Lufax Holding Ltd
Lufax Holding Ltd LU Peers
See (LU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LU | $2.86 | +4.38% | 1.20B | -3.81 | -$0.75 | +11.51% |
| V | $355.84 | +0.94% | 690.03B | 35.80 | $9.94 | +0.62% |
| MA | $578.29 | +1.70% | 521.19B | 40.52 | $14.27 | +0.49% |
| AXP | $298.92 | +5.06% | 209.42B | 20.89 | $14.31 | +0.98% |
| BNH | $15.88 | +0.25% | 85.18B | N/A | N/A | +0.56% |
| COF | $199.97 | +6.50% | 76.61B | 16.80 | $11.90 | +0.90% |
| PYPL | $72.31 | +2.92% | 70.32B | 16.25 | $4.45 | N/A |
| DFS | $202.50 | +6.54% | 50.96B | 10.81 | $18.73 | +1.38% |
| SYF | $60.38 | +8.54% | 22.98B | 8.27 | $7.30 | +1.74% |
| KKRS | $17.53 | -0.34% | 15.56B | N/A | N/A | +6.57% |
Stock Comparison
LU vs V Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 690.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while V trades at $355.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs MA Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 521.19B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while MA trades at $578.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs AXP Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 209.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while AXP trades at $298.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs BNH Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 85.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while BNH trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs COF Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 76.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while COF trades at $199.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs PYPL Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 70.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while PYPL trades at $72.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs DFS Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while DFS trades at $202.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs SYF Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 22.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while SYF trades at $60.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs KKRS Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while KKRS trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs SOFI Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 15.52B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while SOFI trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs ALLY Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while ALLY trades at $36.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 65.02. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs AGM-PC Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.77B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs SYF-PB Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while SYF-PB trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs OBDC Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while OBDC trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs COF-PI Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while COF-PI trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs COF-PJ Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 6.92B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while COF-PJ trades at $18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs SYF-PA Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while SYF-PA trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs COF-PK Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while COF-PK trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs COF-PL Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 6.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while COF-PL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs COF-PN Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while COF-PN trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs OMF Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while OMF trades at $51.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs CGABL Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while CGABL trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs FCFS Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while FCFS trades at $132.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs CACC Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while CACC trades at $499.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs SLM Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while SLM trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs SLMBP Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while SLMBP trades at $69.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs ORCC Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs UPST Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while UPST trades at $52.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -72.55. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs JSM Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while JSM trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs IX Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while IX trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs NNI Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while NNI trades at $114.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs WU Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while WU trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs QFIN Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while QFIN trades at $45.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs SEZL Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while SEZL trades at $86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs ADS Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs BFH Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while BFH trades at $54.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs ENVA Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while ENVA trades at $97.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs FINV Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while FINV trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs AGM-A Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while AGM-A trades at $141.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs AGM Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while AGM trades at $191.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs AGM-PF Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while AGM-PF trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs AGM-PG Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while AGM-PG trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs AGM-PE Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while AGM-PE trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs AGM-PD Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while AGM-PD trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs NAVI Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while NAVI trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs LC Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while LC trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs OCSL Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while OCSL trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 116.83. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs MGI Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs BBDC Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 912.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while BBDC trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs NRDS Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 882.97M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while NRDS trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs ATLCZ Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 876.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while ATLCZ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs ATLC Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 868.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while ATLC trades at $57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs WRLD Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 846.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while WRLD trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs ATLCL Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 835.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while ATLCL trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs EZPW Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 802.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while EZPW trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs LX Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 732.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while LX trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs GDOT Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 591.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while GDOT trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -21.56. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs PRAA Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 589.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while PRAA trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs QD Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 492.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while QD trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs RWAY Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 352.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while RWAY trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs ATLCP Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 350.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while ATLCP trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs RWAYL Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 340.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while RWAYL trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs RWAYZ Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 340.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while RWAYZ trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs RM Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 294.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while RM trades at $29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs NEWTI Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 279.81M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while NEWTI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs YRD Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 275.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while YRD trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs OPRT Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 253.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while OPRT trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs LPRO Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 240.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while LPRO trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs FOA Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 235.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while FOA trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs PMTS Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 231.05M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while PMTS trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs MFIN Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 218.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while MFIN trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs CPSS Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 205.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while CPSS trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs SUNL Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs AHG Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 116.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while AHG trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs XYF Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 101.58M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while XYF trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs ELVT Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs CURR Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 48.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while CURR trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs NICK Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs OMCC Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 33.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while OMCC trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs NISN Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 26.70M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while NISN trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs JT Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs AIHS Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 10.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while AIHS trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs MCVT Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 9.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while MCVT trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs LMFA Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 9.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while LMFA trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs SNTG Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while SNTG trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs CURO Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CURO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs PT Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 390661.00. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while PT trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.
LU vs DXF Comparison
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.20B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3796.00. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.86, while DXF trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.