULL trades at $7.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BULL's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while MNDY trades at $69.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check MNDY's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check AYX's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while ADEA trades at $31.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ADEA's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ENV's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check INST's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while BOX trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 38.81. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BOX's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check ZI's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while PTRN trades at $21.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -26.37. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PTRN's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while BILL trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -141.17. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BILL's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while NATL trades at $43.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NATL's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while RUM trades at $7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check RUM's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while PPLI trades at $42.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PPLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check PPLI's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while SOUN trades at $6.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SOUN's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while RNG trades at $34.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 37.26. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check RNG's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while KC trades at $9.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -19.73. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check KC's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while BRUN trades at $36.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -87.38. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check BRUN's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while SOUNW trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is less volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check SOUNW's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while DBD trades at $83.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check DBD's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while FSLY trades at $16.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -25.94. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check FSLY's competition here

MANH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANH stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANH is priced at $127.99, while NP trades at $29.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANH currently has a P/E ratio of 37.05, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -162.44. In terms of profitability, MANH's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANH is more volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANH.Check NP's competition here