The Western Union Company
The Western Union Company (WU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WU | $8.58 | -1.83% | 2.8B | 3.19 | $2.69 | +11.03% |
| V | $357.04 | +0.87% | 692.4B | 35.89 | $9.95 | +0.64% |
| MA | $568.22 | +0.84% | 512.1B | 39.85 | $14.26 | +0.52% |
| AXP | $311.61 | +1.09% | 216.9B | 21.89 | $14.24 | +0.98% |
| COF | $212.85 | +0.72% | 136.2B | 608.11 | $0.35 | +1.12% |
| COF-PI | $19.71 | +0.66% | 135.4B | 0.77 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PN | $17.02 | +0.24% | 135.4B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PK | $17.96 | +0.62% | 135.4B | 0.70 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PL | $17.20 | +0.47% | 135.3B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PJ | $18.73 | +0.59% | 135.2B | 0.73 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
Stock Comparison
WU vs V Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 692.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while V trades at $357.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check V's competition here
WU vs MA Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 512.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while MA trades at $568.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.85. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MA's competition here
WU vs AXP Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 216.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AXP trades at $311.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AXP's competition here
WU vs COF Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 136.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while COF trades at $212.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 608.11. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF's competition here
WU vs COF-PI Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while COF-PI trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PI's competition here
WU vs COF-PN Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while COF-PN trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PN's competition here
WU vs COF-PK Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while COF-PK trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PK's competition here
WU vs COF-PL Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while COF-PL trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PL's competition here
WU vs COF-PJ Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while COF-PJ trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PJ's competition here
WU vs BNH Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while BNH trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check BNH's competition here
WU vs PYPL Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while PYPL trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PYPL's competition here
WU vs DFS Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check DFS's competition here
WU vs SYF Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while SYF trades at $72.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SYF's competition here
WU vs SOFI Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while SOFI trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 49.30. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SOFI's competition here
WU vs KKRS Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while KKRS trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check KKRS's competition here
WU vs ALLY Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while ALLY trades at $38.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 64.22. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ALLY's competition here
WU vs AGM-PC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PC's competition here
WU vs SYF-PB Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while SYF-PB trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SYF-PB's competition here
WU vs UPST Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while UPST trades at $83.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -114.42. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check UPST's competition here
WU vs OBDC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while OBDC trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OBDC's competition here
WU vs SYF-PA Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while SYF-PA trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SYF-PA's competition here
WU vs OMF Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while OMF trades at $59.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OMF's competition here
WU vs SLM Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while SLM trades at $32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SLM's competition here
WU vs SLMBP Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while SLMBP trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SLMBP's competition here
WU vs CGABL Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while CGABL trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CGABL's competition here
WU vs CACC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while CACC trades at $520.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CACC's competition here
WU vs FCFS Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while FCFS trades at $122.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check FCFS's competition here
WU vs ORCC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ORCC's competition here
WU vs IX Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while IX trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check IX's competition here
WU vs JSM Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while JSM trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check JSM's competition here
WU vs SEZL Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while SEZL trades at $148.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 50.15. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SEZL's competition here
WU vs NNI Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while NNI trades at $124.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NNI's competition here
WU vs BFH Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while BFH trades at $63.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check BFH's competition here
WU vs ADS Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ADS's competition here
WU vs ENVA Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while ENVA trades at $105.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ENVA's competition here
WU vs QFIN Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while QFIN trades at $35.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check QFIN's competition here
WU vs FINV Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while FINV trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check FINV's competition here
WU vs AGM-PG Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AGM-PG trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PG's competition here
WU vs AGM Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AGM trades at $175.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM's competition here
WU vs AGM-PE Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AGM-PE trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PE's competition here
WU vs AGM-A Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AGM-A trades at $130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-A's competition here
WU vs AGM-PF Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AGM-PF trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PF's competition here
WU vs AGM-PD Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AGM-PD trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PD's competition here
WU vs LC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while LC trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LC's competition here
WU vs NAVI Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while NAVI trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NAVI's competition here
WU vs OCSL Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while OCSL trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OCSL's competition here
WU vs LU Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while LU trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LU's competition here
WU vs LX Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while LX trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LX's competition here
WU vs MGI Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MGI's competition here
WU vs BBDC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while BBDC trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check BBDC's competition here
WU vs WRLD Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 844.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while WRLD trades at $159.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check WRLD's competition here
WU vs NRDS Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 816.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while NRDS trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NRDS's competition here
WU vs ATLCL Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 798.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while ATLCL trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLCL's competition here
WU vs ATLCZ Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 792.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while ATLCZ trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLCZ's competition here
WU vs ATLC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 759.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while ATLC trades at $50.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLC's competition here
WU vs EZPW Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 736.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while EZPW trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check EZPW's competition here
WU vs PRAA Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 625M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while PRAA trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PRAA's competition here
WU vs GDOT Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 572M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while GDOT trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -86.83. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check GDOT's competition here
WU vs QD Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 539.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while QD trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check QD's competition here
WU vs RWAYL Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 413.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while RWAYL trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAYL's competition here
WU vs RWAYZ Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 413.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while RWAYZ trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAYZ's competition here
WU vs RWAY Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while RWAY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAY's competition here
WU vs ATLCP Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while ATLCP trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLCP's competition here
WU vs NEWTI Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 318.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while NEWTI trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NEWTI's competition here
WU vs RM Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 317.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while RM trades at $32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RM's competition here
WU vs LPRO Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 316.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while LPRO trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LPRO's competition here
WU vs OPRT Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 279M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while OPRT trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OPRT's competition here
WU vs FOA Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 268.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while FOA trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check FOA's competition here
WU vs YRD Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 268M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while YRD trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check YRD's competition here
WU vs PMTS Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while PMTS trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PMTS's competition here
WU vs MFIN Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 223.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while MFIN trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MFIN's competition here
WU vs CPSS Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while CPSS trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CPSS's competition here
WU vs CURR Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 174.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while CURR trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CURR's competition here
WU vs SUNL Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SUNL's competition here
WU vs XYF Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while XYF trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check XYF's competition here
WU vs ELVT Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ELVT's competition here
WU vs NICK Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NICK's competition here
WU vs AHG Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AHG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AHG's competition here
WU vs OMCC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while OMCC trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OMCC's competition here
WU vs MCVT Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while MCVT trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MCVT's competition here
WU vs NISN Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while NISN trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NISN's competition here
WU vs JT Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check JT's competition here
WU vs LMFA Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while LMFA trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LMFA's competition here
WU vs SNTG Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while SNTG trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SNTG's competition here
WU vs CURO Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CURO's competition here
WU vs AIHS Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AIHS trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AIHS's competition here
WU vs DXF Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 836.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while DXF trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DXF's ROE of -17.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check DXF's competition here
WU vs PT Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 378.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while PT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PT's competition here
WU vs SC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SC's competition here
WU vs PYT Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while PYT trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PYT's competition here
WU vs NRUC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while NRUC trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NRUC's competition here
WU vs GJT Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while GJT trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check GJT's competition here
WU vs IPB Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while IPB trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check IPB's competition here
WU vs WEI Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check WEI's competition here
WU vs MRLN Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while MRLN trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MRLN's competition here
WU vs GJS Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while GJS trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check GJS's competition here
WU vs AEFC Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while AEFC trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AEFC's competition here
WU vs GJO Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while GJO trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check GJO's competition here
WU vs GJP Comparison July 2025
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $8.58, while GJP trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 3.19, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check GJP's competition here