Lufax Holding Ltd
Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LU | $2.95 | -0.17% | 1.2B | -3.56 | -$0.79 | N/A |
| V | $318.93 | +0.00% | 619.1B | 30.18 | $10.64 | +0.78% |
| MA | $520.26 | +0.00% | 470B | 31.82 | $16.55 | +0.60% |
| AXP | $342.65 | +0.00% | 238.4B | 22.52 | $15.37 | +0.95% |
| COF | $205.06 | +0.00% | 132.5B | 62.02 | $3.36 | +1.35% |
| BNH | $16.11 | +0.00% | 107.5B | N/A | N/A | +0.52% |
| DFS | $200.05 | -0.21% | 50.3B | 10.69 | $18.72 | +0.35% |
| IX | $36.01 | +0.00% | 39.2B | 12.99 | $2.72 | +2.29% |
| PYPL | $41.73 | +0.00% | 39B | 7.70 | $5.41 | +0.34% |
| SYF | $72.26 | +0.00% | 26.4B | 7.91 | $9.28 | +1.65% |
Stock Comparison
LU vs V Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 619.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while V trades at $318.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas V's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to V's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check V's competition here
LU vs MA Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 470B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while MA trades at $520.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MA's competition here
LU vs AXP Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 238.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while AXP trades at $342.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AXP's competition here
LU vs COF Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while COF trades at $205.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 62.02. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF's competition here
LU vs BNH Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while BNH trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check BNH's competition here
LU vs DFS Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check DFS's competition here
LU vs IX Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while IX trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check IX's competition here
LU vs PYPL Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while PYPL trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PYPL's competition here
LU vs SYF Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while SYF trades at $72.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SYF's competition here
LU vs SOFI Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while SOFI trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SOFI's competition here
LU vs KKRS Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while KKRS trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check KKRS's competition here
LU vs ALLY Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while ALLY trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ALLY's competition here
LU vs COF-PI Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while COF-PI trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.78. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PI's competition here
LU vs COF-PJ Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while COF-PJ trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PJ's competition here
LU vs COF-PK Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while COF-PK trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PK's competition here
LU vs COF-PL Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while COF-PL trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PL's competition here
LU vs COF-PN Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while COF-PN trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check COF-PN's competition here
LU vs AGM-PC Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PC's competition here
LU vs SYF-PB Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while SYF-PB trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SYF-PB's competition here
LU vs FCFS Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while FCFS trades at $183.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FCFS's competition here
LU vs SYF-PA Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while SYF-PA trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SYF-PA's competition here
LU vs SLMBP Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while SLMBP trades at $75.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SLMBP's competition here
LU vs OMF Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while OMF trades at $57.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OMF's competition here
LU vs CGABL Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while CGABL trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CGABL's competition here
LU vs OBDC Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while OBDC trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OBDC's competition here
LU vs CACC Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while CACC trades at $485.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CACC's competition here
LU vs JSM Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while JSM trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check JSM's competition here
LU vs ORCC Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ORCC's competition here
LU vs NNI Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while NNI trades at $131.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NNI's competition here
LU vs SLM Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while SLM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SLM's competition here
LU vs ENVA Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while ENVA trades at $145.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ENVA's competition here
LU vs BFH Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while BFH trades at $75.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check BFH's competition here
LU vs WU Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while WU trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check WU's competition here
LU vs UPST Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while UPST trades at $30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 65.09. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check UPST's competition here
LU vs ADS Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ADS's competition here
LU vs SEZL Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while SEZL trades at $63.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SEZL's competition here
LU vs QFIN Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while QFIN trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check QFIN's competition here
LU vs LC Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while LC trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check LC's competition here
LU vs AGM-A Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while AGM-A trades at $131.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-A's competition here
LU vs AGM Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while AGM trades at $174.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM's competition here
LU vs EZPW Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while EZPW trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check EZPW's competition here
LU vs FINV Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while FINV trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FINV's competition here
LU vs JCAP Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while JCAP trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check JCAP's competition here
LU vs MGI Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MGI's competition here
LU vs OCSL Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while OCSL trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OCSL's competition here
LU vs BBDC Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 963.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while BBDC trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check BBDC's competition here
LU vs RWAYI Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 947.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while RWAYI trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAYI's competition here
LU vs NAVI Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 913.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while NAVI trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NAVI's competition here
LU vs RWAYL Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 911.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while RWAYL trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAYL's competition here
LU vs ATLC Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 824.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while ATLC trades at $54.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLC's competition here
LU vs NRDS Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while NRDS trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NRDS's competition here
LU vs NEWTG Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 740.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while NEWTG trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NEWTG's competition here
LU vs NEWTO Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 735.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while NEWTO trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NEWTO's competition here
LU vs NEWTH Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEWTH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while NEWTH trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas NEWTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEWTH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NEWTH's competition here
LU vs GDOT Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 669.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while GDOT trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -14.18. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check GDOT's competition here
LU vs WRLD Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 658.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while WRLD trades at $133.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check WRLD's competition here
LU vs AGM-PD Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 637.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while AGM-PD trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PD's competition here
LU vs QD Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check QD's competition here
LU vs LX Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 506.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while LX trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check LX's competition here
LU vs MCVT Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MCVT's competition here
LU vs HTT Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 456.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while HTT trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check HTT's competition here
LU vs PRAA Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 420.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while PRAA trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PRAA's competition here
LU vs RWAYZ Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAYZ's competition here
LU vs ATLCZ Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 387.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while ATLCZ trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLCZ's competition here
LU vs ATLCL Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 377.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while ATLCL trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLCL's competition here
LU vs ATLCP Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 374.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while ATLCP trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ATLCP's competition here
LU vs RM Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while RM trades at $34.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RM's competition here
LU vs YRD Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while YRD trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check YRD's competition here
LU vs NEWTI Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while NEWTI trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NEWTI's competition here
LU vs RWAY Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while RWAY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check RWAY's competition here
LU vs MFIN Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while MFIN trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check MFIN's competition here
LU vs AGM-PE Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while AGM-PE trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PE's competition here
LU vs OPRT Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while OPRT trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OPRT's competition here
LU vs AGM-PF Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 216.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while AGM-PF trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PF's competition here
LU vs ANTA Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 213.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while ANTA trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ANTA's competition here
LU vs FOA Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 210.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while FOA trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is -20.31. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FOA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check FOA's competition here
LU vs AGM-PG Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while AGM-PG trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AGM-PG's competition here
LU vs CPSS Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 183.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while CPSS trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CPSS's competition here
LU vs LPRO Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while LPRO trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check LPRO's competition here
LU vs EMIS Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while EMIS trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMIS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check EMIS's competition here
LU vs CURR Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while CURR trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CURR's competition here
LU vs SUNL Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SUNL's competition here
LU vs PMTS Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while PMTS trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PMTS's competition here
LU vs AHG Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while AHG trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AHG's competition here
LU vs ELVT Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check ELVT's competition here
LU vs NICK Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NICK's competition here
LU vs XYF Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while XYF trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 0.84. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check XYF's competition here
LU vs OMCC Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while OMCC trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check OMCC's competition here
LU vs DXF Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while DXF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DXF's ROE of +854.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check DXF's competition here
LU vs JT Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check JT's competition here
LU vs SNTG Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while SNTG trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SNTG's competition here
LU vs LMFA Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while LMFA trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check LMFA's competition here
LU vs CURO Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check CURO's competition here
LU vs NISN Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while NISN trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check NISN's competition here
LU vs AIHS Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while AIHS trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check AIHS's competition here
LU vs PT Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 403.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while PT trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check PT's competition here
LU vs JF Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JF has a market cap of 391.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while JF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas JF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is more volatile compared to JF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check JF's competition here
LU vs WEI Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check WEI's competition here
LU vs SOFIW Comparison February 2026
LU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LU stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LU is priced at $2.95, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LU currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LU's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LU is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LU.Check SOFIW's competition here