World Acceptance Corporation
World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WRLD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRLD | $172.21 | +4.88% | 937.8M | 11.67 | $14.76 | N/A |
| V | $350.04 | +1.85% | 674.4B | 34.18 | $10.24 | +0.67% |
| MA | $598.96 | +1.19% | 537.4B | 40.41 | $14.82 | +0.49% |
| AXP | $319.16 | +3.57% | 222.1B | 22.42 | $14.24 | +0.95% |
| COF | $221.22 | +4.34% | 141.5B | 598.01 | $0.37 | +1.08% |
| COF-PJ | $19.07 | +1.22% | 139.8B | 0.75 | $25.57 | +1.08% |
| COF-PK | $18.43 | +0.99% | 139.5B | 0.72 | $25.57 | +1.08% |
| COF-PI | $20.00 | +1.47% | 139.3B | 0.78 | $25.57 | +1.08% |
| COF-PN | $17.40 | +1.34% | 138.1B | 0.68 | $25.57 | +1.08% |
| COF-PL | $17.37 | +1.28% | 137.8B | 0.68 | $25.57 | +1.08% |
Stock Comparison
WRLD vs V Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 674.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while V trades at $350.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas V's P/E ratio is 34.18. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to V's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check V's competition here
WRLD vs MA Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 537.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while MA trades at $598.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 40.41. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check MA's competition here
WRLD vs AXP Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 222.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AXP trades at $319.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AXP's competition here
WRLD vs COF Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 141.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while COF trades at $221.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 598.01. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check COF's competition here
WRLD vs COF-PJ Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 139.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while COF-PJ trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.75. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check COF-PJ's competition here
WRLD vs COF-PK Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 139.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while COF-PK trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check COF-PK's competition here
WRLD vs COF-PI Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 139.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while COF-PI trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.78. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check COF-PI's competition here
WRLD vs COF-PN Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 138.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while COF-PN trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check COF-PN's competition here
WRLD vs COF-PL Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 137.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while COF-PL trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check COF-PL's competition here
WRLD vs BNH Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while BNH trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check BNH's competition here
WRLD vs PYPL Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while PYPL trades at $69.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check PYPL's competition here
WRLD vs DFS Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check DFS's competition here
WRLD vs SOFI Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SOFI trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 50.04. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SOFI's competition here
WRLD vs SYF Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SYF trades at $73.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SYF's competition here
WRLD vs KKRS Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while KKRS trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check KKRS's competition here
WRLD vs ALLY Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while ALLY trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check ALLY's competition here
WRLD vs AGM-PC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AGM-PC's competition here
WRLD vs SYF-PB Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SYF-PB trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SYF-PB's competition here
WRLD vs SYF-PA Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SYF-PA trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SYF-PA's competition here
WRLD vs OBDC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while OBDC trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check OBDC's competition here
WRLD vs OMF Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while OMF trades at $60.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check OMF's competition here
WRLD vs SLMBP Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SLMBP trades at $76.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SLMBP's competition here
WRLD vs CGABL Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while CGABL trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check CGABL's competition here
WRLD vs UPST Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while UPST trades at $68.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -1377.00. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check UPST's competition here
WRLD vs SLM Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SLM trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SLM's competition here
WRLD vs FCFS Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while FCFS trades at $144.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check FCFS's competition here
WRLD vs IX Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while IX trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check IX's competition here
WRLD vs CACC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while CACC trades at $506.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check CACC's competition here
WRLD vs JSM Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while JSM trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check JSM's competition here
WRLD vs ORCC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check ORCC's competition here
WRLD vs NNI Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while NNI trades at $130.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check NNI's competition here
WRLD vs SEZL Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SEZL trades at $95.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SEZL's competition here
WRLD vs BFH Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while BFH trades at $62.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check BFH's competition here
WRLD vs ENVA Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while ENVA trades at $113.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check ENVA's competition here
WRLD vs ADS Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check ADS's competition here
WRLD vs WU Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while WU trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check WU's competition here
WRLD vs FINV Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while FINV trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check FINV's competition here
WRLD vs QFIN Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while QFIN trades at $31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check QFIN's competition here
WRLD vs AGM Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AGM trades at $204.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AGM's competition here
WRLD vs AGM-A Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AGM-A trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AGM-A's competition here
WRLD vs AGM-PE Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AGM-PE trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AGM-PE's competition here
WRLD vs AGM-PF Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AGM-PF trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AGM-PF's competition here
WRLD vs AGM-PG Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AGM-PG trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AGM-PG's competition here
WRLD vs AGM-PD Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AGM-PD trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AGM-PD's competition here
WRLD vs LC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while LC trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check LC's competition here
WRLD vs NAVI Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while NAVI trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 42.38. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check NAVI's competition here
WRLD vs LU Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while LU trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check LU's competition here
WRLD vs OCSL Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while OCSL trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check OCSL's competition here
WRLD vs LX Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while LX trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check LX's competition here
WRLD vs MGI Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check MGI's competition here
WRLD vs BBDC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while BBDC trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check BBDC's competition here
WRLD vs ATLC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 991.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while ATLC trades at $65.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check ATLC's competition here
WRLD vs ATLCL Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 945.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while ATLCL trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check ATLCL's competition here
WRLD vs ATLCZ Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 938.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while ATLCZ trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check ATLCZ's competition here
WRLD vs EZPW Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 926.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while EZPW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check EZPW's competition here
WRLD vs QD Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 802.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while QD trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check QD's competition here
WRLD vs NRDS Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 791.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while NRDS trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check NRDS's competition here
WRLD vs GDOT Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 746.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while GDOT trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -30.61. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check GDOT's competition here
WRLD vs PRAA Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 677.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while PRAA trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check PRAA's competition here
WRLD vs MCVT Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 528M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while MCVT trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check MCVT's competition here
WRLD vs RM Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 397.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while RM trades at $40.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check RM's competition here
WRLD vs RWAYL Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 396.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while RWAYL trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check RWAYL's competition here
WRLD vs RWAYZ Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 395.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while RWAYZ trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check RWAYZ's competition here
WRLD vs RWAY Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while RWAY trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check RWAY's competition here
WRLD vs ATLCP Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 349.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while ATLCP trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check ATLCP's competition here
WRLD vs NEWTI Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 320.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while NEWTI trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check NEWTI's competition here
WRLD vs FOA Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 317.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while FOA trades at $28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check FOA's competition here
WRLD vs YRD Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while YRD trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check YRD's competition here
WRLD vs OPRT Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while OPRT trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -42.86. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check OPRT's competition here
WRLD vs LPRO Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 252.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while LPRO trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check LPRO's competition here
WRLD vs MFIN Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while MFIN trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check MFIN's competition here
WRLD vs CPSS Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 188.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while CPSS trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check CPSS's competition here
WRLD vs PMTS Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 176.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while PMTS trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check PMTS's competition here
WRLD vs SUNL Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SUNL's competition here
WRLD vs CURR Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while CURR trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check CURR's competition here
WRLD vs XYF Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 116.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while XYF trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check XYF's competition here
WRLD vs ELVT Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check ELVT's competition here
WRLD vs NICK Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check NICK's competition here
WRLD vs OMCC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while OMCC trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check OMCC's competition here
WRLD vs AHG Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AHG trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AHG's competition here
WRLD vs NISN Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while NISN trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check NISN's competition here
WRLD vs JT Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check JT's competition here
WRLD vs LMFA Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while LMFA trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check LMFA's competition here
WRLD vs SNTG Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SNTG trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SNTG's competition here
WRLD vs CURO Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check CURO's competition here
WRLD vs AIHS Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AIHS trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AIHS's competition here
WRLD vs DXF Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 814.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while DXF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DXF's ROE of -17.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check DXF's competition here
WRLD vs PT Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 419.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while PT trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check PT's competition here
WRLD vs MRLN Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while MRLN trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check MRLN's competition here
WRLD vs IPB Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while IPB trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check IPB's competition here
WRLD vs NRUC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while NRUC trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check NRUC's competition here
WRLD vs WEI Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check WEI's competition here
WRLD vs SC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SC's competition here
WRLD vs PYT Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while PYT trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check PYT's competition here
WRLD vs GJT Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while GJT trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check GJT's competition here
WRLD vs GJP Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while GJP trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check GJP's competition here
WRLD vs SOFIW Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check SOFIW's competition here
WRLD vs AEFC Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while AEFC trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check AEFC's competition here
WRLD vs GJS Comparison August 2025
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 937.8M. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $172.21, while GJS trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.67, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.Check GJS's competition here