The Western Union Company
The Western Union Company WU Peers
See (WU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WU | $8.42 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 3.23 | $2.69 | +10.86% |
| V | $355.05 | +0.00% | 689.4B | 35.73 | $9.95 | +0.64% |
| MA | $561.94 | +0.00% | 508.9B | 39.59 | $14.26 | +0.50% |
| AXP | $318.98 | +0.00% | 226B | 22.55 | $14.31 | +0.90% |
| COF | $212.76 | +0.00% | 137.7B | 18.08 | $11.90 | +1.12% |
| COF-PK | $17.49 | +0.00% | 130.1B | 0.69 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PN | $16.35 | +0.00% | 130.1B | 0.65 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PL | $16.37 | +0.00% | 130.1B | 0.65 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PJ | $17.77 | +0.00% | 129.1B | 0.71 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PI | $18.90 | +0.00% | 128.9B | 0.75 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
Stock Comparison
WU vs V Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 689.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while V trades at $355.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.73. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs MA Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 508.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while MA trades at $561.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AXP Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 226B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AXP trades at $318.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs COF Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 137.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while COF trades at $212.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs COF-PK Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while COF-PK trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs COF-PN Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while COF-PN trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs COF-PL Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while COF-PL trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs COF-PJ Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while COF-PJ trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs COF-PI Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 128.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while COF-PI trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.75. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs BNH Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while BNH trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs PYPL Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while PYPL trades at $74.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs DFS Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs SYF Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while SYF trades at $66.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs SOFI Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while SOFI trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs KKRS Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while KKRS trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs ALLY Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while ALLY trades at $38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 67.02. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AGM-PC Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs SYF-PB Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while SYF-PB trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs OBDC Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while OBDC trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs SYF-PA Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while SYF-PA trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs SLM Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while SLM trades at $32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs OMF Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while OMF trades at $57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs UPST Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while UPST trades at $64.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -93.34. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs SLMBP Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while SLMBP trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs CACC Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while CACC trades at $509.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs CGABL Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while CGABL trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs FCFS Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while FCFS trades at $135.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs SEZL Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while SEZL trades at $179.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 56.42. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs ORCC Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs IX Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while IX trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs JSM Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while JSM trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs NNI Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while NNI trades at $121.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs QFIN Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while QFIN trades at $43.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs ENVA Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while ENVA trades at $111.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs ADS Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs BFH Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while BFH trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs FINV Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while FINV trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AGM-A Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AGM-A trades at $142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AGM Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AGM trades at $194.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AGM-PF Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AGM-PF trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AGM-PG Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AGM-PG trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AGM-PD Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AGM-PD trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AGM-PE Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AGM-PE trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs NAVI Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while NAVI trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs LC Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while LC trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs OCSL Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while OCSL trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 114.58. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs LX Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while LX trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs LU Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while LU trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs MGI Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs BBDC Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 965.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while BBDC trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs WRLD Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 897.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while WRLD trades at $165.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs ATLC Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while ATLC trades at $54.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs NRDS Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 830.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while NRDS trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs ATLCZ Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 804.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while ATLCZ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs ATLCL Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 767.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while ATLCL trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs EZPW Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while EZPW trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs PRAA Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 602.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while PRAA trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs GDOT Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 600.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while GDOT trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -91.13. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs QD Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 501.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while QD trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs RWAY Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 398.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while RWAY trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs RWAYL Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while RWAYL trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs RWAYZ Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 385.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while RWAYZ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs ATLCP Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 333.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while ATLCP trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs RM Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 306.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while RM trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs OPRT Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 295.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while OPRT trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs NEWTI Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while NEWTI trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs PMTS Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 270.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while PMTS trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs YRD Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 260.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while YRD trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs FOA Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 259.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while FOA trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs LPRO Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 237.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while LPRO trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs MFIN Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 229.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while MFIN trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs CPSS Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 217.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while CPSS trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU and CPSS have similar daily volatility (3.20).
WU vs SUNL Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs XYF Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while XYF trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs ELVT Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs CURR Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while CURR trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs NICK Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs OMCC Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while OMCC trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AHG Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs NISN Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while NISN trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs JT Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs LMFA Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while LMFA trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs MCVT Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while MCVT trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs SNTG Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while SNTG trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AIHS Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AIHS trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs CURO Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs PT Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 376.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while PT trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs DXF Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 70.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while DXF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DXF's ROE of -17.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs GJP Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while GJP trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs GJS Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while GJS trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs NRUC Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while NRUC trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs KTN Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while KTN trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs GJO Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while GJO trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs WEI Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs AEFC Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while AEFC trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs SOFIW Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs GJT Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while GJT trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs MRLN Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while MRLN trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.
WU vs IPB Comparison
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.42, while IPB trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.