PayPal Holdings, Inc.

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 663.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while V trades at $345.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas V's P/E ratio is 33.64. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to V's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check V's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 522B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while MA trades at $583.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.23. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check MA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 212.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AXP trades at $307.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AXP's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 137.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while COF trades at $221.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 615.37. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 137.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while COF-PK trades at $18.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF-PK's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while COF-PL trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF-PL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 136.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while COF-PJ trades at $18.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF-PJ's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 136.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while COF-PI trades at $19.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF-PI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while COF-PN trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check COF-PN's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while BNH trades at $16.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check BNH's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check DFS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SOFI trades at $23.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 47.54. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SOFI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SYF trades at $72.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SYF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while KKRS trades at $18.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check KKRS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while ALLY trades at $38.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ALLY's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-PC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SYF-PB trades at $25.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SYF-PB's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SYF-PA trades at $19.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SYF-PA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while OBDC trades at $14.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check OBDC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SLMBP trades at $76.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SLMBP's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while OMF trades at $58.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check OMF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while CGABL trades at $18.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check CGABL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SLM trades at $32.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SLM's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while UPST trades at $63.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -1281.80. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check UPST's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while FCFS trades at $139.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check FCFS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while IX trades at $25.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check IX's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while CACC trades at $477.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check CACC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while JSM trades at $19.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check JSM's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ORCC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while NNI trades at $128.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NNI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SEZL trades at $91.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SEZL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ADS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while BFH trades at $61.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check BFH's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while WU trades at $8.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check WU's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while ENVA trades at $110.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ENVA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while FINV trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check FINV's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while QFIN trades at $33.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check QFIN's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AGM-A trades at $134.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-A's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AGM trades at $188.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AGM-PE trades at $21.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-PE's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AGM-PG trades at $18.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-PG's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AGM-PD trades at $22.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-PD's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AGM-PF trades at $19.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AGM-PF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while LC trades at $15.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check LC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while NAVI trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NAVI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while LU trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check LU's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while OCSL trades at $13.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check OCSL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while LX trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check LX's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check MGI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while BBDC trades at $9.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check BBDC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 944.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while ATLCL trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ATLCL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 935.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while ATLCZ trades at $25.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ATLCZ's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 930.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while EZPW trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check EZPW's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 929.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while WRLD trades at $170.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check WRLD's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 927.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while ATLC trades at $62.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ATLC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 797.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while QD trades at $4.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check QD's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 766.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while NRDS trades at $10.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NRDS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 736.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while GDOT trades at $13.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -30.23. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check GDOT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while PRAA trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check PRAA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 598.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while MCVT trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check MCVT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 396M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while RWAYL trades at $25.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check RWAYL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 394M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while RWAY trades at $10.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check RWAY's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 392.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while RWAYZ trades at $25.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check RWAYZ's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 367.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while RM trades at $38.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check RM's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while ATLCP trades at $23.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ATLCP's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 320.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while NEWTI trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NEWTI's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while FOA trades at $27.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check FOA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 266.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while OPRT trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -43.21. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check OPRT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while YRD trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check YRD's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while LPRO trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check LPRO's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 235.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while MFIN trades at $10.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check MFIN's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 178M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while CPSS trades at $8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check CPSS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 177M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while PMTS trades at $15.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check PMTS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SUNL's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while CURR trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check CURR's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while XYF trades at $13.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check XYF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check ELVT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NICK's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while OMCC trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check OMCC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AHG trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AHG's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while NISN trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NISN's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check JT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while LMFA trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check LMFA's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SNTG trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SNTG's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while CURO trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check CURO's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AIHS trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AIHS's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 852.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while DXF trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DXF's ROE of -17.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check DXF's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 391.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while PT trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check PT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SOFIW's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while GJP trades at $24.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check GJP's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while GJT trades at $22.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check GJT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while KTN trades at $26.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check KTN's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while MRLN trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check MRLN's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while AEFC trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check AEFC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while PYT trades at $23.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check PYT's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while SC trades at $41.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check SC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while IPB trades at $26.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check IPB's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while NRUC trades at $24.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check NRUC's competition here

PYPL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PYPL stands at 66.1B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PYPL is priced at $69.38, while WEI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PYPL currently has a P/E ratio of 14.82, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, PYPL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PYPL is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYPL.Check WEI's competition here