Discover Financial Services

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 707.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while V trades at $364.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas V's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 526.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while MA trades at $584.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 205.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AXP trades at $293.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while COF-PI trades at $18.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while COF-PL trades at $16.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 123.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while COF-PN trades at $16.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while COF-PK trades at $17.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while COF-PJ trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 121B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while COF trades at $189.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while BNH trades at $16.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while PYPL trades at $70.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while SYF trades at $57.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while KKRS trades at $17.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while SOFI trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while ALLY trades at $34.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 58.30. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while SYF-PB trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while OBDC trades at $14.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while SLMBP trades at $78.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while SLM trades at $32.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while SYF-PA trades at $17.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while OMF trades at $51.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while CGABL trades at $16.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while FCFS trades at $127.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while CACC trades at $477.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while JSM trades at $18.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while IX trades at $21.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while UPST trades at $47.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -64.62. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while NNI trades at $115.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while SEZL trades at $106.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 35.93. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while WU trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while QFIN trades at $41.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while BFH trades at $51.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while ENVA trades at $92.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while FINV trades at $8.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AGM-A trades at $138.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AGM-PG trades at $18.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AGM-PE trades at $21.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AGM trades at $186.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AGM-PD trades at $20.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AGM-PF trades at $19.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while NAVI trades at $13.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while OCSL trades at $14.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 121.92. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while LU trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while LC trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 979.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while BBDC trades at $9.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 821M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while WRLD trades at $154.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 785.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while NRDS trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 741.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while ATLC trades at $49.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 741.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while ATLCZ trades at $24.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 739.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while EZPW trades at $13.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 735.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while ATLCL trades at $23.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 610M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while LX trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while PRAA trades at $14.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 506.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while GDOT trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -76.96. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 487.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while QD trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 42.21. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while RWAY trades at $9.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while RWAYZ trades at $25.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 366.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while RWAYL trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 341.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while ATLCP trades at $22.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 286.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while NEWTI trades at $25.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 270.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while YRD trades at $6.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 262M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while RM trades at $26.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while PMTS trades at $22.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while OPRT trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 242.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while FOA trades at $21.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 215.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while LPRO trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 214M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while MFIN trades at $9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while CPSS trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while XYF trades at $18.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 116M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AHG trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while OMCC trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while CURR trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while NISN trades at $4.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while MCVT trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while LMFA trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AIHS trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while SNTG trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while CURO trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 375.7K. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while PT trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while DXF trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while GJO trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while KTN trades at $26.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while WEI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while MRLN trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while NRUC trades at $23.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while PYT trades at $22.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while IPB trades at $25.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while GJP trades at $24.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while GJS trades at $22.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while AEFC trades at $19.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.

DFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DFS stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DFS is priced at $200.05, while SC trades at $41.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.69, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, DFS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DFS is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DFS.