IronNet, Inc.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while MSFT trades at $504.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 38.70. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 660.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while ORCL trades at $231.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 54.15. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 322.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while PLTR trades at $143.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 593.75. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while ADBE trades at $364.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while PANW trades at $188.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 110.39. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CRWD trades at $482.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -705.81. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while SNPS trades at $566.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 65.46. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while HOOD trades at $100.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 56.41. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while FTNT trades at $100.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CRWV trades at $128.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -54.63. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while NET trades at $182.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -790.57. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while ZS trades at $293.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1184.72. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while XYZ trades at $67.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while VRSN trades at $282.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while TOST trades at $43.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 163.98. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while GDDY trades at $168.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CHKP trades at $216.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CPAY trades at $328.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while AFRM trades at $69.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -360.74. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while IOT trades at $37.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -171.36. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while NTNX trades at $72.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -283.00. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CYBR trades at $374.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -185.41. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while GEN trades at $29.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while FFIV trades at $293.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while MDB trades at $206.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -192.07. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while RBRK trades at $85.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while KSPI trades at $81.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while OKTA trades at $93.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 145.29. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while SAIL trades at $20.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while AKAM trades at $77.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while DOX trades at $88.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while FOUR trades at $101.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 35.51. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while KVYO trades at $31.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -191.24. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while WIX trades at $151.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 61.88. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while INFA trades at $24.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 809.50. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CFLT trades at $24.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -25.26. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while DBX trades at $26.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while PATH trades at $12.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -107.37. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CCCS trades at $9.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 975.50. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while VRNS trades at $49.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -63.46. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while S trades at $17.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while WEX trades at $151.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while SPSC trades at $133.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 63.28. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while QLYS trades at $137.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while BOX trades at $32.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while ACIW trades at $44.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while EEFT trades at $105.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while TENB trades at $33.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -90.39. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while ODD trades at $72.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while STNE trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -19.30. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CORZZ trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CORZ trades at $12.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while RELY trades at $17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -609.33. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while AVPT trades at $18.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -140.04. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CLBT trades at $14.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -16.05. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while DLO trades at $11.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while PAGS trades at $8.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while MQ trades at $5.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while DOCN trades at $28.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while WRD trades at $8.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to WRD's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while PAYO trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while BB trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 205.00. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while APPN trades at $29.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -36.76. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while EVTC trades at $34.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while RAMP trades at $32.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -837.25. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while TDC trades at $21.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while FIVN trades at $27.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -464.50. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CORZW trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while AVDX trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.25. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while EVCM trades at $10.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -90.42. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while CSGS trades at $62.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while PGY trades at $23.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while NTCT trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while TUYA trades at $2.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 62.75. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while RPD trades at $23.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 58.85. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.

IRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IRNT stands at 134.1K. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRNT is priced at $0.00, while GB trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IRNT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, IRNT's ROE is N/A, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, IRNT is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRNT.