HUB Cyber Security (Israel) Ltd.
HUB Cyber Security (Israel) Ltd. HUBCW Peers
See (HUBCW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBCW | $0.03 | +23.28% | 6.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSFT | $497.45 | +1.05% | 3.7T | 38.44 | $12.94 | +0.65% |
| ORCL | $212.82 | +1.00% | 597.8B | 48.92 | $4.35 | +0.80% |
| PLTR | $144.25 | +0.94% | 326.4B | 627.17 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $384.95 | -0.67% | 164.1B | 24.68 | $15.60 | N/A |
| PANW | $202.34 | -0.96% | 134.9B | 117.64 | $1.72 | N/A |
| CRWD | $505.22 | +2.25% | 125.9B | -742.97 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| FTNT | $103.86 | +0.16% | 79.5B | 42.74 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $495.70 | +1.73% | 76.9B | 57.17 | $8.67 | N/A |
| CRWV | $158.08 | -0.89% | 75.9B | -62.48 | -$2.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HUBCW vs MSFT Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while MSFT trades at $497.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs ORCL Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 597.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ORCL trades at $212.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs PLTR Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 326.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PLTR trades at $144.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 627.17. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs ADBE Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 164.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ADBE trades at $384.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs PANW Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PANW trades at $202.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 117.64. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CRWD Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CRWD trades at $505.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -742.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs FTNT Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FTNT trades at $103.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs SNPS Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SNPS trades at $495.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 57.17. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CRWV Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CRWV trades at $158.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -62.48. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs HOOD Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while HOOD trades at $84.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 48.30. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs NET Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NET trades at $190.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -829.70. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs VMW Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs SQ Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs ZS Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ZS trades at $313.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1162.41. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs XYZ Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while XYZ trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs NETE Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs VRSN Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while VRSN trades at $283.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs SPLK Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs GDDY Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GDDY trades at $177.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs TOST Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while TOST trades at $42.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 157.39. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CHKP Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CHKP trades at $218.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CPAY Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CPAY trades at $326.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs IOT Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while IOT trades at $39.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -180.59. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs FLT Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs AFRM Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while AFRM trades at $66.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -352.11. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CYBR Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CYBR trades at $403.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -199.78. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs NTNX Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NTNX trades at $75.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -289.54. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs GEN Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GEN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs RBRK Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while RBRK trades at $92.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs MDB Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while MDB trades at $209.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -190.19. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs FFIV Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FFIV trades at $289.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs OKTA Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while OKTA trades at $98.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 150.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs KSPI Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while KSPI trades at $83.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs NLOK Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs SAIL Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SAIL trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs AKAM Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while AKAM trades at $79.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs DOX Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while DOX trades at $91.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs ALTR Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs PLAN Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs KVYO Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while KVYO trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -194.82. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs WIX Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while WIX trades at $159.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 63.20. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs FOUR Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FOUR trades at $98.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs INFA Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while INFA trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 812.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CFLT Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CFLT trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -25.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs DBX Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while DBX trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs HCP Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs PATH Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PATH trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -106.50. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs JCOM Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs SQSP Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs NEWR Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CCCS Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CCCS trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 931.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs S Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while S trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.64. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs VRNS Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while VRNS trades at $50.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -62.88. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs QLYS Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while QLYS trades at $141.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs WEX Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while WEX trades at $149.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs SPSC Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SPSC trades at $134.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 62.65. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs BOX Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while BOX trades at $34.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CORZ Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CORZ trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CORZZ Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CORZZ trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs NVEI Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs ACIW Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ACIW trades at $45.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs EEFT Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while EEFT trades at $102.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs TENB Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while TENB trades at $33.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -87.55. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs STNE Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while STNE trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs ODD Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ODD trades at $71.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs AVPT Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while AVPT trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -147.85. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CLBT Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CLBT trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -17.73. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs ESMT Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs RELY Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while RELY trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -626.33. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs DLO Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while DLO trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs SWI Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs PAGS Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PAGS trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs EVOP Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CORZW Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CORZW trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs BB Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while BB trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 236.25. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs MQ Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while MQ trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 58.40. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs DOCN Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while DOCN trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs PAYO Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PAYO trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs WRD Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while WRD trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to WRD's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs EVTC Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while EVTC trades at $36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs RAMP Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while RAMP trades at $32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -818.75. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs APPN Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while APPN trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -34.18. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs TDC Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while TDC trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs GETVV Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs FIVN Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FIVN trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -444.17. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs AVDX Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while AVDX trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 245.00. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs FORG Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs EVCM Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while EVCM trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -86.83. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs GSKY Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs CSGS Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while CSGS trades at $63.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs NTCT Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while NTCT trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs GET Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs STER Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs AVPTW Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while AVPTW trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs ZUO Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs SUMO Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs GB Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while GB trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs RPD Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while RPD trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 56.44. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.
HUBCW vs PGY Comparison
HUBCW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBCW stands at 6.3M. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBCW is priced at $0.03, while PGY trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, HUBCW's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBCW is more volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBCW.