Currenc Group, Inc.
Currenc Group, Inc. CURR Peers
See (CURR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CURR | $1.57 | +16.30% | 118.1M | -1.76 | -$0.88 | N/A |
| V | $347.93 | -2.23% | 674.5B | 34.99 | $9.94 | +0.81% |
| MA | $550.18 | -2.37% | 495.8B | 38.63 | $14.24 | +0.66% |
| AXP | $319.47 | -1.77% | 223.8B | 22.33 | $14.31 | +1.17% |
| COF-PL | $17.18 | -0.41% | 143.1B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.09% |
| COF-PK | $18.07 | -0.72% | 142.6B | 0.71 | $25.57 | +1.09% |
| COF-PJ | $18.70 | -0.53% | 141.9B | 0.73 | $25.57 | +1.09% |
| COF-PI | $19.64 | -0.61% | 141.9B | 0.77 | $25.57 | +1.09% |
| COF-PN | $17.04 | -0.64% | 141.8B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.09% |
| COF | $219.79 | -0.43% | 140.6B | 18.45 | $11.91 | +1.09% |
Stock Comparison
CURR vs V Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 674.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while V trades at $347.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas V's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs MA Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 495.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while MA trades at $550.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 38.63. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs AXP Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 223.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while AXP trades at $319.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs COF-PL Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 143.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while COF-PL trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs COF-PK Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 142.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while COF-PK trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs COF-PJ Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while COF-PJ trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs COF-PI Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while COF-PI trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs COF-PN Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 141.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while COF-PN trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs COF Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while COF trades at $219.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs BNH Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while BNH trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs PYPL Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while PYPL trades at $71.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs DFS Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SYF Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SYF trades at $70.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SOFI Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SOFI trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 49.30. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs KKRS Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while KKRS trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs ALLY Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while ALLY trades at $40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 67.38. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs AGM-PC Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SYF-PB Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SYF-PB trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs OBDC Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while OBDC trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SYF-PA Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SYF-PA trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs UPST Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while UPST trades at $75.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -103.59. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SLMBP Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SLMBP trades at $75.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SLM Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SLM trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs OMF Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while OMF trades at $58.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs CGABL Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while CGABL trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs CACC Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while CACC trades at $515.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs FCFS Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while FCFS trades at $132.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs ORCC Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs JSM Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while JSM trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs IX Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while IX trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SEZL Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SEZL trades at $134.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 45.21. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs NNI Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while NNI trades at $121.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs ENVA Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while ENVA trades at $114.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs QFIN Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while QFIN trades at $43.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs BFH Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while BFH trades at $61.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs ADS Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs WU Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while WU trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs FINV Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while FINV trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs AGM-PD Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while AGM-PD trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs AGM-PF Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while AGM-PF trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs AGM-PG Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while AGM-PG trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs AGM-PE Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while AGM-PE trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs AGM-A Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while AGM-A trades at $134.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs AGM Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while AGM trades at $177.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs NAVI Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while NAVI trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs LC Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while LC trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs OCSL Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while OCSL trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 120.17. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs LX Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while LX trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs LU Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while LU trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs MGI Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs BBDC Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while BBDC trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs WRLD Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 906M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while WRLD trades at $170.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs ATLCL Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 882.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while ATLCL trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs ATLC Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 843.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while ATLC trades at $55.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs ATLCZ Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 805.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while ATLCZ trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs NRDS Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 789.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while NRDS trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs EZPW Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 780.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while EZPW trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs PRAA Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while PRAA trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs GDOT Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 587.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while GDOT trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -89.25. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs QD Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 556.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while QD trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs RWAY Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 411.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while RWAY trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs RWAYZ Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 410.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while RWAYZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs RWAYL Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 393.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while RWAYL trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs ATLCP Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while ATLCP trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs NEWTI Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 322.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while NEWTI trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs RM Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while RM trades at $32.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs OPRT Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 297.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while OPRT trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs LPRO Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 292.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while LPRO trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs YRD Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 260.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while YRD trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs FOA Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 253.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while FOA trades at $22.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs PMTS Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 249.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while PMTS trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs MFIN Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while MFIN trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs CPSS Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 208.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while CPSS trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SUNL Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs XYF Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while XYF trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs ELVT Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs NICK Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs OMCC Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while OMCC trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs AHG Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while AHG trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs NISN Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while NISN trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs JT Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs LMFA Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while LMFA trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs MCVT Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while MCVT trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SNTG Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SNTG trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs AIHS Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while AIHS trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs CURO Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs DXF Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 899K. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while DXF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DXF's ROE of -17.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs PT Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 435.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while PT trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs NRUC Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while NRUC trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs MRLN Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while MRLN trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs GJO Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while GJO trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs WEI Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs IPB Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while IPB trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SOFIW Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs GJP Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while GJP trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs GJT Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while GJT trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs KTN Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while KTN trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs PYT Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while PYT trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.
CURR vs SC Comparison
CURR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURR stands at 118.1M. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CURR is priced at $1.57, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, CURR's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURR is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURR.