Capital One Financial Corporation
Capital One Financial Corporation COF-PL Peers
See (COF-PL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COF-PL | $16.37 | -0.49% | 127.5B | 0.64 | $25.57 | +1.13% |
| V | $355.05 | +1.85% | 687.9B | 35.65 | $9.95 | +0.65% |
| MA | $561.94 | +2.11% | 506.5B | 39.41 | $14.26 | +0.51% |
| AXP | $318.98 | +0.56% | 223.4B | 22.29 | $14.31 | +0.92% |
| COF | $212.76 | +0.83% | 136.1B | 17.87 | $11.90 | +1.13% |
| COF-PK | $17.49 | +0.46% | 128.2B | 0.68 | $25.57 | +1.13% |
| COF-PN | $16.35 | -0.49% | 127.7B | 0.64 | $25.57 | +1.13% |
| COF-PJ | $17.77 | -0.56% | 127.3B | 0.70 | $25.57 | +1.13% |
| COF-PI | $18.90 | +0.53% | 127.3B | 0.74 | $25.57 | +1.13% |
| BNH | $15.36 | -3.09% | 95.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.55% |
Stock Comparison
COF-PL vs V Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 687.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while V trades at $355.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs MA Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 506.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while MA trades at $561.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.41. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AXP Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 223.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AXP trades at $318.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs COF Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while COF trades at $212.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs COF-PK Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while COF-PK trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs COF-PN Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while COF-PN trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs COF-PJ Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while COF-PJ trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs COF-PI Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while COF-PI trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs BNH Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while BNH trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs PYPL Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while PYPL trades at $74.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs DFS Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SYF Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SYF trades at $66.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SOFI Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SOFI trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs KKRS Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while KKRS trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs ALLY Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while ALLY trades at $38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 64.93. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AGM-PC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SYF-PB Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SYF-PB trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs OBDC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while OBDC trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SYF-PA Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SYF-PA trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SLM Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SLM trades at $32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs OMF Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while OMF trades at $57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SLMBP Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SLMBP trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs UPST Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while UPST trades at $64.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -88.60. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs CGABL Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while CGABL trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs FCFS Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while FCFS trades at $135.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SEZL Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SEZL trades at $179.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 60.35. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs CACC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while CACC trades at $509.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs ORCC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs IX Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while IX trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs JSM Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while JSM trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs NNI Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while NNI trades at $121.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs QFIN Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while QFIN trades at $43.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs ADS Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs ENVA Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while ENVA trades at $111.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs WU Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while WU trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs BFH Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while BFH trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs FINV Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while FINV trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AGM-A Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AGM-A trades at $142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AGM-PF Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AGM-PF trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AGM-PD Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AGM-PD trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AGM-PG Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AGM-PG trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AGM-PE Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AGM-PE trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AGM Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AGM trades at $194.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs NAVI Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while NAVI trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs LC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while LC trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs LX Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while LX trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs OCSL Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while OCSL trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 113.83. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs LU Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while LU trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs MGI Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs BBDC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 962.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while BBDC trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs WRLD Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 876.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while WRLD trades at $165.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs ATLC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 828.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while ATLC trades at $54.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs NRDS Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 817.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while NRDS trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs ATLCZ Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 808.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while ATLCZ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs EZPW Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 763.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while EZPW trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs ATLCL Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 760.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while ATLCL trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs GDOT Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 591.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while GDOT trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -89.83. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs PRAA Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 585M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while PRAA trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs QD Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 516M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while QD trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs RWAY Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 400.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while RWAY trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs RWAYL Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 391.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while RWAYL trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs RWAYZ Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 384M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while RWAYZ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs ATLCP Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 333.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while ATLCP trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs OPRT Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 314.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while OPRT trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs RM Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 290.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while RM trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs NEWTI Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while NEWTI trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs PMTS Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 267.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while PMTS trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs FOA Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while FOA trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs YRD Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while YRD trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs LPRO Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 232.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while LPRO trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs MFIN Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 221.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while MFIN trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs CPSS Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while CPSS trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SUNL Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs XYF Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 122.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while XYF trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs ELVT Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs NICK Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs CURR Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while CURR trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs OMCC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while OMCC trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AHG Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs NISN Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while NISN trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs JT Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs LMFA Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while LMFA trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs MCVT Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while MCVT trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SNTG Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SNTG trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AIHS Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AIHS trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs CURO Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs PT Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 370.3K. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while PT trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs DXF Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 69.1K. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while DXF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs WEI Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SOFIW Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs GJP Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while GJP trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs GJT Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while GJT trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs KTN Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while KTN trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs PYT Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while PYT trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs SC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs GJS Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while GJS trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs AEFC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while AEFC trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs IPB Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while IPB trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.
COF-PL vs NRUC Comparison
COF-PL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PL stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PL is priced at $16.37, while NRUC trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.64, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PL's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PL is less volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PL.