HUB Cyber Security Ltd.
HUB Cyber Security Ltd. HUBCZ Peers
See (HUBCZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBCZ | $0.01 | -1.42% | 7.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSFT | $479.14 | +0.88% | 3.6T | 37.09 | $12.92 | +0.68% |
| ORCL | $211.08 | -1.92% | 591.9B | 48.52 | $4.35 | +0.81% |
| PLTR | $141.41 | +2.92% | 320B | 614.83 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $401.81 | +2.59% | 171.3B | 25.71 | $15.63 | N/A |
| PANW | $198.11 | +0.94% | 132.1B | 114.51 | $1.73 | N/A |
| CRWD | $479.39 | -0.26% | 119.5B | -665.82 | -$0.72 | N/A |
| FTNT | $101.95 | +1.11% | 78B | 41.95 | $2.43 | N/A |
| CRWV | $158.45 | +7.65% | 75.9B | -62.63 | -$2.53 | N/A |
| SNPS | $479.45 | +0.12% | 74.4B | 55.36 | $8.66 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HUBCZ vs MSFT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while MSFT trades at $479.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 37.09. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ORCL Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 591.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ORCL trades at $211.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PLTR Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 320B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PLTR trades at $141.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 614.83. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ADBE Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ADBE trades at $401.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PANW Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PANW trades at $198.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 114.51. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CRWD Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CRWD trades at $479.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -665.82. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FTNT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FTNT trades at $101.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CRWV Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CRWV trades at $158.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -62.63. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SNPS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SNPS trades at $479.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 55.36. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs HOOD Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while HOOD trades at $76.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NET Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NET trades at $179.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -746.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs VMW Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SQ Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ZS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ZS trades at $305.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1129.70. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs XYZ Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while XYZ trades at $64.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NETE Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SPLK Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs VRSN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while VRSN trades at $281.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GDDY Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GDDY trades at $178.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs TOST Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while TOST trades at $42.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 157.94. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CHKP Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CHKP trades at $221.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CPAY Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CPAY trades at $332.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs IOT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while IOT trades at $39.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -186.26. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FLT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs AFRM Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while AFRM trades at $60.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -320.26. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CYBR Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CYBR trades at $389.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -190.89. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NTNX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NTNX trades at $72.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -278.46. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GEN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GEN trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs RBRK Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while RBRK trades at $92.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FFIV Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FFIV trades at $290.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs OKTA Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while OKTA trades at $99.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 152.74. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs MDB Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while MDB trades at $202.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -185.78. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs KSPI Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while KSPI trades at $86.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NLOK Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SAIL Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SAIL trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs AKAM Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while AKAM trades at $79.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs DOX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while DOX trades at $93.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ALTR Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PLAN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs KVYO Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while KVYO trades at $34.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -203.59. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs WIX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while WIX trades at $156.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 62.16. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs INFA Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while INFA trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 805.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs DBX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while DBX trades at $28.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CFLT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CFLT trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs HCP Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs JCOM Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PATH Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PATH trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -104.04. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SQSP Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NEWR Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FOUR Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FOUR trades at $91.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CCCS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CCCS trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 890.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs S Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while S trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs VRNS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while VRNS trades at $49.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -61.05. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs BOX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while BOX trades at $35.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SPSC Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SPSC trades at $134.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 61.20. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs QLYS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while QLYS trades at $139.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs WEX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while WEX trades at $143.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NVEI Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ACIW Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ACIW trades at $45.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs EEFT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while EEFT trades at $107.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs STNE Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while STNE trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -19.10. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ODD Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ODD trades at $71.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs RELY Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while RELY trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -651.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs TENB Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while TENB trades at $32.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -85.13. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ESMT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs AVPT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while AVPT trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -146.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CLBT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CLBT trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -17.29. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CORZZ Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CORZZ trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CORZ Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CORZ trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SWI Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PAGS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PAGS trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs EVOP Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs DLO Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while DLO trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs MQ Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while MQ trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs BB Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while BB trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -436.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs DOCN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while DOCN trades at $28.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PAYO Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PAYO trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs EVTC Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while EVTC trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs WRD Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while WRD trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WRD's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs APPN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while APPN trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -36.67. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FIVN Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FIVN trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -461.83. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs TDC Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while TDC trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GETVV Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs RAMP Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while RAMP trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -793.25. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs AVDX Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while AVDX trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 244.50. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs FORG Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GSKY Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CSGS Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CSGS trades at $64.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs CORZW Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while CORZW trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GET Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs EVCM Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while EVCM trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -79.58. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs NTCT Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while NTCT trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs STER Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs ZUO Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs AVPTW Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while AVPTW trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs RPD Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while RPD trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 57.41. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs SUMO Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs GB Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while GB trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.
HUBCZ vs PGY Comparison
HUBCZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCZ stands at 7.2M. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCZ is priced at $0.01, while PGY trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, HUBCZ's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCZ is more volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCZ.