HUB Cyber Security Ltd.
HUB Cyber Security Ltd. HUBCZ Peers
See (HUBCZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBCZ | $0.01 | +13.43% | 5.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSFT | $503.32 | +0.37% | 3.7T | 38.84 | $12.96 | +0.79% |
| ORCL | $230.56 | -1.89% | 647.2B | 53.09 | $4.34 | +0.95% |
| PLTR | $142.10 | -0.28% | 321.6B | 592.13 | $0.24 | N/A |
| ADBE | $363.35 | -2.18% | 154.1B | 23.24 | $15.63 | N/A |
| PANW | $187.39 | -2.44% | 125B | 107.70 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $478.45 | -1.78% | 119.2B | -693.26 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| SNPS | $559.28 | -1.22% | 86.8B | 64.66 | $8.65 | N/A |
| HOOD | $98.34 | -0.36% | 86.8B | 56.18 | $1.75 | N/A |
| FTNT | $99.06 | -1.14% | 75.8B | 40.76 | $2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HUBCZ vs MSFT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while MSFT trades at $503.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ORCL Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 647.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ORCL trades at $230.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 53.09. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PLTR Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 321.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PLTR trades at $142.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 592.13. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ADBE Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ADBE trades at $363.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PANW Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 125B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PANW trades at $187.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 107.70. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CRWD Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 119.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CRWD trades at $478.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -693.26. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SNPS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 86.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SNPS trades at $559.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 64.66. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs HOOD Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 86.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while HOOD trades at $98.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 56.18. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FTNT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FTNT trades at $99.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 40.76. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NET Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NET trades at $181.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -788.30. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs VMW Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CRWV Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CRWV trades at $125.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -49.70. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SQ Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ZS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ZS trades at $289.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1158.96. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs XYZ Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while XYZ trades at $65.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NETE Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SPLK Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs VRSN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while VRSN trades at $281.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs TOST Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while TOST trades at $43.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 160.67. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GDDY Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GDDY trades at $167.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CHKP Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CHKP trades at $215.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CPAY Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CPAY trades at $324.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FLT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs IOT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while IOT trades at $37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -169.82. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs AFRM Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while AFRM trades at $64.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -340.58. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NTNX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NTNX trades at $72.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -278.42. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CYBR Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CYBR trades at $374.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -184.64. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GEN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GEN trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FFIV Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FFIV trades at $291.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs MDB Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while MDB trades at $202.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -185.75. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs RBRK Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while RBRK trades at $84.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs KSPI Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while KSPI trades at $81.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs OKTA Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while OKTA trades at $91.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 140.83. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NLOK Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs AKAM Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while AKAM trades at $77.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SAIL Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SAIL trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs DOX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while DOX trades at $88.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ALTR Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ and ALTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HUBCZ vs PLAN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FOUR Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FOUR trades at $100.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs KVYO Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while KVYO trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -184.88. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs INFA Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while INFA trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 810.50. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs WIX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while WIX trades at $152.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 60.44. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CFLT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CFLT trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -24.89. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs DBX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while DBX trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs HCP Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs JCOM Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PATH Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PATH trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -102.96. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SQSP Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CCCS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CCCS trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 955.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NEWR Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs VRNS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while VRNS trades at $49.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -61.20. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs S Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while S trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs WEX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while WEX trades at $150.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SPSC Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SPSC trades at $131.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 61.27. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs QLYS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while QLYS trades at $135.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NVEI Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ and NVEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HUBCZ vs BOX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while BOX trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ACIW Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ACIW trades at $43.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs EEFT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while EEFT trades at $102.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs TENB Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while TENB trades at $32.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -85.68. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ODD Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ODD trades at $71.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs STNE Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while STNE trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -18.63. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ESMT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CORZ Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CORZ trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CORZZ Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CORZZ trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs AVPT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while AVPT trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -137.23. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs RELY Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while RELY trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -579.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CLBT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CLBT trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SWI Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs DLO Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while DLO trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs EVOP Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PAGS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PAGS trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs MQ Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while MQ trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 57.15. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs DOCN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while DOCN trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs WRD Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while WRD trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WRD's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs BB Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while BB trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 201.75. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PAYO Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PAYO trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs EVTC Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while EVTC trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs APPN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while APPN trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -34.55. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs RAMP Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while RAMP trades at $32.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -804.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GETVV Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs TDC Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while TDC trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs AVDX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while AVDX trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 245.75. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FIVN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FIVN trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -443.33. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CORZW Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CORZW trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FORG Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs EVCM Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while EVCM trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -87.92. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GSKY Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CSGS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CSGS trades at $61.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GET Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PGY Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PGY trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs STER Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NTCT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NTCT trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ZUO Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs TUYA Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while TUYA trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 61.25. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SUMO Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs RPD Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while RPD trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 56.07. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GB Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GB trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.