HUB Cyber Security (Israel) Ltd.
HUB Cyber Security (Israel) Ltd. (HUBCW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUBCW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBCW | $0.03 | +11.33% | 12M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSFT | $512.50 | -0.24% | 3.8T | 39.58 | $12.95 | +0.63% |
| ORCL | $247.71 | +1.06% | 695.8B | 57.08 | $4.34 | +0.73% |
| PLTR | $157.88 | -0.58% | 357.2B | 717.59 | $0.22 | N/A |
| ADBE | $369.47 | -0.34% | 156.7B | 23.67 | $15.61 | N/A |
| PANW | $204.50 | +0.61% | 136.3B | 116.85 | $1.75 | N/A |
| CRWD | $472.18 | +0.91% | 117.7B | -674.54 | -$0.70 | N/A |
| SNPS | $592.63 | -1.48% | 109.7B | 68.43 | $8.66 | N/A |
| HOOD | $106.77 | +1.83% | 94.2B | 61.01 | $1.75 | N/A |
| FTNT | $104.88 | +0.06% | 80.3B | 43.16 | $2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HUBCW vs MSFT Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while MSFT trades at $512.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check MSFT's competition here
HUBCW vs ORCL Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 695.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ORCL trades at $247.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 57.08. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check ORCL's competition here
HUBCW vs PLTR Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 357.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PLTR trades at $157.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 717.59. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check PLTR's competition here
HUBCW vs ADBE Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ADBE trades at $369.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check ADBE's competition here
HUBCW vs PANW Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 136.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PANW trades at $204.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 116.85. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check PANW's competition here
HUBCW vs CRWD Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 117.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CRWD trades at $472.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -674.54. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CRWD's competition here
HUBCW vs SNPS Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SNPS trades at $592.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 68.43. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check SNPS's competition here
HUBCW vs HOOD Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while HOOD trades at $106.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 61.01. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check HOOD's competition here
HUBCW vs FTNT Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FTNT trades at $104.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.16. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check FTNT's competition here
HUBCW vs NET Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NET trades at $199.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -830.71. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check NET's competition here
HUBCW vs VMW Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check VMW's competition here
HUBCW vs CRWV Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CRWV trades at $110.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -43.59. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CRWV's competition here
HUBCW vs SQ Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check SQ's competition here
HUBCW vs XYZ Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while XYZ trades at $80.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check XYZ's competition here
HUBCW vs ZS Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ZS trades at $289.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1111.92. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check ZS's competition here
HUBCW vs VRSN Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while VRSN trades at $305.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 36.51. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check VRSN's competition here
HUBCW vs TOST Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while TOST trades at $48.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 181.30. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check TOST's competition here
HUBCW vs NETE Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check NETE's competition here
HUBCW vs SPLK Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check SPLK's competition here
HUBCW vs CHKP Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CHKP trades at $218.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CHKP's competition here
HUBCW vs GDDY Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GDDY trades at $166.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check GDDY's competition here
HUBCW vs CPAY Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CPAY trades at $333.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CPAY's competition here
HUBCW vs IOT Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while IOT trades at $39.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -180.36. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check IOT's competition here
HUBCW vs FLT Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check FLT's competition here
HUBCW vs AFRM Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while AFRM trades at $67.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -355.16. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check AFRM's competition here
HUBCW vs MDB Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while MDB trades at $244.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -224.23. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check MDB's competition here
HUBCW vs NTNX Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NTNX trades at $74.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -285.69. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check NTNX's competition here
HUBCW vs CYBR Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CYBR trades at $382.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -186.79. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CYBR's competition here
HUBCW vs GEN Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GEN trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check GEN's competition here
HUBCW vs FFIV Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FFIV trades at $301.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check FFIV's competition here
HUBCW vs RBRK Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while RBRK trades at $87.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check RBRK's competition here
HUBCW vs OKTA Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while OKTA trades at $97.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 150.52. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check OKTA's competition here
HUBCW vs KSPI Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while KSPI trades at $85.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check KSPI's competition here
HUBCW vs NLOK Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check NLOK's competition here
HUBCW vs AKAM Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while AKAM trades at $79.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check AKAM's competition here
HUBCW vs SAIL Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SAIL trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check SAIL's competition here
HUBCW vs DOX Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while DOX trades at $86.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check DOX's competition here
HUBCW vs ALTR Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check ALTR's competition here
HUBCW vs PLAN Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check PLAN's competition here
HUBCW vs FOUR Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FOUR trades at $106.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check FOUR's competition here
HUBCW vs KVYO Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while KVYO trades at $33.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -199.35. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check KVYO's competition here
HUBCW vs CFLT Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CFLT trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CFLT's competition here
HUBCW vs INFA Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while INFA trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 818.67. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check INFA's competition here
HUBCW vs WIX Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while WIX trades at $150.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 59.72. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check WIX's competition here
HUBCW vs DBX Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while DBX trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check DBX's competition here
HUBCW vs HCP Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check HCP's competition here
HUBCW vs JCOM Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check JCOM's competition here
HUBCW vs CCCS Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CCCS trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 998.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CCCS's competition here
HUBCW vs PATH Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PATH trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -101.96. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check PATH's competition here
HUBCW vs SQSP Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check SQSP's competition here
HUBCW vs S Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while S trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check S's competition here
HUBCW vs NEWR Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check NEWR's competition here
HUBCW vs VRNS Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while VRNS trades at $54.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -67.17. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check VRNS's competition here
HUBCW vs WEX Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while WEX trades at $175.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check WEX's competition here
HUBCW vs SPSC Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SPSC trades at $140.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 65.52. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check SPSC's competition here
HUBCW vs QLYS Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while QLYS trades at $137.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check QLYS's competition here
HUBCW vs NVEI Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check NVEI's competition here
HUBCW vs BOX Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while BOX trades at $32.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check BOX's competition here
HUBCW vs ACIW Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ACIW trades at $44.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check ACIW's competition here
HUBCW vs EEFT Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while EEFT trades at $104.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check EEFT's competition here
HUBCW vs CORZ Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CORZ trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CORZ's competition here
HUBCW vs CORZZ Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CORZZ trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CORZZ's competition here
HUBCW vs TENB Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while TENB trades at $33.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -87.26. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check TENB's competition here
HUBCW vs AVPT Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while AVPT trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -141.31. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check AVPT's competition here
HUBCW vs ESMT Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check ESMT's competition here
HUBCW vs ODD Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ODD trades at $68.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check ODD's competition here
HUBCW vs STNE Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while STNE trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -16.49. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check STNE's competition here
HUBCW vs RELY Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while RELY trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -573.67. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check RELY's competition here
HUBCW vs CLBT Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CLBT trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CLBT's competition here
HUBCW vs SWI Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check SWI's competition here
HUBCW vs DLO Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while DLO trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check DLO's competition here
HUBCW vs EVOP Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check EVOP's competition here
HUBCW vs WRD Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while WRD trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WRD's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check WRD's competition here
HUBCW vs MQ Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while MQ trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 57.70. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check MQ's competition here
HUBCW vs PAGS Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PAGS trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check PAGS's competition here
HUBCW vs DOCN Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while DOCN trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check DOCN's competition here
HUBCW vs PAYO Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PAYO trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check PAYO's competition here
HUBCW vs PGY Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PGY trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check PGY's competition here
HUBCW vs PGYWW Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PGYWW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check PGYWW's competition here
HUBCW vs BB Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while BB trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 191.75. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check BB's competition here
HUBCW vs APPN Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while APPN trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -36.93. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check APPN's competition here
HUBCW vs FIVN Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FIVN trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -485.83. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check FIVN's competition here
HUBCW vs RAMP Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while RAMP trades at $33.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -838.25. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check RAMP's competition here
HUBCW vs CORZW Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CORZW trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CORZW's competition here
HUBCW vs TDC Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while TDC trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check TDC's competition here
HUBCW vs EVTC Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while EVTC trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check EVTC's competition here
HUBCW vs EVCM Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while EVCM trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -96.75. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check EVCM's competition here
HUBCW vs GETVV Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check GETVV's competition here
HUBCW vs AVDX Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while AVDX trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.50. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check AVDX's competition here
HUBCW vs FORG Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check FORG's competition here
HUBCW vs GSKY Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check GSKY's competition here
HUBCW vs CSGS Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CSGS trades at $61.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check CSGS's competition here
HUBCW vs GET Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check GET's competition here
HUBCW vs STER Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check STER's competition here
HUBCW vs NTCT Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NTCT trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check NTCT's competition here
HUBCW vs ZUO Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check ZUO's competition here
HUBCW vs SUMO Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check SUMO's competition here
HUBCW vs GB Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GB trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check GB's competition here
HUBCW vs RPD Comparison July 2025
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 12M. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while RPD trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 55.22. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.Check RPD's competition here