LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LX
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LX | $2.25 | +5.14% | 381.3M | 1.64 | $1.37 | +13.51% |
| V | $300.80 | +0.77% | 580B | 28.22 | $10.66 | +0.84% |
| MA | $493.44 | +0.36% | 440.4B | 29.87 | $16.52 | +0.64% |
| AXP | $300.11 | -0.44% | 206.1B | 19.53 | $15.37 | +1.14% |
| COF | $181.92 | -1.40% | 113.1B | 54.14 | $3.36 | +1.54% |
| BNH | $14.98 | -1.58% | 100.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.61% |
| DFS | $200.05 | -0.21% | 50.3B | 10.69 | $18.72 | +0.35% |
| PYPL | $45.34 | +1.59% | 42.4B | 8.38 | $5.41 | +0.62% |
| IX | $30.03 | -1.38% | 33.3B | 11.42 | $2.63 | +2.69% |
| SUNB | $63.09 | -2.11% | 26.1B | 19.35 | $3.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LX vs V Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 580B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while V trades at $300.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas V's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to V's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check V's competition here
LX vs MA Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 440.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while MA trades at $493.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check MA's competition here
LX vs AXP Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 206.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while AXP trades at $300.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check AXP's competition here
LX vs COF Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while COF trades at $181.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 54.14. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check COF's competition here
LX vs BNH Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 100.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while BNH trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check BNH's competition here
LX vs DFS Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check DFS's competition here
LX vs PYPL Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while PYPL trades at $45.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check PYPL's competition here
LX vs IX Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while IX trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check IX's competition here
LX vs SUNB Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while SUNB trades at $63.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check SUNB's competition here
LX vs SYF Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while SYF trades at $68.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check SYF's competition here
LX vs SOFI Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while SOFI trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 40.64. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check SOFI's competition here
LX vs KKRS Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while KKRS trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check KKRS's competition here
LX vs ALLY Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while ALLY trades at $39.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check ALLY's competition here
LX vs COF-PI Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while COF-PI trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check COF-PI's competition here
LX vs COF-PJ Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while COF-PJ trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check COF-PJ's competition here
LX vs COF-PK Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while COF-PK trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check COF-PK's competition here
LX vs COF-PL Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while COF-PL trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check COF-PL's competition here
LX vs COF-PN Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while COF-PN trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check COF-PN's competition here
LX vs AGM-PC Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check AGM-PC's competition here
LX vs SYF-PB Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while SYF-PB trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check SYF-PB's competition here
LX vs FCFS Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while FCFS trades at $199.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check FCFS's competition here
LX vs SYF-PA Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while SYF-PA trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check SYF-PA's competition here
LX vs SLMBP Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while SLMBP trades at $74.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check SLMBP's competition here
LX vs OMF Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while OMF trades at $54.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check OMF's competition here
LX vs CGABL Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while CGABL trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check CGABL's competition here
LX vs OBDC Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while OBDC trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check OBDC's competition here
LX vs ORCC Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check ORCC's competition here
LX vs JSM Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while JSM trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check JSM's competition here
LX vs NNI Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while NNI trades at $129.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check NNI's competition here
LX vs CACC Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while CACC trades at $416.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check CACC's competition here
LX vs SLM Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while SLM trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check SLM's competition here
LX vs ENVA Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while ENVA trades at $136.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check ENVA's competition here
LX vs BFH Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while BFH trades at $73.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check BFH's competition here
LX vs ADS Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check ADS's competition here
LX vs WU Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while WU trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check WU's competition here
LX vs UPST Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while UPST trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 56.84. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check UPST's competition here
LX vs SEZL Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while SEZL trades at $63.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check SEZL's competition here
LX vs QFIN Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while QFIN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check QFIN's competition here
LX vs AGM-A Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while AGM-A trades at $119.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check AGM-A's competition here
LX vs LC Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while LC trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check LC's competition here
LX vs AGM Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while AGM trades at $150.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check AGM's competition here
LX vs EZPW Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while EZPW trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check EZPW's competition here
LX vs FINV Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while FINV trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check FINV's competition here
LX vs JCAP Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while JCAP trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check JCAP's competition here
LX vs MGI Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check MGI's competition here
LX vs OCSL Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while OCSL trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check OCSL's competition here
LX vs RWAYI Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 926.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while RWAYI trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check RWAYI's competition here
LX vs RWAYL Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 911.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while RWAYL trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check RWAYL's competition here
LX vs BBDC Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while BBDC trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check BBDC's competition here
LX vs ATLC Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 809.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while ATLC trades at $53.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check ATLC's competition here
LX vs NAVI Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 789.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while NAVI trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check NAVI's competition here
LX vs LU Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 779.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while LU trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check LU's competition here
LX vs NRDS Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 772.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while NRDS trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check NRDS's competition here
LX vs NEWTO Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 723.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while NEWTO trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check NEWTO's competition here
LX vs NEWTG Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 721M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while NEWTG trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check NEWTG's competition here
LX vs WRLD Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 704.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while WRLD trades at $139.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check WRLD's competition here
LX vs PRAA Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 693.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while PRAA trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check PRAA's competition here
LX vs NEWTH Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, NEWTH has a market cap of 657.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while NEWTH trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas NEWTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEWTH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to NEWTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check NEWTH's competition here
LX vs GDOT Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 616.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while GDOT trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check GDOT's competition here
LX vs AGM-PD Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 596M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while AGM-PD trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check AGM-PD's competition here
LX vs QD Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check QD's competition here
LX vs MCVT Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check MCVT's competition here
LX vs KRAQ Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 426.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while KRAQ trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check KRAQ's competition here
LX vs RWAYZ Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check RWAYZ's competition here
LX vs HTT Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 385.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while HTT trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check HTT's competition here
LX vs ATLCL Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while ATLCL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check ATLCL's competition here
LX vs ATLCZ Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 373.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while ATLCZ trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check ATLCZ's competition here
LX vs ATLCP Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while ATLCP trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check ATLCP's competition here
LX vs NEWTI Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while NEWTI trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check NEWTI's competition here
LX vs RM Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while RM trades at $33.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check RM's competition here
LX vs RWAY Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while RWAY trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check RWAY's competition here
LX vs AGM-PE Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while AGM-PE trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check AGM-PE's competition here
LX vs CURR Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 219.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while CURR trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check CURR's competition here
LX vs AHG Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 210.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while AHG trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check AHG's competition here
LX vs OPRT Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 205.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while OPRT trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check OPRT's competition here
LX vs AGM-PF Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 205.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while AGM-PF trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check AGM-PF's competition here
LX vs MFIN Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while MFIN trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check MFIN's competition here
LX vs AGM-PG Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 189.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while AGM-PG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check AGM-PG's competition here
LX vs FOA Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while FOA trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check FOA's competition here
LX vs PMTS Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while PMTS trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check PMTS's competition here
LX vs CPSS Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 170.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while CPSS trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check CPSS's competition here
LX vs ANTA Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while ANTA trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check ANTA's competition here
LX vs EMIS Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 158.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while EMIS trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMIS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check EMIS's competition here
LX vs IFIN-WT Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check IFIN-WT's competition here
LX vs SUNL Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check SUNL's competition here
LX vs LPRO Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 141.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while LPRO trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check LPRO's competition here
LX vs YRD Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while YRD trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check YRD's competition here
LX vs FOA-WT Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check FOA-WT's competition here
LX vs ELVT Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check ELVT's competition here
LX vs NICK Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check NICK's competition here
LX vs OMCC Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while OMCC trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check OMCC's competition here
LX vs XYF Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while XYF trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check XYF's competition here
LX vs DXF Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while DXF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DXF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check DXF's competition here
LX vs KRAQW Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, KRAQW has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while KRAQW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas KRAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRAQW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to KRAQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check KRAQW's competition here
LX vs JT Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check JT's competition here
LX vs SNTG Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while SNTG trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check SNTG's competition here
LX vs NISN Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while NISN trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is more volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check NISN's competition here
LX vs CURO Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check CURO's competition here
LX vs LMFA Comparison April 2026
LX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LX stands at 381.3M. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LX is priced at $2.25, while LMFA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LX currently has a P/E ratio of 1.64, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LX is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LX.Check LMFA's competition here