World Acceptance Corporation
World Acceptance Corporation WRLD Peers
See (WRLD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRLD | $175.06 | +0.05% | 929.1M | 10.74 | $16.30 | N/A |
| V | $355.88 | -0.53% | 690.1B | 35.80 | $9.94 | +0.79% |
| MA | $563.52 | -0.28% | 508B | 39.58 | $14.24 | +0.64% |
| AXP | $325.24 | +2.49% | 227.9B | 22.74 | $14.31 | +1.15% |
| COF-PL | $17.25 | +0.12% | 143.6B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.08% |
| COF-PK | $18.20 | -0.27% | 143.6B | 0.71 | $25.57 | +1.08% |
| COF-PI | $19.76 | +0.30% | 142.9B | 0.77 | $25.57 | +1.08% |
| COF-PJ | $18.80 | +0.32% | 142.7B | 0.73 | $25.57 | +1.08% |
| COF-PN | $17.15 | +0.00% | 142.7B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.08% |
| COF | $220.74 | +1.24% | 141.4B | 18.54 | $11.91 | +1.08% |
Stock Comparison
WRLD vs V Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 690.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while V trades at $355.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs MA Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 508B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while MA trades at $563.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AXP Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AXP trades at $325.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs COF-PL Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 143.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while COF-PL trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs COF-PK Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 143.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while COF-PK trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs COF-PI Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 142.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while COF-PI trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs COF-PJ Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while COF-PJ trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs COF-PN Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while COF-PN trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs COF Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while COF trades at $220.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs BNH Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while BNH trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs PYPL Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while PYPL trades at $75.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs DFS Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SYF Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SYF trades at $71.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SOFI Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SOFI trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 48.77. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs KKRS Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while KKRS trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs ALLY Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while ALLY trades at $40.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 67.55. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AGM-PC Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SYF-PB Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SYF-PB trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs UPST Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while UPST trades at $79.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -108.26. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs OBDC Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while OBDC trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SYF-PA Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SYF-PA trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs OMF Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while OMF trades at $59.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SLM Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SLM trades at $33.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SLMBP Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SLMBP trades at $74.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs CGABL Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while CGABL trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs CACC Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while CACC trades at $530.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs FCFS Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while FCFS trades at $132.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs ORCC Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs JSM Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while JSM trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs IX Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while IX trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SEZL Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SEZL trades at $148.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs NNI Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while NNI trades at $126.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs ENVA Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while ENVA trades at $117.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs BFH Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while BFH trades at $62.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs QFIN Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while QFIN trades at $42.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs ADS Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs WU Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while WU trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs FINV Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while FINV trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AGM-A Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AGM-A trades at $144.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AGM-PD Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AGM-PD trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AGM-PF Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AGM-PF trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AGM Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AGM trades at $196.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AGM-PG Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AGM-PG trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AGM-PE Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AGM-PE trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs NAVI Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while NAVI trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs LC Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while LC trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs OCSL Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while OCSL trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 119.75. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs LX Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while LX trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs LU Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while LU trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs MGI Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs BBDC Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 990M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while BBDC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs ATLC Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 895.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while ATLC trades at $59.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs ATLCL Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 878.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while ATLCL trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs NRDS Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 840.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while NRDS trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs ATLCZ Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 805.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while ATLCZ trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs EZPW Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while EZPW trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs PRAA Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 644M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while PRAA trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs GDOT Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 589M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while GDOT trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -89.42. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs QD Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 571.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while QD trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs RWAYZ Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 411.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while RWAYZ trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs RWAY Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 409M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while RWAY trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs RWAYL Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 393.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while RWAYL trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs ATLCP Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 332.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while ATLCP trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs RM Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while RM trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs NEWTI Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 320.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while NEWTI trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs OPRT Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 306.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while OPRT trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs LPRO Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while LPRO trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs FOA Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while FOA trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs YRD Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 262.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while YRD trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs PMTS Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 259.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while PMTS trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs MFIN Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 223.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while MFIN trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs CPSS Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 216.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while CPSS trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SUNL Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs XYF Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 140.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while XYF trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs CURR Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while CURR trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs ELVT Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs NICK Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs OMCC Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while OMCC trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AHG Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AHG trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs NISN Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while NISN trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs JT Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs LMFA Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while LMFA trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs MCVT Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while MCVT trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SNTG Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SNTG trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AIHS Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AIHS trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs CURO Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs DXF Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while DXF trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DXF's ROE of -17.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs PT Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 431.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while PT trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs GJO Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while GJO trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SOFIW Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs GJP Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while GJP trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs GJT Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while GJT trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs KTN Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while KTN trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs PYT Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while PYT trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs SC Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs MRLN Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while MRLN trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs GJS Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while GJS trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs WEI Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.
WRLD vs AEFC Comparison
WRLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLD stands at 929.1M. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRLD is priced at $175.06, while AEFC trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLD's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLD is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLD.