Five9, Inc.

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 202.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while SAP trades at $176.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SAP's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 190.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while APP trades at $599.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 49.33. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check APP's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while CRM trades at $178.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CRM's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 144.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while UBER trades at $70.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check UBER's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 138.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while SHOP trades at $110.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 104.51. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SHOP's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while NOW trades at $107.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 60.82. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NOW's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while CDNS trades at $376.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 86.99. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CDNS's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while ADBE trades at $240.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ADBE's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while INTU trades at $313.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN and INTU have similar daily volatility (5.11).Check INTU's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while DDOG trades at $228.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 583.71. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DDOG's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while SNOW trades at $239.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -44.50. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SNOW's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while ADSK trades at $241.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ADSK's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while MSTR trades at $148.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check MSTR's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ANSS's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while WDAY trades at $128.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 38.66. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check WDAY's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while ROP trades at $317.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ROP's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while GTOP trades at $48.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 39.71. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GTOP's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while STRF trades at $100.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check STRF's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while FICO trades at $1,315.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check FICO's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while STRC trades at $98.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check STRC's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while ZM trades at $99.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ZM's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while TEAM trades at $92.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -108.62. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check TEAM's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while STRK trades at $73.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check STRK's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check AZPN's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while PTC trades at $139.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PTC's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while SSNC trades at $66.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SSNC's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while GRAB trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 90.75. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GRAB's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while TYL trades at $304.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 41.77. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check TYL's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while U trades at $29.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas U's P/E ratio is -17.69. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check U's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check BKI's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while DT trades at $40.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 72.06. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DT's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while GWRE trades at $139.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GWRE's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DAY's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check XM's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CDAY's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while FIG trades at $22.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check FIG's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while HUBS trades at $200.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 105.76. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check HUBS's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while DOCU trades at $49.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DOCU's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while BSY trades at $32.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check BSY's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while YMM trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check YMM's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while FROG trades at $73.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -134.68. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check FROG's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check OCFT's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while MANH trades at $142.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check MANH's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NATI's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SMAR's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while CWAN trades at $24.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.64. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CWAN's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while PAYC trades at $135.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PAYC's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while PCOR trades at $46.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -91.94. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PCOR's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while IDCC trades at $254.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check IDCC's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check COUP's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while TTAN trades at $64.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -36.58. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check TTAN's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while DSGX trades at $71.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DSGX's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while APPF trades at $158.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 38.72. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check APPF's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while PCTY trades at $110.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PCTY's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while YOU trades at $57.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check YOU's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while PEGA trades at $34.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PEGA's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while OTEX trades at $22.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check OTEX's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while ESTC trades at $58.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -68.20. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ESTC's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while NICE trades at $90.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NICE's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while LYFT trades at $13.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check LYFT's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while COMP trades at $8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 419.50. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check COMP's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while DUOL trades at $108.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DUOL's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while GBTG trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 59.03. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GBTG's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while ZETA trades at $20.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -194.55. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ZETA's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check OCTVV's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while NAVN trades at $19.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NAVN's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while GTLB trades at $27.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -78.03. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GTLB's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while CVLT trades at $110.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 67.87. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CVLT's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GRND-WT's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while RUM trades at $9.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -22.67. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check RUM's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CVT's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PYCR's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while MNDY trades at $77.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check MNDY's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while KC trades at $12.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -25.73. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check KC's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while SRAD trades at $13.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 49.58. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SRAD's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PWSC's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while RNG trades at $41.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 44.26. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check RNG's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while BTDR trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check BTDR's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check AYX's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while SOUN trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SOUN's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ENV's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check INST's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while BILL trades at $35.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -150.85. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check BILL's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while DAVE trades at $269.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DAVE's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while BOX trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check BOX's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ZI's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while STUB trades at $9.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check STUB's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while LIF trades at $41.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check LIF's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while NATL trades at $45.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NATL's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while BULL trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check BULL's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while ADEA trades at $27.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ADEA's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while PTRN trades at $18.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -23.06. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PTRN's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while QTWO trades at $45.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 39.76. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check QTWO's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while BRZE trades at $23.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -20.15. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check BRZE's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while DBD trades at $80.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DBD's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while NP trades at $28.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -157.28. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NP's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while WK trades at $47.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 197.92. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check WK's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while FSLY trades at $16.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -24.30. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check FSLY's competition here

FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.02, while CALX trades at $40.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.37, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 83.65. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CALX's competition here