GigCapital4, Inc.
GigCapital4, Inc. GIGGW Peers
See (GIGGW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIGGW | $0.16 | +3.00% | 5.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSFT | $491.09 | -0.20% | 3.7T | 37.96 | $12.94 | +0.66% |
| ORCL | $229.98 | +5.03% | 646.3B | 52.89 | $4.35 | +0.75% |
| PLTR | $132.12 | +1.10% | 299B | 574.48 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $378.47 | -3.48% | 161.3B | 24.26 | $15.60 | N/A |
| PANW | $196.97 | -0.31% | 131.3B | 113.19 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $496.10 | +0.82% | 123.6B | -729.54 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| HOOD | $97.98 | +6.12% | 86.5B | 56.01 | $1.75 | N/A |
| SNPS | $523.11 | +0.25% | 81.2B | 60.49 | $8.65 | N/A |
| FTNT | $102.21 | -0.21% | 78.2B | 42.07 | $2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GIGGW vs MSFT Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while MSFT trades at $491.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs ORCL Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 646.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while ORCL trades at $229.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 52.89. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs PLTR Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 299B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while PLTR trades at $132.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 574.48. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs ADBE Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 161.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while ADBE trades at $378.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs PANW Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 131.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while PANW trades at $196.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 113.19. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CRWD Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 123.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CRWD trades at $496.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -729.54. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs HOOD Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while HOOD trades at $97.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 56.01. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs SNPS Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while SNPS trades at $523.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 60.49. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs FTNT Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while FTNT trades at $102.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 42.07. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CRWV Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CRWV trades at $151.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -59.99. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs NET Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while NET trades at $185.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -806.87. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs VMW Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs SQ Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs ZS Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while ZS trades at $309.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1145.67. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs XYZ Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while XYZ trades at $69.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs NETE Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs VRSN Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while VRSN trades at $282.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs SPLK Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs GDDY Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while GDDY trades at $175.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 33.80. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs TOST Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while TOST trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 157.56. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CHKP Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CHKP trades at $219.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CPAY Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CPAY trades at $337.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs AFRM Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while AFRM trades at $68.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -359.79. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs IOT Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while IOT trades at $38.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -174.32. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs FLT Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs NTNX Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while NTNX trades at $75.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -290.04. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CYBR Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CYBR trades at $387.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -191.01. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs GEN Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while GEN trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs FFIV Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while FFIV trades at $296.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs MDB Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while MDB trades at $204.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -185.76. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs RBRK Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while RBRK trades at $85.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs OKTA Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while OKTA trades at $98.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 150.96. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs KSPI Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while KSPI trades at $84.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs NLOK Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs SAIL Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while SAIL trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs AKAM Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while AKAM trades at $79.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs DOX Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while DOX trades at $91.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs ALTR Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW and ALTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GIGGW vs PLAN Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs WIX Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while WIX trades at $164.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 65.35. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs KVYO Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while KVYO trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -193.12. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs FOUR Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while FOUR trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CFLT Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CFLT trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -26.39. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs INFA Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while INFA trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 811.00. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs DBX Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while DBX trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs HCP Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs PATH Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while PATH trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -107.08. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs JCOM Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs SQSP Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CCCS Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CCCS trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 961.00. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs NEWR Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs S Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while S trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs VRNS Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while VRNS trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -61.78. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs SPSC Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while SPSC trades at $139.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 65.12. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs QLYS Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while QLYS trades at $143.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CORZ Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CORZ trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CORZZ Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CORZZ trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs WEX Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while WEX trades at $151.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs NVEI Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW and NVEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GIGGW vs ACIW Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while ACIW trades at $45.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs BOX Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while BOX trades at $32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs EEFT Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while EEFT trades at $105.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs STNE Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while STNE trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -20.01. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs ODD Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while ODD trades at $75.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs TENB Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while TENB trades at $33.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -88.55. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs ESMT Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs AVPT Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while AVPT trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -142.46. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs RELY Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while RELY trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -608.50. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CLBT Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CLBT trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -16.54. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs SWI Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CORZW Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CORZW trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs DLO Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while DLO trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs PAGS Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while PAGS trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs EVOP Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs MQ Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while MQ trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 58.65. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs DOCN Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while DOCN trades at $28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs BB Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while BB trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 211.75. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs PAYO Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while PAYO trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs EVTC Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while EVTC trades at $37.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs WRD Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while WRD trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WRD's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs APPN Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while APPN trades at $30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -36.31. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs TDC Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while TDC trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs RAMP Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while RAMP trades at $33.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -825.62. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs GETVV Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs FIVN Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while FIVN trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -446.00. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs AVDX Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while AVDX trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 245.75. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs FORG Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs EVCM Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while EVCM trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -89.00. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs CSGS Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while CSGS trades at $65.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs GSKY Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs NTCT Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while NTCT trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs GET Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs PGY Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while PGY trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs STER Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs PGYWW Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while PGYWW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs RPD Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while RPD trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 58.52. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs ZUO Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs TUYA Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while TUYA trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.
GIGGW vs SUMO Comparison
GIGGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIGGW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIGGW is priced at $0.16, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIGGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, GIGGW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GIGGW is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIGGW.