ORIX Corporation
ORIX Corporation IX Peers
See (IX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IX | $21.20 | -0.80% | 4.8B | 9.95 | $2.13 | +1.65% |
| V | $366.83 | -0.32% | 711.3B | 36.90 | $9.94 | +0.62% |
| MA | $585.43 | +0.22% | 527.6B | 41.05 | $14.26 | +0.49% |
| AXP | $296.02 | +0.03% | 207.4B | 20.66 | $14.33 | +0.98% |
| COF-PJ | $18.00 | +1.12% | 124.4B | 0.70 | $25.57 | +1.25% |
| COF-PK | $17.34 | +0.53% | 124.1B | 0.68 | $25.57 | +1.25% |
| COF-PN | $16.35 | +0.43% | 123.7B | 0.64 | $25.57 | +1.25% |
| COF-PL | $16.41 | +0.31% | 123.5B | 0.64 | $25.57 | +1.25% |
| COF-PI | $18.85 | +0.21% | 123.2B | 0.74 | $25.57 | +1.25% |
| COF | $192.00 | -0.45% | 122.9B | 16.12 | $11.91 | +1.25% |
Stock Comparison
IX vs V Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 711.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while V trades at $366.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas V's P/E ratio is 36.90. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs MA Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 527.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while MA trades at $585.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AXP Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 207.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AXP trades at $296.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs COF-PJ Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while COF-PJ trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs COF-PK Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while COF-PK trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs COF-PN Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 123.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while COF-PN trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs COF-PL Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while COF-PL trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs COF-PI Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 123.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while COF-PI trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs COF Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while COF trades at $192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs BNH Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while BNH trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs PYPL Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while PYPL trades at $72.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs DFS Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SYF Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SYF trades at $57.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs KKRS Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while KKRS trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SOFI Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SOFI trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs ALLY Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while ALLY trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 58.67. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AGM-PC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SYF-PB Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SYF-PB trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs OBDC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while OBDC trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SYF-PA Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SYF-PA trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SLMBP Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SLMBP trades at $78.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SLM Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SLM trades at $31.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs OMF Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while OMF trades at $51.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs CGABL Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while CGABL trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs CACC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while CACC trades at $474.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs FCFS Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while FCFS trades at $124.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs ORCC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs JSM Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while JSM trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs UPST Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while UPST trades at $51.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -70.38. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs NNI Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while NNI trades at $113.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SEZL Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SEZL trades at $123.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs WU Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while WU trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs QFIN Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while QFIN trades at $42.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs ADS Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs ENVA Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while ENVA trades at $94.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs BFH Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while BFH trades at $49.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs FINV Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while FINV trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AGM-PD Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AGM-PD trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AGM-PG Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AGM-PG trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AGM-PE Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AGM-PE trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AGM-PF Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AGM-PF trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AGM Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AGM trades at $184.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AGM-A Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AGM-A trades at $133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs NAVI Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while NAVI trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs OCSL Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while OCSL trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 117.50. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs LU Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while LU trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs LC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while LC trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs MGI Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs BBDC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 928.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while BBDC trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs WRLD Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 831.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while WRLD trades at $156.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs NRDS Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 809.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while NRDS trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 29.35. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs ATLC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 744.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while ATLC trades at $49.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs ATLCZ Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 739.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while ATLCZ trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs ATLCL Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 733.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while ATLCL trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs EZPW Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 716.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while EZPW trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs LX Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 627.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while LX trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs PRAA Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 562.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while PRAA trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs GDOT Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 506.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while GDOT trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -76.92. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs QD Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 493.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while QD trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs RWAYZ Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 369.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while RWAYZ trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs RWAY Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 363.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while RWAY trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs RWAYL Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 362.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while RWAYL trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs ATLCP Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 339.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while ATLCP trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs YRD Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 302.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while YRD trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs OPRT Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 289.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while OPRT trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs NEWTI Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 279.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while NEWTI trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs RM Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 268M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while RM trades at $27.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs PMTS Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while PMTS trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs FOA Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 231.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while FOA trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs LPRO Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 228.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while LPRO trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs MFIN Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 219.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while MFIN trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs CPSS Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while CPSS trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SUNL Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs XYF Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while XYF trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AHG Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 116.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AHG trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs ELVT Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs NICK Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs OMCC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while OMCC trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs CURR Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while CURR trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs NISN Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while NISN trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs JT Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AIHS Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AIHS trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs MCVT Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while MCVT trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs LMFA Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while LMFA trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SNTG Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SNTG trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs CURO Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs PT Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 378.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while PT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs DXF Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while DXF trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs MRLN Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while MRLN trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs IPB Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while IPB trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs WEI Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SOFIW Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs GJP Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while GJP trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs GJT Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while GJT trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs GJO Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while GJO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs SC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs KTN Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while KTN trades at $26.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs AEFC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while AEFC trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.
IX vs NRUC Comparison
IX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IX stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IX is priced at $21.20, while NRUC trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IX currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IX's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IX is less volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IX.