The Western Union Company
The Western Union Company (WU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WU | $9.44 | -2.98% | 3B | 6.27 | $1.52 | +9.82% |
| V | $309.55 | +1.00% | 592.2B | 28.81 | $10.66 | +0.82% |
| MA | $505.39 | +1.62% | 444.5B | 30.13 | $16.53 | +0.63% |
| AXP | $300.42 | -0.49% | 206.7B | 19.49 | $15.39 | +1.09% |
| COF | $181.73 | +2.41% | 111.8B | 53.36 | $3.37 | +1.56% |
| BNH | $15.22 | +0.66% | 101.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.62% |
| DFS | $200.05 | -0.21% | 50.3B | 10.69 | $18.72 | +0.35% |
| PYPL | $45.68 | +2.96% | 42B | 8.30 | $5.41 | +0.62% |
| IX | $30.51 | +0.83% | 33.3B | 11.35 | $2.64 | +2.69% |
| SUNB | $72.71 | +4.11% | 30.9B | 21.97 | $3.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WU vs V Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 592.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while V trades at $309.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas V's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to V's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check V's competition here
WU vs MA Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 444.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while MA trades at $505.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MA's competition here
WU vs AXP Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 206.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AXP trades at $300.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AXP's competition here
WU vs COF Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 111.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while COF trades at $181.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 53.36. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF's competition here
WU vs BNH Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while BNH trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check BNH's competition here
WU vs DFS Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check DFS's competition here
WU vs PYPL Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while PYPL trades at $45.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PYPL's competition here
WU vs IX Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while IX trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check IX's competition here
WU vs SUNB Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while SUNB trades at $72.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SUNB's competition here
WU vs SYF Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while SYF trades at $64.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SYF's competition here
WU vs SOFI Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while SOFI trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 45.54. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SOFI's competition here
WU vs KKRS Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while KKRS trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check KKRS's competition here
WU vs COF-PI Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while COF-PI trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.75. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PI's competition here
WU vs COF-PJ Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while COF-PJ trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PJ's competition here
WU vs ALLY Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while ALLY trades at $36.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ALLY's competition here
WU vs COF-PK Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while COF-PK trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PK's competition here
WU vs COF-PL Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while COF-PL trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PL's competition here
WU vs COF-PN Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while COF-PN trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PN's competition here
WU vs AGM-PC Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PC's competition here
WU vs SYF-PB Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while SYF-PB trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SYF-PB's competition here
WU vs FCFS Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while FCFS trades at $192.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check FCFS's competition here
WU vs SYF-PA Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while SYF-PA trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SYF-PA's competition here
WU vs SLMBP Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while SLMBP trades at $75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SLMBP's competition here
WU vs CGABL Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while CGABL trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CGABL's competition here
WU vs OMF Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while OMF trades at $52.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OMF's competition here
WU vs OBDC Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while OBDC trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OBDC's competition here
WU vs ORCC Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ORCC's competition here
WU vs JSM Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while JSM trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check JSM's competition here
WU vs CACC Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while CACC trades at $446.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CACC's competition here
WU vs NNI Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while NNI trades at $129.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NNI's competition here
WU vs SLM Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while SLM trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SLM's competition here
WU vs ENVA Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while ENVA trades at $136.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ENVA's competition here
WU vs BFH Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while BFH trades at $72.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check BFH's competition here
WU vs ADS Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ADS's competition here
WU vs UPST Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while UPST trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 58.58. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check UPST's competition here
WU vs SEZL Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while SEZL trades at $66.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SEZL's competition here
WU vs AGM-A Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AGM-A trades at $124.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-A's competition here
WU vs QFIN Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while QFIN trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check QFIN's competition here
WU vs AGM Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AGM trades at $151.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM's competition here
WU vs LC Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while LC trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LC's competition here
WU vs EZPW Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while EZPW trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check EZPW's competition here
WU vs FINV Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while FINV trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check FINV's competition here
WU vs JCAP Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while JCAP trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +468.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check JCAP's competition here
WU vs MGI Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MGI's competition here
WU vs OCSL Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 977.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while OCSL trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OCSL's competition here
WU vs LU Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while LU trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LU's competition here
WU vs RWAYI Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 936.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while RWAYI trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAYI's competition here
WU vs RWAYL Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while RWAYL trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAYL's competition here
WU vs BBDC Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 847.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while BBDC trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check BBDC's competition here
WU vs NAVI Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 773.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while NAVI trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NAVI's competition here
WU vs NRDS Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 737.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while NRDS trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NRDS's competition here
WU vs NEWTO Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 730.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while NEWTO trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NEWTO's competition here
WU vs NEWTG Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 726.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while NEWTG trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NEWTG's competition here
WU vs ATLC Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 726.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while ATLC trades at $50.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLC's competition here
WU vs WRLD Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 674.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while WRLD trades at $136.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check WRLD's competition here
WU vs NEWTH Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, NEWTH has a market cap of 654.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while NEWTH trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas NEWTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NEWTH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NEWTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NEWTH's competition here
WU vs PRAA Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 652.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while PRAA trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PRAA's competition here
WU vs AGM-PD Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 635.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AGM-PD trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PD's competition here
WU vs GDOT Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while GDOT trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check GDOT's competition here
WU vs QD Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check QD's competition here
WU vs MCVT Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MCVT's competition here
WU vs LX Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 443.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while LX trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LX's competition here
WU vs HTT Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 421.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while HTT trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check HTT's competition here
WU vs RWAYZ Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAYZ's competition here
WU vs ATLCZ Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 387M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while ATLCZ trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLCZ's competition here
WU vs ATLCL Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while ATLCL trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLCL's competition here
WU vs ATLCP Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 368.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while ATLCP trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLCP's competition here
WU vs NEWTI Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 322.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while NEWTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WU has daily volatility of 2.21 and NEWTI has daily volatility of N/A.Check NEWTI's competition here
WU vs YRD Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 306.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while YRD trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check YRD's competition here
WU vs RM Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while RM trades at $31.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RM's competition here
WU vs RWAY Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 239.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while RWAY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAY's competition here
WU vs AGM-PE Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AGM-PE trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PE's competition here
WU vs AHG Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 230.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AHG trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AHG's competition here
WU vs MFIN Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while MFIN trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MFIN's competition here
WU vs AGM-PF Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AGM-PF trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PF's competition here
WU vs AGM-PG Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AGM-PG trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PG's competition here
WU vs OPRT Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while OPRT trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OPRT's competition here
WU vs CURR Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 178.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while CURR trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CURR's competition here
WU vs LPRO Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while LPRO trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LPRO's competition here
WU vs PMTS Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 169.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while PMTS trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PMTS's competition here
WU vs ANTA Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while ANTA trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ANTA's competition here
WU vs CPSS Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while CPSS trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CPSS's competition here
WU vs FOA Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 165.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while FOA trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check FOA's competition here
WU vs EMIS Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 158.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while EMIS trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to EMIS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check EMIS's competition here
WU vs SUNL Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SUNL's competition here
WU vs ELVT Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ELVT's competition here
WU vs NICK Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NICK's competition here
WU vs XYF Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while XYF trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check XYF's competition here
WU vs OMCC Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while OMCC trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OMCC's competition here
WU vs DXF Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while DXF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DXF's ROE of +854.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check DXF's competition here
WU vs JT Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check JT's competition here
WU vs SNTG Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while SNTG trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SNTG's competition here
WU vs LMFA Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while LMFA trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LMFA's competition here
WU vs AIOS Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AIOS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AIOS trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AIOS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AIOS's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AIOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AIOS's competition here
WU vs NISN Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while NISN trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NISN's competition here
WU vs CURO Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CURO's competition here
WU vs AIHS Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while AIHS trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AIHS's competition here
WU vs JF Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, JF has a market cap of 379.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while JF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas JF's P/E ratio is -9.23. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to JF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check JF's competition here
WU vs PT Comparison March 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 3B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 378.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $9.44, while PT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.27, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PT's competition here