Credit-Enhanced Corts Trust Aon
Credit-Enhanced Corts Trust Aon KTN Peers
See (KTN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTN | $26.50 | N/A | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| V | $353.54 | -1.24% | 685.6B | 35.60 | $9.93 | +0.65% |
| MA | $563.58 | -1.15% | 507.9B | 39.52 | $14.26 | +0.50% |
| AXP | $285.22 | -0.68% | 199.8B | 19.92 | $14.32 | +1.02% |
| COF | $185.08 | -1.53% | 118.5B | 15.55 | $11.90 | +1.30% |
| COF-PN | $15.91 | -0.50% | 118.5B | 0.62 | $25.57 | +1.30% |
| COF-PL | $16.00 | -0.23% | 118.5B | 0.63 | $25.57 | +1.30% |
| COF-PJ | $17.60 | +0.69% | 118.5B | 0.69 | $25.57 | +1.30% |
| COF-PI | $18.37 | +0.11% | 118.5B | 0.72 | $25.57 | +1.30% |
| COF-PK | $17.05 | +0.03% | 118.5B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.30% |
Stock Comparison
KTN vs V Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, V has a market cap of 685.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while V trades at $353.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs MA Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 507.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while MA trades at $563.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.52. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs AXP Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 199.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AXP trades at $285.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs COF Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while COF trades at $185.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs COF-PN Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while COF-PN trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs COF-PL Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while COF-PL trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs COF-PJ Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while COF-PJ trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs COF-PI Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while COF-PI trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs COF-PK Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while COF-PK trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs BNH Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while BNH trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs PYPL Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while PYPL trades at $69.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs DFS Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs SYF Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SYF trades at $56.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs KKRS Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while KKRS trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs SOFI Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SOFI trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs ALLY Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while ALLY trades at $33.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 55.97. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs AGM-PC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs SYF-PB Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SYF-PB trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs OBDC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while OBDC trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs SLM Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SLM trades at $33.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs SLMBP Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SLMBP trades at $75.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs SYF-PA Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SYF-PA trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs OMF Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while OMF trades at $50.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs CGABL Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while CGABL trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs FCFS Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while FCFS trades at $127.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs CACC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while CACC trades at $476.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs ORCC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs JSM Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while JSM trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs IX Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while IX trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs UPST Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while UPST trades at $45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs NNI Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while NNI trades at $114.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs SEZL Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SEZL trades at $105.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs WU Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while WU trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs QFIN Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while QFIN trades at $42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs ADS Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs BFH Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while BFH trades at $50.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs ENVA Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while ENVA trades at $90.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs FINV Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while FINV trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs AGM-A Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AGM-A trades at $135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and AGM-A have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTN vs AGM-PE Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AGM-PE trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and AGM-PE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTN vs AGM-PF Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AGM-PF trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs AGM-PG Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AGM-PG trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs AGM-PD Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AGM-PD trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and AGM-PD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTN vs AGM Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AGM trades at $182.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs NAVI Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while NAVI trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs OCSL Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while OCSL trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 117.50. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs LU Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while LU trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs LC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while LC trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs MGI Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and MGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTN vs BBDC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 952.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while BBDC trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs NRDS Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 783.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while NRDS trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs WRLD Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 761.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while WRLD trades at $143.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs EZPW Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 737.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while EZPW trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs ATLCL Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 717.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while ATLCL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs ATLC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 717.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while ATLC trades at $47.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs ATLCZ Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 717.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while ATLCZ trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs LX Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 657.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while LX trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs PRAA Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 540.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while PRAA trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs GDOT Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 496.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while GDOT trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -75.42. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs QD Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 467.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while QD trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs RWAYL Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 361.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while RWAYL trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs RWAYZ Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 361.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while RWAYZ trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs RWAY Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 361.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while RWAY trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs ATLCP Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 351.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while ATLCP trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs NEWTI Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 283.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while NEWTI trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and NEWTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTN vs YRD Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 269.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while YRD trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs RM Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while RM trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs OPRT Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 230.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while OPRT trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs LPRO Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 230M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while LPRO trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs FOA Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 228M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while FOA trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs PMTS Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while PMTS trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs MFIN Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 214.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while MFIN trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs CPSS Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 189.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while CPSS trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs SUNL Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs AHG Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AHG trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs XYF Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 121.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while XYF trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs ELVT Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs NICK Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs OMCC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while OMCC trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and OMCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTN vs CURR Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while CURR trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs NISN Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while NISN trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs JT Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs MCVT Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while MCVT trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs AIHS Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AIHS trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs LMFA Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while LMFA trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs SNTG Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SNTG trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs CURO Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to CURO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs PT Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 392.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while PT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs DXF Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while DXF trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs GJP Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while GJP trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and GJP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTN vs GJO Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while GJO trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and GJO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTN vs SOFIW Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs AEFC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while AEFC trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs GJT Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while GJT trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and GJT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTN vs SC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs PYT Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while PYT trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and PYT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTN vs MRLN Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while MRLN trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs NRUC Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while NRUC trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN is less volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTN.
KTN vs IPB Comparison
KTN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTN stands at 0. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTN is priced at $26.50, while IPB trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTN's ROE is N/A, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTN and IPB have similar daily volatility (0.00).