Sezzle Inc.
Sezzle Inc. SEZL Peers
See (SEZL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEZL | $172.30 | +2.82% | 5.7B | 57.97 | $2.97 | N/A |
| V | $354.22 | -0.35% | 687.2B | 35.62 | $9.95 | +0.65% |
| MA | $561.52 | -0.55% | 506B | 39.37 | $14.26 | +0.51% |
| AXP | $325.61 | +0.95% | 228.2B | 22.76 | $14.31 | +0.89% |
| COF | $218.81 | +1.69% | 140B | 18.38 | $11.90 | +1.10% |
| COF-PL | $17.07 | +2.22% | 132.7B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.10% |
| COF-PK | $17.95 | +1.41% | 132B | 0.70 | $25.57 | +1.10% |
| COF-PN | $16.97 | +1.68% | 131.9B | 0.66 | $25.57 | +1.10% |
| COF-PJ | $18.46 | +1.76% | 131.8B | 0.72 | $25.57 | +1.10% |
| COF-PI | $19.48 | +1.97% | 131.1B | 0.76 | $25.57 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
SEZL vs V Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 687.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while V trades at $354.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs MA Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 506B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while MA trades at $561.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AXP Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 228.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AXP trades at $325.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs COF Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 140B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while COF trades at $218.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs COF-PL Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while COF-PL trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs COF-PK Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 132B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while COF-PK trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs COF-PN Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 131.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while COF-PN trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs COF-PJ Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while COF-PJ trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs COF-PI Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while COF-PI trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.76. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs BNH Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while BNH trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs PYPL Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while PYPL trades at $76.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs DFS Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs SYF Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while SYF trades at $69.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs SOFI Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while SOFI trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 42.15. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs KKRS Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while KKRS trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs ALLY Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while ALLY trades at $40.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 68.15. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AGM-PC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs SYF-PB Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while SYF-PB trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs OBDC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while OBDC trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs SYF-PA Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while SYF-PA trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs SLM Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while SLM trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs OMF Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while OMF trades at $59.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs UPST Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while UPST trades at $73.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -100.49. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs SLMBP Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while SLMBP trades at $73.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs CACC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while CACC trades at $543.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs CGABL Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while CGABL trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs FCFS Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while FCFS trades at $136.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs ORCC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs IX Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while IX trades at $22.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs JSM Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while JSM trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs NNI Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while NNI trades at $122.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs ENVA Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while ENVA trades at $115.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs WU Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while WU trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs QFIN Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while QFIN trades at $42.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs ADS Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs BFH Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while BFH trades at $59.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs FINV Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while FINV trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AGM-A Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AGM-A trades at $144.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AGM Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AGM trades at $199.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AGM-PF Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AGM-PF trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AGM-PD Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AGM-PD trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AGM-PG Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AGM-PG trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AGM-PE Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AGM-PE trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs NAVI Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while NAVI trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs LC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while LC trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs OCSL Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while OCSL trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 116.08. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs LX Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while LX trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs LU Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while LU trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs MGI Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs BBDC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 972.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while BBDC trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs WRLD Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 920.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while WRLD trades at $173.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs ATLC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while ATLC trades at $56.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs NRDS Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 846.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while NRDS trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs ATLCZ Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 805.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while ATLCZ trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs ATLCL Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 772.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while ATLCL trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs EZPW Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 763M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while EZPW trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs GDOT Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 618.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while GDOT trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -93.92. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs PRAA Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 610.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while PRAA trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs QD Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 495.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while QD trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs RWAY Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 403.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while RWAY trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs RWAYL Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 390.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while RWAYL trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs RWAYZ Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while RWAYZ trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs ATLCP Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 333.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while ATLCP trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs RM Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while RM trades at $31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs OPRT Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while OPRT trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.49. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs PMTS Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 275.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while PMTS trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs NEWTI Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while NEWTI trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs LPRO Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 268.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while LPRO trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs YRD Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 264.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while YRD trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs FOA Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while FOA trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs MFIN Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 227.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while MFIN trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs CPSS Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 219.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while CPSS trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs SUNL Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs XYF Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 132.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while XYF trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs ELVT Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs NICK Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs CURR Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while CURR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs OMCC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while OMCC trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AHG Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AHG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs NISN Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while NISN trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs JT Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs LMFA Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while LMFA trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs MCVT Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while MCVT trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs SNTG Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while SNTG trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AIHS Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AIHS trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs CURO Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs DXF Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 922.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while DXF trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DXF's ROE of -17.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs PT Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 382.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while PT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs AEFC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while AEFC trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs SOFIW Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs GJP Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while GJP trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs GJT Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while GJT trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs KTN Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while KTN trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs PYT Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while PYT trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs SC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs GJS Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while GJS trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs IPB Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while IPB trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs WEI Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.
SEZL vs NRUC Comparison
SEZL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEZL stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEZL is priced at $172.30, while NRUC trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEZL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.97, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEZL's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEZL is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEZL.