FirstCash Holdings, Inc
FirstCash Holdings, Inc FCFS Peers
See (FCFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFS | $128.15 | +1.15% | 5.69B | 20.50 | $6.25 | +1.19% |
| V | $367.97 | +0.78% | 713.54B | 36.91 | $9.97 | +0.62% |
| MA | $586.33 | +0.52% | 528.44B | 41.20 | $14.23 | +0.48% |
| AXP | $299.33 | -0.13% | 209.70B | 20.89 | $14.33 | +0.98% |
| BNH | $15.78 | -0.60% | 97.85B | N/A | N/A | +0.56% |
| COF | $197.44 | +0.11% | 75.65B | 16.61 | $11.89 | +0.91% |
| PYPL | $72.32 | +0.19% | 70.33B | 16.25 | $4.45 | N/A |
| DFS | $200.05 | -0.21% | 50.34B | 10.69 | $18.72 | +1.40% |
| SYF | $60.04 | -1.25% | 22.85B | 8.22 | $7.30 | +1.75% |
| KKRS | $17.66 | +1.44% | 15.67B | N/A | N/A | +6.58% |
Stock Comparison
FCFS vs V Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 713.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while V trades at $367.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas V's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs MA Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 528.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while MA trades at $586.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs AXP Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 209.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while AXP trades at $299.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs BNH Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 97.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while BNH trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs COF Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 75.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while COF trades at $197.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs PYPL Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 70.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while PYPL trades at $72.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs DFS Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs SYF Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 22.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while SYF trades at $60.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs KKRS Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while KKRS trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs SOFI Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 15.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while SOFI trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs ALLY Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while ALLY trades at $36.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 60.14. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs AGM-PC Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs SYF-PB Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while SYF-PB trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs OBDC Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while OBDC trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs COF-PI Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 7.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while COF-PI trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs COF-PJ Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 6.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while COF-PJ trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs SYF-PA Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while SYF-PA trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs COF-PK Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 6.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while COF-PK trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs COF-PL Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 6.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while COF-PL trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs COF-PN Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while COF-PN trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs OMF Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while OMF trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs CGABL Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while CGABL trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs CACC Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while CACC trades at $502.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs SLM Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while SLM trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs SLMBP Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while SLMBP trades at $69.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs ORCC Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs JSM Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while JSM trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs IX Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while IX trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs UPST Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while UPST trades at $47.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -65.03. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs NNI Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while NNI trades at $119.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs SEZL Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while SEZL trades at $98.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs WU Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while WU trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs QFIN Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while QFIN trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs ADS Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs BFH Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while BFH trades at $53.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs ENVA Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while ENVA trades at $97.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs FINV Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while FINV trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs AGM-PD Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while AGM-PD trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs AGM-PF Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while AGM-PF trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs AGM-PG Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while AGM-PG trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs AGM-A Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while AGM-A trades at $143.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs AGM-PE Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while AGM-PE trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs AGM Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while AGM trades at $192.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs NAVI Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while NAVI trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs LU Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while LU trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs OCSL Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while OCSL trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 120.42. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs LC Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while LC trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs MGI Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs BBDC Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 961.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while BBDC trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs WRLD Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 853.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while WRLD trades at $148.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs NRDS Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 839.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while NRDS trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs ATLCL Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 796.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while ATLCL trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs ATLCZ Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 796.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while ATLCZ trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs EZPW Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 764.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while EZPW trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs ATLC Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 762.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while ATLC trades at $50.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs LX Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 747.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while LX trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs PRAA Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 587.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while PRAA trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs GDOT Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 512.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while GDOT trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -77.83. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS and GDOT have similar daily volatility (1.83).
FCFS vs QD Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 489.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while QD trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 42.36. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs RWAYL Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 379.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while RWAYL trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs RWAYZ Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 377.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while RWAYZ trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs RWAY Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 366.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while RWAY trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs ATLCP Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 351.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while ATLCP trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs NEWTI Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 300.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while NEWTI trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs RM Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 287.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while RM trades at $29.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs YRD Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 273.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while YRD trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs OPRT Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 258.57M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while OPRT trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs LPRO Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 250.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while LPRO trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs PMTS Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 246.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while PMTS trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs FOA Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 240.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while FOA trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs MFIN Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 214.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while MFIN trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs CPSS Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 187.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while CPSS trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs SUNL Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs AHG Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 118.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while AHG trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs XYF Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 104.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while XYF trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs ELVT Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs NICK Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs OMCC Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 40.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while OMCC trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs CURR Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 36.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while CURR trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs NISN Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 20.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while NISN trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs JT Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs MCVT Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 10.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while MCVT trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs AIHS Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 9.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while AIHS trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs LMFA Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 8.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while LMFA trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs SNTG Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while SNTG trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs CURO Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs PT Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 391072.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while PT trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.
FCFS vs DXF Comparison
FCFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 5.69B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3334.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $128.15, while DXF trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.