Capital One Financial Corporation
Capital One Financial Corporation COF-PK Peers
See (COF-PK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COF-PK | $18.02 | +0.39% | 138.5B | 0.70 | $25.57 | +1.10% |
| V | $351.86 | +0.26% | 682.1B | 35.28 | $9.97 | +0.65% |
| MA | $558.76 | +0.74% | 503.6B | 39.24 | $14.24 | +0.53% |
| AXP | $304.14 | +0.39% | 213.1B | 21.38 | $14.23 | +1.00% |
| COF | $217.42 | +0.71% | 139.1B | 18.27 | $11.89 | +1.10% |
| COF-PL | $17.20 | -0.06% | 138.6B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.10% |
| COF-PJ | $18.66 | -0.27% | 138.5B | 0.73 | $25.57 | +1.10% |
| COF-PN | $17.01 | -0.23% | 138.3B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.10% |
| COF-PI | $19.70 | -0.15% | 138.3B | 0.77 | $25.57 | +1.10% |
| BNH | $15.81 | +0.32% | 109.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.51% |
Stock Comparison
COF-PK vs V Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 682.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while V trades at $351.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs MA Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 503.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while MA trades at $558.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.24. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK and MA have similar daily volatility (0.89).
COF-PK vs AXP Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 213.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AXP trades at $304.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs COF Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while COF trades at $217.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs COF-PL Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 138.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while COF-PL trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs COF-PJ Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 138.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while COF-PJ trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs COF-PN Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 138.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while COF-PN trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs COF-PI Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 138.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while COF-PI trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs BNH Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while BNH trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs PYPL Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while PYPL trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs DFS Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SYF Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SYF trades at $70.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SOFI Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SOFI trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 48.79. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs KKRS Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while KKRS trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs ALLY Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while ALLY trades at $38.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 64.76. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SYF-PB Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SYF-PB trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs AGM-PC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs UPST Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while UPST trades at $79.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -109.58. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs OBDC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while OBDC trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SYF-PA Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SYF-PA trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SLM Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SLM trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs OMF Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while OMF trades at $57.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SLMBP Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SLMBP trades at $75.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 35.32. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs CGABL Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while CGABL trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs CACC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while CACC trades at $519.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs FCFS Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while FCFS trades at $133.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs ORCC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs IX Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while IX trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs JSM Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while JSM trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SEZL Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SEZL trades at $134.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs NNI Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while NNI trades at $120.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs BFH Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while BFH trades at $62.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs ENVA Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while ENVA trades at $114.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs ADS Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs WU Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while WU trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs QFIN Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while QFIN trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs FINV Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while FINV trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs AGM-PD Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AGM-PD trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs AGM-PG Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AGM-PG trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs AGM-A Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AGM-A trades at $127.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs AGM-PE Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AGM-PE trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs AGM Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AGM trades at $173.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs AGM-PF Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AGM-PF trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs LC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while LC trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs NAVI Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while NAVI trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs OCSL Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while OCSL trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 118.54. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs LU Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while LU trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs LX Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while LX trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs MGI Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs BBDC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while BBDC trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs WRLD Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 876.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while WRLD trades at $165.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs NRDS Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 794.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while NRDS trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs ATLC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 783.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while ATLC trades at $51.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs ATLCZ Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 780.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while ATLCZ trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs ATLCL Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 779M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while ATLCL trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs EZPW Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 766.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while EZPW trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs PRAA Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 625.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while PRAA trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs GDOT Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 564M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while GDOT trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -85.62. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs QD Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 546.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while QD trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs RWAYL Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 422.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while RWAYL trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs RWAY Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 415.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while RWAY trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs RWAYZ Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 410.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while RWAYZ trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs ATLCP Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 332.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while ATLCP trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs RM Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while RM trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs LPRO Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 306.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while LPRO trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs NEWTI Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 302M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while NEWTI trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs OPRT Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 280.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while OPRT trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs FOA Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 273.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while FOA trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs YRD Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 266.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while YRD trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs PMTS Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 236.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while PMTS trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs MFIN Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while MFIN trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs CPSS Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 187.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while CPSS trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SUNL Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs CURR Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while CURR trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs XYF Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 124.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while XYF trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs ELVT Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs NICK Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs OMCC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while OMCC trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs AHG Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AHG trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -24.87. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs LMFA Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while LMFA trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs NISN Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while NISN trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs JT Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs MCVT Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while MCVT trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SNTG Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SNTG trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs AIHS Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AIHS trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs CURO Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs DXF Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 890K. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while DXF trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DXF's ROE of -17.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs PT Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 373.5K. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while PT trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs AEFC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while AEFC trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs GJP Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while GJP trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs PYT Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while PYT trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs SOFIW Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs MRLN Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while MRLN trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs NRUC Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while NRUC trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs GJO Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while GJO trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs WEI Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs GJS Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while GJS trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.
COF-PK vs IPB Comparison
COF-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COF-PK stands at 138.5B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COF-PK is priced at $18.02, while IPB trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COF-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.70, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COF-PK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COF-PK is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COF-PK.