Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QTWO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTWO | $51.83 | -0.59% | 3.2B | 22.44 | $2.31 | N/A |
| SAP | $157.86 | -0.38% | 183.9B | 21.16 | $7.46 | +1.86% |
| APP | $506.98 | -2.58% | 170.3B | 44.05 | $11.51 | N/A |
| SHOP | $122.54 | -0.51% | 159B | 81.15 | $1.51 | N/A |
| UBER | $74.54 | +0.26% | 151.7B | 16.20 | $4.60 | N/A |
| CRM | $163.32 | +0.50% | 133.8B | 11.79 | $13.85 | +1.30% |
| NOW | $107.71 | -1.04% | 111.1B | 29.33 | $3.67 | N/A |
| CDNS | $384.17 | -0.46% | 106B | 51.02 | $7.53 | N/A |
| DDOG | $257.54 | -4.26% | 91.7B | 117.06 | $2.20 | N/A |
| SNOW | $261.45 | -2.26% | 90.6B | 185.41 | $1.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QTWO vs SAP Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 183.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while SAP trades at $157.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SAP's competition here
QTWO vs APP Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while APP trades at $506.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 44.05. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check APP's competition here
QTWO vs SHOP Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 159B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while SHOP trades at $122.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 81.15. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SHOP's competition here
QTWO vs UBER Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while UBER trades at $74.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check UBER's competition here
QTWO vs CRM Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 133.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while CRM trades at $163.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CRM's competition here
QTWO vs NOW Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while NOW trades at $107.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NOW's competition here
QTWO vs CDNS Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while CDNS trades at $384.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CDNS's competition here
QTWO vs DDOG Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while DDOG trades at $257.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 117.06. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DDOG's competition here
QTWO vs SNOW Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while SNOW trades at $261.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 185.41. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SNOW's competition here
QTWO vs ADBE Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while ADBE trades at $223.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ADBE's competition here
QTWO vs INTU Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while INTU trades at $274.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check INTU's competition here
QTWO vs ADSK Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while ADSK trades at $208.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ADSK's competition here
QTWO vs WDAY Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while WDAY trades at $138.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check WDAY's competition here
QTWO vs ROP Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while ROP trades at $355.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ROP's competition here
QTWO vs ANSS Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ANSS's competition here
QTWO vs FICO Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while FICO trades at $1,250.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check FICO's competition here
QTWO vs STRC Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while STRC trades at $87.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check STRC's competition here
QTWO vs STRF Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while STRF trades at $96.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check STRF's competition here
QTWO vs MSTR Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while MSTR trades at $94.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check MSTR's competition here
QTWO vs ZM Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while ZM trades at $89.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ZM's competition here
QTWO vs TEAM Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while TEAM trades at $88.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check TEAM's competition here
QTWO vs BSP Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while BSP trades at $32.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is -329100.00. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BSP's competition here
QTWO vs STRK Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while STRK trades at $60.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check STRK's competition here
QTWO vs STRD Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while STRD trades at $60.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check STRD's competition here
QTWO vs AZPN Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check AZPN's competition here
QTWO vs SSNC Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while SSNC trades at $66.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SSNC's competition here
QTWO vs GRAB Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while GRAB trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GRAB's competition here
QTWO vs GRABW Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while GRABW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GRABW's competition here
QTWO vs PTC Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while PTC trades at $124.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PTC's competition here
QTWO vs U Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while U trades at $30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas U's P/E ratio is -28.87. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check U's competition here
QTWO vs TYL Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while TYL trades at $309.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check TYL's competition here
QTWO vs DT Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while DT trades at $43.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DT's competition here
QTWO vs BKI Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BKI's competition here
QTWO vs GWRE Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while GWRE trades at $136.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GWRE's competition here
QTWO vs DAY Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DAY's competition here
QTWO vs XM Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check XM's competition here
QTWO vs FROG Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while FROG trades at $90.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 101.96. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check FROG's competition here
QTWO vs WULF Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while WULF trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -15.58. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check WULF's competition here
QTWO vs CDAY Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CDAY's competition here
QTWO vs HUBS Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while HUBS trades at $207.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check HUBS's competition here
QTWO vs FIG Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while FIG trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 45.87. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check FIG's competition here
QTWO vs DOCU Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while DOCU trades at $49.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DOCU's competition here
QTWO vs BSY Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while BSY trades at $31.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BSY's competition here
QTWO vs MANH Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while MANH trades at $154.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check MANH's competition here
QTWO vs YMM Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while YMM trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check YMM's competition here
QTWO vs OCFT Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check OCFT's competition here
QTWO vs NATI Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NATI's competition here
QTWO vs SMAR Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SMAR's competition here
QTWO vs PAYC Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while PAYC trades at $139.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PAYC's competition here
QTWO vs TTAN Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while TTAN trades at $77.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 64.21. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check TTAN's competition here
QTWO vs CWAN Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while CWAN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CWAN's competition here
QTWO vs COMP Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while COMP trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 586.00. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check COMP's competition here
QTWO vs IDCC Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while IDCC trades at $264.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check IDCC's competition here
QTWO vs PCOR Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while PCOR trades at $43.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PCOR's competition here
QTWO vs PCTY Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while PCTY trades at $118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PCTY's competition here
QTWO vs APPF Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while APPF trades at $175.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check APPF's competition here
QTWO vs ESTC Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while ESTC trades at $60.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ESTC's competition here
QTWO vs CVLT Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while CVLT trades at $150.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 34.46. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CVLT's competition here
QTWO vs NAVN Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while NAVN trades at $25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 398.77. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NAVN's competition here
QTWO vs DSGX Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while DSGX trades at $72.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DSGX's competition here
QTWO vs COUP Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check COUP's competition here
QTWO vs LYFT Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while LYFT trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check LYFT's competition here
QTWO vs NICE Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while NICE trades at $99.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NICE's competition here
QTWO vs DUOL Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while DUOL trades at $124.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DUOL's competition here
QTWO vs OTEX Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while OTEX trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check OTEX's competition here
QTWO vs YOU Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while YOU trades at $55.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check YOU's competition here
QTWO vs GTLB Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while GTLB trades at $32.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GTLB's competition here
QTWO vs DAVE Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while DAVE trades at $400.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DAVE's competition here
QTWO vs ZETA Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while ZETA trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ZETA's competition here
QTWO vs PEGA Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while PEGA trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PEGA's competition here
QTWO vs GBTG Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while GBTG trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 134.36. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GBTG's competition here
QTWO vs SRAD Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while SRAD trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 64.38. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check SRAD's competition here
QTWO vs OCTV Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while OCTV trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 51.52. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check OCTV's competition here
QTWO vs PTRN Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while PTRN trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PTRN's competition here
QTWO vs DLO Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while DLO trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DLO's competition here
QTWO vs LIF Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while LIF trades at $54.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check LIF's competition here
QTWO vs GRND-WT Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check GRND-WT's competition here
QTWO vs MNDY Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while MNDY trades at $82.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check MNDY's competition here
QTWO vs CVT Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check CVT's competition here
QTWO vs BILL Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while BILL trades at $41.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BILL's competition here
QTWO vs PYCR Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PYCR's competition here
QTWO vs BOX Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while BOX trades at $28.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BOX's competition here
QTWO vs BULL Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while BULL trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BULL's competition here
QTWO vs STUB Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while STUB trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check STUB's competition here
QTWO vs PWSC Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PWSC's competition here
QTWO vs PSFE-WT Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
QTWO vs BLSH Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while BLSH trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 64.54. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BLSH's competition here
QTWO vs RNG Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while RNG trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check RNG's competition here
QTWO vs AYX Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check AYX's competition here
QTWO vs ENV Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ENV's competition here
QTWO vs INST Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check INST's competition here
QTWO vs ZI Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ZI's competition here
QTWO vs NATL Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while NATL trades at $44.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NATL's competition here
QTWO vs ADEA Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while ADEA trades at $28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check ADEA's competition here
QTWO vs BTDR Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while BTDR trades at $13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check BTDR's competition here
QTWO vs AGYS Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while AGYS trades at $108.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 61.22. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check AGYS's competition here
QTWO vs FSLY Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while FSLY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 67.55. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check FSLY's competition here
QTWO vs NP Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while NP trades at $31.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas NP's P/E ratio is 77.90. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check NP's competition here
QTWO vs DBD Comparison July 2026
QTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTWO stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTWO is priced at $51.83, while DBD trades at $85.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTWO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.44, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, QTWO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTWO is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTWO.Check DBD's competition here