Helport AI Limited
Helport AI Limited HPAIW Peers
See (HPAIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPAIW | $0.19 | -7.09% | 7.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSFT | $478.04 | -0.23% | 3.6T | 37.00 | $12.92 | +0.68% |
| ORCL | $208.17 | -1.39% | 583.7B | 47.85 | $4.35 | +0.81% |
| PLTR | $138.24 | -2.24% | 312.8B | 601.04 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $382.68 | -4.74% | 163.1B | 24.48 | $15.63 | N/A |
| PANW | $202.05 | +1.99% | 134.7B | 116.79 | $1.73 | N/A |
| CRWD | $492.03 | +2.64% | 122.6B | -683.37 | -$0.72 | N/A |
| CRWV | $171.93 | +8.47% | 82.3B | -67.96 | -$2.53 | N/A |
| FTNT | $102.88 | +0.91% | 78.7B | 42.34 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $475.40 | -0.84% | 73.8B | 54.90 | $8.66 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HPAIW vs MSFT Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while MSFT trades at $478.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs ORCL Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 583.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while ORCL trades at $208.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 47.85. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs PLTR Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 312.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while PLTR trades at $138.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 601.04. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs ADBE Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 163.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while ADBE trades at $382.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs PANW Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 134.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while PANW trades at $202.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 116.79. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CRWD Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 122.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CRWD trades at $492.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -683.37. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CRWV Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CRWV trades at $171.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -67.96. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs FTNT Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while FTNT trades at $102.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 42.34. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs SNPS Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while SNPS trades at $475.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 54.90. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs HOOD Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while HOOD trades at $74.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 42.83. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs NET Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while NET trades at $181.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -755.04. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs VMW Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs SQ Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs ZS Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while ZS trades at $307.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1138.19. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs XYZ Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while XYZ trades at $63.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs NETE Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs VRSN Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while VRSN trades at $283.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs SPLK Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs GDDY Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while GDDY trades at $178.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs TOST Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while TOST trades at $42.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 157.28. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CHKP Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CHKP trades at $219.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CPAY Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CPAY trades at $327.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs FLT Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs IOT Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while IOT trades at $38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -181.90. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs NTNX Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while NTNX trades at $73.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -283.23. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CYBR Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CYBR trades at $390.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -191.38. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs AFRM Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while AFRM trades at $59.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -315.26. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs GEN Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while GEN trades at $29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs RBRK Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while RBRK trades at $89.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs MDB Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while MDB trades at $205.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -188.62. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs FFIV Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while FFIV trades at $288.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs OKTA Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while OKTA trades at $98.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 151.80. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs KSPI Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while KSPI trades at $84.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs NLOK Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs SAIL Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while SAIL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs AKAM Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while AKAM trades at $78.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs DOX Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while DOX trades at $92.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs ALTR Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW and ALTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HPAIW vs PLAN Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs KVYO Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while KVYO trades at $34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -202.35. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs WIX Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while WIX trades at $157.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 62.36. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs INFA Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while INFA trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 805.33. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CFLT Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CFLT trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -24.73. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs DBX Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while DBX trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs HCP Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs JCOM Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs PATH Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while PATH trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -103.50. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs SQSP Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs FOUR Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while FOUR trades at $91.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs NEWR Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CCCS Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CCCS trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 909.00. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs S Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while S trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs VRNS Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while VRNS trades at $49.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -61.33. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs BOX Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while BOX trades at $35.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs SPSC Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while SPSC trades at $134.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 61.07. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs QLYS Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while QLYS trades at $140.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs WEX Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while WEX trades at $142.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs NVEI Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW and NVEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HPAIW vs ACIW Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while ACIW trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs EEFT Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while EEFT trades at $102.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs RELY Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while RELY trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -688.00. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs STNE Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while STNE trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs TENB Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while TENB trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -86.39. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs ODD Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while ODD trades at $70.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 41.76. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs ESMT Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs AVPT Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while AVPT trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -146.00. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CLBT Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CLBT trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -17.37. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CORZ Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CORZ trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CORZZ Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CORZZ trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs SWI Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs PAGS Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while PAGS trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs EVOP Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs DLO Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while DLO trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs MQ Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while MQ trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 55.90. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs BB Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while BB trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -430.00. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs DOCN Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while DOCN trades at $27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs PAYO Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while PAYO trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs EVTC Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while EVTC trades at $36.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs APPN Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while APPN trades at $29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -36.11. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs WRD Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while WRD trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -6.49. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to WRD's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs TDC Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while TDC trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs FIVN Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while FIVN trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -458.83. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs GETVV Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs RAMP Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while RAMP trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -785.32. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs AVDX Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while AVDX trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 244.25. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs FORG Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs GSKY Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CSGS Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CSGS trades at $63.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs CORZW Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while CORZW trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs EVCM Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while EVCM trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -80.67. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs GET Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs NTCT Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while NTCT trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs STER Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs AVPTW Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while AVPTW trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs ZUO Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs RPD Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while RPD trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 56.91. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs SUMO Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs GB Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while GB trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.
HPAIW vs PGY Comparison
HPAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPAIW stands at 7.1M. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPAIW is priced at $0.19, while PGY trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, HPAIW's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HPAIW is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPAIW.