Five9, Inc.
Five9, Inc. (FIVN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FIVN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIVN | $22.24 | +29.30% | 1.7B | 49.42 | $0.45 | N/A |
| MSFT | $414.44 | +1.63% | 3.1T | 24.65 | $16.80 | +0.84% |
| ORCL | $171.83 | +6.47% | 494.2B | 30.79 | $5.58 | +1.16% |
| PLTR | $144.07 | +3.57% | 330.1B | 228.68 | $0.63 | N/A |
| PANW | $181.08 | +0.98% | 123.4B | 100.61 | $1.80 | N/A |
| CRWD | $455.64 | +2.22% | 115.6B | -723.24 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| ADBE | $250.71 | +1.87% | 101.3B | 14.60 | $17.17 | N/A |
| SNPS | $489.02 | +1.33% | 93.7B | 75.12 | $6.51 | N/A |
| NET | $217.50 | +6.11% | 76.6B | -725.20 | -$0.30 | N/A |
| FTNT | $86.29 | +2.35% | 63.8B | 35.66 | $2.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FIVN vs MSFT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while MSFT trades at $414.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check MSFT's competition here
FIVN vs ORCL Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 494.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while ORCL trades at $171.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ORCL's competition here
FIVN vs PLTR Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 330.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while PLTR trades at $144.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 228.68. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PLTR's competition here
FIVN vs PANW Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while PANW trades at $181.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 100.61. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PANW's competition here
FIVN vs CRWD Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CRWD trades at $455.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -723.24. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CRWD's competition here
FIVN vs ADBE Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while ADBE trades at $250.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ADBE's competition here
FIVN vs SNPS Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while SNPS trades at $489.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 75.12. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SNPS's competition here
FIVN vs NET Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while NET trades at $217.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -725.20. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NET's competition here
FIVN vs FTNT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while FTNT trades at $86.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 35.66. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check FTNT's competition here
FIVN vs CRWV Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CRWV trades at $119.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -42.33. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CRWV's competition here
FIVN vs VMW Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check VMW's competition here
FIVN vs SQ Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SQ's competition here
FIVN vs XYZ Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while XYZ trades at $71.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check XYZ's competition here
FIVN vs NETE Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NETE's competition here
FIVN vs SPLK Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SPLK's competition here
FIVN vs VRSN Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while VRSN trades at $272.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check VRSN's competition here
FIVN vs AFRM Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while AFRM trades at $67.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 83.38. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check AFRM's competition here
FIVN vs ZS Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while ZS trades at $139.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -317.75. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ZS's competition here
FIVN vs FLT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check FLT's competition here
FIVN vs MDB Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while MDB trades at $263.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -302.83. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check MDB's competition here
FIVN vs CYBR Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CYBR's competition here
FIVN vs CPAY Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CPAY trades at $307.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CPAY's competition here
FIVN vs FFIV Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while FFIV trades at $323.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check FFIV's competition here
FIVN vs IOT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while IOT trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -1525.75. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check IOT's competition here
FIVN vs TOST Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while TOST trades at $29.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check TOST's competition here
FIVN vs KSPI Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while KSPI trades at $86.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check KSPI's competition here
FIVN vs AKAM Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while AKAM trades at $103.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 33.84. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check AKAM's competition here
FIVN vs PAYP Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while PAYP trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PAYP's competition here
FIVN vs NLOK Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NLOK's competition here
FIVN vs OKTA Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while OKTA trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 57.85. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check OKTA's competition here
FIVN vs CHKP Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CHKP trades at $114.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CHKP's competition here
FIVN vs GEN Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while GEN trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GEN's competition here
FIVN vs GDDY Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while GDDY trades at $86.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GDDY's competition here
FIVN vs NTNX Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while NTNX trades at $42.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 46.30. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NTNX's competition here
FIVN vs RBRK Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while RBRK trades at $55.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -30.94. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check RBRK's competition here
FIVN vs CFLT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CFLT's competition here
FIVN vs DOCN Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while DOCN trades at $102.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DOCN's competition here
FIVN vs ALTR Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ALTR's competition here
FIVN vs PLAN Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PLAN's competition here
FIVN vs INFA Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check INFA's competition here
FIVN vs HCP Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check HCP's competition here
FIVN vs DOX Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while DOX trades at $64.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DOX's competition here
FIVN vs SAIL Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while SAIL trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -22.35. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SAIL's competition here
FIVN vs KVYO Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while KVYO trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -201.64. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check KVYO's competition here
FIVN vs JCOM Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check JCOM's competition here
FIVN vs DBX Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while DBX trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DBX's competition here
FIVN vs SQSP Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SQSP's competition here
FIVN vs CORZ Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CORZ trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -23.12. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CORZ's competition here
FIVN vs CORZZ Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CORZZ trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CORZZ's competition here
FIVN vs NEWR Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NEWR's competition here
FIVN vs BLSH Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while BLSH trades at $39.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check BLSH's competition here
FIVN vs PATH Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while PATH trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PATH's competition here
FIVN vs CCCS Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CCCS's competition here
FIVN vs KLAR Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while KLAR trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -18.40. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check KLAR's competition here
FIVN vs WEX Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while WEX trades at $151.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check WEX's competition here
FIVN vs S Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while S trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas S's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to S's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check S's competition here
FIVN vs NVEI Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NVEI's competition here
FIVN vs RELY Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while RELY trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 73.52. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check RELY's competition here
FIVN vs FOUR Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while FOUR trades at $45.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 41.88. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check FOUR's competition here
FIVN vs ACIW Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while ACIW trades at $43.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ACIW's competition here
FIVN vs WIX Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while WIX trades at $80.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 91.59. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check WIX's competition here
FIVN vs CORZW Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CORZW trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CORZW's competition here
FIVN vs DLO Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while DLO trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check DLO's competition here
FIVN vs ESMT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ESMT's competition here
FIVN vs BOX Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while BOX trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 43.12. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check BOX's competition here
FIVN vs CLBT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CLBT trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 43.06. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CLBT's competition here
FIVN vs SWI Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SWI's competition here
FIVN vs BB Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while BB trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check BB's competition here
FIVN vs QLYS Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while QLYS trades at $88.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check QLYS's competition here
FIVN vs VRNS Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while VRNS trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -23.45. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check VRNS's competition here
FIVN vs CCC Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CCC trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 88.17. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CCC's competition here
FIVN vs EVOP Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check EVOP's competition here
FIVN vs STNE Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while STNE trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check STNE's competition here
FIVN vs PAGS Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while PAGS trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PAGS's competition here
FIVN vs EEFT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while EEFT trades at $74.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check EEFT's competition here
FIVN vs TDC Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while TDC trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check TDC's competition here
FIVN vs NTCT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while NTCT trades at $33.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check NTCT's competition here
FIVN vs TENB Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while TENB trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -212.30. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check TENB's competition here
FIVN vs WRD Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while WRD trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check WRD's competition here
FIVN vs CSGS Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while CSGS trades at $80.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check CSGS's competition here
FIVN vs AVPT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while AVPT trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 68.07. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check AVPT's competition here
FIVN vs SPSC Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while SPSC trades at $58.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SPSC's competition here
FIVN vs EVCM Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while EVCM trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 121.10. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check EVCM's competition here
FIVN vs AVDX Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check AVDX's competition here
FIVN vs GETVV Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GETVV's competition here
FIVN vs FORG Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check FORG's competition here
FIVN vs ATEN Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while ATEN trades at $26.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ATEN's competition here
FIVN vs RAMP Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while RAMP trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check RAMP's competition here
FIVN vs GSKY Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GSKY's competition here
FIVN vs MQ Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while MQ trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -144.33. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check MQ's competition here
FIVN vs EVTC Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while EVTC trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check EVTC's competition here
FIVN vs GET Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GET's competition here
FIVN vs PAYO Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while PAYO trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check PAYO's competition here
FIVN vs GCT Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while GCT trades at $45.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GCT's competition here
FIVN vs APPN Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while APPN trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 1127.00. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check APPN's competition here
FIVN vs STER Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check STER's competition here
FIVN vs ZUO Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check ZUO's competition here
FIVN vs SUMO Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check SUMO's competition here
FIVN vs GB Comparison May 2026
FIVN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIVN stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIVN is priced at $22.24, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIVN currently has a P/E ratio of 49.42, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FIVN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FIVN is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIVN.Check GB's competition here