Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QTWO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTWO | $45.98 | -12.54% | 3.1B | 43.30 | $1.13 | N/A |
| SAP | $182.62 | -6.88% | 222.3B | 26.32 | $7.25 | +1.54% |
| APP | $572.93 | -6.64% | 203.5B | 52.53 | $11.53 | N/A |
| CRM | $192.00 | -8.40% | 164.5B | 23.25 | $8.64 | +0.85% |
| SHOP | $113.73 | -8.37% | 151.8B | 114.69 | $1.02 | N/A |
| UBER | $70.80 | -4.03% | 145.9B | 17.78 | $4.03 | N/A |
| NOW | $120.14 | -11.57% | 131.6B | 75.98 | $1.68 | N/A |
| CDNS | $401.82 | -2.98% | 114.9B | 97.52 | $4.27 | N/A |
| ADBE | $254.33 | -7.19% | 105.9B | 15.27 | $17.16 | N/A |
| DDOG | $245.94 | -11.37% | 95.8B | 672.68 | $0.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QTWO vs SAP Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 222.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while SAP trades at $182.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SAP's competition here
QTWO vs APP Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while APP trades at $572.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 52.53. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check APP's competition here
QTWO vs CRM Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 164.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while CRM trades at $192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CRM's competition here
QTWO vs SHOP Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while SHOP trades at $113.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 114.69. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SHOP's competition here
QTWO vs UBER Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while UBER trades at $70.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check UBER's competition here
QTWO vs NOW Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 131.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while NOW trades at $120.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 75.98. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NOW's competition here
QTWO vs CDNS Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while CDNS trades at $401.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 97.52. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CDNS's competition here
QTWO vs ADBE Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while ADBE trades at $254.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ADBE's competition here
QTWO vs DDOG Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while DDOG trades at $245.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 672.68. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DDOG's competition here
QTWO vs SNOW Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while SNOW trades at $248.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SNOW's competition here
QTWO vs INTU Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while INTU trades at $313.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check INTU's competition here
QTWO vs ADSK Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while ADSK trades at $230.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ADSK's competition here
QTWO vs MSTR Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while MSTR trades at $135.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check MSTR's competition here
QTWO vs WDAY Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while WDAY trades at $143.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check WDAY's competition here
QTWO vs ROP Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while ROP trades at $331.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ROP's competition here
QTWO vs ANSS Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ANSS's competition here
QTWO vs ZM Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while ZM trades at $106.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ZM's competition here
QTWO vs FICO Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while FICO trades at $1,187.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check FICO's competition here
QTWO vs STRF Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while STRF trades at $97.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check STRF's competition here
QTWO vs STRC Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while STRC trades at $96.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check STRC's competition here
QTWO vs TEAM Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while TEAM trades at $100.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -133.05. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check TEAM's competition here
QTWO vs STRK Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while STRK trades at $69.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check STRK's competition here
QTWO vs AZPN Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check AZPN's competition here
QTWO vs PTC Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while PTC trades at $139.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PTC's competition here
QTWO vs SSNC Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while SSNC trades at $67.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SSNC's competition here
QTWO vs GRAB Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while GRAB trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GRAB's competition here
QTWO vs GWRE Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while GWRE trades at $156.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 73.65. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GWRE's competition here
QTWO vs U Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while U trades at $29.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas U's P/E ratio is -19.58. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check U's competition here
QTWO vs TYL Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while TYL trades at $306.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 43.20. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check TYL's competition here
QTWO vs DT Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while DT trades at $43.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 83.29. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DT's competition here
QTWO vs HUBS Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while HUBS trades at $221.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 126.32. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check HUBS's competition here
QTWO vs BKI Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BKI's competition here
QTWO vs FIG Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while FIG trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check FIG's competition here
QTWO vs DAY Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DAY's competition here
QTWO vs XM Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check XM's competition here
QTWO vs CDAY Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CDAY's competition here
QTWO vs DOCU Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while DOCU trades at $52.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 37.23. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DOCU's competition here
QTWO vs FROG Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while FROG trades at $83.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -166.13. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check FROG's competition here
QTWO vs BSY Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while BSY trades at $33.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 39.08. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BSY's competition here
QTWO vs YMM Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while YMM trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check YMM's competition here
QTWO vs MANH Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while MANH trades at $150.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check MANH's competition here
QTWO vs OCFT Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check OCFT's competition here
QTWO vs NATI Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NATI's competition here
QTWO vs PCOR Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while PCOR trades at $49.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -103.30. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PCOR's competition here
QTWO vs SMAR Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SMAR's competition here
QTWO vs PAYC Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while PAYC trades at $137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PAYC's competition here
QTWO vs CWAN Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while CWAN trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.50. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CWAN's competition here
QTWO vs TTAN Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while TTAN trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -43.40. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check TTAN's competition here
QTWO vs ESTC Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while ESTC trades at $64.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ESTC's competition here
QTWO vs OCTV Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while OCTV trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check OCTV's competition here
QTWO vs IDCC Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while IDCC trades at $254.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check IDCC's competition here
QTWO vs DSGX Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while DSGX trades at $74.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DSGX's competition here
QTWO vs PCTY Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while PCTY trades at $113.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PCTY's competition here
QTWO vs ZETA Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while ZETA trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -252.35. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ZETA's competition here
QTWO vs APPF Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while APPF trades at $163.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check APPF's competition here
QTWO vs PEGA Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while PEGA trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PEGA's competition here
QTWO vs COUP Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check COUP's competition here
QTWO vs OTEX Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while OTEX trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check OTEX's competition here
QTWO vs YOU Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while YOU trades at $55.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 45.41. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check YOU's competition here
QTWO vs NICE Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while NICE trades at $94.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NICE's competition here
QTWO vs NAVN Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while NAVN trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NAVN's competition here
QTWO vs GTLB Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while GTLB trades at $29.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -93.59. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GTLB's competition here
QTWO vs LYFT Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while LYFT trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check LYFT's competition here
QTWO vs COMP Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while COMP trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 431.00. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check COMP's competition here
QTWO vs DUOL Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while DUOL trades at $109.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DUOL's competition here
QTWO vs CVLT Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while CVLT trades at $118.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 77.29. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CVLT's competition here
QTWO vs GBTG Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while GBTG trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.53. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GBTG's competition here
QTWO vs MNDY Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while MNDY trades at $85.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 39.96. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check MNDY's competition here
QTWO vs OCTVV Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check OCTVV's competition here
QTWO vs GRND-WT Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GRND-WT's competition here
QTWO vs BTDR Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while BTDR trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BTDR's competition here
QTWO vs CVT Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CVT's competition here
QTWO vs PYCR Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PYCR's competition here
QTWO vs RNG Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while RNG trades at $43.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check RNG's competition here
QTWO vs KC Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while KC trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -26.86. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check KC's competition here
QTWO vs SRAD Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while SRAD trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 52.62. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SRAD's competition here
QTWO vs RUM Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while RUM trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -20.86. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check RUM's competition here
QTWO vs BILL Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while BILL trades at $36.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -167.26. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BILL's competition here
QTWO vs BOX Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while BOX trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BOX's competition here
QTWO vs SOUN Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while SOUN trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SOUN's competition here
QTWO vs LIF Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while LIF trades at $45.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check LIF's competition here
QTWO vs PWSC Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PWSC's competition here
QTWO vs DAVE Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while DAVE trades at $251.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DAVE's competition here
QTWO vs AYX Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check AYX's competition here
QTWO vs ENV Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ENV's competition here
QTWO vs INST Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check INST's competition here
QTWO vs STUB Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while STUB trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check STUB's competition here
QTWO vs ZI Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ZI's competition here
QTWO vs ADEA Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while ADEA trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ADEA's competition here
QTWO vs BULL Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while BULL trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BULL's competition here
QTWO vs NATL Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while NATL trades at $44.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NATL's competition here
QTWO vs FSLY Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while FSLY trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check FSLY's competition here
QTWO vs PTRN Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while PTRN trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PTRN's competition here
QTWO vs BRUN Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while BRUN trades at $35.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -111.33. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BRUN's competition here
QTWO vs WK Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while WK trades at $49.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 216.42. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check WK's competition here
QTWO vs BRZE Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while BRZE trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -22.93. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BRZE's competition here
QTWO vs DBD Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while DBD trades at $81.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DBD's competition here
QTWO vs FRSH Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while FRSH trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check FRSH's competition here
QTWO vs AGYS Comparison June 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $45.98, while AGYS trades at $87.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.30, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 65.42. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check AGYS's competition here