LendingClub Corporation

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 683.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while V trades at $352.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 512.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MA trades at $568.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 199.31B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AXP trades at $284.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 84.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while BNH trades at $15.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 71.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while COF trades at $187.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 68.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while PYPL trades at $70.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 47.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while DFS trades at $190.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AGRIP has a market cap of 46.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AGRIP trades at $99.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AGRIP's P/E ratio is 103.63. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AGRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ORXCF has a market cap of 21.68B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ORXCF trades at $19.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ORXCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORXCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ORXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 21.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SYF trades at $55.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while KKRS trades at $17.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 14.57B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SOFI trades at $13.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 10.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ALLY trades at $34.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 61.79. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MIUFY has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MIUFY trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MIUFY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIUFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to MIUFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.77B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MIUFF has a market cap of 9.39B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MIUFF trades at $6.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MIUFF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIUFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to MIUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SYF-PB trades at $24.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EDNMF has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while EDNMF trades at $36.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EDNMF's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EDNMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to EDNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EDNMY has a market cap of 7.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while EDNMY trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EDNMY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EDNMY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to EDNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while COF-PI trades at $18.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while OBDC trades at $13.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 6.91B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while COF-PJ trades at $18.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SYF-PA trades at $17.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 6.71B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while COF-PK trades at $17.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while COF-PL trades at $16.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 6.26B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while COF-PN trades at $16.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CGABL trades at $16.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FCFS trades at $132.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while OMF trades at $48.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CACC trades at $491.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SLM trades at $26.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SLMBP trades at $69.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while JSM trades at $17.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while IX trades at $20.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while UPST trades at $47.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -64.62. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while NNI trades at $112.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, KGTHY has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while KGTHY trades at $13.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas KGTHY's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KGTHY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to KGTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MAURY has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MAURY trades at $37.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MAURY's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAURY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to MAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FREJO has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FREJO trades at $15.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FREJO's P/E ratio is -167.03. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FREJO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to FREJO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FREJP has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FREJP trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FREJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FREJP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to FREJP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while WU trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CSASF has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CSASF trades at $19.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CSASF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSASF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to CSASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while QFIN trades at $42.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SEZL trades at $87.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 39.77. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MAURF has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MAURF trades at $15.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MAURF's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAURF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to MAURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CMPRF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CMPRF trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CMPRF's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMPRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to CMPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ENVA trades at $94.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while BFH trades at $50.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FINV trades at $8.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AGM-A trades at $137.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AGM trades at $185.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, KRKKF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while KRKKF trades at $101.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas KRKKF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRKKF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to KRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AGM-PE trades at $22.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AGM-PG trades at $18.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AGM-PD trades at $22.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AGM-PF trades at $19.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EHMEF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while EHMEF trades at $103.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EHMEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EHMEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to EHMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AEOJF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AEOJF trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AEOJF's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEOJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to AEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ZIZTF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ZIZTF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ZIZTF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZIZTF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ZIZTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AIFLF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AIFLF trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AIFLF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AIFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, HYPOF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while HYPOF trades at $214.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HYPOF's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HYPOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to HYPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while NAVI trades at $13.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while OCSL trades at $13.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 114.92. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while LU trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, UMTAF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while UMTAF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas UMTAF's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UMTAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to UMTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, PRLPF has a market cap of 971.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while PRLPF trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas PRLPF's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRLPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to PRLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AIFLY has a market cap of 909.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AIFLY trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AIFLY's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIFLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AIFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 902.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while BBDC trades at $8.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 839.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ATLCZ trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 829.26M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ATLC trades at $54.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 826.34M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while NRDS trades at $11.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 816.40M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while EZPW trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 816.09M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ATLCL trades at $24.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 807.70M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while WRLD trades at $140.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ZNKKY has a market cap of 802.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ZNKKY trades at $8.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ZNKKY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZNKKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to ZNKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 653.71M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while LX trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ECNCF has a market cap of 611.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ECNCF trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ECNCF's P/E ratio is 72.47. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ECNCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to ECNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 599.22M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while GDOT trades at $10.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -21.84. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EGTIF has a market cap of 575.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while EGTIF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EGTIF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EGTIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to EGTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 531.01M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while PRAA trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 484.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while QD trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SHGKY has a market cap of 482.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SHGKY trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SHGKY's P/E ratio is -30.75. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHGKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to SHGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FDCHF has a market cap of 475.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FDCHF trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FDCHF's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FDCHF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to FDCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ITJTY has a market cap of 361.81M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ITJTY trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ITJTY's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITJTY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ITJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 350.32M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ATLCP trades at $23.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 340.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while RWAY trades at $9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 339.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while RWAYL trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, INJJF has a market cap of 338.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while INJJF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas INJJF's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INJJF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to INJJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 335.51M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while RWAYZ trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, IPFPF has a market cap of 327.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while IPFPF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas IPFPF's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPFPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to IPFPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 286.71M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while RM trades at $28.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NECA has a market cap of 275.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while NECA trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NECA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NECA's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to NECA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 274.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while NEWTI trades at $25.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 271.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while YRD trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 251.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while OPRT trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GCSSF has a market cap of 248.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while GCSSF trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas GCSSF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GCSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to GCSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 242.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while PMTS trades at $21.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 236.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FOA trades at $21.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 213.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MFIN trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 208.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while LPRO trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, HUNTF has a market cap of 204.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while HUNTF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HUNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUNTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to HUNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CHFHF has a market cap of 202.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CHFHF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CHFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHFHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to CHFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 200.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CPSS trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FPLPF has a market cap of 190.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FPLPF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FPLPF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FPLPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to FPLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SEZNL has a market cap of 180.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SEZNL trades at $14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SEZNL's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEZNL's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to SEZNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CFNB has a market cap of 171.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CFNB trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CFNB's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFNB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to CFNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, IMMFF has a market cap of 144.22M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while IMMFF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas IMMFF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMMFF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to IMMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 112.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AHG trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FAVO has a market cap of 111.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FAVO trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FAVO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FAVO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to FAVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 96.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while XYF trades at $13.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 55.37M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CURR trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 34.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while OMCC trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, RYTTF has a market cap of 34.18M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while RYTTF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RYTTF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RYTTF's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to RYTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 23.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while NISN trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FIGI has a market cap of 22.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FIGI trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FIGI's P/E ratio is -68.33. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FIGI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to FIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ACCFF has a market cap of 22.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ACCFF trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ACCFF's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACCFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to ACCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, IOUFF has a market cap of 17.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while IOUFF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas IOUFF's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IOUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to IOUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, RMIAF has a market cap of 10.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while RMIAF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RMIAF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RMIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to RMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AMSA has a market cap of 10.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AMSA trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AMSA's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 10.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AIHS trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 10.06M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MCVT trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 10.01M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while LMFA trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MRBLF has a market cap of 9.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MRBLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MRBLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRBLF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to MRBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, PRPS has a market cap of 6.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while PRPS trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas PRPS's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRPS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to PRPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GWSFF has a market cap of 6.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while GWSFF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas GWSFF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GWSFF's ROE of +2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to GWSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MITJF has a market cap of 5.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MITJF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MITJF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MITJF's ROE of -245.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to MITJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ALEDY has a market cap of 5.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ALEDY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ALEDY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALEDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ALEDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SPFX has a market cap of 5.05M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SPFX trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SPFX's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPFX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to SPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SNTG trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FNNZF has a market cap of 3.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FNNZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FNNZF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNNZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to FNNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, KYNC has a market cap of 3.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while KYNC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas KYNC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KYNC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to KYNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MBDC has a market cap of 3.25M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MBDC trades at $29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to MBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CURO trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CURO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, XSHLF has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while XSHLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas XSHLF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XSHLF's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to XSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AIJTY has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AIJTY trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AIJTY's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIJTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AIJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CUROQ has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CUROQ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CUROQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CUROQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to CUROQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CHWWF has a market cap of 1.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CHWWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CHWWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHWWF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to CHWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CAFI has a market cap of 1.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CAFI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CAFI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAFI's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to CAFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ATNPQ has a market cap of 925827.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ATNPQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ATNPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATNPQ's ROE of +24.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to ATNPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, COSG has a market cap of 458596.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while COSG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas COSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COSG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to COSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CBRJ has a market cap of 415596.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CBRJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CBRJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBRJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to CBRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 379147.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while PT trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CYIO has a market cap of 351023.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CYIO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CYIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CYIO's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to CYIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CFGX has a market cap of 315928.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CFGX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CFGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFGX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to CFGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, BCAP has a market cap of 284236.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while BCAP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas BCAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to BCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SUNLQ has a market cap of 79203.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SUNLQ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SUNLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUNLQ's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to SUNLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ECDD has a market cap of 28889.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ECDD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ECDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ECDD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to ECDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FDTC has a market cap of 17426.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FDTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FDTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FDTC's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to FDTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ARWD has a market cap of 7675.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while ARWD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ARWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARWD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to ARWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, YUANF has a market cap of 4892.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while YUANF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas YUANF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YUANF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to YUANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3558.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while DXF trades at $7.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, RAHGF has a market cap of 2684.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while RAHGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RAHGF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RAHGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to RAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, VIEWF has a market cap of 2675.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while VIEWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas VIEWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIEWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to VIEWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EPOR has a market cap of 2052.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while EPOR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPOR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to EPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, RBRI has a market cap of 1953.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while RBRI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RBRI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to RBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, WORC has a market cap of 1910.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while WORC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas WORC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WORC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to WORC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, DKGH has a market cap of 1489.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while DKGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas DKGH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DKGH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to DKGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GAFL has a market cap of 1464.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while GAFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas GAFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GAFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to GAFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, WEIDY has a market cap of 1409.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while WEIDY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas WEIDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WEIDY's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to WEIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FRNV has a market cap of 596.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FRNV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FRNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRNV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to FRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CHFI has a market cap of 577.00. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CHFI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CHFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to CHFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NRUC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while NRUC trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GJP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while GJP trades at $24.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, IPB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while IPB trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GJO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while GJO trades at $24.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AEFC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AEFC trades at $20.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FLXP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while FLXP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FLXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLXP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to FLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, PYT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while PYT trades at $23.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MRLN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while MRLN trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AWKS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AWKS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AWKS's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AWKS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, WEI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while WEI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SOFIW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CIAS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while CIAS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CIAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to CIAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, TSLMF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while TSLMF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas TSLMF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSLMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to TSLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AATRL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while AATRL trades at $54.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AATRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AATRL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to AATRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while SC trades at $41.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EPORP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while EPORP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EPORP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPORP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to EPORP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, KTN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while KTN trades at $26.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, KTBA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while KTBA trades at $22.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas KTBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KTBA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is less volatile compared to KTBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GJS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while GJS trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.

LC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LC stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GJT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LC is priced at $10.57, while GJT trades at $22.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LC is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LC.