Marlin Business Services Corp.

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, V has a market cap of 619.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while V trades at $318.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check V's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 470B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while MA trades at $520.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check MA's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 238.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while AXP trades at $342.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check AXP's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while COF trades at $205.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 62.02. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check COF's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while BNH trades at $16.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check BNH's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check DFS's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while IX trades at $36.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check IX's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while PYPL trades at $41.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check PYPL's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while SYF trades at $72.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check SYF's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while SOFI trades at $19.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check SOFI's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while KKRS trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check KKRS's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while ALLY trades at $41.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check ALLY's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while COF-PI trades at $19.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.78. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check COF-PI's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while COF-PJ trades at $18.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check COF-PJ's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while COF-PK trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check COF-PK's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while COF-PL trades at $17.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check COF-PL's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while COF-PN trades at $16.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check COF-PN's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check AGM-PC's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while SYF-PB trades at $26.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check SYF-PB's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while FCFS trades at $183.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check FCFS's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while SYF-PA trades at $19.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check SYF-PA's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while SLMBP trades at $75.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check SLMBP's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while OMF trades at $57.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check OMF's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while CGABL trades at $17.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check CGABL's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while OBDC trades at $11.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check OBDC's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while CACC trades at $485.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check CACC's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while JSM trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check JSM's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check ORCC's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while NNI trades at $131.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check NNI's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while SLM trades at $23.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check SLM's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while ENVA trades at $145.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check ENVA's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while BFH trades at $75.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check BFH's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while WU trades at $9.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check WU's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while UPST trades at $30.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 65.09. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check UPST's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check ADS's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while SEZL trades at $63.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check SEZL's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while QFIN trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check QFIN's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while LC trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check LC's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while AGM-A trades at $131.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check AGM-A's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while AGM trades at $174.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check AGM's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while EZPW trades at $25.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check EZPW's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while FINV trades at $5.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check FINV's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while JCAP trades at $21.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check JCAP's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while LU trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check LU's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check MGI's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while OCSL trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check OCSL's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 963.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while BBDC trades at $9.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check BBDC's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 947.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while RWAYI trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check RWAYI's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 913.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while NAVI trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check NAVI's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 911.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while RWAYL trades at $25.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check RWAYL's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 824.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while ATLC trades at $54.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check ATLC's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while NRDS trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check NRDS's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 740.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while NEWTG trades at $25.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check NEWTG's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 735.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while NEWTO trades at $25.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check NEWTO's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, NEWTH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while NEWTH trades at $25.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWTH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to NEWTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check NEWTH's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 669.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while GDOT trades at $11.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -14.18. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check GDOT's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 658.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while WRLD trades at $133.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check WRLD's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 637.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while AGM-PD trades at $21.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check AGM-PD's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while QD trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check QD's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 506.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while LX trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check LX's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while MCVT trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check MCVT's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 456.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while HTT trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check HTT's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 420.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while PRAA trades at $11.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check PRAA's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check RWAYZ's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 387.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while ATLCZ trades at $25.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check ATLCZ's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 377.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while ATLCL trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check ATLCL's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 374.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while ATLCP trades at $24.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check ATLCP's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while RM trades at $34.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check RM's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while YRD trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check YRD's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while NEWTI trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check NEWTI's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while RWAY trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check RWAY's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while MFIN trades at $10.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check MFIN's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while AGM-PE trades at $22.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check AGM-PE's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while OPRT trades at $5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check OPRT's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 216.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while AGM-PF trades at $19.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check AGM-PF's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 213.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while ANTA trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check ANTA's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 210.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while FOA trades at $21.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is -20.31. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check FOA's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while AGM-PG trades at $18.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check AGM-PG's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 183.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while CPSS trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check CPSS's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while LPRO trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check LPRO's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while EMIS trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMIS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check EMIS's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while CURR trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check CURR's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check SUNL's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while PMTS trades at $12.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check PMTS's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while AHG trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check AHG's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check ELVT's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check NICK's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while XYF trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 0.84. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check XYF's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while OMCC trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check OMCC's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while DXF trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXF's ROE of +854.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check DXF's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check JT's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while SNTG trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check SNTG's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while LMFA trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check LMFA's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while CURO trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check CURO's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while NISN trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check NISN's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while AIHS trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check AIHS's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 403.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while PT trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check PT's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, JF has a market cap of 391.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while JF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is less volatile compared to JF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check JF's competition here

MRLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRLN stands at 0. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MRLN is priced at $23.49, while GJO trades at $24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLN is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLN.Check GJO's competition here