Synchrony Financial
Synchrony Financial SYF-PA Peers
See (SYF-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYF-PA | $18.40 | -0.11% | 7B | 2.48 | $7.39 | +1.57% |
| V | $355.05 | +1.85% | 687.9B | 35.65 | $9.95 | +0.65% |
| MA | $561.94 | +2.11% | 506.5B | 39.41 | $14.26 | +0.51% |
| AXP | $318.98 | +0.56% | 223.4B | 22.29 | $14.31 | +0.92% |
| COF | $212.76 | +0.83% | 136.1B | 17.87 | $11.90 | +1.13% |
| COF-PK | $17.49 | +0.46% | 128.2B | 0.68 | $25.57 | +1.13% |
| COF-PN | $16.35 | -0.49% | 127.7B | 0.64 | $25.57 | +1.13% |
| COF-PL | $16.37 | -0.49% | 127.5B | 0.64 | $25.57 | +1.13% |
| COF-PJ | $17.77 | -0.56% | 127.3B | 0.70 | $25.57 | +1.13% |
| COF-PI | $18.90 | +0.53% | 127.3B | 0.74 | $25.57 | +1.13% |
Stock Comparison
SYF-PA vs V Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 687.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while V trades at $355.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs MA Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 506.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while MA trades at $561.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.41. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AXP Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 223.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AXP trades at $318.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs COF Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while COF trades at $212.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs COF-PK Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while COF-PK trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs COF-PN Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while COF-PN trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs COF-PL Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 127.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while COF-PL trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs COF-PJ Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while COF-PJ trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs COF-PI Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while COF-PI trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs BNH Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while BNH trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs PYPL Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while PYPL trades at $74.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs DFS Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs SYF Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while SYF trades at $66.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs SOFI Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while SOFI trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs KKRS Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while KKRS trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs ALLY Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while ALLY trades at $38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 64.93. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AGM-PC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs SYF-PB Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while SYF-PB trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs OBDC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while OBDC trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs SLM Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while SLM trades at $32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs OMF Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while OMF trades at $57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs SLMBP Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while SLMBP trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs UPST Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while UPST trades at $64.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -88.60. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs CGABL Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while CGABL trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs FCFS Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while FCFS trades at $135.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs SEZL Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while SEZL trades at $179.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 60.35. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs CACC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while CACC trades at $509.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs ORCC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs IX Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while IX trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs JSM Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while JSM trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs NNI Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while NNI trades at $121.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs QFIN Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while QFIN trades at $43.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs ADS Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs ENVA Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while ENVA trades at $111.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs WU Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while WU trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs BFH Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while BFH trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs FINV Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while FINV trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AGM-A Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AGM-A trades at $142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AGM-PF Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AGM-PF trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AGM-PD Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AGM-PD trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AGM-PG Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AGM-PG trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AGM-PE Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AGM-PE trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AGM Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AGM trades at $194.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs NAVI Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while NAVI trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs LC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while LC trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs LX Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while LX trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs OCSL Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while OCSL trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 113.83. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs LU Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while LU trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs MGI Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs BBDC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 962.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while BBDC trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs WRLD Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 876.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while WRLD trades at $165.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs ATLC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 828.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while ATLC trades at $54.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs NRDS Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 817.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while NRDS trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs ATLCZ Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 808.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while ATLCZ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs EZPW Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 763.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while EZPW trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs ATLCL Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 760.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while ATLCL trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs GDOT Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 591.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while GDOT trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -89.83. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs PRAA Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 585M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while PRAA trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs QD Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 516M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while QD trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs RWAY Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 400.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while RWAY trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs RWAYL Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 391.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while RWAYL trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs RWAYZ Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 384M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while RWAYZ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs ATLCP Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 333.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while ATLCP trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs OPRT Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 314.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while OPRT trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs RM Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 290.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while RM trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs NEWTI Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while NEWTI trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs PMTS Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 267.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while PMTS trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs FOA Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while FOA trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs YRD Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while YRD trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs LPRO Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 232.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while LPRO trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs MFIN Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 221.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while MFIN trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs CPSS Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while CPSS trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs SUNL Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs XYF Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 122.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while XYF trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs ELVT Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs NICK Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs CURR Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while CURR trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs OMCC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while OMCC trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AHG Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs NISN Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while NISN trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs JT Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs LMFA Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while LMFA trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs MCVT Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while MCVT trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs SNTG Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while SNTG trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AIHS Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AIHS trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs CURO Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs PT Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 370.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while PT trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs DXF Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 69.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while DXF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs AEFC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while AEFC trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs SOFIW Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs GJP Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while GJP trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs GJT Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while GJT trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs KTN Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while KTN trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs PYT Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while PYT trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs SC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs GJS Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while GJS trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs WEI Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs IPB Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while IPB trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.
SYF-PA vs NRUC Comparison
SYF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYF-PA stands at 7B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYF-PA is priced at $18.40, while NRUC trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYF-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SYF-PA is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYF-PA.